Questions were put by members: want to eat this bowl of rice, and points for attention
"I said a few words. "Some members took the microphone, sharp eyes locked in silent after the lens sitting in the Gallery to record meeting me.
He went to glance in my direction, I instantly realized that he is going to say.
"Some media, like you, is the science and technology daily, grabbed some negative issues. "The word gets out, I suddenly became a focus of the audience without any presence, many startled eyes pitter-patter hit my body.
Never thought, in the session has come to an end when I became his "negative characteristic".
"Involving military enterprise, not free to write. You want to eat this bowl of rice, you pay attention. I've already written down your press card number carefully related departments to pick you up! "This is my colleague as" very talented "members, staring at me, leaving ruthless.
Before it originated about 15 minutes, she got up to leave, I chased out, asked a question about the military enterprise. At that time, his facial expression change, put a hand and motioned to not want to talk much. And when I tried to explain my purpose is not a mining of so-called "black history", he stood back into his room (Member's room and the Hall on the same floor), and slapped it on the door.
Journalists have been refused is the norm, I didn't think much, back to the venue, will open hearings. But, because it did not get the answer wasn't even clear questions, he would pick up the phone, directly to my "fire".
I wonder, and I think the Commissioner misunderstood me for his purposes, and justified. Indeed, as a reporter, in the face of the members of the CPPCC National Committee discussed the meeting shouldn't be so connected, but forgot where, but he is an equal subjects, anxious reiterated his intentions to him. "Not what I mean. I would like to know the actual situation that comes to you, if you have a problem, can I ask you to talk to me later? ”
Members or with the kind of sharp, full of anger eyes stared at me, first, led fan left a full sentence: "I have no obligation to talk to you! ”
I'm helpless, sitting back; and slow, feel less polite, added the sentence: "Okay, still a member thank you. ”
However, after the end of the discussion, I was supported by several members of the guests comfort, that I do not have the episode in mind.
Brushed back in this way existence is quite wonderful.
(Editors: Pan Yi burn UN657)
2016-03-16 16:15:01
Integrated
记者提问被委员撂狠话：想吃这碗饭，就注意点
“我说两句。”某委员拿过话筒，镜片后犀利的眼神锁在了默默坐在旁听席记录会议内容的我身上。
他往我这边一瞥，我瞬间明白了，他将要说什么。
“有些媒体，比如你，科技日报的是吧，抓着一些负面问题不放。”此话一出，本来毫无存在感的我突然成了全场焦点，众多惊疑的眼光噼里啪啦砸在我身上。
万万没想到，在政协会议已经进入尾声的时候，我成了他口中的“负面典型”。
“涉及军工企业的，不能随便写。你要还想吃这碗饭，你就注意点。我已经记下了你的记者证号，小心相关部门把你抓起来！”这位被我的同事评价为“很有才华”的委员，瞪着我，撂下狠话。
一切缘起于大概十五分钟之前，这位委员起身离席，我追出去，问了一个关于军工企业的问题。当时，他脸色一变，摆摆手，示意不想多谈。而当我尽力解释我的来意并非挖掘所谓的“黑历史”后，他闪身进了自己的房间（委员的房间和会场在同一层楼），并用力摔上了门。
记者被拒绝乃是常事，我没有多想，回到会场，照常听会。只是不料，因为这个没得到答案甚至还没说清楚的提问，他会拿起话筒，直接向我“开火”。
我觉得莫名其妙，又觉得这位委员误解了我找他的目的，起身辩解。确实，作为一名记者，在政协讨论会场上不该如此驳委员的面子；但当时一下忘了自己身在何处，只当他是一位平等的采访对象，急着向他重申自己的来意。“我不是这个意思。我就是想了解实际情况才来找您，如果您觉得有问题，待会能不能请您跟我详细聊聊？”
委员还是用那种犀利的、含着火气的眼神瞪着我，头一偏,领导范十足地甩下一句：“我没有这个义务跟你谈！”
我无奈，坐回位置；又后知后觉，感到自己不大礼貌，补充了一句：“好，还是谢谢委员。”
不过，讨论结束后，我居然得到了好几名委员的贴心安慰，叫我不要将刚才的插曲放在心上。
以这种方式刷了回存在感，还是蛮奇妙的。
(责任编辑：潘奕燃 UN657)
2016-03-16 16:15:01
综合