Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)归海一刀
published in(发表于) 2014/5/9 7:41:54
A sand field in Guangxi Province for obstructing flood by forced demolition， County Government was found responsible：

CNS, Qinzhou, May 9 (reporters Chen Yan and Zhao Ziqin)-grit sanding facilities for obstruction of qinzhou, Guangxi's flood was local county governments forced demolitions, the sand field in the three human rights defenders was eventually rewarded. 9th disclosure of the qinzhou City Intermediate Court, which recently made judgement, confirming both illegal and ordered the concerned County government compensation for the loss of sand 70%.

Court determined that on November 5, 2008, a County Water Conservancy Bureau in qinzhou above Sandy River Channel sand mining license, valid until the end of 2009. Sand raise the necessary funds to purchase a sanding machine, switchboards, transformers, Samut facilities such as chops, building sand, sand for sale. Administrative license within the validity of the County's flood control and drought relief headquarters thinks grit sanding facilities hamper flood shall be ordered removed.

November 6, 2009, the sand field in order to be able to continue to sand, sand urged the water resources Council to seek an extension of a year term but have been turned down. Sand the subsequent administrative review to the local government, in February 2010, the administrative reconsideration of the County Government's decision to order a Water Conservancy Bureau conducted a specific administrative act. Water Conservancy Bureau according to the actual situation of sand stretches and expert technicians identify views, sand decides not to grant requests for extensions.

Sandy objected, had twice submitted to the Court of administrative proceedings, maintaining the WCB's decision not to grant renewal of sand mining license.

In March 2010, the abrasive sand mining after license expiration, with no renewal of sand mining permits continue to sand. The Water Conservancy Bureau, Bureau of land and resources Department of County government organizations joint law enforcement, dismantle and clean the sand sand facilities. Owing to delays in the removal of all sand mining facility for checking, recording and properly handle, sand and lots of sand caused by the device is unable to confirm falling, resulting in economic losses.

It is learned that sand mining facilities were removed by defendants, sand continuously higher people's Government departments and related complaints. On January 11, 2011, the County of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region legal requirements involved with the sand settled, but the County did not comply with. In 2013, the sand made for claims in writing to the County Government, but were rebuffed.

Sand claims, sand after sand mining permission field invested more than 1 million Yuan to purchase sand mining equipment, most of which funds in Bank loans. Defendant County Government, such as using public security, water resources, land and natural resources of law enforcement team, dismantle all facilities and burning sand, sand caused enormous economic losses. County specific administrative act unlawful requests the Court to confirm that the accused, ordered the compensation for direct and indirect economic losses.

Accused the County argued, organization of joint law enforcement specific administrative acts of legitimate subject of law enforcement, law enforcement procedures, without any fault, without compromising the legitimate rights and interests of sand, sand the illegal facts are clear. At the same time, Sands executive compensation limitations, requests the Court to dismiss the claims.

After the court hearing the case believes that County Government is not only illegal specific administrative act of the accused, and caused the plaintiff's loss of sand mining equipment, larger fault liability, loss of sand behaviour has a direct causal relationship with the Government, the Government should bear the liability for necessary and reasonable.

In late April, the judgement of the Court, defendant County government compensation for sand 337,600 Yuan of direct economic losses, the plaintiff's own direct economic loss of 144,600 dollars. (End text)

(Original title: the sand was to demolish the County of qinzhou, Guangxi was sentenced to take 70% responsibility)

　　中新网钦州5月9日电(陈燕 赵子钦) 广西钦州一砂场抽砂设施因妨碍行洪被当地县政府强拆，该砂场经过三次维权终有所获。钦州市中级法院9日披露，该院近日作出判决，确认双方均违法，判令涉事县政府赔偿砂场七成损失。

　　法院审理查明，2008年11月5日，钦州某县水利局向上述砂场作出河道采砂许可，有效期至2009年底。砂场自筹资金购置了抽砂机、配电盘、变压器、抽沙木排、构建砂台等设施，采砂出售。在行政许可有效期内，该县防汛抗旱指挥部认为砂场的抽砂设施妨碍行洪责令拆除。

　　2009年11月6日，砂场为了能继续采砂，遂向水利局申请延续一年采砂期限但被拒。砂场随后向当地政府提出行政复议，2010年2月，该县政府行政复议决定责令水利局重新作出具体行政行为。水利局根据采砂场河段的实际情况及专家技术人员鉴定的意见，决定不准予砂场延期申请。

　　砂场不服，曾两次向法院提出行政诉讼，均维持水利局不准予延续采砂许可的决定。

　　2010年3月，砂场采砂许可有效期满后，没有取得延续采砂许可仍继续采砂。该县政府即组织水利局、国土局等部门联合执法，拆除和清理该砂场采砂设施。由于没有及时对拆除的全部采砂设施进行清点、登记，并妥善处理，致砂场许多采砂设备无法确认下落，造成经济损失。

　　据悉，采砂设施被被告拆除后，砂场不间断地向上级人民政府及有关部门反映投诉。2011年1月11日，广西自治区法制办要求涉事县与砂场协商解决，但该县并未遵照执行。2013年，砂场向该县政府书面提出赔偿申请，但遭回绝。

　　砂场诉称，砂场取得河道采砂许可后投入100多万元购置采砂设备，其中大部份资金向银行借贷。被告县政府动用公安、水利、国土资源等组成执法队伍，拆除和烧毁砂场所有设施，造成砂场巨大经济损失。请求法院确认被告县政府具体行政行为违法，判令赔偿直接和间接经济损失。

　　被告县政府辩称，组织联合执法的具体行政行为执法主体、执法程序合法，无任何过错，不损害砂场的合法权益，砂场的违法事实清楚。同时，砂场的行政赔偿申请已过诉讼时效，请求法院驳回其诉讼请求。

　　法院审理该案后认为，被告县政府具体行政行为不仅违法，而且造成原告采砂设备灭失，过错的责任较大，砂场损失与政府行为间有直接因果关系，政府应承担必要、合理的赔偿责任。

　　今年4月底，法院作出判决，判令被告县政府赔偿砂场直接经济损失33.76万元，原告自行承担直接经济损失14.46万元。(完)

(原标题：广西钦州一砂场遭强拆 县政府被判担七成责任)

赞