Liu Zhi-Qin: Wang Yi, Minister Wang Yi _ to tell Americans ' anxiety | news
Liu Zhi-Qin: Minister Wang Yi also said Americans ' anxiety
This year's session of the most interesting events is the Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi at a press conference. In the just concluded this morning at a press conference, Foreign Minister Wang Yi to face various reporters laughing, answered freely, widely praised by the society.
In particular on the subject of Sino-US relations in particular triggered heated discussion, Foreign Minister Wang Yi in the most clear and concise language to reiterate to the world China's United States friendship and expectations, it is refreshing, as Sino-US relations have to be afraid of the media feel free and few expect China-us conflict in order to "chestnut out" countries were disappointed.
Foreign Minister Wang Yi's speech showed China as a responsible big country broad disagreements, and look to the future and the vision of peace. The wonderful performance of our Foreign Ministers Wang Yi "like"!
In recent times, the debate surrounding the South China Sea between China and America is very lively. Many international relations experts worry, worry about whether China and unavoidable "Thucydides trap", inevitably through the "World War I" to decide their world leadership. This fear is too "novel", with old men room with a mock duel "seating on the hero" habits of children. It is clear that such "children mode" handling of Sino-US relations is certainly not feasible today.
Foreign Minister Wang Yi reiterated that China is not the United States, China does not and cannot become the United States. China has no intention to replace the United States to lead the world. This is from China heart confession, is the true voice of the people in China. When it comes to this issue, Foreign Minister Wang Yi to specifically highlight the "American thinking" topic, sharply pointed out the United States in dealing with the emerging powers of China's future "American anxiety" roots. United States have become accustomed to in the world "I satisfy myself" life and "loner" acting style, makes the United States determine China's operations into its own mining "potential enemy trap", the resulting fear, anxiety, and "fantasy".
In fact, China does not want to replace the United States to lead the world's ambitions, has no such ambitions. This ability does not matter, but Chinese entrenched "Chinese thought" are closely linked. What we call the "Chinese thought" always adhering to the old left's philosophy "do unto others", and "American thinking" to the contrary, it insists that it is "self" centered "has been applied to the people" principles, "their desire to conquer others." China's work is about "dominating" Wende tribute, while the United States is pursuing "ice world", to deter others by force. Which is better, the world will judge.
Different ways of thinking between China and America is mainly "Chinese thought" is respected, "share", and "American thinking" more emphasis is "exclusive". In particular, voice and influence in many areas of dispute, that is "sharing" and "exclusive" debate. While China pursues only "under the framework of the existing international order towards appropriate development space and discourse", does not involve United States core interests. Peaceful coexistence of both countries can be accomplished, the joint development.
China and the us share a common interest in more problems, and show the world that China and the us have the ability to handle bilateral issues of common concern. Paris "climate deal" and both in network security cooperation understandings, indicating no conflict of fundamental interests between the two countries, not to "rat race" dueling grounds in history between the city and the new country "hostility contradiction" of at least two countries, there is no reason not for common development.
World United States is enough, so the world cannot tolerate two United States of the consequences. Therefore, the choice was exactly the right wise, China: China would never "setting up another stove, another set of" China just wanted to make the world more fair and better.
Recently saw a story circulating on the Internet about the bilateral relations, said is one of Korean Americans, Martin recalled. He remembers encounters a pair of volunteers on the battlefield, wounded American troops protected and risking possible threats by us forces mistakenly hit onto the injured us soldiers in combat positions before returned to the us for medical treatment. The good vibrations all American, American commander King salute to bid farewell to those who volunteer. Since then, these soldiers do not want to fight, particularly when the volunteers fighting. Mr Martin concluded: when does war between America and China, it must be the fault of Americans.
This story from one angle explains the importance of China and there is mutual understanding, as Foreign Minister Wang Yi said, when the United States changed the "American thinking" will find that the front is "enlightened" new heaven and Earth.
On Sino-US relations in the future, no need to worry about excess, we believe that China and the us can give the world a "security assurances". No fighting between China and, when common in the world.
(Author Liu Zhi-Qin et senior researcher at the finance Research Institute of the Renmin University)
Responsible editor: Xiang Changming SN123
Article keywords:Yi Wang
I want feedback
Save a Web page
刘志勤：王毅部长又说出了美国人的焦虑|王毅_新闻资讯
刘志勤：王毅部长又说出了美国人的焦虑
今年两会最引人关注的事件当属外交部长王毅的记者招待会。在今天上午刚刚结束的记者会上，王毅外长面对各路记者谈笑风生，应答自如，受到社会广泛好评。
特别是涉及中美关系的话题尤其引发热议，王毅外长用最简洁明了的语言向世界重申了中国对美国的友好和期望，令人耳目一新，也让为中美关系担心受怕的媒体感觉轻松，让少数指望中美冲突加剧，以便“火中取栗”的国家感到失望。
王毅外长的讲话表现出中国作为一个负责任的大国坦荡磊落的胸怀和放眼未来与和平的高瞻远瞩。我们为王毅外长的精彩表现点“赞”！
最近一个时期以来，中美两国围绕南海问题的争论显得十分热闹。不少国际关系专家对此忧心忡忡，担心中美无法回避“修昔底德陷阱”，难免通过“一战”来决定两国的世界领导地位。这种担心未免太过于“小说化”，并带有古时好汉间靠比武决斗来“论英雄排座次”的梁山习气。很显然，用这种“梁山模式”处理当今中美关系肯定是行不通的。
王毅外长重申：中国不是美国，中国不会也不可能成为美国。中国无意取代美国领导世界。这是发自中国内心的表白，是中国百姓的真实心声。在谈到这个问题时，王毅外长特别提出“美式思维”的话题，一针见血地指出了美国在对待中国这个新兴大国的未来存在“美式焦虑”的根源所在。美国已经习惯于在世界上“我行我素”的生活状态和“独来独往”的行事作风，使得美国在观察判断中国的行动时陷入它自己挖掘的“潜敌陷阱”中，由此产生各种担心，焦虑和“臆想”。
其实中国没有想取代美国去统领世界的野心，也没有如此的雄心壮志。这和有没有能力没有关系，而是和中国根深蒂固的“中式思维”紧密相连的。我们所说的“中式思维”始终秉承老祖宗留下的处事哲学“己所不欲勿施于人”，而“美式思维”恰恰相反，它坚持的是以“己”为中心的“己所欲施于人”原则，用“自己之欲，征服他人”。中国处事讲究的是“君临天下”，以文德服人，而美国则追求“军凌世界”，以武力震慑他国。哪个更好，世界自有公论。
中美两国思维方式的不同主要在于“中式思维”推崇的是“分享”，而“美式思维”则更多强调的是“独享”。特别是在许多领域的话语权和影响力之争，就是“分享”和“独享”之争。而中国所追求的只是在“现有国际秩序框架下，争取相应的合理发展空间和话语权”而已，丝毫不涉及美国的核心利益。中美两国完全能够做到和平共处，协同发展。
中美两国在更多的问题上有着共同利益，并且向世界表明中美两国有能力处理两国共同关切的问题。如巴黎的“气候协议”以及中美两国在网络安全达成的合作谅解，说明中美两国之间没有根本的利益冲突，更没有“你死我活”的决斗理由，是历史上守城大国和新起大国之间“敌对矛盾”最少的两个大国，没有理由不能共同发展。
世界上有一个美国已经足够了，世界也不可能承受出现两个美国的后果。所以，中国的选择是绝对正确英明的：中国绝不会“另起炉灶，另搞一套”，中国只想让世界变得更加公平美好。
最近看到一个在网上流传的有关中美关系的故事，说的是一位参加过朝鲜战争的美国人马丁的回忆。他记得在战场上遇到一对志愿军，把受伤的美军保护起来，并冒着可能被美军误打的威胁把这些受伤美军士兵抬到还在交战的阵地前交还美军救治。这个善举震动了所有美军，美军连长敬军礼送别那些志愿军。从那以后，这些美军士兵再不愿意参加战斗，特别是面对志愿军的战斗。马丁先生由此得出结论：如果中美之间真的发生了战争，那一定是美国人的错。
这个故事从一个角度解释了中美双方存在着相互理解的重要性，正如王毅外长所说，当美国改变了“美式思维”，会发现前方是“豁然开朗”的新的天地。
对中美关系未来，大可不必担心过度，我们相信中美两国完全能够给世界一个“安全保证”。中美无战事，世界当共同。
（作者刘志勤系中国人民大学重阳金融研究院高级研究员）
责任编辑：向昌明 SN123
文章关键词： 王毅
我要反馈
保存网页