Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2015/6/10 7:27:04 China civil institutions in the three countries to prosecute Japan demanded the return of national treasures
CNS, Beijing, June 9 (reporter Ma Xueling)-9th, China's Minister of civil claims against Japan Federation of cultural relics recovered Wang Jinsi and lawyer Zhang Xingshui line to the Beijing higher people's Court to file a petition, demanding Japan return Government abroad the first national treasure of China--the Chinese Tang Hong Lu wells stone and an apology and compensation. A day after, the Federation has been by mail, to the Tokyo District Court, the Hague International Tribunal indictments were submitted on the matter.
Chinese Tang Hong Hong Lu Qing Lu Jing stele was Emperor Xuanzong sent Cui relics of the ? established in Port Arthur in ad 714, Tang dynasty conferred the jurisdiction of Northeast local government the materialization of the Bohai Sea country proves that history of Northeast China, national history and cultural history with great historic value. On April 30, 1908, Japan Navy as Russo-Japanese war "trophies" looted, dedicated to Japan Emperor Meiji, Japan Palace hidden ever since.
In August 2014, Chinese Tang Hong Lu wells stone building 1300 anniversary, China Federation of civil claims against Japan by Japan's Ambassador to musichang people, wrote to Emperor Akihito of Japan and Japan Government, demanding Japan quickly return, this is the first official to China Japan recovered cultural relics of the Royal family. On December 23, 2014, Wang Jinsi, people in Japan, demand Japan immediately return stone Chinese Tang Hong Lu wells.
"But so far, we still have not received any replies, so this time in Beijing, Tokyo, the Hague proceedings. "The litigation of plaintiffs Wang Jinsi of Beijing, Xinhua said.
This lawsuit lawyer Zhang Xingshui said that relying on war-looted art was related to human social justice principles and universal values of human civilization deviation of illegal and criminal acts, the plaintiffs are responsible for representing their people, have rights of recourse for war or any other violent means to their cultural heritage and historical relics lost overseas. In accordance with international law and practice, the defendants also have the obligation to return.
Zhang XING water noted that the annex to the 1899 Hague Convention II and annex to the 1907 Hague Convention IV respecting the laws and customs of 56th article of the Convention are prohibited in the looted cultural property during the war, "these laws of Japan and China are binding, provided strong support for the return of looted treasures. ”
Civil claims against Japan, President of the Federation of the Diaoyutai Islands in China, said since recovering from last year, frequently with Chinese folk, but had some leeway, not a last resort not on the road to prosecute human rights. But given Japan ignores China's civil justice advocate, fell on deaf ears, so sue.
The Diaoyutai Islands and said that "during the war, Japan looted Chinese treasures, the suit is the first by the civil society organizations in China to Japan legal action to recover national treasures, regardless of the eventual outcome, provide experience and achievements to solve similar problems, is of milestone significance, also gave Japan the Government and people of an opportunity for a correct understanding of history. ”
Beijing, reporters noted that the lawsuit Japan Imperial Palace Office of the imperial household Agency, Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and Japan's Ambassador to musichang people as defendants.
Said Wang Jinsi, "this is because Abe, more than three times distorts the facts of aggression, Japan Palace imperial household agency directly responsible as hidden relics Management Department, Japan's Ambassador to the lack of sincerity to solve the problem. ”
When asked why not to prosecute Japan when the Emperor, said Wang Jinsi, "Emperor Akihito of Japan national symbol, Japan has a high prestige and good image, has maintained that friendship between China and Japan and Japan invaded China on issues that reflect on, so the defendant choose to exclude it on. ”
"China's civil organization and after careful consideration, that is essential in the long-term development of China-Japan relations, and also in order to be with Japan authorities can continue contact, not as a defendant, Emperor, hope the emperor will play a constructive role. "Wang Jinsi added.
In litigation requests in the, except requests court decree accused public apologized and returned Chinese Tang Hong Lu well carved stone zhiwai, China Civil on day claims Federation also requests court decree accused bear plaintiffs for Chase please heritage, on day history legacy problem activities spending of all costs, amounted to Yuan 13.01 million Yuan; and Decree accused for infringement behavior to to plaintiffs for representative of people compensation spirit loss fee, amounted to Yuan 1.4 billion yuan.
In response, Wang Jinsi referring to some of those involved in the recovery of about "Japan returned to one-year delay, mental damages should be increased by 100 million Yuan" point of view, compared with 107 years compared to the Chinese people suffering from pain of loss of national treasures, compensation for moral damage is not a high amount of 10.7 billion yuan. But after much weighing, that claim is not the main purpose, or the claim is determined in the amount of 1.4 billion yuan, which symbolizes every Chinese must be paid for.
Taking into account the particularity of the relationship between restrictions and legal issues such as jurisdiction, said Wang Jinsi, hoped that the Beijing high people's Court would accept the case, and make a reasonable decision. If not accepted, expected in Tokyo and the Hague prosecution can achieve a breakthrough, the positive efforts by various means and achieve national treasure back. (End)
(Original title: Chinese in Beijing Tokyo, the Hague prosecution Japan demanded the return of national treasures)
赞