Save the next generation! United Kingdom formally announced that it would introduce a "fat tax"-a fat tax, United Kingdom-IT information
CCTV News:
United Kingdom is one of the Western countries with the highest sugar intake. United Kingdom cancer research, according to a report released earlier this year, if current growth trends, by 2035, the United Kingdom nearly three-fourths per cent of adults are overweight or obese.
--In order to "save the next generation", United Kingdom began to impose a "fat tax".
In order to get people to lose weight, we have taxes on sugary drinks!
Although dubbed a "fat tax", but small series found that the tax directly to the obesity is not money, but rather aimed at the production of sugar-sweetened beverages business.
United Kingdom Chancellor of the Exchequer Osborne 16th says:
Excessive consumption of sugary beverages can cause certain diseases, the Government cannot sit idly by. In order to "save the next generation", United Kingdom will begin to produce the sugary drink tax.
In order to allow manufacturers sufficient time to adjust product formulations, United Kingdom is planned for April 2018 the introduction of this new tax.
Osborne predicted that levy the first year, the United Kingdom Government will reap US $ 736 million in taxes, or about $ 4.76 billion yuan, the more tax revenue will be used to support school sport.
English: what? Sugars we consume a lot?
United Kingdom is one of the Western countries with the highest sugar intake, but most people did not know how much sugar they consume. Many parents did not know their children ate milk shakes are how high in sugar, many students do not know the sugar content of the juice is not low.
Under the United Kingdom Department of health statistics, a 5-year old United Kingdom children′s average annual intake of sugar total weight with his weight. Children with poor economic conditions, more intake of sugar.
United Kingdom Association of soft drinks: the Pan we don′t want back
United Kingdom Association of soft drinks raise an objection. In their view, United Kingdom since 2012 in sugar and sugary drinks has fallen by 13.6%, and the British from the intake of sugar content continues to grow elsewhere.
United Kingdom Association of soft drinks jiawen·patingdun says:
Such punitive measures for consumers to buy only a certain category of goods, but they eat the cake, cookie intake of sugars and calories are also on the rise, this is very unfair.
Health experts also said Britons overall calories and sugar content in diet is relatively high, so only to tax sugary drinks that a policy to combat obesity problem is unlikely to be effective.
Read-write fat tax consumption tax
Fat tax, also known as fat tax, Europe has, for those special tax levied on the foods can lead to obesity. In 2006, the World Health Organization has recommended the introduction of similar taxes.
Why a "fat tax" is not a tax on certain people, but taxes on specific goods?
Impose a "fat tax", but around the fat people, because if we tax fat people directly, will face a dilemma of neither efficiency nor fairness.
Directly to fat tax would require screening for all, identify the taxpayer, the tax registration and collection on a regular basis, but also have to check tax evasion. In that case, taxing high cost.
And, you keep those genes just says "fat" people, you think?
In accordance with the understanding of small series, "fat tax" is somewhat similar to China′s consumption tax was levied against certain. Both ad valorem levy, also from the collection.
Denmark was among the first to use trans-fat foods special taxing countries, Denmark also tax on carbonated drinks alone, and candy has imposed a supertax of 90 years. In addition, Germany, and Hungary, and Finland and other countries also have similar taxes.
But the "fat tax" effect seems to be a fashion :
On October 1, 2011, Denmark began to tax the products are rich in saturated fats, including ice cream, butter, whole milk, pizza, French fries, etc. Ice cream, chocolate, sweets and soda taxes as high as 25%, butter, oil, milk, pizza and meat, the tax rate per kilogram of saturated fat 16 Denmark Krone (about RMB 18.33). Rose 14% butter price immediately.
The taxes aimed at reducing people′s fat intake, and was quickly named a "fat tax". However, the survey found that a "fat tax" the first year of implementation, Denmark people for the purchase of 200 million kroner more obesity food money, but did not change their spending habits. Are flocking to high-fat and high-calorie foods has not changed, but more choose cheaper, perhaps less healthy products.
Finally, consumer prices due to fat tax increase, operating costs increased and unemployment risks, and Denmark who travel to other countries to go shopping, Denmark Department of taxation decided that, from 2013 to repeal the tax, and to cancel the plan of the proposed tax on chocolate.
Food business operators believe that a "fat tax" will make tax within the scope of goods and higher prices, affecting sales and taxes increased operation difficulties.
Also, introduce a fat tax on consumer behavior changes little, if food producers change their recipes to reduce food fat and calorie content, might be able to get better results.
Lower sugar demand led companies to set food recipe
As said earlier, of a person′s daily intake of sugar there are a lot of ways, in addition to sugary drinks, cakes, biscuits and other foods. Then, only a tax on sugary drinks is somewhat unfair.
To reduce sugar intake, basic ideas should be from the angle of supply and demand. In plain English, this is "reducing the sugar in the food, beverage," and "reduced consumer demand for sugar".
In fact, this is also the trend. According to a Xinhua report in September last year, a report by the China quality Association of tea beverage consumer satisfaction survey:
Consumer demand for normal sugary tea beverages continues to drop demand for sugar-free and low sugar tea drinks and more vigorous and conspicuous.
Contact now available online again: don′t burn "A4 paper waist" and "Mermaid line", "vest line", etc, as well as friends of common hazards of the sugary drinks, against excessive intake of sugar and other popular science article, and you can feel, pursuit of fitness, healthy eating man has now more and more.
Small series of brief shows that in recent years, many beverage companies are also to adjust the formula accordingly, the introduction of sugar and sugar-free products:
As early as in 1995, the company launched the "low calorie" diet Coke. In early 2008, Coca Cola in Shanghai launched a new diet soda beverage "zero" (ZERO).
In 2013, the Coca Cola Company also announced increases of diet drinks promotions, and is not intended for children under 12 years old marketing.
The summer of 2009, master introduced sugar-free green tea, Tieguanyin tea low sugar.
In January, renowned live Lactobacilli Milky beverage maker Yakult company (Yakult) that introduced new products in the market on the Chinese mainland--Yakult in sugar, sugar 70%, about 40% calories.
In March, the Wei Chuan (Wei Chuan Foods Corporation) has announced that its activity officially upgraded low-sugar version of active lactic acid bacteria beverage by lactic acid bacteria, the "sugar-light".
Finally, it also wanted to share with you, keep a healthy figure 12-Word mantra:
Pipe mouth, move its leg, drink, wash sleep.
拯救下一代！英国正式宣布将开征“肥胖税” - 肥胖税,英国 - IT资讯
据央视新闻报道：
英国是糖分摄入量最高的西方国家之一。英国癌症研究会今年年初发布的一份报告指出，如果按目前的趋势增长，到2035年，英国将近四分之三的成年人都会存在超重或肥胖问题。
——为了“拯救下一代”，英国要开始征收“肥胖税”。
为了让人们减肥，我们对含糖饮料征税吧！
虽然被戏称为“肥胖税”，但小编发现，这个税种并非直接向肥胖人群收钱，而是瞄准了生产糖饮料的企业。
英国财政大臣奥斯本16日表示：
过度饮用含糖饮料会引发某些疾病，政府不能坐视不管。为了“拯救下一代”，英国要开始对生产含糖饮料的企业征税。
为了让生产商有足够时间调整产品配方，英国计划在2018年4月开征这个新税种。
奥斯本预计，开征第一年，英国政府将收获7.36亿美元的税款，约合人民币47.6亿，这一税收将用于支持学校开展更多的体育运动。
英国人：什么？我们摄入的糖分很多吗？
英国是糖分摄入量最高的西方国家之一，但大多数英国人并不知道他们摄入了多少糖分。许多父母并不知道给孩子吃的奶昔含糖量有多高，许多学生也不清楚果汁的食糖量并不低。
根据英国卫生部门的统计，一名5岁英国孩子的年平均摄入糖总重量与他的体重相当。经济条件较差的孩子，摄入的糖更多。
英国软饮料协会：这个锅我们不想背
英国软饮料协会对此提出了异议。他们认为，英国含糖饮料的含糖量自2012年以来已经下降了13.6%，而英国人从其他地方摄入的糖含量却在不断增长。
英国软饮料协会的加文·帕廷顿表示：
这样的惩罚措施只针对消费者购买某一类别的商品进行，但是他们吃蛋糕、饼干中摄入的糖和热量也在增多，这非常不公平。
有健康专家也表示，英国人整体饮食结构的热量和含糖量都比较高，因此仅仅靠向含糖饮料征税这一项政策来对抗肥胖问题恐怕难以奏效。
写成肥胖税读作消费税
肥胖税亦称脂肪税，欧洲早已有之，是针对那些能够导致肥胖的食品所征收的特别税种。2006年，世界卫生组织曾建议开征类似税种。
为什么“肥胖税”不是对特定人群征税，而是对特定商品征税呢？
征收“肥胖税”，却绕开胖人，是因为如果直接向胖人征税，将会面临既无效率也无公平的双重困境。
如果直接向发胖者征税，就需要对所有人进行筛查，确定纳税义务人，进行纳税登记，并且定期征收，还得稽查是否有逃税行为。这种情况下，征税成本过高。
而且，你让那些遗传基因里就写着“胖”的人，作何感想？
按照小编的理解，“肥胖税”有点类似于中国的消费税，是针对某些特定的商品征收的。既有从价征收，也有从量征收。
丹麦是最早对于使用反式脂肪的食品特别征税的国家，丹麦还对碳酸饮料单独征税，而对糖果已经征收了90年的特别附加税。此外，德国、匈牙利、芬兰等国也有类似的税种。
但这个“肥胖税”的效果，似乎有些差强人意：
2011年10月1日，丹麦开始向富含饱和脂肪的产品征税，包括冰淇淋、黄油、全脂牛奶、比萨、薯条等等。针对冰激凌、巧克力、甜食以及汽水的税率高达25%，黄油、牛奶、比萨饼、油类和肉类，税率为每千克饱和脂肪16丹麦克朗（约合人民币18.33元）。黄油的价格立马上涨了14%。
这个旨在减少国民脂肪摄入量的税种，迅速被命名为“肥胖税”。然而，调查发现，在“肥胖税”实施的第一年，丹麦人为购买肥胖食品多掏了2亿克朗的钱，却并没有改变自己的消费习惯。购买高脂肪高热量食品的数量都没有发生变化，只是更多选择了更加便宜、也许也是更不健康的产品。
最终，由于肥胖税导致消费品价格上升、公司运营成本增加、工人失业风险加大，还导致丹麦人前往其他国家去购物，丹麦税务部决定从2013年起废除这一税种，并且取消拟议中征收巧克力税的计划。
有食品企业经营者认为，“肥胖税”将使征税范围内的商品的价格提高，影响销量，而税负的增加将使企业运营面临困难。
同时，征肥胖税对消费者消费行为的改变收效甚微，如果食品生产者主动改变配方降低食品中的脂肪及热量的含量，也许能起到更好的效果。
降低食品糖分需求带动企业调整配方
如前文所说，一个人每天摄入糖分的途径有很多，除了含糖饮料，还有蛋糕、饼干等各种食品。那么，只对含糖饮料征税是有些不太公平。
要想减少糖分摄入，基本的思路应当是从供给和需求两个角度入手。用大白话说，就是“让食品、饮品中的糖分减少”和“让消费者对糖分的需求减少”。
事实上也有这样的趋势。据新华网报道，去年9月，一份由中国质量协会发布的茶饮料消费者满意度调查显示：
消费者对于普通含糖类茶饮料的需求持续降低，而对无糖及低糖茶饮品需求越发旺盛和明显。
再联系如今网上热炒“A4纸腰”、“人鱼线”、“马甲线”等概念，以及朋友圈常见的《含糖饮料的危害》、《过多摄入糖分的危害》等科普文，你也能感受到，如今追求健美身材、健康饮食的人已越来越多。
小编简单梳理发现，近年来，许多饮料企业也在相应地调整配方，推出低糖、无糖产品：
早在1995年，可口可乐公司就推出了“低卡路里”的健怡可口可乐。2008年初，可口可乐又在上海新推出一款无糖汽水饮料“零度”（ZERO）。
2013年，可口可乐公司还宣布加大对减肥饮料的促销，并承诺不面向12岁以下儿童展开营销。
2009年夏天，康师傅推出了无糖绿茶、低糖铁观音茶。
今年1月，全球知名的活菌型乳酸菌乳饮品制造商养乐多公司(Yakult)宣布，在中国大陆市场推出新品——养乐多低糖，含糖量减少70%，热量降低约40%。
就在3月，味全（味全食品工业股份有限公司）也宣布，其活性乳酸菌正式升级低糖版活性乳酸菌饮品，奉行“轻糖主义”。
最后，小编还是想和大家分享，保持健康身材的十二字真言：
管住嘴、迈开腿、多喝水、勤洗睡。