Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2014/6/15 9:09:25 Foreign Ministry： Vietnam has to communicate more than 30 times， mostly by Chinese side
Yi Xianliang was quoted: Hello friend, good afternoon!
Nice to meet with you again, as we all know, May 8 here I share with you a brief, after Ouyang yujing also share with you the notification.
Media briefings held today, once again, why? We believe that some of the things happened in the past 40 days, we need further clarification.
On May 27, built in the South after job completion of the first phase of the project, moved into its second phase, operation sea was built in China's Xisha Islands offshore of the island. After the second phase operation started, Viet Nam is also carried out a large number of ships, including armed vessels, to interfere with the normal operations of the Chinese Government and corporate ship collision on the Chinese site, also include sending frogmen and underwater agents, also in the area, was placed inside the massive nets, large floats, poses a threat to navigation safety.
As of today 12 o'clock noon, Vietnam still has 51 ships and on the ground, more about China operation collisions totaled 1547 times. Upon Vietnam's provocations, China has to take necessary precautions, had to send corporate ship to the scene to protect job security, to effectively maintain the normal order of production and safety of navigation.
Since May 2, China more than 30 times in all aspects with Vietnam to communication, such communication is carried out every day. Vietnam's illegal interference continued, and spread a lot of unfounded statements in an attempt to create new territorial dispute.
The Paracel Islands are Chinese territory, is under the jurisdiction of the Chinese Government's long-term, there is no dispute with any other country. In the larger dispute between China and Vietnam in the South China Sea, but does not include the Paracel. Vietnam over the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea dispute in some islands and reefs that territorial disputes and overlapping claims to maritime interests in the waters of the South China Sea dispute, which the core of the Nansha disputes, controversial due to Viet Nam 29 island illegally encroached on China's Nansha Islands and reefs. China has always opposed the unlawful invasion of Vietnam, demanding more from the invasion and occupation of China withdrawn all personnel and facilities on the island. China's determination to preserve the sovereignty of Nansha is unwavering. China wants to develop good Sino-Vietnamese relations, but we cannot abandon principle, especially on the issue of territorial sovereignty. China urges Vietnam to respect China's sovereignty and jurisdiction, an immediate halt to China's job to any form of interference, the withdrawal was built South of the island in the waters of all the ships and crew members, maritime peace will soon be restored. Meanwhile, we must urge Viet Nam to stop distorted and fabricated facts as so-called Xisha controversial actions. The communication is open between the. China will continue to work with the Viet Nam communications, and strive to properly deal with the current situation.
Last time when I was talking to friends from the media briefings, everybody wants to see the situation for the Chinese side. We did a video, also provide some photos, please see, and then I'll answer your question.
The first video. On May 2, the Vietnam ship KN762 active impact China's maritime police ship No. 46001, cause damage to the right before Chinese maritime police vessel deck railing.
The second video. Vietnam KN762 rammed the Chinese maritime police boat No. 46105, led the Chinese side deck before the ship left guardrail damaged. The waves formed on the right side you can see more vessels, suggesting that its initiative to move, rather than a Chinese ship was moving. Active collision at sea vessels can create waves of stop moving ships occurs under the influence of waves of displacement.
Third video. On May 3, the same No. 46001 KN762 active impact the Chinese boats, cause damage to the Chinese ships left-lateral fence, part of the hull was damaged.
The fourth video. Vietnam placed a great deal of influence on the sea or even undermine the safe navigation of large obstacles. Video shows our maritime police vessel on salvaging Vietnam placed obstacles. We currently have up 30 large obstacles, these objects pose a great threat to navigational safety. China waters in this assignment not only pose a threat to the safe navigation of the vessel, as well as job security, because the area is also a very busy international waterway in South China Sea, Vietnam has greatly threatened other ships navigation safety. This is a flagrant challenge to the freedom of navigation and safety. China had to send a certain number of ships in the area, and even more distant waters fishing these obstructions.
These pictures are mainly Vietnamese fishing vessels rammed the Chinese vessels, the Chinese side was deliberately placed obstructions.
Needs to be noted is that Vietnam put these big net on all vessels sailing is the most dangerous. As we all know, all ships have a propeller underneath, once stirred up the fishing net to the entire ship would be profoundly damaging.
Q: China News Service. Mr Yi Xianliang was quoted tell us something at sea, Deputy Director, and now would like to ask, the scene is now OK? Both sides now how many ships? The second problem is that media reports said that Viet Nam declared that China Sea sank a ship in the job Viet Nam fishing boats, and blocked the South face of the drowning fishermen rescue, please introduce the Chinese side is aware of the situation.
Yi Xianliang was quoted: at present, Viet Nam still has 51 aircraft of various types of vessels at the scene on Chinese interference.
I must stress once again that Viet Nam's ships from its ports over more than 150 miles of range waters in special operations to the Chinese side to actively engage in disruption and destruction. Currently in the job area, number of Chinese ships auxiliary ships--including jobs and business ship is 71. The problem we face is, causing substantial damage to prevent collision at sea, this is very difficult. But we are taking all the measures are of utmost restraint. We have just watched the video and pictures. Viet Nam was actually challenging the freedom of navigation and safety at sea, not only challenging China's sovereign rights and jurisdiction, also challenges the entire international community generally follow the basic guidelines that safeguard and protect the freedom of navigation and security. Vietnam this dangerous violation of the Charter of the United Nations, the United Nations law of the Sea Convention and the Protocol for the Suppression of maritime safety, a series of international law. China sent a certain number of public boat to the scene to maintain the normal order of operations is a necessity for it. China faces destruction at the scene and anti-corruption, interference and anti-jamming in pressure. Everything that could be an objective and impartial look at the current situation, whether institutions or persons, will be able to come to such a conclusion, that is, China always maintain a high degree of restraint.
As for your second question, more so-called China knocked one of Viet Nam's fishing boat, and prevent the Viet Nam rescue, this is not true. The reality is that the afternoon of May 26, waters in this assignment, one of Viet Nam's "fishing boat"--this "fishing boat" needs quotation marks--in disregard of China's repeated dissuade 981 platform forced collision warning zone. Is now the fishing season, the Chinese side also have fishing vessels in the waters. After it was hit by a Chinese fishing boat, rollover pass. People soon were on the boat were picked up. The Chinese maritime salvage lifting vessel at the scene at that time, we are going to rescue, but Viet Nam more than 30 ships were soon surrounded the fishing waters, the Chinese side could not get close to it. These "fishermen" in the title but also quotes. From these "fishermen" look, they on the simple with the help of other ships, the "fishermen" are not necessarily fishermen. Vietnam media's distorted reports on this matter, my understanding of an ulterior motive. It must be noted that, over the years, at Xisha, Nansha sea areas, China's countless aid Viet Nam fishers, Vietnam also expressed thanks to us. Despite the us up in the area, we do not want to see happen, Viet Nam go very far, but nobody fell or was there some kind of maritime accidents, our boats will be in strict accordance with international law and domestic law provides for relief measures, much less a so-called blocking aid. Vietnam is purely fabricated lies, distorted facts.
Q: the people's daily. I have two questions. First is that the Chinese side emphasized that the Paracels are Chinese territory, there was no dispute. But Vietnam claim the Paracel Islands was Viet Nam's territory, or at least controversial. How does China look at Vietnam's territorial ambitions? The second issue, we note that in Vietnam claims sovereignty over the Paracel Islands when we have a full historical and legal basis, listed in the San Francisco Conference, the Geneva Accord, talks between the two parties and the two countries leaders said, the evidence doesn't hold water?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: I want to answer your second question first. Paracel Islands without any controversy, that a sufficient historical and legal evidence, does not mean that you have disputes on contentious. Today, in the 21st century, any claim to territorial claims of other States, that the world may be confused. You say Vietnam lists known as the Geneva agreement, the Treaty of San Francisco and the 1975 Vietnamese leaders in talks that matter, these cannot prove that Vietnam will have grounds for such claims. Instead, it proved that Chinese sovereignty over the Paracel Islands is undisputed. I can tell you several ways to illustrate this problem.
1th, was first discovered, the earliest Chinese name, the earliest development and operation of the Paracel Islands, the Government first to exercise jurisdiction and sovereignty over the Paracels. As early as the 14th century AD, the Chinese Government has been under its jurisdiction the Paracel Islands, Viet Nam took out so-called evidence of 17th century to 700 years earlier.
2nd, Viet Nam has often said that in France the colonial era, France used to claim sovereignty over the Xisha, Viet Nam Sai Sha claims is based on its ownership rights of inheritance to the colonial Government. This is groundless. France recognized China's sovereignty over the Paracel Islands. On August 22, 1921, France Cabinet Gabriel in the Paracel Islands on the issue, Prime Minister and Foreign Minister admitted: since 1909 as the Chinese Government has established the sovereignty claim on the Islands we have now is not possible. Later France a number of actions taken by the Government, the Chinese Government expresses its resolute opposition, intervened and battle. There is a lot of history to prove it.
3rd, according to World War II the provisions of the Cairo Declaration and other international documents, including the Xisha, Nansha, Japan occupied Chinese territory should be returned to China. Vietnam mentioned the 1951 Treaty of San Francisco. China until 1951, in fact, that is, after the end of World War II, is completed on the Paracel and Spratly Islands recovery of these lost ground. Why the largest island in the Paracel Islands and reefs called yongxing island? Was the Government of China in the period from 1946 to 1948, 4 warships were sent to the Xisha and Nansha Islands to retake the Islands and reefs, yongxing island name was named by yongxing ship. Zhongye island in Nansha, Islands, etc, are made up of warship or military officer recaptured these islands was named after. So any talk about the San Francisco Treaty of 1951 again to confirm that the so-called Viet Nam in the Xisha Islands of the so-called power? In addition, in 1951, Premier Zhou Enlai and Foreign Minister issued a clear statement about Conference in San Francisco, noted that Xisha and Nansha Islands and East Sha, zhongsha Islands are Chinese territory. Viet Nam known as no country raised objections, this is clearly untrue.
To discuss the Geneva Conference of 1954, a history of common sense knows that, which is aimed at peaceful settlement of the Korean question and the Indochina, agenda of the Conference, as well as of the Geneva agreement, with no ties to the Xisha and Nansha Islands, made no mention of the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Viet Nam took out an article unrelated to the so-called basis for advocating so-called power is totally untenable.
4th in the 70 's of last century before, Viet Nam's official documents, books, maps are clearly recognizes the Xisha, Nansha, China's territory. In 1958, when Viet Nam Pham Van note, Prime Minister Zhou Enlai, Prime Minister, against China on September 4, 1958, issued a statement on the decision of the territorial sea, Vietnam clearly recognize the Xisha, Nansha Islands are Chinese territory. There's a legal issue. Viet Nam mentioned and says that it only recognizes China's 12-nautical mile territorial sea, is the recognition and respect for China's 12-mile territorial sea claims, excluding the recognition of territorial sovereignty. That is clearly not true. Because the Chinese Government's statement was released to the world, based on 50 's four Convention, when Nations are extending 3 nautical miles to 12 nautical miles territorial sea, according to the international law, China made a statement, Viet Nam notes China's favour, respect China's statement. The statement is very clear about Xisha, Nansha and zhongsha Islands and the dongsha Islands, as well as some of the other islands, China enjoyed a 12 nautical mile territorial sea of power. So people with legal knowledge are not difficult to see that the fan with the Prime Minister's note legally cannot be negative. Can't deny what? Just can't deny Viet Nam Government to China on other islands and reefs of the Xisha, Nansha and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction and respect.
5th, Viet Nam's recent claims that China was occupied the Paracels by force, that far from the truth. In January 1974, China's Xisha Islands defenders away invasion of Paracel atolls and island oasis of the South Vietnamese Saigon Government troops. Please pay attention to three key words. First, China's Xisha "defenders". What does that mean? Mean Chinese in Sai Sha was a garrison. Second, the South Vietnamese army invaded the "two" Islands. More than a total of more than 30 Islands the Paracels. Third, we are defenders of "expelled" the invading army. Backed off what nature is? The provisions of the Charter of the United Nations for territories for violations of the right of self-defence. In January 1974, fact is that China's defenders backed off two South Vietnamese Saigon troops on the small island. I can tell you that the two islands now belong essentially to uninhabited islands, Paracel Islands and reefs are not particularly suitable for human habitation. Elves attempted to secretly occupied two reefs in South Vietnam, China backed off. This is why Chinese people usually talk about the story of the Battle of the Paracel Islands. So today, Viet Nam said China occupied the Paracels by force, is entirely fictional.
6th, Viet Nam has claimed that according to September 1975, the leaders of China and Viet Nam during the meeting, leaders of a conversation, China said Sha's problems can be talked about. This is completely wrong. Viet Nam copy is dated May 13, 1988 in China, the people's daily published a memo. This memo records it is clear that China's leaders in China have enough material to prove, the Xisha and Nansha Islands have been China's territory is a prerequisite. Viet Nam is now taken out of context, distorted the facts, distort China's leaders talk, may move to in order to prove its claim to sovereignty over the Paracel Islands. This is simply untenable.
These aspects can be seen, Xisha Islands without controversy.
Go back to your first question. I would like to emphasize that according to the series I just introduce evidence, Paracel Islands without any controversy, China called Xisha Islands dispute cannot negotiate with anyone. I shall also take this opportunity to repeat, key in Nansha disputes between Vietnam, one of the most prominent issues is Viet Nam invaded 29 of China's Nansha Islands, China has never ceased to request Viet Nam from the withdrawn all personnel and facilities on the Islands and reefs in China that China's determination to safeguard sovereignty will and should not be any doubt. While we have always advocated, and Viet Nam through direct, bilateral negotiations and consultations in resolving the Nansha disputes.
For years, us-Vietnamese relations and regional perspective, Viet Nam in Nansha's tort action to exercise great restraint, Viet Nam would like to use China in the Spratly Islands dispute on the issue of restraint to create the Xisha Islands dispute, I think Viet Nam's calculations completely wrong. If Viet Nam this illusion, then the negative impact and consequences of this illusion is very serious.
Q: Germany the world newspaper. I have two questions. First of all you mentioned, China is forced to send some civil ships to maintain security in the region, can you specifically or directly to us about, is what type of ships sent by China, is the site OK? The second question is about the rig 's. Our operation of the rig, or the status of a job is not particularly understand. Do it in the course of operation now? China is ready to continue in this area and the time work? Is there a next job?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: the first question. China is currently there are two types of vessels at sea, the first category is working boats, including support vessels, transport ships, supply vessels. Second category. Chinese maritime police vessel. Chinese maritime police vessels dispatched, frankly speaking, we are the necessity for it, normal offshore commercial and development activities, should not be sent so many ships to engage in security work. We have many platforms at sea, we've got some platform, an escort ship no, why? Because there is no need. In addition to workers on a platform outside, no ships and crew members around. We were forced to send dozens of Coast Guard vessels, it is helpless because the impact of our platforms are confronted with more than 50 ships. More than 50 ships from different directions collided over and working stationary. What are you like? If we don't send a certain number, sufficient to guarantee security of the coast guard fleet, not only reasonable and lawful operations cannot be carried out platform will be under great threat. This platform is very big, does not have any capacity to prevent damage and interference. Just as we know, the Viet Nam placed the big wood, fishing nets, if close to the platform will cause unthinkable damage to the platform. I do want to emphasize is that measures taken by the Chinese Government is minimal, and most restrained. My personal judgment, the vast majority of countries in the world, made no such restraint. Such restraint is because based on the relationship between China and Vietnam, based on us as one of the major countries in the region to maintain peace and stability, based on the Sino-Vietnamese, especially cooperation at sea since last year. While we exercise restraint, urges, requests Viet Nam stop interference immediately. Everything has a head, if not, in the event of serious events, China also had to take the necessary measures to guarantee our safety, security of our platform and the safety of personnel. Us Viet Nam every communication about it, we hope we can have a good communication between the results.
Q: China daily. According to the Notice to Mariners issued by the Chinese side about whether jobs will end in mid-August? China expresses what is next scheduled to consider?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: the job is actually 10 years ago, that is, continuation of operations since 2004. Chinese enterprises in 2004 conducting geological surveys in the area, last year carried out more than two months of three-dimensional seismic operations and Wellsite surveys. At present, our job is the well site last year after the investigation of drilling established. Drilling, there is usually a natural routine execution. Under the plan, at this stage of the operation should end by mid-August. As for the next step, my own judgment is relevant enterprises should be based on their technology and business needs, on the wheel of geological assessment, to make arrangements. However, by the end of July or early August, the South China Sea into the typhoon season, this area is difficult. So back to media asking me why the schedule at this point in time? Natural factors as the South China Sea and its best operating season is end of March or beginning of April, this time in late July, forward backward meteorological factors are very complex. I must stress that this is the technical and commercial activities of the business, I think they should be based on the current situation, mainly, the geological aspects of the evaluation is to be judged.
Q: the AFP news agency. Just showing you videos and pictures were taken on May 2. Could you describe to us why released after 40 days of the May 2 videos and photos?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: Chinese enterprises are engaged in a normal job, I have no need to design any media, anyone or the professionals put these things off. As you can see, we have lots of photos and video looks very professional, some of our marine police or perhaps the ship's staff by mobile phone. We have always maintained that there should be communication between the ways and means to resolve the disputes between us, there is no need to hype this thing through the media. But 40 days, Viet Nam has been a lot of hype in the media, has sent a large number of professional journalists to the scene to shoot, even causing trouble, after shooting a lot onto the Internet to render, this approach will not solve any problems. Here our friends in the media, we hope that you will be able to problem solving through communication and consultation between Sino-Vietnam providing a good public opinion environment. I come to you and our friends in the media do that again today, to tell you some facts, I have no intention to hype this thing. Only after the make the truth clear, I believe that a good environment can build up, also can help Vietnam sit down calmly and consultations in resolving the problems in the present.
Q: China News Service. You're talking about communication problems between China and Vietnam. I recently saw reported that Viet Nam News said that since May, China has repeatedly rejected Vietnam's Chinese and Vietnamese leaders held telephone conversations, Vietnam to send a Special Envoy to visit China, arranging high-level meetings and a series of recommendations. Whether the stories are true?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: the statement is not true. May 2 to today, we have communicated more than 30 times, and most communication is offered to the Chinese side. Us adopts a positive and open positions on this issue, the so-called accusations of China's refusal to communicate, to dialogue, I do not know what is the intention and purpose. But I know that the more individuals may seek another means to create some sort of so-called conditions. So-called an alternative route, that is, litigation. Sue has a premise, just refuse to dialogue or bilateral communication means have been exhausted and therefore manufacture such rumors or distorted facts. If it's for a lawsuit, then I must say, the abacus is even more wrong. China will continue to make every effort to communicate with Vietnam, Vietnam's problems have always been through bilateral negotiation, would eventually seek a proper settlement approach. We have confidence, we have this wisdom, we also have a large number of successful experience.
Q: China Central television. There are two problems. China to the United Nations and other international organizations, condemning the Viet Nam's note on their official website, the Foreign Ministry last week issued a condemnation of the more provocative articles, how do you both of these actions is to seek the understanding and support of the international community? The second issue, you mentioned a lawsuit. Vietnam says it will in the South China Sea disputes submitted to international arbitration or international justice, how will China respond?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: to answer your first question. Because Vietnam recently has spread a lot of untrue statements, some purely intentional distortions, fabrications, China granted to be clarified by means of appropriate, which includes we submit documentation to relevant institutions. The documentation and articles published by our Ministry of Foreign Affairs official Web site a few days ago is the same. Keep it expanding and China opposes multilateral, the complication without any change in the position, our position is not to solve the problem through bilateral consultations. We believe that the international community will uphold justice, objective and impartial look at related issues.
On your second question. I actually have part of the answer. Vietnam no matter what goal or the so-called lawsuit or arbitration, there is no foundation in law. We have sufficient historical evidence and legal grounds to justify what we stand for, our actions are reasonable and lawful. Vietnam may waters, or even so-called legal action against China's territorial sovereignty, the Chinese side will never accept. We deal with this issue is very clear, do not accept the jurisdiction of international litigation or arbitration, this position is consistent with the provisions of international law, as well as international law, including the United Nations Convention on the law of the powers conferred on the Chinese side. There are currently 34 countries under the United Nations Convention on the law of the sea and the Chinese statement is similar or the same, that is, in terms of territorial and maritime demarcation issues, failed to accept or exclude international arbitration or jurisdiction. China and other related countries in the enjoyment of this right should be respected under international law. Forcing a country to accept international judicial or arbitral, international law in theory contrary to the principle of the sovereign equality of States, nor does it comply with the relevant international law practice, as well as the relevant provisions of the United Nations Convention.
As for disputes between Vietnam, I have already said, resolve contradictions, differences and disputes between the parties in China and Vietnam, we have a lot of successful experiences. This is to resolve the issue through bilateral negotiations and consultations. Through almost 30 years of negotiations that we have the land border, after 26 years of negotiations to solve the demarcation of the Beibu Gulf in China and Vietnam. 2011 Vietnam signed a guiding principle agreement on sea. The agreement explicitly stated that on the basis of respecting historical facts and international law, properly handle and resolve the disputed sea. So I believe that Vietnam has the patience and wisdom to resolve our problems through bilateral channels.
Q: Japan's TV Asahi. You say Vietnam hit the Chinese ships, more than 1000 times that Chinese corporate board initiative to impact how many times? Active fishing vessels hit how many times? And your video KN762 is a public service ship or a fishing boat?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: I've talked about the rush is Viet Nam initiative, China was forced to make the necessary defence. You see from the video, is more proactive, our job is fixed, and the more you ship to squeeze in, hit, we went to block, our initiative is more offensive? We are still, and Vietnam actively ran 150 miles over, constantly rushing in all directions. And Vietnam don't clash, it will not take any action, because we need to provide the security of a reasonable range, you are outside of this range, we're not going to take any action. But rushing you, we must take certain defensive barrier, you can say that I was going to hit him?
China today at the work site is 71 ships, more than more than 30 maritime police vessel, the other is a job aid ship. You can think of, we're 71, the other side is 51, and I were in this place, but for such a very large plant, or 981 platform provides protection, this difficulty can be imagined. Is open at sea, four directions can come over. So the Chinese side in the case of a high degree of restraint, take the necessary protective measures, beyond reproach.
Question: associated press. Viet Nam has said the Chinese Government has sent naval vessels and warships in the waters, a fact?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: as the Viet Nam arbitrary interference forced us to airspace and maritime police vessel, to take the minimum level, the minimum amount of defensive action. But the more I want to say, you should immediately cease all interference.
Q: China Radio International. We note that Viet Nam claimed that vocal on many occasions by the international community in the near future to support Viet Nam of the peaceful settlement of disputes, how do you think this is Viet Nam brag about on their own?
Yi Xianliang was quoted: I also noticed the side of this statement, and frankly, this statement surprised me, it completely deviates from the facts. First to see that Viet Nam regarding the claims of some countries and international organizations, including some of their leaders to support Vietnam's position, those countries and international organizations have been clarified. You may have noticed, today a message, Xinhua, Ashe General Assembly Office of Viet Nam media distorted reports specifically for clarification. Some countries and organizations have to Viet Nam media coverage distorts the facts or even fabricated facts expressed strong dissatisfaction. Of course there are very few countries in spite of the fact that, regardless of the truth or law, for its own sake, deliberately tell tales out of trouble. We urge these countries to return to reason. The majority of the world countries and international organizations have maintained a standpoint, there is no echo or support on this issue in Viet Nam's unreasonable claim, this is a basic fact.
赞