Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2014/6/12 5:08:42 My fellow election must be approved by all the academicians selected
The Beijing news yesterday, was passed on to the Chinese Academy of engineering, China Academy of engineering regulations (hereinafter referred to as the Constitution) amendment. New amendments to new modifications to the exit mechanism of academicians, made it clear that "when the Member's violation of scientific ethics or personal conduct misdemeanors, when the affected group of academicians and engineering reputation, should persuade them to give up the title of academician". While it is reported that the new CAs are intended for the same provisions of the Statute.
Nominate and elect the mechanism revised
At present, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of engineering academician Conference is being held. It is reported that the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Academy of engineering changes to the respective regulations, respectively, to the reform and consummation of the Academician system.
June 9, in, Chinese Academy of Sciences 17th times academician Assembly, and China engineering homes 12th times academician Assembly of opening Shang, XI clear said, according to General academician and each aspects views, party of 18 session plenary session proposed has reform academician system of requirements, main is to highlight academic oriented, reduced not necessary of intervention, improved and perfect academician selection mechanism, and discipline layout, and age structure, and part-time and treatment, and retired exit system,.
Yesterday passed amendments to the Constitution, channels, the elect of the nomination mechanism and exit mechanism has been modified. However, for outside calls for "retired academician", but no related expressions.
It is learnt that the Academician system reforms with a view to selection to the team of academicians to more young talents, with an increased focus on defense, emerging disciplines and interdisciplinary fields such as eligible candidates. In addition, academician candidates requested and academician's own code of conduct.
Both houses articles of Association have been amended several times
Currently 743, 802, academician of Chinese Academy of engineering academician Chinese Academy of Sciences. Academicians elected once every two years.
China's existing academician system is evolved by the Chinese Academy of Sciences academician system. Division of Chinese Academy of Sciences was founded in 1955. In 1993, approved by the State Council, and retitle the Academician with Chinese Academy of Sciences, academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Chinese Academy of engineering was established in 1994.
The Chinese Academy of Sciences in 1992, the sixth member of the Constitution adopted by the General Assembly, in 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006, 2008 after 7 amendments; the Constitution of Chinese Academy of engineering in 1995, 1998, 2000 and 2008 after four amendments.
On being here at the Conference of the academicians of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Academy of engineering of their statutes "overhaul" on the reform and consummation of the Academician system. Chinese Academy of engineering, in yesterday's vote, the amendment to the Constitution of Chinese Academy of engineering.
"Candidate recommendation"
Before you make changes
In addition to direct references from academicians, provinces (regions and municipalities), the relevant competent authorities, national research institutes, universities, enterprises and so on can be recommended.
The modified
Only 2 kinds of nominations
Academician is a direct nominations, each elected every member nominated candidates does not exceed the number two, three academician of the Division of not less than the nomination of candidates for the force;
Second, commissioned by Chinese Academy of engineering academic society, according to prescribed procedures and recommended by the selection, nomination of candidates.
"Elect voting"
Division of range voting where the candidate.
Academy of increase final selection vote.
"Exit mechanism"
When academician personal conduct contravening the national law against national interests or involve loss of scientific ethics, academician deviates from the standard, may revoke the title of academician.
Adds "discouraged" provides that, when academician of violation of scientific ethics or personal conduct misdemeanor, seriously affecting the Group of academicians and engineering reputation when, urged them to give up the title of academician.
"Focus 1"
Fellow nomination shrunk to two
Yesterday's Institute of engineering through the Constitution defined the two nominations: first direct nominations of academicians, each elected every member nominated candidates does not exceed the number two, three academician of the Division of not less than the nominated candidates for effective; the second is commissioned by Chinese Academy of engineering academic society, according to prescribed procedures and recommended by the selection, nomination of candidates.
New regulations delete the previous "relevant engineering scientific and technological research, design and construction, run institutions, learned societies, universities, enterprises, according to prescribed procedures recommended after selection of relevant departments, provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, nomination" provisions. It is understood that the Chinese Academy of Sciences elected nominations also will retain only the above two ways.
It is understood that the specific provisions for the nomination after the Academician will listen to their opinions and suggestions, and co-opted by academicians of the Chinese Academy of engineering working clear implementation measures and other documents.
Which are considered to be "prominent academicians elected academic orientation and reduce unnecessary administrative interference. "Yesterday, in a Beijing News reporter interview, Chinese Academy of engineering, said Wang mengshu, a professor at Beijing Jiaotong University, the amendment motion has highlighted" strict entrance control. "
He explained that the call has always been a lot of people find relationships to seek recommendations. He said, "now provides time hasn't come out, there will be lots of people called to say, ' you have to recommend me. '"
Wang believes that recommend nominating Member needs to understand the situation, but most people don't have the energy and time. Some academicians do not want intervention recommended. "Please recommend a lot of people, involving a human. Some units also interventions recommended nomination requirements must recommend this unit. Then this academician for those without academic research units do? This is not fair. ”
Gu haibing, a professor at Renmin University believes that current progress is cancelled the Executive power, but the problem is that many of China's academic community too much interference by executive power that "does not resolve the problem, reform not overvalued. ”
"Focus 2"
Election must be approved by all the academicians selected
Previous regulations, "the assessment of candidates and election of academicians organized by the various divisions. "While this revision will be the Faculty's internal vote changed to" primary ", adding all the academicians of" final selection "link.
Added new articles of the Nineth: "the Faculty of preliminary results by the Bureau to consider and determine a final candidate list, submit the whole hospital should vote vote election of academicians. Final selection taking Chinese, received more than half of the valid votes cast in favour of the candidate elected. "The move is seen or will be more difficult to elect new academicians, will help strengthen the interdisciplinary candidate checks.
Move is seen or will be more difficult to academicians were elected, will help strengthen the interdisciplinary candidate checks, but Gu haibing, a professor at Renmin University believes that this amendment, in fact of little value, this is not necessarily progress. Subject to classification is not the same subject of vote meaningless. Only similar or the same subject to vote, makes sense.
He said that also left the program in the world. But in his view, whether domestic or foreign, are not very much in favour of it. "The economics are less likely to mix chemistry thing. This is not a particularly large improvement, more are imitations of foreign practices, and really has very little meaning. ”
"Focus 3"
Academician misdemeanor dismissal
Fellow exit mechanism has drawn much outside attention. In fact, the "academician exit mechanism" was revised in 2008 already exists in the relevant provisions of the Charter: member acts in conflict with the law or the loss of scientific ethics, according to the prescribed procedures to revoke its title of academician.
Once inside Chinese Academy of engineering issued calls for strengthening the academic moral constraints. Academician, and in serious cases of misconduct may be revoked title of academician, has appeared before controversial "tobacco" academicians, but on a practical level, rarely to individual academician revoked title in China.
Yesterday, on the basis of new regulations in the original, and adds "discouraged" rule: when fellow individuals in violation of scientific ethics or misbehavior, seriously affecting the Group of academicians and engineering reputation when, urged them to give up the title of academician.
Compared with the previous regulation, this was clearly academician revoked title of specific processes. In accordance with a previous regulations, shall have not less than five academicians written proposals or proposal by the Division, the Bureau of the Standing Committee, academician seek the revocation of their titles. , Also needed after the Faculty vote, and review by the Presidium to ratification, and informed all the academicians.
While it is reported that Wu and academician revoked title of specific procedures in the in-depth study, be detailed and clear in the relevant provisions.
In this regard, Xiong education experts believe that if fellow scientific misconduct involved, "Wu" is a very weak penalty. He believes that if Member breach of scientific ethics, scientific misconduct involved, its title should be cancelled. "The so-called ' zero tolerance ' is any violation of academic ethics, should exempt him from qualifying. ”
He said that real academician exits should be deprived of their privileges, such as academicians cannot enjoy Deputy Ministerial treatment, this is the real exit. "Interest does not exit, how can it be a real exit. ”
In addition, Wu expressed in terms of "violation of scientific ethics" and cancellation provisions expressed in the "loss of moral" Xiong bingqi says, "this statement is vague, defined by who? Should there be rules, what is contrary to, what is lost? Need to be clearly defined. ”
"Focus 4"
New articles do not mention "retired academician"
For the attention of "academician retirement", the Constitution did not mention.
In this regard, said Wang mengshu, academician is the highest honorary title, no question of retirement.
Xiong bingqi says, "retired academician," this should not be a problem, "If there is no academic interests, academic honors, retired or not doesn't matter. "He describes, but because academicians enjoying special interests, so want to have a retirement system.
He said, including issues such as age of academicians, all because of interest or age or retirement are not a problem.
Insiders say Chinese Academy of Sciences, academician system now, in theory, is to retire. Moreover, many old fellow I want to retire, but the reality is, many universities, the units are not supported, such as retirement. "One University, units, befriends an academician, if retired, have fewer resources for the University, is the unit wouldn't let him back. ”
This version of the write/Beijing News reporter Dandan Li
(Original title: Academician Constitution overhaul by "discouraging" clause)
赞