Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)qq
published in(发表于) 2014/6/11 10:55:11
Reproduction had shielded case case case： Southern weekend， sued reputation right infringement

Lu Qun to testify later, Tang Hui Lu Qun found handed a copy of the material, and its exploration of Zhou Lanlan "suicide".

Photo reporter Liu Xing

Today, Guangzhou yuexiu district people's Court of southern weekend reporter Chai Huiqun Zhou Lanlan were heard in public action, southern weekend newspaper, Nanfang media group, Guangdong Nanfang media group limited reputation right infringement case.

The case margin Yu South weekend August 1, 2013 published of by reporter Chai Huiqun wrote of prostitution shop boss "fake meritorious service" truth (following referred to "fake meritorious service" truth), the paper Department South weekend published of had shielded detention thematic reported in the of a article, main focused Yu once hosting and forced had shielded of female Lele prostitution of "Willow love leisure center" boss Qin Xing in detention center Shi of once "save meritorious service" event.

Allegedly, on June 12, 2007, during the Qin Xing was being held in a detention center, and another detainee found Wang Ting Zhou Lanlan, a fellow detainee hanged himself, and save it. Detention Center for the Qin Xing issued by the relevant proof, Qin Xing clemency request handling units. But soon there were media reports, Zhou Lanlan denied that he had committed suicide in jail and was saved, and is known as "meritorious service" event.

The southern weekend, for the first time in the "meritorious service" in fact disclose more information on the case, including the day of the incident prison surveillance video, political and Legislative Affairs Committee of Hunan province during his inspection on the matter, except for Zhou Lanlan showed surveillance video of all true, rescued Zhou Lanlan artificially as well as the Yongzhou Public Security Bureau has denied the "meritorious service" issue. Article also noted that Twitter name is "Yu shi en route" on the micro-blogging – criticism made in Yongzhou city public security "fake crime," Lu Qun, Deputy Director of Hunan provincial Commission for discipline inspection to prevent corruption in related materials, also changing attitudes that Zhou Lanlan suicide be does exist, there is no "crime" issue.

Disclosure had shielded the southern weekend in which organs are affected by Tang Hui petitions brought great stability pressure that may exist in the judicial sector, which at that time had sparked widespread concern.

"Crime" article, truth, also cited Lu Qun, said a full investigation unit, "meritorious service" a matter of political and Legislative Affairs Committee of Hunan province did not disclose the findings, one reason may be that the pressure is too big, "disclosed the findings, Zhou Lanlan is perjury, you have to grab. Catch Tang Hui have gone into it, grab one of our staff? ”

In today's hearing, the Court allegedly were played in court on June 12, 2007 Zhou Lanlan "suicide be saved" video surveillance. You can see in the video, a subtitle is marked "Zhou Lanlan" women on the wall out of the cells, into the toilet, after more than 10 minutes, was marked by subtitles, "Wang Ting, and Qin Xing" the two women led to the bathroom, from which a person to lift.

Zhou Lanlan admitted in court, their Zhou Lanlan is video, but she stressed that this was not the day of the incident on video. Zhou Lanlan recalled about her in May of that year there had been a sore foot, which should be their painful leg bathroom falls, and then being helped out of the video.

Earlier, Zhou Lanlan told several reporters, including Chai Huiqun, he wasn't in the video people was carried out. Zhou Lanlan explained in court, this was because he had seen the video is not clear.

Wu Buda Zhou Lanlan's Attorney believes that the southern weekend article a number of inaccurate and biased points, no Lu Qun and Yongzhou public security in the manuscripts inconsistencies in the material nor Zhou Lanlan's interpretation of their contradictory claims. Wu Buda has also submitted to the court testimony of several rooms with people, said it did not see Zhou Lanlan committed suicide. Wu Buda also pointed out that proved to save lives of many testimonies before there are strikingly similar.

Chai Huiqun agent thinks, "" meritorious "truth article does not directly on whether Zhou Lanlan suicide made a final decision, but the parties and there are sources, there is no misrepresentation, is the normal supervision report.

Chai Huiqun agent pointed out that Zhou Lanlan denied he was wood's article has been mentioned suicide, in addition to journalists is an independent body, rather than a megaphone of the interviewee, should render the parties claim, rather than indiscriminately, to publish all interviews.

The same day, Tang Hui and Lu Qun also came to the courtroom, Lu Qun to witness confirmed an interview with the southern weekend on the referenced content is correct. Lu Qun, said himself that the Zhou Lanlan suicide no doubt they were rescued. Lu Qun finished after verification, Lu Qun Tang Hui found and handed over a media report about his case failed to open, Lu Qun said it would focus on.

Trial lasted until nearly 8 o'clock in the evening. In the Court debate, said Zhou Lanlan, considering that Wood Group reports are official conduct, to abandon the prosecution of Chai Huiqun. Chai Huiqun said in the final statement, not infringement, "if it's in violation, then tell the truth are tort".

The present case was not adjudged, Tang Hui told the China Youth daily reporter, Zhou Lanlan loses, she will consider prosecuting the southern weekend.

Staff writer, Guangzhou, June 10-

(Original title: Zhou Lanlan against southern weekend newspaper defamation case hearing)

赞