Gree beautiful report, Ministry of science and technology ennui-gree, beauty-IT information

Gree reported each other national science and technology progress award of beauty and fraud matters are fermented.

Although the authenticity of this thing yet, but authenticity doesn't seem to matter. Because authenticity is just related to the two enterprises ' credibility problem. However, behind this event, related to the Ministry of science and technology awards are fair and objective, is a challenge to national science and technology authority. Its market triggered by the national award of science and technology authority, air conditioning industry technology innovation gold review and questioning has gone far beyond the two companies themselves.

Who gave Hercules review award?

National Science and Technology Awards Office (hereinafter Awards), was put in an awkward position. As award of national science and technology progress award, the Office gave gree and midea has named award.

This award is directly under the Ministry of science and technology, is mainly responsible for the national science and technology award organizations, scientific and technological achievements management and day-to-day management of the science and technology secret work. National Science and technology progress Awards is the premier award made outstanding contributions in scientific and technological progress activities citizens and organizations established by one of the five State Science and technology awards. It should be said, have been recognized by awards, as recognized by the State Council and the Ministry of science and technology, and their extraordinary authority, academic status and influence .

But the rewards far from thought, because of two major home appliance giant Hagrid beauty competition and mutual accusations of fraud, for rescission of awards, and pleadings referred to the award, this tough approach is unexpected.

Full of evidence reported to the Ministry of science and technology out of the problem

Gree and midea spotters have made elaborate preparations, rigorous logic provides superior reporting letter. The room air conditioners gree employee Chen reported the United States key technologies research and industrialization project of implementing enterprise standards did not meet national standards and regulatory requirements, the main innovation "... ... Compared with the air conditioners at home and abroad, which prolongs 65.1%...... "is not credible, want to withdraw America in 2014, the country's National Science Award.

Beautiful staff Li Meng to report the key technology of variable-frequency air conditioners gree research and application projects at various key data fraud: 1HZ no cooling effect; the project model SEER data false recommended the repeal of gree 2011 prize of national technological progress awards.

It should be said that this opening each other's misdeeds, both tried very hard, full of evidence. Focusing of contradictions in the awards Department Award is bound to give the industry and the general public a claim, at least give informants a claim. Kicks will this lawsuit to award, the equivalent to the Ministry of science and technology with a big problem.

In fact, lawsuits must also run by the reward trial. As a sponsor, and selection, they are in the best position and capacity needs to be re-examined, or organizational assessment of experts and scholars on both sides, otherwise, institutions do not have the permission of the third party.

Gree beauty ends conjecture

In other words, even if the third party after review finds that one false, but this incentive can recognize it? Public approval?

If not recognized, may has several situation: a is award do has himself of evaluation and evaluation system, and representative national highest of evaluation system, third party institutions even has qualification, but cannot representative national highest academic status and authoritative; second species situation is, third party institutions fundamental no evaluation qualification, even has clear of results, also cannot representative official; third species situation is award do insisted himself of selection is just of no false behavior, so not identity.

But conflict has emerged. When that evaluation and submit the information there is no fraud, but between clear evidence proves cheat each other for a prize, this problem and how to solve it?

If, after review, finds one false, then why on behalf of the State Supreme science and technology award of the prize to a false corporate awards?

The third level, is the most likely outcome is that the two sides buried the hatchet. Under official mediation, announced that no fraud on both sides, all technological innovation is recognized. Problems in the evaluation of different systems and standards. Of course, the results of the third level is a hypothetical, only this can be for both sides to stop the war, to make awards have a face, not to review loopholes and lax on his back properly. Makes a false Enterprise award, what is a joke, this is rewarding the most unwilling to see the truth.

Of course, most undesirable is the ending of the third hypothesis. Because it's unfair to other businesses, not selected in a fair rules of the game award, is also not responsible for national top science and technology award.

Most want to see is the truth. The truth, means may be rewarding and beauty of gree "lose-lose" situation.

Why as soon as the truth, it may be a "lose-lose"? Truth means that there is fraud, means that the award selection is not strict. Gree beauty or win your case, but the rewards of a slap. Market may have on scientific and technological problems in the selection set out, likely bickering technology selected to become objects of, this is definitely not want to see outcomes of the Department of science and technology. Such a situation occurs, incentives must be self-examination, for future selection will be strict quality control. Because they are not strict, gree the mutual opening of beauty appears only event.

In fact, this is a good thing for China's scientific and technological innovation, play a role in purifying. China's scientific and technological innovation needs most now is to purify, false, is the biggest support for scientific and technological innovation.

If haven't cheated both sides are evil

Although a few years ago appeared a case of academic fraud was precedent for revocation of national science and technology progress award, but since the Awards began in 2000 established, annual hundreds of projects, fraud and award-winning is a small probability event.

If the judgment is no problem for the two projects, that is, gree, midea reported is not true, then two-party competition is real, and being despised: to carry personal attack competitors at reported rights abuses and damage the image, it is evil.

Or fraud in the award process or reporting of fraud in the process, gree and midea either one or two is bound to bear the lose-lose result.

So, gree, midea, looks set to kick the ball to the rewarding and the State Council, must lie on it. Seen from the recent reported comments of netizens, some have shifted to the gree "1 Hz frequency converter" and the beautiful "1-to-1" challenge, which is the most successful marketing slogans on both sides is based on reported two science and technology progress award.

In knowing, for example, about "1-to-1" the mainstream view is that business operation results in the specific environment of the laboratory setting "expansion for" widespread publicity, in fact misled by marketing. Similarly, with regard to "1 Hz" frequency converter has a similar view.

White goods, air conditioning, in technological innovation is relatively slow, lagging far behind the black appliances technology speed of iteration. Therefore, the white goods business was marketing-driven, brand-led, but before the TV industry formed an monopoly brand.

Regardless of how the events unfolded, gree, midea's refreshed line of tear force detrimental to the industry. May is only meaningful on air conditioning "core technology" collective disenchantment, more consumers understand, even Fortune 500 companies for home appliances, the technological innovations are much lower than you think.

格力美的相互举报，科技部情何以堪 - 格力,美的 - IT资讯

格力和美的相互举报对方国家科学技术进步奖造假的事态正在发酵。

虽然这件事情的真伪还没有定论，但真伪似乎并不重要。因为真伪只是关系到两个企业的诚信问题。然而，这一事件的背后，却关系到科技部的奖项评选是否公正客观，是对国家科技权威的一次挑战。其引发的市场对国家科学技术奖评奖权威性、空调业技术创新含金量的审视和质疑已经远远超出了两家企业本身。

是谁给格力美的评的奖？

国家科学技术奖励工作办公室（以下简称奖励办）首先被放在了一个尴尬的位置。作为国家科学技术进步奖的评奖单位，该办公室给格力和美的先后评选进步奖。

这个奖励办是科技部的直属单位，主要承担国家科技奖评审组织、科技成果管理和科技保密的日常管理工作。而国家科学技术进步奖则是国务院为奖励在科技进步活动中作出突出贡献的公民、组织而设立的五项国家科学技术奖之一。应该说，能得到奖励办的认可，就等同于是国务院和科技部的认可，其权威、学术地位和影响力非同一般。

但是奖励办远远不会想到，两大家电巨头格力美的因为竞争而相互指责对方造假，要求撤销奖励，诉状也都交到了奖励办，这一棘手做法是始料未及的。

证据十足的举报给科技部出了难题

格力和美的的举报人员都提出了精心准备，逻辑严谨完备的举报信函。格力员工陈进举报美的《房间空气调节器节能关键技术研究及产业化》项目所执行企业标准不符合国家标准化法规的要求，其主要创新点“……与国内外同等级空调器相比，耗电量减少65.1%……”效果不可信，希望国家撤销美的在2014年获得的国家科学进步二等奖。

美的员工李猛举报格力的《变频空调关键技术的研究及应用》项目多处关键数据造假：1HZ技术无制冷效果；项目机型SEER数据虚假，建议撤销格力2011年国家科技进步奖奖项。

应该说，为了本次互揭对方的丑行，双方都拼尽了十分力气，证据十足。矛盾的焦点集中在了评奖部门，奖励办势必要给行业和公众一个说法，起码是给举报人一个说法。将这个官司踢给了奖励办，这等于给科技部出了一道大难题。

事实上，双方的官司也必须由奖励办判案。作为主办方和评选方，他们也是最有资格和能力需要重新审视，或组织专家学者对双方进行评估的，否则，第三方机构是没有这个权限的。

格力美的结局猜想

换句话说，即使第三方机构经过评测认定其中一方造假，但这个结果奖励办能认可吗？公众能认可吗？

如果不认可，可能有几种情况：一种是奖励办有自己的评价和评测体系，而且代表国家最高的评价体系，第三方机构即使有资质，但不能代表国家最高学术地位和权威性；第二种情况是，第三方机构根本没有评价资质，即使有明确的结果，也不能代表官方；第三种情况是奖励办坚持自己的评选是公正的没有作假行为，因此不予认同。

但矛盾又出现了。如果奖励办认为评选和企业提交的资料没有作假行为，但企业之间却提出明确的证据，证明了对方为获奖而作假，这个问题又如何解决？

如果经过重新评审，认定其中一方作假，那么代表国家最高科学技术进奖的评选为何给一个作假的企业颁奖？

第三个层面，也最有可能出现的结局是，双方握手言和。在官方的调停下，宣布双方都没有作假行为，所有技术创新是得到认可的。问题出现在评价体系和标准方面有所不同。当然，第三个层面的结果是假设的，只有这样的结局才能让双方停止战争，也才能让奖励办有面子，不至于背上评审漏洞和不严格的黑锅。让一个作假的企业获奖，说出去是一个天大的笑话，这是奖励办最不愿意看到的事实真相。

当然，市场最不希望出现的就是第三种假设的结局。因为那样对其他企业不公平，不是在公平的游戏规则下评选的奖项，也是对国家最高科技奖的不负责任。

市场最想看到的是真相。真相，意味着可能是奖励办和格力美的有“双输”的局面。

为什么说一旦有真相，可能是“双输”呢？真相意味着有一方作假，意味着奖励办评选不严格。格力美的一方或赢了官司，却打了奖励办一巴掌。市场可能把本来对科技评选中存在的问题一下子集中爆发出来，有可能各类科技评选都成为口诛笔伐的对象，这肯定不是科技部想看到的结局。这样的局面出现，奖励办必须要自我检讨，对以后的评选将严把质量关。因为他们把关不严，才出现格力美的互揭事件。

其实，这对于中国的科技创新是一个好事儿，起到净化作用。中国科技创新现在最需要的是净化，去伪存真，才是对科技创新最大的支持。

如果都没作假 双方是在作恶

虽然几年前出现过一例学术造假被撤销国家科学技术进步奖的先例，但考虑到该奖项从2000年开始设立、每年评选上百个项目，造假并获奖实在是小概率事件。

如果判定两个项目都没有问题，也就是格力、美的的相互举报都不成立，那么两方的恶性竞争将被做实，并被行业不齿：为携私攻击竞争对手不惜滥用举报权利，损害行业形象，实属作恶。

要么是评奖过程中作假，要么是举报过程中造假，格力和美的中的两方或一方，必将要为此承担双输的结果。

所以说，格力、美的看似将球踢给了奖励办和国务院，其实是自作自受。从近期相关报道的网民评论上看，一部分已经转向了对格力“1赫兹变频”和美的“1晚1度电”的质疑，而这两个堪称双方最成功营销的广告语正是基于被举报的两项科学技术进步奖。

比如在知乎上，关于“1晚1度电”的主流看法就是企业把实验室设定的特定环境下空调运行结果“扩大为”普遍现象而加以宣传，实为营销误导。同样，关于“1赫兹”变频也有类似看法。

空调在内的白色家电在技术创新上相对缓慢，远远落后于黑色家电的技术迭代速度。因此，白色家电企业一直是营销主导、品牌主导，反而先于彩电行业形成了相对垄断的品牌。

不论事态如何发展，格力、美的这场刷新底线的撕逼对行业有害无益。唯一有意义的可能是对空调“核心科技”的集体祛魅，更多消费者明白了，即便是财富500强的家电公司，所做的技术创新也比想象中低的多。