Reported 27 capital cities food recall information transparency to zero | transparent | | food information _ news
Original title: 27 provincial capital city recall information transparency to zero
Xinhua Wan Jing
Implement a food recall is an effective measure for enhanced follow-up supervision of the production and processing. And food quality and safety market access system of food recall system interaction, interaction, for further strengthening food production supervision and dealing with food safety emergencies effectively plays a very important role.
March 15, Peking University public participation research and support center released of China food security regulatory transparency observation report (following referred to report) disclosure, in on national 27 a capital city food drug prison management sector of website, on food recalled information transparency of observation assessment displayed: 27 a capital city Council all for zero, that is, 27 a capital city of food drug regulatory sector no a disclosure local of food recalled situation.
All dynamic information disclosure fail
According to the report, Peking University Law School Assistant Dean Li Yuanyuan, head to introduce, the observed a total of 59, including the State food and drug administration, the country′s 31 provincial food and drug administration and 27 provincial capital city food and drug administration.
According to the findings of the report show that those involved in food safety alert, food recalls, food safety inspection, investigation and administrative punishment regulation illegal activity information, most notably consumer concerns, but also the most timely, efficient and dissemination to the public.
Peking University School of law is responsible for the publishing of the report post-doctoral, doctor of law, University of Oxford Chinese Peng told this reporter: "rumor to run faster than rumors, also most pressing for disclosure of such information. "However, China′s food and drug regulators in this area is" complete, while light "-the dynamics of food safety supervision information disclosure is the lowest score in the evaluation project" disaster zone. " Scoring of State food and Drug Administration 46.55%, provincial and municipal food and drug administration an average scoring rate of 38.45%.
Specifically, the provincial food and drug Bureau announced a food safety risk warnings with an average scoring rate is 49.35%; sampling information open the scoring rate is 76.13%; resolutely average scoring rate of food advertising information is 45.81%; administrative penalties information open the scoring rate was 55.91%. Capital city information on FDA′s transparency significantly lower: 34.44%, 24.44%, and 32.1%, respectively.
Lowest food recall information transparency
The dynamic information, information disclosure transparency minimum on food recalls. According to the report of the country′s 27 provincial capital city food and drug Department sites observed 27 provincial capital food recall information transparency in the Council′s assessment test scores all in Kaohsiung. 31 provincial food and drug administration only in Shanghai on January 4, 2015, Fu XI food limited recall information is disclosed, and wusu city announced on October 30, 2014, Yu bin, Goole town in Xinjiang Winery recall information, food recall information in provincial food and Drug Administration transparency score was only 0.48%.
About food recalls, new food safety law in force from October 1, 2015 63rd provides: "the State shall establish a system of food recall. Food producers found that the food does not meet the food safety standards or there is evidence that may be harmful to human health, should cease production immediately, recall of foods has been listed for sale, notify the relevant producers and consumers, and record the recall and notification situations. ”
Although it will recall information public obligations on food production who, but that does not mean that food and drug departments to disclose such information without a specification ... September 30, 2015, released by the food and Drug Administration on the implementation of food recall suggestions to management points out that: "(iii) unified release recall information. Provincial and municipal food and drug supervision Department is responsible for the administration of the food producers recall information published within the administrative area. Office, the Provincial Bureau to set up special columns on the website, issuing food recalls information, provincial and municipal food and drug supervision departments should urge the provincial and municipal food and drug supervision departments Web site carefully verified and grass-roots food and drug regulators to issue food recall information; provincial and municipal food and drug supervision departments website link a food recall information to uniform administration website. ”
Only Qinghai risk warning more than once a month
According to the new food safety law, the 22nd article, the analysis showed that food may have a higher degree of security risks, food and drug departments at and above the county level shall timely food safety alert.
But Peng Wijdenbosch told reporters, their observation team on October 1, 2014, from October 1, 2015 food safety alert issued by the statistics, found that the basic situation of food introduced three aspects, risks and how to avoid risks, the country office has released details, but slightly less overall release number, a total of 10 times, less than 1 time per month. Qinghai province food and Drug Administration published during the same period to the Convention on the prevention of nassidae food poisoning alert of the risk warnings on the bean food poisoning prevention 10 food safety alert information, such as average monthly food safety alert issued by more than 1, the observed object is the only full score.
Food recalled information public of specific requirements is provides in September 1, 2015 began entered into force of food recalled management approach 15th article: "food recalled announcement should including following content: (a) food producers of name, and residence, and statutory representative people, and specific head, and contact phone, and electronic mailbox,; (ii) food name, and trademark, and specifications, and production date, and batch,; (three) recalled reasons, and grade, and start date, and regional range; (four) Related food production process of return and compensation obligations of business operators and consumers. "
The report pointed out that our food recall information system is still at the initial stage, and on the information disclosure system of food recall will remain on paper only.
Responsible editor: Wang Hao
Article keywords: Food capital of transparency in information disclosure
I want feedback
Save a Web page
Legal network-legal journal
报告称27个省会城市食品召回信息透明度为零|食品|透明度|信息公开_新闻资讯
原标题：27个省会城市召回信息透明度为零
记者 万静
实施食品召回是加强生产加工后续监管的一种有效措施。食品召回制度与食品质量安全市场准入制度相互配合,共同作用,对于进一步强化食品生产监管,有效应对食品安全突发事件具有非常重要的作用。
3月15日,北京大学公众参与研究与支持中心发布的《中国食品安全监管透明度观察报告》(以下简称《报告》)披露,在对全国27个省会城市食品药监管理部门的网站,关于食品召回信息透明度的观测评估显示:27个省会市局全部为零,也就是说,27个省会城市的食品药品监管部门没有一家披露当地的食品召回情况。
动态监管信息披露全部不及格
据《报告》负责人、北京大学法学院院长助理李媛媛介绍,此次观察对象共59个,包括国家食品药品监督管理总局、全国31个省级食品药品监管局和27个省会城市食品药品监管局。
根据《报告》调查结果显示:那些涉及食品安全风险警示、食品召回、食品安全抽检、违法查处和行政处罚等监管活动一线的信息,最值得普通消费者关注,而且也最应该及时、高效地公开和传播。
负责此次《报告》发布的北京大学法学院博士后、牛津大学法学博士彭钅享向记者介绍:“所谓辟谣要比谣言跑得快,对于上述这些信息的披露也最紧迫。”然而,我国食药监管部门在这方面表现是“重完成时,轻进行时”——食品安全监管动态信息公开是整个测评项目中得分最低的“重灾区”。国家食药总局得分率为46.55%,省、市食药局平均得分率仅为38.45%。
具体而言,省级食药局公布食品安全风险警示信息平均得分率为49.35%；抽检信息公开得分率为76.13%；查处违法食品广告信息公开的平均得分率为45.81%；行政处罚信息公开得分率为55.91%。省会城市食药局在这些信息项上的透明度则显著更低:分别为34.44%、24.44%、21.48%和32.1%。
食品召回信息透明度最低
在各项动态监管信息中,关于食品召回的信息披露透明度最低。根据《报告》对全国27个省会城市食药监部门网站的观察发现,27个省会市局的食品召回信息透明度评估测评得分全部挂零。31个省级食药监局中也仅有上海在2015年1月4日,公开了福喜食品有限公司的召回信息,以及新疆于2014年10月30日公布乌苏市古尔图镇御宾酒厂的召回信息,省级食药监部门食品召回信息透明度得分率仅为0.48%。
关于食品召回,2015年10月1日起施行的新食品安全法第六十三条规定:“国家建立食品召回制度。食品生产者发现其生产的食品不符合食品安全标准或者有证据证明可能危害人体健康的,应当立即停止生产,召回已经上市销售的食品,通知相关生产经营者和消费者,并记录召回和通知情况。”
虽然该条文将召回信息公开的义务放在食品生产者身上,但这并不意味着食药监部门公开此类信息没有规范依据。2015年9月30日发布的《食品药品监管总局关于贯彻落实〈食品召回管理办法〉的实施意见》指出:“(三)统一发布召回信息。省市级食品药品监管部门负责管理本行政区域内食品生产经营者的召回信息发布。总局、省局要在网站上设置专门栏目,统一发布食品召回信息,省市级食品药品监管部门要督促省市级食品药品监管部门网站和基层食品药品监管部门认真核实需要发布的食品召回信息；省市级食品药品监管部门网站食品召回信息要统一链接到总局网站。”
仅青海每月风险警示超过一次
根据新食品安全法第二十二条规定,对经综合分析表明可能具有较高程度安全风险的食品,县级以上食药部门应当及时提出食品安全风险警示。
但是彭钅享向记者介绍,他们的观测团队通过对2014年10月1日至2015年10月1日之间发布的食品安全风险警示进行了统计,发现对于食品的基本情况介绍、风险情况、如何避免风险三方面内容,国家总局都有详细公布,但总体发布次数略少,共10次,每月不到1次。而青海省食品药品监督管理局在同一期间内发布了《关于预防织纹螺食物中毒的风险警示》《关于预防菜豆食物中毒的风险警示》等10次食品安全风险警示信息,平均每月发布的食品安全风险警示超过了1次,是此项上唯一满分的观察对象。
食品召回信息公开的具体要求则规定在2015年9月1日开始生效的《食品召回管理办法》第十五条:“食品召回公告应当包括下列内容:(一)食品生产者的名称、住所、法定代表人、具体负责人、联系电话、电子邮箱等；(二)食品名称、商标、规格、生产日期、批次等；(三)召回原因、等级、起止日期、区域范围；(四)相关食品生产经营者的义务和消费者退货及赔偿的流程”。
《报告》为此指出,我国的食品召回信息制度还处在初始阶段,而关于食品召回的信息披露制度也仅仅停留在纸面。
责任编辑：王浩成
文章关键词： 食品 透明度 信息公开 省会
我要反馈
保存网页
法制网-法制日报