Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2014/6/20 8:48:04 Former Vice Mayor of Anhui liuan involved corruption trial， had to take 600 million incentive company
Xinhuanet, Hefei, June 20 (reporters Xu Haitao and Liu Meizi)-2009 Government of huoqiu County of Anhui Province "in order to encourage projects on the enterprise" to come up with 600 million Yuan reward Dachang mining local private enterprises, attracted national attention. On June 19, 2014, when the original ren Quan Junliang, huoqiu County Party Secretary on trial for alleged corruption in Suzhou, Anhui. Trials revealed that 23 times Quan Junliang Dachang mining Chairman accepted bribes, as well as the Beijing housing 1, for its help in corporate incentives, transfer of mining rights.
In July 2009, in huoqiu County of Anhui Province Government announced to encourage the Dachang mining companies in local construction "1 million ton of nodular casting project", will reward the company 600 million Yuan. Were the County's annual revenue of more than 700 million Yuan only a State-level poor counties, and why this approach "rewarding" a private enterprise? This triggered national media attention.
Major leaders of the then Anhui provincial CPC Committee and Government instructions, and sent investigation teams. Shortly thereafter, huoqiu County party Committee and Government acknowledged that "mistakes", declared "canceled 600 million Yuan reward." In the bulletin, however, they still aggrieved that the project approval process, "compliance" and "meet the long-term and fundamental interests of the masses in our County", but simply "rush".
Nearly 5 years later, the case of Quan Junliang, appeared in court on suspicion of corruption, so that the public can learn more about the past, "huoqiu incentive" behind the details of the case.
Suzhou city Procuratorate accused, former Vice Mayor of ' an Quan Junliang, alleged abuse led to losses of more than 500 million yuan of State assets, accepting bribes of 3.6 million Yuan. Which 2004 to 2011 between, Quan Junliang using served as in huoqiu County Board Deputy Secretary, and County, and County Secretary of positions convenience, accept Anhui big Chang mining group limited original Chairman Ji Lichang of merit, for the company and the company holdings of first mine big Chang company in production operating, and Enterprise award, and accident processing, and road built, and enterprise with to, and mine right transfer, aspects provides help, has 23 times total received its 730,000 yuan.
Handling authorities introduced Quan Junliang ties to the Ji Lichang, 2009 "600 million Yuan reward" after being forced to cancel 2010 two men started "cooperative" iron transfer matters. At that time, fan bridge iron mine, huoqiu County of exploration rights agreement to mine Dachang company, Ji Lichang found Quan Junliang, wants 150 million yuan of transfer prices. But the mine's assessed value of 620 million Yuan, Quan Junliang was asked then-Deputy County magistrate will evaluate the price to less than 300 million Yuan. In August of that year, Quan Junliang chaired a county party Committee Standing Committee, determine the price of 289 million dollars will Fan Qiao prospecting rights to mine iron ore Dachang company, and give the company nearly 140 million Yuan "offers, incentives and tax breaks."
Thank you Quan Junliang "strongly supports" Ji Lichang 2011 sent to Quan Junliang in housing 1 Xueyuan South Road Haidian District, Beijing, the 2008 purchase price of houses over 2 million dollars.
After price certification center of Anhui province found that Fan Qiao iron ore prospecting rights in assessing the value of 814 million Yuan, Quan Junliang alleged favoritism, abuse of authority, illegal transfer of State-owned mineral rights at low prices, caused more than 500 million yuan of economic losses to the country.
In the courtroom of the 19th, Quan Junliang agrees to the Prosecutor accused the basic facts of the crime, but arguing that it has transferred Fan Qiao iron ore without any favoritism, there is no intervention price, did not constitute the crime of abuse; 1 properties ever received by households should not be included in the amount of bribes.
Prosecutors said Quan Junliang accepting real estate never had before and returned some of the bribes, was facing increased post adjustment and awed by the national anti-corruption and justifiable without appropriate supporting evidence. In view of the complexity of the case, the Tribunal was not adjudged.
赞