Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)归海一刀
published in(发表于) 2014/5/31 8:15:42
Chinese female general bursts of question 4 asked for an American Defense Ministers， and called each other easy way out，

News Service Singapore, May 31 (Xinhua Xia Yuhua) United States Defense Hagel 31st at the 13th session of the Shangri-La dialogue, addressing the General Assembly for the first time publicly accused to China. Sino-US Defense Relations Director of Chinese Academy of military science, major general Yao Yunzhu q bursts on the scene four questions. Female General in an interview, said that Hagel answers obviously trivial.

Hagel in China in his speech that day portrayed a claim the right to rule by force of destroyers, potential threat to the regional security in Asia. It makes the third time Yao Yun of the Shangri-La dialogue bamboo "a little upset", "Hagel and Abe is a tune, said China does not abide by the rules? ”

"I'm going to be a mild problem, wondering what happened to him in accordance with the consensus of the heads of State of the two countries to further develop relations between the two armies? How to implement not confrontational connotation? "Yao Yunzhu said in in an interview with news agency reporters, Chuck Hagel, unreasonable criticism of the aggressive, giving names to make her change her mind, opportunity in getting questions thrown out four questions in a row.

Japan acts of nationalization of the Diaoyu Islands is not unilaterally change the status quo? Jurisdiction and sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands is not the same thing? China criticized the use of force and means of pressure to change the status quo, the United States easily with a conflict with another country's allies say mutual defense treaty applicable to conflicts of interest if it is coercive and excessive use of force? China East Sea identifies areas which under international law is violated?

Yao Yunzhu Hagel did not answer her question seriously, obviously trivial. Hagel said that China established Tokai identification did not violate any laws, but should also discuss with neighbours should not unilaterally change the status quo, "I would like to ask: in 1952, Japan in the United States established an air defense identification zone during the occupation, it was who talked about it? "Yao Yunzhu said.

On the Diaoyu Island issue, Hagel responded by saying China to change the status quo acts violate Japan's real jurisdiction. "Although he said that United States does not stand on the sovereignty issue, but jurisdiction of the Diaoyu Islands into the scope of Japan-us Security Treaty, jurisdiction and sovereignty actually becomes the same thing. According to his logic, Korea on Dokdo has real jurisdiction, but also under the protection of the ROK-US Security Treaty, Japan has no reason to its claim of sovereignty. "Yao Yunzhu said.

'S remarks on the day Hagel, say Yao Yunzhu felt he was very blunt and frank: no one can challenge United States leadership in the Asia-Pacific region, United States return to the Asia-Pacific is no longer a vision but a reality. "Judging from Chuck Hagel speaks, United States need to do two things: one is the specification of the object as needed from the international community, China, various constraints on its behavior; the second is to give his allies in Asia a sense of protection and security. "Yao Yunzhu said.

She believes that Hagel's talk from a relatively significant change compared to the past, that is that in the past he doesn't directly criticize China, tend to be "nothing" and that is "both subject matter and the country" is very tough, "this is United States policy toward China since the beginning of this year a variety of results". (End text)

(Original title: Chinese female general bursts of four asked United States Defense evades)

　　中新社新加坡5月31日电 (记者 夏宇华)美国国防部长哈格尔31日在第十三届香格里拉对话会首次大会发言中对中国进行了公开指责。中国军事科学院中美防务关系中心主任姚云竹少将在现场答问环节连发四问。这位女将军在接受记者采访时表示，哈格尔的回答很明显避重就轻。

　　哈格尔当天在他的发言中把中国描绘成了一个靠武力申张权利的规则破坏者、亚洲地区安全的潜在威胁。这让第三次参加香格里拉对话会的姚云竹“有一点生气”，“哈格尔和安倍怎么是一个调子，把中国说得那么不守规矩？”

　　“本来我准备的是一个比较温和的问题，想问问他怎么按照两国元首的共识进一步发展两军关系？怎么落实不对抗的基本内涵？”姚云竹在接受中新社记者专访时说，哈格尔对中国咄咄逼人指名道姓的不合理批评让她改变了主意，在得到提问机会后接连抛出四个问题。

　　日本的钓鱼岛国有化是不是单方面改变现状的行为？钓鱼岛的主权和管辖权是不是一回事儿？中国被批评使用武力和高压的手段改变现状，那美国动不动就跟一个与别国有冲突的盟国说什么共同防御条约适用于利益冲突事件，是不是一种胁迫和滥用武力？中国设立东海识别区违反了哪条国际法？

　　姚云竹觉得哈格尔没有认真回答她的问题，很明显避重就轻。哈格尔说，中国设立东海识别区并没有违反什么法律，但应该事先跟邻国商量，不应该单方面改变现状，“我当时特别想追问一下：1952年日本在美国占领期间设立了防空识别区，它当时跟谁商量过吗？”姚云竹说。

　　对钓鱼岛问题，哈格尔回应称，中国改变现状的行为侵犯了日本的现实管辖权。“他虽然说美国在主权问题上不持立场，但却把钓鱼岛的管辖权纳入了日美安保条约范畴，把管辖权和主权实际上变成了相同的东西。按照他的逻辑，韩国对独岛拥有现实管辖权，而且也受韩美安保条约的保护，日本就没有理由对其再申张主权。”姚云竹说。

　　对哈格尔当天的发言，姚云竹觉得他表达得很直白、很坦率：谁也不能挑战美国在亚太地区的领导地位，美国重返亚太已不是一个愿景而是现实。“从哈格尔的讲话来看，美国要做两件事：一是把中国作为需要国际社会规范的对象，对其行为进行种种限制；二是给他的亚洲盟国一种保障感和安全感。”姚云竹说。

　　她认为，哈格尔这次的讲话跟以往相比有一个比较明显的变化，那就是过去他不怎么直接批评中国，往往是“对事不对国”，这次是“既对事又对国”，显得很强硬，“这是美国今年初以来对华政策一系列变化的结果”。(完)

（原标题：中国女将军连发四问 美国防长避重就轻）

赞