Hourly network red, line teachers should pipe? -Reticulocyte, teachers, online education-IT information

Recently, 2,617 students buying online tutor physics online live lesson Jimmy Wang Yu, after deducting the 20% online platform is divided into, Jimmy Wang Yu teachers up to one hour of actual income 18842, pay even greater than the current hottest network anchorwoman. Statistics show that teacher Jimmy Wang Yu′s 7 lesson, total number of lectures to 9479, courses amounted to about 84,000 yuan if calculated by deduction 20% into online education platform, the teacher for 7 hours of actual revenue more than 67,000 yuan, almost an ordinary school teacher one year′s income. Online tutor of Nanjing, told reporters: "people do a lot of the science teacher. ”

In favour of

Not be prohibited should be encouraged

Teachers is the key of education imbalance. Encourage excellent teachers with online lectures to encourage excellent teachers scarce resources spread through Internet platforms and allow more students to share high quality teaching resources, to meet the demands of the students and their parents, also in line with the direction of modern education. From this perspective, the development of distance education to encourage outstanding teachers lecturing on the line, has just started teaching online tutoring needs should not be banned should be effective stimulus and encouragement.

Online counselling for teachers, public attention should not be focused on profitability, but should pay attention to its function and effect. Profit to teacher online tutoring is the stimulus, but there are two problems not to be ignored but should be clarified: is online tutor cannot benefit must frustrate teacher online tutoring initiative, which is detrimental to a balanced education resources. Excellent teacher given online money to encourage outstanding teachers online classes, good; the second is the online class, there is no normative background, educational authorities should be concerned, it is necessary to set policy for online, but also give the online rules.

Accelerating the pace of online class teacher, should not only teachers in the effort. For excellent teachers, schools, networking platforms, educational management departments should join forces as soon as possible the famous teacher, excellent teacher indoor teaching into online education resources; on a number of online tutors should contact teaching practice of online teaching and usually be necessary norms.

Teacher than reticulocyte in the news, is wonderful. Seen from the profession and dissemination of content, network red by an event or behavior "hit", which some people are eating face, ugly, there is one caters to Internet users entertainment, stimulation, peep, fantasy and spectators and other psychological, communication tends to be casual, entertainment content. Teacher online tutoring, and using his years of teaching, in new ways and means of dissemination of scientific and cultural knowledge to students, give a man a "fishing".

Teacher and the reticulocyte and not necessarily a cultural level, on the formation of social action and influence are essentially different. Network anchorwoman in the entertainment industry, with Jimmy Wang Yu with face to get teachers the same income, although not illegal, but should not be encouraged. Teacher online tutoring results, is to let the students do not lose on the starting line, this ", and it takes but" investments, aimed in the long term, work in generations. If network anchorwoman, reticulocyte higher revenue than the teacher, it is worse in the education environment, educational concept of shame.

Bian Guangchun

Income net red what is

"Online teachers" is a "professional" presence, filling the social demand for high quality teachers ′ resources. Only 1 block, 5 to 9 per cent of the price, you can hear a lively and interesting, and can make their own benefit lesson, can be almost one to one counselling service, for most people, the cost of this nature are nothing, compared to the more expensive remedial classes, but also have a price advantage.

Not only that, demand according to the instructor lecture and service levels to choose, freedom of choice is that classes cannot be compared. It can be said that "online teachers" model is "the Internet +" product highlights the principle of fairness, everywhere around the survival of the fittest rules of market competition, it is necessary to spare teachers provide income-generating opportunities and platforms also needed extra lessons and learning, students who need high quality resources to provide a good service.

Of course, we must also acknowledge that paid class of teachers engage in outside practice indeed debatable, some teachers are worried whether it will affect the normal teaching some, worried about teaching order whether this will affect can be forgiven. But in the face of "Internet +" thing, we can′t simply say "no", one size fits all its great killing.

As a whole, "online teachers" of this new thing is a positive effect. First, again activate has existing teachers power, in years education resources distribution imbalance of reality context Xia, through Internet of way for resources again distribution provides has new of may, at least, most parents is support of; second, modern economic social, "online teachers" contribution of is himself of wisdom, paid who and "online teachers" you love I may, nothing worth criticism of.

Despite concerns, such as affecting the normal order of teaching, teaching, in fact, rather than thinking about how to "online teachers" run better, how to make teacher in normal and "online teachers" balance the two roles. From the perspective of promoting education fairness, instead of such a society should be encouraged to explore the education sector, continues to explore a new pattern in the specification, to achieve education fairness with ease. Yu Haijun

Oppose

Paid tutor new varieties

"Online teachers" in the "online" make an hour million people aren′t jealous envy, but this "online" is a paid tutor from the underground into the line on the new trends, is worthy of note. Paid tutor is banned, last year the Ministry of education introduced the non-primary and secondary schools and in-service teachers paid to dot regulations, draw 6 "red lines": non-school organizations, require students to take paid lessons; non-primary and secondary schools and training institutions combined paid extra lessons outside school. Relevant departments explained: "online counselling" is the new thing not being included, but should belong to the "part-time outside of social power running school institutions subject teaching, tutoring and get reward" category, it is prohibited.

"Online teachers" online "online" in paid tutoring, which is eating a bowl of pot, make money "got no trouble" is in both camps, "Eastern Western." Xinwueryong, will form a "magnet effect" allows teachers to focus on "online" on the platform, then the teacher or do you have a mind to studying business, serious teaching book finishing good man? They just make the routine school instruction for completing a task, teaching will be affected, say a person′s energy is limited, "online teachers" online "online" money must be shortage of others their own.

"Online teachers" is another "official business sea" drilling loophole. Also in a proper way to make money through "online" get paid tutor, is permitted, if that "online teachers" "big money", then he should resign, which specializes in "online teachers", rather than in the one foot in the system, one foot in the system, the "two grasp". Relevant provisions of the education sector should be introduced, banning, and to strengthen management and supervision of teachers "online" get paid tutor, must be severely punished, paid tutor must not turn from the underground line, harm the cause of education.

Ms Wu Ling

Wary of another grey area

In a surprise, online tutoring and we should "nets red" comparable to high paying jobs happy, after all, they are using modern Internet technology services for education, knowledge in the Internet age there is no distance, their presence is worth more than network anchorwoman I′m afraid, while we also provide online tutoring in this industry of sprawl, lack of regulatory nieyibahan.

It is undeniable that online more and more primary and middle school students and parents in hot pursuit. Today, the traditional shortcomings of online training and coaching to become clear: rent, space, number, class fee had to expensive, students ′ learning time is not free, the high cost of travelling time and can′t solve doubts. Online counseling and low cost, at home, in the Office could be carried out, as long as the Internet, thanks to the accumulating effects of the Internet, may have set the price is very cheap, students do not know about or can play back at any time, low cost, high efficiency, flexible and cheap.

When online tutoring by the sought after when, when not many students can pay on line into the huge income online tutor, I believe that this "cake" will be bigger and bigger, more and more teachers will be this "cake" temptations, their energy and effort to be clearly tilted to the side, hard to say. In recent years, many State-run teacher conducting courses, lessons, in order to attract students to take classes, "Ian", under the class "all-rounder" of bad practices. See online income is so high, I am afraid that more teachers will sit. Not all educators are people with feelings. Online tutoring this new thing, related departments should also timely specification.

Must be aware of, the Department of education introduced in recent years of primary and middle school teachers engage in paid remedial provisions basically involves only the line, did not address line, because when there are no online tutoring. Now, the relevant provisions can be considered to be amended to keep pace with. In recent years, under the road ban and paid everything why the phenomenon in many places still exist? Because paid lessons has formed a whole chain of interests, be reversed. Specification for online tutoring as early as possible, so as to avoid forming another "grey area".

He Yonghai

In a few words

This one is good, belonging to the small profits but quick turnover.

--Hu Yawei

Red Star net income, you are not banned, teachers income you keep? Reticulocyte live the boring stuff, can earn money, teachers or learning.

--GAO yan

Teachers share best teaching for students in need, what′s wrong? Not only Yes, States should also make an effort to network education, via the Internet, remote and backward village school can also has the city′s best school teachers, teachers can increase revenue, students can get a good education, why ban?

--Wu Duosi

On is when I learn IELTS online courses, teachers are hard to teach, but cheaper and saves money. Has this pattern of demand.

--Sun breaks

Now the doctors zuozhen pilot point, must let the teacher in school lessons?

--Sand

Not be prohibited should be standard. One is to standardize online education management. The other is to use the personal income tax code adjustment income. Finally, should not fear the teachers ′ income is high, but should reflect the existing shortcomings in wages.

--Dong Zheng

时薪过万超网红，线上教师该不该管？ - 网红,教师,线上教育 - IT资讯

最近，2617名学生购买了在线辅导老师王羽的高中物理在线直播课，扣除20%的在线平台分成后，王羽老师一小时的实际收入高达18842元，这个薪资甚至超过当下火热的网络女主播。资料显示，王羽老师开设的7节课，听课总人数达到9479人，课程总收入约8.4万元，如果按在线教育平台扣除20%分成计算，该老师7个小时的实际总收入超过了6.7万元，几乎是一个普通学校教师一年的收入。南京一在线辅导老师告诉记者：“理科老师课团的人确实很多。”

●赞成

不应禁止而应鼓励

教育不均衡问题的关键在于师资。鼓励优秀老师线上讲课，让优秀老师稀缺资源通过互联网平台传播，让更多学生分享到优质教学资源，能满足学生和家长的诉求，也符合现代教育的方向。从这个层面看，发展远程教育，鼓励优秀老师线上讲课，对刚刚起步的教师在线辅导，需要的不应该是禁止而应该是有效的刺激与鼓励。

对教师在线辅导，公众不应将目光集中在盈利性上，而应关注其功能和效果。盈利对教师在线辅导固然有着相应的刺激作用，但有两个问题不可忽视而应厘清：一是在线辅导教师不能获益，必然挫伤老师在线辅导的积极性，这对均衡教育资源是不利的。让优秀老师在线授课有钱赚，鼓励优秀老师在线上课，有益无害；二是对在线上课尚无规范的背景下，教育主管部门应予关注，既要对在线上课定政策，也要给在线上课定规矩。

加快老师在线上课步伐，不应该只是老师在努力。对于优秀老师，学校、网络平台、教育管理部门等应齐心合力，尽快落实著名老师、优秀老师将室内教学转化为在线教育资源；对一些在线辅导教师，应联系线上教学与平时教学实际，予以必要规范。

新闻中拿老师跟网红比，可谓奇葩。从职业和传播内容上看，网红靠某个事件或行为“一炮打响”，其中有一部分人是靠脸蛋吃饭，有一部分人是迎合网民审丑、娱乐、刺激、偷窥、臆想以及看客等心理，传播的往往是休闲、娱乐性内容。老师在线辅导，是用自己多年积累的教学才能，以新型方式与途径向学生传播科学文化知识，授人以“渔”。

老师与网红未必是一个文化层次，对社会形成的作用与影响也有本质上的不同。网络女主播从事的是娱乐产业，凭脸蛋能够得到与王羽老师相同的收入，虽说并不违法，却不值得鼓励。教师在线辅导的结果，是让学生不输在起跑线上，这种“十年树木、百年树人”的投资，志在长远，功在千秋万代。如果网络女主播等网红的收入一定比老师高，则是教育环境之劣，教育观念之耻。

卞广春

收入超网红有何不可

“在线教师”这个“职业”的存在，填补了社会对优质师资资源的需求。人们只需花1块、5块到9块不等的价格，就能听到一堂生动有趣且能让自己受益匪浅的课，还能受到几乎一对一辅导的服务，对大多数人来说，这样的花费自然算不得什么，而对比那些收费高昂的辅导班来说，更是占有价格优势。

不仅如此，需求者可根据授课者讲课和服务水平来选择，选择的自由度也是那些辅导班不可比拟的。可以说，“在线教师”的模式是“互联网+”的产物，充分凸显了公平公正的原则，处处彰显着优胜劣汰的市场竞争规则，既给闲暇的教师提供了创造收入的机会和平台，也给需要补课和学习、需要优质资源的学生提供了很好的服务。

当然，我们也必须承认，教师从事校外有偿上课的确值得商榷，一些人对教师是否会影响正常教学感到担忧也不无道理，对教学秩序是否会受影响感到担心也情有可原。可是，面对“互联网+”的新生事物，我们不能简单粗暴地说“不”，一刀切将其棒杀。

整体而言，“在线教师”这一新鲜事物带来的是正面效应。首先，重新盘活了现有师资力量，在多年来教育资源分配失衡的现实语境下，通过互联网的方式为资源重新分配提供了新的可能，至少，大多数家长是支持的；其次，现代经济社会，“在线教师”贡献的是自己的智慧，付费者与“在线教师”你情我愿，没什么值得非议的。

尽管诸如影响正常教学、教学秩序等担忧，其实倒不如考虑如何让“在线教师”更好地规范运行，如何让教师在正常教学工作与“在线教师”两种角色中实现平衡。从推动教育教学公平公正的角度来说，教育部门反倒更应该鼓励这样一种社会探索，在不断规范中探索这样一种全新模式，为实现教育公平公正提供方便。禹海君

●反对

有偿家教新变种

对于“在线教师”网上的“在线辅导”一小时挣万元，人们并不是眼红嫉妒，而是这种“在线辅导”，是有偿家教从地下转入线上的新动向，值得人们注意。有偿家教是明令禁止的，去年教育部出台《严禁中小学校和在职中小学教师有偿补课的规定》，划出6条“红线”：严禁中小学校组织、要求学生参加有偿补课；严禁中小学校与校外培训机构联合进行有偿补课等。有关部门解释：虽然“线上辅导”是新生事物没被列入其中，但应该属于“在校外社会力量办学机构兼职从事学科类教学、文化补习并从中获取报酬”一类，所以是被禁止的。

“在线教师”网上“在线辅导”从事有偿家教，这是吃着碗里想着锅里，赚钱“得来全不费工夫”，是脚踏两只船，“东宿西餐”。心无二用，势必形成“磁铁效应”，让老师们把主要精力都用在“在线辅导”平台上，那么老师还有心思去钻研业务吗，认真教好书育好人吗？他们只是把学校的正常教学当成完成任务的例行公事，教学会受到影响，再说人的精力是有限的，“在线教师”网上“在线辅导”赚钱，必然会种了别人田荒了自己地。

“在线教师”，是另一种“官员经商下海”，钻了空子。赚钱也要取之有道，通过“在线辅导”搞有偿家教，是绝对不能允许的，如果认为“在线教师”“大有钱图”，那么应该辞职，专门从事“在线教师”工作，而不是一只脚在体制内，一只脚在体制外，“两手抓”。教育部门应该出台有关规定，进行禁止，并加强管理监督，对教师搞“在线辅导”搞有偿家教，必须严惩，决不能让有偿家教从地下转入线上，危害教育事业。

吴玲

警惕又一灰色地带

在惊讶之余，我们应该为在线辅导成了能与“网红”媲美的高薪饭碗高兴，毕竟他们是用现代互联网技术服务于教育，让知识在网络时代没有距离，他们的存在比网络女主播恐怕更有价值；同时，我们也要为在线辅导这个行业的无序发展、监管缺失捏一把汗。

不可否认，在线辅导越来越受中小学生及家长追捧。如今，传统的线下培训与辅导的弊端逐渐显现：受房租、场地、人数限制，课时费不得不昂贵，学生学习时间不自由、交通时间成本较高，且不能随时解决学习疑惑。而在线辅导成本低，在家里、办公室等都可进行，只要能上网，得益于互联网的聚沙成塔效应，更可将单价定得很便宜，学生不懂之处还可随时回放，可谓成本低、效率高、灵活便宜。

当在线辅导深受追捧之时，当线上学生不多的付出能汇聚成在线辅导老师的巨额收入时，我相信这个“蛋糕”会越做越大，会有越来越多的在职教师被这块“蛋糕”诱惑，他们的精力和心思会不会明显倾向于这一边，不好说。近年来不少公办教师乱办班、乱补课，为吸引生源采取课上“留一手”、课下“多面手”的恶劣做法。看到在线辅导收入那么高，恐怕会有更多老师坐不住了。不是所有教育工作者都是有情怀的人。在线辅导这个新事物，也应该受到相关部门的及时规范。

必须意识到，教育部门近年出台的禁止中小学在职教师从事有偿补课的规定，基本上只涉及线下，没有涉及线上，因为彼时还没有出现在线辅导。现在，相关规定可考虑予以修订，以做到与时俱进。近年来，道道禁令之下，有偿补课的现象在不少地方为何依然普遍存在？就是因为有偿补课已形成一整条利益链，积重难返。在线辅导也要尽早规范，以免形成又一个“灰色地带”。

何勇海

●三言两语

这个不错，属于薄利多销型。

——胡亚伟

明星网红收入高，你不禁止，老师收入高你就要禁止？网红直播那么无聊的东西，都能挣钱，老师还是真才实学呢。

——高燕

老师分享优秀的教学给予需要的学生，有什么错？不但没错，国家还应该要大力推行网络教育，通过互联网，让偏远落后的山村学校也能拥有像城里一样的优秀学校师资力量，老师可以提高收入，学生又能得到好的教育，为什么要禁止？

——伍多斯

我学雅思的时候都是上的网上课程，老师也很用心教，而且便宜又节省了路费。有需求就有这种模式啊。

——孙破

现在医生都试行多点坐诊了，就必须让老师在校内上课吗？

——沙其

不应禁止，应该规范。一方面是要规范这种在线教育管理。另一方面是要用个人收入的所得税规范调整收入。最后，不应惧怕教师收入高，而是应该反思现行工资中的不足。

——董政