On hungry people′s daily it was 315 exposure: could not be "one size fits all"-315, hungry-IT information
After development the problems exposed, should not simply to "badmouth" or even "catch-all" prohibition, but rather as an opportunity to improve and upgrade
CCTV this year "staged" party, exposed the network reservation platform "hungry". Food production site "sewers" Chef "taste the finished dish thrown in pot" platform boot merchant fictitious address, false propaganda, even unlicensed black workshop settled by default ... ... Although the food and drug administration in Beijing in the programme just broadcast to investigate the "hungry" five stores in one food processing sites, interviewed by the Shanghai food and Drug Administration is "hungry" officials, but young and ridicule of customary takeout, feeling "like eating a fly."
"The Internet +" brought great changes to our lives, from online shopping to mobile phones ordering food, clothing, has been the network change. However, the "hungry" also revealed that"savage" to avoid accumulation of various contradictions and problems, "blowout" could be behind that pays top academics, and bad quality of consumption . "Hungry" is, but in the "digital lifestyle" trend, not built up a sound market order in a timely manner, would lead to bad money drives out good money, as well as issues affecting industry development and reduce the welfare of the public.
"The Internet +" concept means that Internet collocation with other industries can have a multiplier effect, to further enhance the value. Web ordering service, for example, orders from consumers to food production and distribution, involves many subjects, far from being a software so simple. We are a restaurant, a site how tubes are good at, but a network platform connects numerous restaurants, building up a large system, how can this tube, may lack some experience. "The Internet +" era, will generate many new topics of social governance.
As with the network about car rental services, how to access, how to regulate network food consumption, will become a long time concern, challenging problems. For the new format, it is necessary to avoid "a pipe die", and too thin, too specific, stifle the industry′s vitality; to avoid "chaos" for not keeping up with, let speculators profit and consumer interests. It really tests the patience of management wisdom of macro-and micro- .
From a regulatory perspective, necessary to define better the relationship between selling platform and access to food and beverage businesses, provides better responsibility, rights and benefit of the subject . What responsibility platform which responsibility, restaurants, who should control what kind of problems occur, "whose doll who walk away." While increasing market inspection system, the construction of the market system, offline set up sound market order. Brewing for a long time, the upcoming network food sale measures on the supervision and obligation to do a clear statement of the network platform; in some provinces and cities have done a number of management innovation, including the introduction of platform submission to regulatory systems, and so on, are trying to outline clearly the responsibility framework.
For each online reservation platforms, should also have more self-discipline . Internet economy competitive, fast upgrades, however, "only quality is not broken". Chinese consumers will certainly walk fast cheap stage, into the "quality time". Either stick to the scrutiny of the bottom line, or a live video monitoring, such as increased transparency, networking platforms obviously has a lot of work to do--in the eyes of not only greater, greater share. No quality and reputation protection, loss of market share and is "minute" matter.
Regardless of online ordering, or other Web-based services, and after phased development the problems exposed, should not simply to "badmouth" or even "catch-all" ban, but should be seen as an opportunity to improve and upgrade. Community is no small matter, such treatment, the surface is the Internet platform, but the essence is the management of public life, can be said to be another "people′s livelihood". The supervision of government departments must be to reform and help the heart of ambition, and strive to achieve innovative upgrade.
人民日报谈饿了么被315曝光：不能搞“一刀切” - 315,饿了么 - IT资讯
对于阶段性发展之后暴露出来的问题，不应简单“唱衰”甚至“一刀切”禁止，而应视为改进与升级的契机
今年央视的“3·15”晚会，曝光了网络订餐平台“饿了么”。食物制作现场“污水横流”，厨师“尝完的菜扔回锅里”，平台引导商家虚构地址、虚假宣传，甚至默认无照经营的黑作坊入驻……虽然北京食药监局在节目刚播出就查处了“饿了么”五店合一食品加工点，上海食药监局也约谈了“饿了么”相关负责人，但习惯叫外卖的年轻人还是吐槽，感觉“像吃了一只苍蝇”。
“互联网+”为我们的生活带来巨大变化，从上网购物到手机叫餐，衣食住行都已经被网络改变。然而，“饿了么”的情况也揭示，“野蛮生长”难免积累下种种矛盾和问题，“井喷”的背后可能是泥沙俱下、良莠不齐的消费品质。“饿了么”虽然是个案，但在“数字化生活”的大趋势下，不及时构建起良性的市场秩序，就会导致劣币驱逐良币，成为既影响行业发展、更降低公众福利的问题。
“互联网+”的概念意味着，互联网要与其他行业搭配，才能产生乘数效应，进一步提升价值。以网络订餐服务为例，从消费者下单到食物的制作、配送，涉及的主体很多，远不是一个软件那么简单。我们对一家餐馆、一个网站怎么管很在行，但一个网络平台连接起无数餐馆，构建起一个庞大的系统，这该怎么管，可能就缺少点经验了。“互联网+”时代，会产生很多社会治理的新课题。
与网络约租车等服务一样，网络餐饮消费如何准入、如何监管，将成为今后很长一段时间里备受关注、也极具挑战的问题。对于这样的新业态，既要避免“一管就死”，管得太细太具体，扼杀了行业的活力；也要避免“一放就乱”，监管跟不上，让投机者得利、消费者受损。这确实考验着管理部门宏观的智慧、微观的耐心。
从监管层面讲，必须界定好外卖平台与接入餐饮商家之间的关系，规定好责、权、利的主体。平台负哪些责任、餐馆负哪些责任，出现什么样的问题应该由谁来管，“谁的娃娃谁抱走”。同时加大市场检查系统、市场评价系统的建设，线上线下一起建构起良性的市场秩序。酝酿许久、即将出台的网络食品经营监督管理办法，对网络平台的义务做了明确表述；部分省市也做了一些管理创新，包括实行平台向监管部门报送制度等等，都在尝试勾勒清楚这个责权利的框架。
对于各个网络订餐平台来说，也应该有更多自律意识。互联网经济竞争激烈、更新换代快，然而，“唯品质不破”。中国消费者必然会走过图快图便宜的阶段，进入“品质时代”。不管是坚守严格的审查底线，还是以即时视频监督等方式增加透明度，网络平台方显然有很多工作可以去做——眼里不能只是圈更大的地、做更大的份额。没有品质与口碑保障，丢失市场与份额是“分分钟”的事儿。
不管是网络订餐，还是其他基于网络的服务，对于阶段性发展之后暴露出来的问题，不应简单“唱衰”甚至“一刀切”地禁止，而应该视为改进与升级的契机。衣食住行无小事，这样的治理，表面看是管理互联网平台，但本质上是管理公众的生活，可以说是另一种“民生”。政府部门的监管模式，必须以改革之心、利民之志，努力实现创新升级。