Red Cross officials were accused of living in a mansion, Changzhou, Jiangsu oppressing the neighborhood′s official response | Red | Mansion _ news
Original title: Changzhou red will respond to "leader sitting on a requirement of 3 million mansion neighborhood": exaggeration
CNS, Nanjing, March 17 (reporter Zhong Sheng)-16th, wujin district, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Red Cross network of heat transfer in the near future ", Changzhou, a leading Red Cross ′ requirement of sit ′300 million mansion neighborhood" response. Red Cross says party Alex have had friction with neighbors, but most of the content of false claims are exaggerated.
On March 15, Changzhou, exposure of media to the network a leading Red Cross "sitting" requirement of 3 million mansion neighborhood, under the title party denied reports Changzhou aunt′s Garden 5 West County property owners at the ceiling water seepage, then find the upstairs owner Alex consultations on this matter. Alex refused to negotiate, and claimed to be the Red Cross leadership, wujin district, worth more than 3 million homes. Because of the articles involved in the "lead", "Mansion", "bully neighborhood," and so on, quickly sparked a public debate, and to shift the focus from the neighbourhood disputes to public officials on style issues.
Wujin district Red Cross stated in response that says, mentioned in the report taking a solid red an ordinary clerk. Housing leaking, leaking from after the fact the two sides have conducted numerous consultations, because in the way of compensation, the amount of compensation did not reach a consensus on matters such as, resulting in not being able to properly handle the dispute. There is no "oppression" is, there is no "3 million Mansion".
On March 13, the Netizen "Xue Mu cock" to put pressure on gu with a view to an early resolution of disputes without authorization on the Forum to "wujin district a leader" and "a leading Red Cross, wujin district" for the title of the content posted. Subsequently, some media reported without rigorous proof, reprinted, sparking public debate.
Event of another party applying aunt says in contact with Gu a, Gu is not claimed to be leaders, nor did he mention 3 million homes. Now, Alex is looking for decorators visiting aunt applied for repair, and has promised to foot the Bill. The approach to this, and aunt is happy with, or do not wish to online reports to Mr Gu′s work. (End)
Editor: Sue cure SN226
Article keywords: Red mansions
I want feedback
Save a Web page
China News Network
江苏常州红会官员被指住豪宅欺压邻里 官方回应|红会|豪宅_新闻资讯
原标题：常州红会回应“领导坐拥300万豪宅欺压邻里”：夸大其词
中新网南京3月17日电 (钟升) 16日，江苏常州市武进区红十字会就近期网络热传的“常州红十字会某领导‘坐拥’300万豪宅欺压邻里”一事做出回应。红会表示，事件当事人顾先生确与邻里有过摩擦，但大部分内容均为夸大其词的虚假说法。
3月15日，有媒体以《网曝常州红十字会某领导“坐拥”300万豪宅欺压邻里，当事人矢口否认》为题，报道称常州花园西郡5栋业主施阿姨家天花板渗水，于是找到了楼上的业主顾先生协商此事。顾先生拒绝协商，并声称自己是武进区红会领导，拥有价值300多万的别墅。由于文章中涉及“领导”、“豪宅”、“欺压邻里”等内容，很快引发了公众的热议，并将关注热点从邻里纠纷转移到公职人员的作风问题上。
武进区红会在回应中说明称，报道中所提顾某实为红会一名普通科员。关于房屋漏水一事，双方从漏水事情发生后已进行过多次协商，只因在赔偿方式、赔偿金额等事项上未达成共识，导致纠纷没能及时妥善处理。但并不存在“欺压”的说法，也并不存在“300万豪宅”。
3月13日，网友“薛木鸡鸡”为给顾某施加压力以期早日解决纠纷，擅自在论坛上以“武进区某领导”“武进区红十字会某领导”等内容为标题发帖。随后，部分媒体在未经严谨求证的情况下报道、转载，引发公众热议。
事件另一当事人施阿姨表示，在与顾某一家的接触中，顾某并未说过自己是领导，也没提及有300万的别墅。目前，顾先生已找装修工人去施阿姨家进行修理，并承诺将承担所有费用。对这样的处理方式，施阿姨也很满意，也希望不要因为网上的报道影响到顾先生的工作。(完)
责任编辑：苏未然 SN226
文章关键词： 红会 豪宅
我要反馈
保存网页
中国新闻网