Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/5/9 7:45:54 Report of the Chinese Academy of social sciences on the livable city in China： Zhuhai Beijing， 41st
CNS, Beijing, May 9 (reporter Kan Feng)-according to a research report of the Chinese Academy of social sciences published on 9th, China ranks the livability of the city, become China's most livable city, Zhuhai, Beijing ranked 41st. Research Group pointed out that the report, livable short Board has restricted the major constraints for the sustainable development of Beijing.
Hong Kong's economy the most competitive in Northwest Shanghai and Shenzhen cities generally fall behind
9th, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of financial strategies and social sciences documentation publishing house jointly issued a blue book on urban competitiveness of the Chinese urban competitiveness report.
Research Group of reports according to the cities ' economic competitiveness index, livable cities and urban competitiveness index and business and sustainable competitiveness index, analysis of 294 cities in China, including Hong Kong, Macao and the status and pattern of comprehensive economic competitiveness, 289, as well as Hong Kong and Macao and the mainland cities livable, business competitiveness and sustainable competitiveness.
Report through data analysis for a 2013 comprehensive economic competitiveness index rankings in Chinese cities, Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shanghai ranked in the top three, entering the top ten cities are Taipei, Beijing, Suzhou, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Foshan and Macao.
According to the report, in the top ten cities in China's economy, Hong Kong and Macao regions three seats, southeastern coastal mainland cities accounted for five seats, circum-Bohai Sea region two seats, while the Central and Western regions do not have a comprehensive economic competitiveness of cities in the top ten. The top-ranked city of Wuhan in the central region ranked 13th, while top-ranked Xian in Northwestern China only ranked 34th. "Natural impact on urban comprehensive competitiveness of an economy is quite obvious. "The report said.
Judging from the city's administrative ranks, special administrative region, municipalities, sub-provincial cities and cities, capital cities of comprehensive economic competitiveness to be significantly higher than the other prefecture-level cities.
From national and regional comprehensive economic competitiveness index, Hong Kong, Macao and Southeast coastal cities, cities of Bohai city, comprehensive economic competitiveness index values are above the national average in other regions were below the national average, the major regional rankings followed by Hong Kong, Macao, Southeast region, the Bohai region, Northeast, Central, Southwest and Northwest.
Livable city Zhuhai topped Beijing's "difficult" problems
In addition to economic competitiveness, the report also dedicated sections of comprehensive analysis of Chinese cities "livable".
Based on house price to income ratio, the comprehensive analysis of environmental indicators, in 2013 that China ranks top ten livable cities: Haikou, Sanya, Xiamen, Zhuhai and Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Wuxi, Hangzhou and Zhoushan, Shanghai.
Judging from livability rankings that are given in the report, Chinese coastal cities, especially those in the seaside city's livable cities index is high, while the "Chongqing and Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Guangzhou" in five cities in this country, only Shanghai ranking top ten livable city competitiveness.
For example, Beijing, with a population of more than 20 million, its livable city in China ranks only 41. "Livable short Board in Beijing, has become the major constraints of sustainable development, if it is not to be addressed as soon as possible, and would ultimately jeopardize Beijing's overall development. "The report said.
"Haze and prices become iconic challenge for urban livability. "Report when comparing the 2013 level of livable cities in China, in particular, the analysis of residents ' demands for air quality and housing.
"In 2013, haze has spread to more than 25 provinces, more than 100 large and medium cities, average national haze reached 29.9 days for the year, a 52-year record. "The report said," with ten haze v "when to crack a livable city construction in China faces important challenges.
In the area of housing, the report says, in China, the House price to income ratio and livable competitiveness overall trend in sorting consistency, livable city-building is the key to enable members of the public in the city "affordable" and "hold" capability. "China's home prices continue rising throughout the year, average prices for new homes in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen have exceeded 30,000 yuan, ' difficult ' issues have become more prominent. ”
Ecology became common in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban short Board
When evaluating the comparison of urban eco-environment in China in 2013, the report noted in particular that in 2013, under the premise of Governments ' controlling power, urban environmental pollution caused China event is still solid growth, issues such as haze, water pollution, destruction of the vegetation also showed a normal trend. Eco-environmental problems of urbanization in China has been severely affected quality.
Reported in the quality of the environment, resource conservation and ecological conditions as a major indicator of competitiveness of Chinese eco-cities rankings, Hong Kong, Huangshan and Macao, and as the top three. In addition, Ordos, Shiyan, Yangzhou, Nanning, Xianning city, Dalian, sanming, entering the top of the competitiveness of eco-city in China.
Regional performance, outstanding performance in Southeast China, Northwest and North-Eastern regions of around Bohai, the overall level is very low. Special report argues that "competitiveness of eco-cities are Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei cities common weaknesses. ”
For example, despite the comprehensive economic competitiveness ranked 6th in Beijing, but Beijing's eco-competitiveness in the national rankings in 92nd place. Tianjin Municipal comprehensive economic competitiveness of ranked 8th place, however in urban eco-competitiveness, Tianjin ranks 151th in the country. Eco-ranking cities of Shijiazhuang, capital of Hebei province is ranked only No. 236.
As the haze disaster area, air quality is undoubtedly the low ranking of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei ecological factors. Special report for example, 2014 publications of the Department of environmental protection show that Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta in the three major cities, most serious air pollution in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, in 2013, the Environmental Protection Department monitors in 74 cities, in 10 cities with the worst air quality, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei accounted for 7. "This is reflected in sustainable competitiveness competitiveness of eco-cities are Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei cities short Board. "The report said. (End text)
(Original title: report of the Chinese Academy of social sciences on the livable city in China: Zhuhai Beijing ranked 41st)
中新网北京5月9日电(记者 阚枫)中国社会科学院9日发布的一份研究报告显示，在中国城市的宜居程度排名中，珠海成为中国最宜居城市，而首都北京位列第41位。报告课题组指出，宜居方面的短板已成为制约北京市可持续发展的主要制约。
港深沪经济竞争力最强 西北城市普遍落后
9日，中国社会科学院财经战略研究院和社科文献出版社共同发布了城市竞争力蓝皮书《中国城市竞争力报告》。
报告课题组根据城市综合经济竞争力指数，宜居城市、宜商城市竞争力指数以及可持续竞争力指数，分析了包括港澳台在内中国294个城市的综合经济竞争力的现状与格局，以及港澳和内地289个城市宜居、宜商竞争力以及可持续竞争力。
在报告通过数据分析得出的2013年中国城市综合经济竞争力指数排名中，香港、深圳、上海名列前三，进入前十名的城市还有台北、广州、北京、苏州、天津、佛山、澳门。
根据报告，在中国经济前十强的城市中，港澳台地区占三席，东南沿海的内地城市占五席，环渤海地区占两席，而广大中西部地区没有一个城市进入综合经济竞争力十强。中部地区排名最靠前的城市武汉列第13位，而西北地区排名最靠前的西安仅列第34位。“可见，区位优势对城市综合经济竞争力的影响十分明显。”报告指出。
从城市的行政等级来看，特别行政区、直辖市、副省级城市和计划单列市、省会城市的综合经济竞争力要明显高于其他地级城市。
从全国及各大区域综合经济竞争力指数来看，港澳台城市、东南沿海城市、环渤海城市的综合经济竞争力指数均值高于全国平均水平，其他区域均低于全国平均水平，各大区域排名依次是港澳台地区、东南地区、环渤海地区、东北地区、中部地区、西南地区和西北地区。
宜居城市珠海居首 北京“居不易”问题突出
除了经济竞争力排名比较，这份报告还专设章节综合分析了中国城市的“宜居”程度。
根据房价收入比、环境生态等指标的综合分析，这份报告将2013年中国宜居城市前十强排列为：珠海、香港、海口、三亚、厦门、深圳、舟山、无锡、杭州和上海。
从报告给出的宜居排名来看，中国东部沿海城市特别是海滨城市的宜居城市竞争力指数较高，而“京津沪穗渝”这国家五大中心城市中仅有上海位居宜居城市竞争力十强。
比如，拥有2000多万人口的北京，其在中国城市中的宜居排名仅列41位。“宜居方面的短板已成为制约北京市可持续发展的主要制约，如不尽快加以解决，最终必将危及北京市的整体发展。”报告称。
“雾霾和房价成为城市宜居面临的标志性难题。”报告比较2013年中国城市的宜居程度时，特别将居民对于空气质量和住房诉求特别分析。
“2013年雾霾已经波及25个省份、100多个大中型城市，全年全国平均雾霾天数达29.9天，创52年来之最。”报告称，“十面霾伏”何时破解成为中国宜居城市建设面临的重要挑战。
在住房方面，报告称，在中国，房价收入比与宜居竞争力整体排序存在趋势一致性，宜居城市建设的关键在于使市民具备在城市“居得起”和“居得住”的能力。“中国百城房价持续整年上涨，北京、上海和深圳新建住宅均价已超过3万元人民币，‘居不易’问题更加突出。”
生态成为京津冀城市的共同短板
在评价比较2013年中国城市的生态环境时，这份报告特别指出，2013年，在政府重拳治理的前提下，中国城市环境污染引发的重大事件仍呈爆发式增长，雾霾、水污染、植被破坏等问题也都呈现常态化趋势。生态环境问题已经严重影响了中国城镇化的质量。
报告在以环境质量、资源节约和生态状况作为主要指标的中国生态城市竞争力排名中，香港、黄山和澳门，依次列为前三甲。除此之外，鄂尔多斯、十堰、扬州、南宁、咸宁、大连、三明，进入中国生态城市竞争力的前十强。
在区域表现上，东南地区表现优异，西北、环渤海和东北地区总体水平很低。报告特别提出，“生态城市竞争力是京津冀城市共同的短板。”
例如，尽管北京市的综合经济竞争力位列全国第6位，但是，北京的生态竞争力在全国排名却在第92位。天津市的综合经济竞争力位列全国城市第8位，然而在城市的生态竞争力方面，天津在全国位列第151位。河北省省会城市石家庄的生态排名更是仅排第236位。
作为雾霾重灾区，空气质量无疑是拉低京津冀生态排名的主要原因。报告特别举例，环保部2014年的发布资料显示，京津冀、长三角和珠三角三大城市群中，京津冀的空气污染最为严重，2013年环保部监测了74个大中城市，空气质量最差的10个城市中，京津冀占了7个。“这反映出在可持续竞争力方面的就是生态城市竞争力是京津冀城市共同的短板。”报告称。(完)
(原标题：社科院报告评中国宜居城市：珠海最佳北京列第41位)
赞