Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)qq
published in(发表于) 2014/6/7 8:55:13
Lin Zhiying sued the computer newspaper reported falsely claimed 300，000 yuan，

Lin Zhiying sued the computer newspaper reported falsely claimed 300,000 yuan-Lin Zhiying, computer-IT news Lin Zhiying sued the computer newspaper reported falsely claim 300,000 yuan

On "Lin Zhiying company directors of identity fraud" message after the widely reproduced on the Web, raising public's Director Lin Zhiying technology identity fraud hot. In response, Lin Zhiying believes that the information reported by the computer and Chinese network information reporting untruths, violating his honor, then take them to court and claim 300,000 yuan. Yesterday morning, the Chaoyang District Court hearing the case. Your honor, the computer think coverage is only proof, is not at fault; Chinese business networks, it is agreed to apologize.

Lin Zhiying complains, he is a Taiwan actor, singer and race car driver. On February 8 this year, learned its Xian China network media Ltd in its China business network published an article named Lin Zhiying exposes the lies of the technology directors of identity fraud, false article.

Lin Zhiying believes that the article go from December 16, 2013, the 49th issue of the computer newspaper reported that article in apparent position marked "water technology's got talent", "knowledge of the operating system" and other false content, even with Lin Zhiying without any relation to the "new network information technology company limited" described as Lin Zhiying was founded at age 26. Since then, the computer again issued Lin Zhiying surveys: science article, the mystery of the company's directors.

Honor, Chinese merchants network argues that the articles involved to go NetEase, as partners, Chinese portal NetEase published reprinted articles. In addition, because the companies in Taiwan registered, it cannot be ascertained whether Lin Zhiying as directors of the company, agreed to apologize, but did not agree to lose money.

The computer journal believes that its right of supervision by public opinion, the story always was in confirmation, did not determine Lin Zhiying was not a Director of the company. Moreover, full investigation, Lin Zhiying are not the directors of the Corporation. As ever, must be an interested party to query.

Recess in the case, and optional sentencing date.

赞