Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/6/1 9:19:50 Why online privacy to get worse，
Why get worse-privacy online privacy exposure, fan dance, the Internet-IT news Why online privacy to get worse
Privacy really is dead -or just those who mourn for lost privacy and those people dancing on the grave of privacy said. Privacy killer murder not only the NSA (NSA) and look inside people and private enterprises, keen to self-exposure and showcase our privacy disappear also play an important role. You see the concert up countless hands, they're holding the camera in preparation for expanding social networking photo upload. When we make a meal, before enjoying will send a tweet. "OK,Glass" command, called Google goggles on his face to get video, audio, and location, and then spread throughout the world. With so many privacy now becomes public, granted, we no longer value the privacy.
But human lives are not a database, privacy is not just an act of hiding your data. In reality, Privacy Act like a closed or open doors, but rather like a fan dancer (fan dance)--an implicit desire is now luring game.
Editor's Note: Fan Dance (fan dance) is a half-naked dancing, stylized representation to fan.
Under those criteria, the explosive spread of personal information online are mysterious, unknown to the new direction. When you publish photos on instagram, and it's not answering people's questions, but provide clues for new problems: who you with? In doing this? How do you feel? In between each picture update what? Why would this picture be out? In every information publishing, a show with more creative covert means secret, privacy today is the busiest places.
Could any of us is not very attention to privacy, then look at the behavior of our youth. Microsoft Researcher Danah Boyd is studying how young people use social networks: the result is that teenagers are also devotes considerable attention to privacy in public, and often both at the same time. In a behavior called whitewailling, they will be posted on Facebook within a certain period of time has a lot of details, but soon to delete everything to do with that period of time, leaving only an empty timeline. This is a new approach to protecting privacy in the age of social media: a large number of published information that will eventually be deleted. In addition, Boyd discovered a "social steganography" (social steganography) – teenagers in the open display of information such as slang, inside joke, or lyrics to hide the real meaning of the information, in this case, only certain friends understand the significance of status while other friends (adult or further friends) do not understand.
However, rabum implicit choice when leakage and leakage. In other words, privacy leaks all stem from autonomous decisions. When companies or private affairs of Government than the bottom line, the user will have no hesitation in opposing it. Facebook is a good example, when it is shared without the user explicitly allows the user to adapt to the new rules caused a backlash. More generally have to say, a recent Pew surveys (Pew survey) reported that the 86% of Internet users said they had tried to remove or cover their tracks on the Internet. Then, on the United States Government to monitor all United States scandals (Snowden Prism).
When you publish photos on instagram, and it's not answering people's questions, but provide clues for new problems: who you with? In doing this? Why would this picture be out?
Through their own way, rise of information public information privacy continues indefinitely. In the era of film, photos for something means that it is very important. But a super convenient and ubiquitous pictures today, means that the photo becomes a not everyone follows the rules of a specific thing. Now is not going to do what instead is respected at some point, given their importance. Shortly after the network's most popular slogan and is now completely different: there is no truth (No pics or it didn't happen)
We have been to "private" and "public" considered conflict of these two events, and the truth just like fan dancing, and they were a perfect system. Yes, we do more openly than in the past, what was more or less the pros and cons. But until now declared that "privacy is dead", otherwise we can't fairly judge the trend towards more open. If we want to understand the digital age of "Privacy", we need to recognize that public and did not kill the privacy of the information. Instead, the public relies on people to pay more attention to privacy of information--and vice versa.
为什么网络隐私暴露越演越烈 - 隐私,扇子舞,互联网 - IT资讯为什么网络隐私暴露越演越烈
隐私真的已死——或者只是那些为着失去隐私而哀悼的人和那些在隐私坟上跳舞的人说说而已。谋杀隐私的凶手不仅仅是国安局（NSA）和窥探人们隐私的企业，热衷于自我暴露与展示的我们对隐私的消失也扮演着重要角色。君不见演唱会里举起来无数双手，他们正拿着相机，准备在不断扩大的社交网络里拍照上传。当我们做了一顿美味，在享用之前却会发一条微博。操着“OK，Glass”的口令，召唤着脸上的Google眼镜去获取视频，音频和地理位置，然后把它们传播到全世界。当这么多隐私现在变为公众性，理所应当的，我们自然不再看重隐私。
但是人类的生活不是一个数据库，隐私也不仅仅是一种把自己的数据藏起来的行为。在现实里，隐私不像一个关着或是开着的门，而是像一个扇子舞（fan dance）——一个关于欲隐欲现的诱惑性游戏。
编辑注：fan dance（扇舞）是一种半裸体舞，以扇遮羞。
在那种标准下，网上个人信息的爆炸式传播正向新的神秘的、未知的方向发展。当你在instagram上发布照片的时候，这不是在回答人们的疑问，而是为新的问题提供了线索：你在和谁一起？在一起干嘛？你当时感觉如何？在每次图片更新之间发生了什么事情？为什么这张照片会流出？在每一次信息发布中，用充满创意的隐蔽方式来展示秘密，就是今天隐私繁盛的地方。
可能我们中间有人不是很注意隐私，那么看看青少年的行为吧。微软的研究者Danah Boyd正研究青少年是如何使用社交网络的：结果是青少年们既十分公开也十分注意隐私，而且这两者经常同时进行。在一种叫做whitewailling的行为里，他们会在某段时间内在Facebook上发布有着很多细节的状态，但是很快就把那段时间的所有东西都删除，只留下一个空白的时间线。这是一种在社交媒体时代保护隐私的新方式：大量发布最终会被删除的信息。此外，Boyd还发现了“社交隐写术”（social steganography）——青少年们在明处展示俚语、圈内笑话或者歌词等信息来隐藏信息的真实含义，这样的话，只有特定的好友懂得状态的意义而其他好友（成人或是关系远一些的朋友）则不懂。
然而，扇子舞的含蓄正是选择何时泄漏和泄漏什么。也就是说，隐私是否泄漏全部源于自主的决定。当企业或者政府超过了隐私的底线，用户会毫不犹豫地反对。Facebook就是个例子，当它未经用户明确允许就让用户适应新的分享规则引起了反弹。更概括得说，最近的一份Pew调查（皮尤调查）报告，86%的网络用户说他们曾经设法在网上消除或者掩盖他们的足迹。然后，还有关于美国政府监视全美国的丑闻（斯诺登的棱镜门）。
当你在instagram上发布照片的时候，这不是在回答人们的疑问，而是为新的问题提供了线索：你在和谁一起？在一起干嘛？为什么这张照片会流出？
通过自己的方式，信息公开的兴起让信息隐私延续了下去。在胶片时代，为某样东西拍照意味着它很重要。但到了拍照超级便利和无处不在的今天，意味着拍照留念变成了一种人人遵守的规则而不是什么特殊的事情。现在正到了不去照相反而是对于某个时刻尊重，给于它们重要性的时候。可能不久后网络上最受欢迎的口号会和现在完全不同：无图才有真相（No pics or it didn't happen）
我们一直把「隐私」和「公开」这两件事认为是冲突的，而事实就像扇子舞一样，他们是一个相互完善的系统。没错，我们确实比以前更加公开，这也带来或多或少的利与弊。但是除非现在宣布「隐私已死」，否则我们还不能公正地评判这种更公开的趋势。如果我们想要理解数码时代的「隐私」，我们需要认识到：信息的公开并没有杀死隐私。相反，信息的公开依赖于人们更加注重隐私——相反亦然。
赞