Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2014/6/15 9:10:03 Henan set up safety accident death toll line was ridiculous
Newspaper commentator in Jiangzhou sleep
In fact, similar digital management, hard but instead wanted to play hard in practice restraint. We don't have to care about such deaths drop in specific provisions, but should watch behind every accident is man-made, eye there is no strict accountability.
Principles and the number is always a dilemma in the management. This turn to areas of safety seriously.
Henan has recently demanded that "all kinds of production safety accident death toll this year below control in 1098". This number less than 1120 people further lower than last year. However, after all, are the lives lost, cold requirement, although is more demanding, but always hurt other people's feelings. They asked: "does this 1098 people damn it? This index also was planned, ridiculous! Should put an end to security incidents, a thorough investigation together with! ”
Make all kinds of production safety accident death toll has fallen, it's the principle. But turn to each year's numbers, the number is. Adhere to the "zero death", it's the principle. But accidents lead to certain death, this is the number. However, the paradox is, by number of strictly proportional control, to continue to strengthen the principle of rigidity, but it faces cross-examination, this is why?
Abstract of principles, a specific number. On the implementation of principles and ideas, and often need to be enforced through force of numbers, which is the source of conflict. Not just safety areas, reality is often a combination of fighting in all areas. Corruption like a piece of money, corruption and 1 million, quantities are quite different but similar in nature, and is a violation of the principles. If you get 5000 count bribery, then send 4999 count as? In life, a dollar of interest, we can all promote the style. But 1 million of interest, we may speak of safeguarding the interests of their own principles.
This suggests that number set to zero unless the corresponding principles and implementation are rigid. Otherwise, the deconstruction of the principle number will always be met or challenge. But this clearly does not meet the rules of real life. So when principles need quantitative management, what we need to focus on, quantity should be based on the principles of maintenance and not vice versa. If rigidly adhere to the principle of absolute rigidity, not only can't do, things tend to get into the debates of nothingness.
Some standard star toilets, set no more than three flies, just for ease of management. If you care about in two or four, the final debate was boring. Because a fly no, in reality barely possible. Set a certain number of standard on the level of corruption, also for ease of management. We certainly hope that the safety incidents and zero death, but in reality, it can't be done. Death by zero standard rigid management and how to walk in the real sense? In fact, similar digital management, hard but instead wanted to play hard in practice restraint. This is the most practical, the most important.
In this sense, the digital management of the principles, we can be regarded as optimal management of convenience, rather than a violation of principles. Provisions cannot be considered only killed 100 people the next year killed 90 people this year, is not sparing human lives, is shirking its responsibility for security. If the secure 1000 people die in accidents last year, only 300 people this year, showed a declining trend, it must have been. But this does not mean that we can for each accident the person responsible behind reducing accountability. In fact, we don't have to care about the drop in specific provisions of this death, but should watch behind every accident is man-made, eye there is no strict accountability. Keep public tight, keep your eyes open, managers will not be slacking off.
(Original title: set the death toll less stringent accountability)
赞