Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/5/27 8:46:34 Court： former topless in the mobile phone must be deleted，
Court: mobile phone ex-topless-mobile phone self must be removed, couples self timer, photos-IT news Court: phone former topless, you must delete
Some people just like to shoot sex photos, and even videos, if you both agree that shooting is no problem, sweating these photos not only you, and your spouse. If both sides break up, how these should be handled? Party has the right to require the other party to delete photo (video)?
Last week, Germany Court gives an affirmative answer, received a request from the Lady, rule her former boyfriend removed all of her nude pictures and videos.
Germany Web site The Local reported that the man had engaged in the career of the photographer, so collect a lot of videos and intimate photographs, some of which are women's self portrait.
Should be deleted when the corresponding material in the final sentence men, the judge also has repeatedly declared that the personal rights of women exceeds that of men for any ownership of the images. But the Court's decision does not include women's clothing, photos, because these pictures will not harm to the woman.
This case makes people think about in addition to Germany, should consider the adoption of similar laws in other countries, if requested, the former should be removed might endanger each other's photos.
The idea appears to be is a good way to protect the privacy and dignity of women (99% in this case are related to women). But while the idea is a good one, this law doesn't actually is unlikely to take effect.
Because the other person can refuse to delete previous photos or videos, can ignore the Court's ruling, and backups can be kept secret, and how such laws are enforced? Lack of effective oversight, whether the convicted party to delete photos delete became an empty talk. But after all, the law might be better than none.
But this does not mean that people use personal photo scum of insult or intimidate the female wits end. Author Charlotte Laws and Amanda Levendowski, and other legal scholars have called on the public (also put pressure on the judiciary), put an end to "revenge erotic pictures/video". If it's between a husband and wife private photos? This legal decision.
法院：手机里前任裸照必须删除 - 手机自拍,情侣自拍,艳照 - IT资讯法院：手机里前任裸照必须删除
有些人就是喜欢拍下嘿咻的照片甚至视频，如果双方都同意拍摄则问题不大，这些大汗淋漓的照片记录的不只是你，还有你的配偶。假如双方分手，这些照片应该如何处理？一方有权要求另一方删除照片(视频)么？
上周一家德国法院对此给出了肯定回答，接受了一位女士的要求，判决她的前任男友删除所有有关她的裸体照片和视频。
据德国英语网站The Local报道，该名男子曾经从事过摄影师的职业，所以收藏有大量视频和私密照片，其中不乏一些女性自拍。
在最终宣判男子应该删除相应材料时，法官还反复宣布该女子的个人权利超过男子对图像的任何所有权。但是法庭的判决不包括女子穿衣的照片在内，因为这些照片基本不会危害到该名女子。
这桩案子让人们思考除了德国在内的其它国家是否应该考虑通过类似法律条文，如果对方提出要求，前任应该删除可能危害到对方的照片。
这个点子看似是保护隐私和女性尊严的好办法(99%的这种案子都涉及女性)。不过虽然想法很好，这种法律条文实际并不太可能起效。
因为对方完全可以拒绝删除前任的照片或视频，完全可以不理睬法院的裁决，而且他们可以保存有秘密备份，这种法律要如何强制执行？缺乏有效监督，被判决删除照片的一方是否真正删除就成了一句空话。但是毕竟，有法律好过没有。
但这并不意味着人们面对利用私密照片侮辱或恐吓女性的败类就束手无策了。作家Charlotte Laws和Amanda Levendowski等法学学者都在号召公众(也对司法界施加了压力)，杜绝“报复型色情图片/视频”。如果是夫妻之间的私密照片呢？这种情况法律就管不着了。
赞