Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)
published in(发表于) 2016/4/5 7:00:38
Shijiazhuang Sphinx cottage was demolished

English

中文

Shijiazhuang Sphinx cottage was demolished (photo) | | Fortress architecture of the Sphinx _ news

Above: workers dismantling the "Sphinx" (on April 5); bottom: tourists visit "the Sphinx" (on May 16, 2014).


[Shijiazhuang "Sphinx" was removed] above: workers dismantling the "Sphinx" (on April 5); bottom: tourists visit "the Sphinx" (on May 16, 2014). A few days ago, is located in the western suburbs of Shijiazhuang city, Hebei province, one of the "Sphinx" was removed. It is understood that the building is a cultural Business Park built for the film and now the play has been filmed, and then dismantling it. Wang Xiao Xinhua photo


According to the Beijing news report:


Shijiazhuang village Sphinx was taken to suspects being Egypt again complaints


The Beijing News (Xinhua Yuanyuan Cheng) yesterday, Shijiazhuang city, Hebei province, copies of "Sphinx" building was split apart. The building was controversial, and was Egypt Antiquities Department. Demolition cause, Park no response.


  Suspected by Egypt Antiquities Department complaint again


Yesterday, the Shijiazhuang great wall film animation creative tourism Park, workers are removing fake "Sphinx", whose head and body have been separated, bezel with blue and black gauze walls, respectively.


Local villagers said that the Sphinx was split before the Spring Festival this year, suspected by Egypt to the UNESCO cultural heritage sector complaints again. This building belongs to parks and construction has not yet been responded.


It is understood that the "Sphinx" was to begin construction in 2014, about 20 meters high, about 60 meters in length. Park official says the building belongs, are built for TV/film shooting, not tourist attractions.


In May of that year, Egypt Antiquities Department had complained to UNESCO. Egypt Antiquities Department Chairman Ali said, if construction of the "Sphinx" is intended to make a movie entertainment, in accordance with international conventions, contractors must notify Egypt.


Ali believes that a knockoff "Sphinx" details the original gap will affect visitors to Egypt Antiquities original understanding, will also directly affect Egypt tourism and on the joint income of the film and television industry.


Media reported, citing more than Egypt Antiquities Department official as saying that Egypt had to coordinate with the Chinese side in the hope that they make removal of compensation, or.


  Building interior luxury Palace


Build a staff member has said in media interviews, construction of the statue was not malicious fake Egypt cultural heritage, film and television drama.


"It's only scene in the film, not for any other purpose, and have never received a penny." Shijiazhuang great wall film animation creative tourism Park officials have responded by saying that filming this is temporary, one-time use, after the demolition.


Media Interior pictures of buildings, interior luxury Palace.


"In the past, you can go in and visit, not money, was later on and off your money, was shut after the controversial". According to local villagers, and now can only see part of the head.


Yesterday, Park officials say, and all building are used in films and TV series shot in the studios, has been controversial since the construction of the Sphinx, and the complaint, upon completion, is rarely used for filming, their internal structure is not clear. In addition, it completed, it attracts a lot of tourists, and it is understood, villagers have charged.


  Experts say


  Such copycat behavior difficult from legal aspects to solve


Vice President of the Chinese society for future studies of tourism branch introduced Dr Liu Simin, International Convention for the protection of cultural heritage has two main: the 1972 UNESCO Convention on the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage and the 2003 Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. In 1972 of the Convention focuses on the materiality of "cultural heritage" to protect, focus is on the protection of heritage, so that it is not damaged, but no provisions related to intellectual property rights. According to current international law and international practice, Egypt "Sphinx" hardly protected by intellectual property laws, copyright also exceed the 50-year period. Copying, copying contemporary construction of intellectual property protection to avoid legal sanctions.


"Like the Beijing World Park with lots of micro-architecture, which is not related. "Said Liu Simin, built according to the original replica of the original building where the countries affected to a certain degree, do not respect each other's culture. Liu Simin pointed out that generic places of interest in China and there are many countries, Orlando Walt Disney World Park copied many famous buildings around the world, including China, the Temple of heaven. Parthenon in Greece's capital Athens, temple roof is collapsing, but United States Tennessee Nashville wholesale copying of the Parthenon, building specifications are same as the history of the Parthenon.


Liu Simin considered cribbing frequent, closely related to world heritage protection of intellectual property rights or existing legal gaps, because it is difficult to determine the places of intellectual property rights, including the World Heritage property and its owner, in the foreseeable future, difficult from legal aspects to solve the plagiarism and copycat behavior.


Liu Simin said that tourism industry now frequently copied, imitated, and has some fresh, eye-catching. Although this lack of creative plagiarism is not to be encouraged, but that does not mean they are not accepted by the market. The other hand, the Act of plagiarism, copying, places of interest or world heritage legal costs low.


Liu Simin said the cottage "Sphinx", while Egypt is difficult to legally charged and prosecuted, but as a symbol, led to discussion of the UNESCO Convention on the protection of World Heritage property and modify specific world heritage properties and rights holders of intellectual property rights, to legal norm acts of imitation, copy.



Responsible editor: Sun Ailin SN146





Article keywords:
Sphinx cottage building

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Xinhua News Agency
石家庄山寨狮身人面像被拆除(图)|狮身人面像|山寨建筑_新闻资讯

  上图:工人在拆除“狮身人面像”(4月5日摄);下图:游客在参观“狮身人面像”(2014年5月16日摄)。


  [石家庄“狮身人面像”被拆除]上图:工人在拆除“狮身人面像”(4月5日摄);下图:游客在参观“狮身人面像”(2014年5月16日摄)。日前,位于 河北省石家庄市西郊的一座“狮身人面像”被拆除。据了解,这一建筑是一家文化创业园区为影视拍摄而建,现在戏已拍摄完毕,于是将它拆解。新华社记者 王晓 摄


  另据新京报报道:


  石家庄山寨狮身人面像被拆 疑遭埃及再次投诉


  新京报讯 (记者程媛媛)昨日,河北省石家庄复制版“狮身人面像”建筑被拆分,身首分离。该建筑曾备受争议,并遭到埃及文物部门投诉。对于拆除原因,园区方面暂未回应。


  疑似遭埃及文物部门再次投诉


  昨日,石家庄长城影视动漫旅游创意园,多名工人正在拆除山寨“狮身人面像”,其头部与躯体已经分离,分别用蓝色挡板和黑色纱布围挡。


  当地村民说,该狮身人面像于今年春节前被拆分,疑似遭埃及文物部门向联合国教科文组织再次投诉。对此,建筑所属园区和施工方暂未回应。


  据了解,该“狮身人面像”于2014年开始建造,高约20米,身长约60米。该建筑所属园区负责人称,建造用途为影视拍摄,并非旅游景点。


  当年5月,埃及文物部门曾向联合国教科文组织投诉。埃及文物部门主席阿里表示,如果建造“狮身人面像”目的是为了拍电影娱乐,按照国际公约,施工方必须通知埃及方面。


  阿里认为,山寨版“狮身人面像”细节处理方面与原版差距较大,会影响游客对埃及古文物原貌的了解,也会直接影响到埃及旅游及连带影视产业的收入。


  据媒体援引多名埃及文物部门官员的话称,埃及曾与中国方面协调,希望中方做出赔偿、或自行拆除。


  建筑内部装潢豪华如宫殿


  建造方一名工作人员曾在接受媒体采访时表示,建造这座雕像并非恶意山寨埃及文化遗产,只是方便拍影视剧。


  “这仅是影视剧中的场景而已,没有任何其他用途,也没有收过一分钱费用”。石家庄长城影视动漫旅游创意园相关负责人曾回应称,这是拍戏用的临时场景,一次性所用,拍摄完就拆除。


  有媒体曝光建筑内部图片称,装潢豪华如宫殿。


  “以前是可以去里面参观的,刚修时不要钱,后来有人断断续续收过钱,引起争议后就关了”。当地村民称,现在只能看到部分头部。


  昨日,创意园区相关负责人说,影视城内所有建筑均用于影视剧拍摄,狮身人面像自建造以来一直备受争议,加上曾被投诉,建成后很少用于拍摄,对于其内部构造并不清楚。此外,其建成后吸引了很多游客,据其了解,曾有村民自发收取费用。


   ■ 专家说法


  此类山寨行为难从法律层面解决


  中国未来研究会旅游分会副会长刘思敏博士介绍,文化遗产的保护主要有两个国际公约:1972年《联合国教科文组织对世界文化和自然遗产保护公 约》和2003年《保护非物质文化遗产公约》。1972年的《公约》侧重于物质性的“文化遗产”进行保护,着眼点是保护遗产,使其不被破坏,但没有知识产 权方面的相关规定。根据现有国际法及国际惯例,埃及“狮身人面像”也很难受到知识产权相关法律的保护,其著作权也超越了一般50年的保护时限。而复制、抄 袭具有知识产权保护的现当代建筑很难避免法律制裁。


  “像北京世界公园就有许多微缩的建筑,这是没有关系的。”刘思敏说,但按照原比例复制建造会对原始建筑所在国家造成一定影响,不尊重对方文化。刘思敏指 出,仿制名胜古迹的现象在中国以及许多国家都存在:奥兰多迪斯尼世界公园仿制了世界各地许多的著名建筑,包括中国的天坛。帕特农神庙在希腊首都雅典如今庙 顶已坍塌,但美国田纳西州的纳什维尔全盘复制了帕特农神庙,建筑物的规格都同历史上的帕特农神庙一样。


  刘思敏认为,抄袭现象频频出现,与世界遗产知识产权保护还存在法律空白密切相关,由于难以确定包括世界遗产在内的名胜古迹知识产权属性及其权利人,在可预见的将来,很难从法律层面解决这种抄袭和山寨的行为。


  刘思敏指出,如今旅游业界频繁出现复制、仿造现象,具有一定的新鲜感,吸引眼球。虽然这种缺乏创造力的抄袭行为不值得提倡,但不意味着它们不受市场认同。另一方面,抄袭、复制名胜古迹或世界遗产的行为法律代价低。


  刘思敏表示,山寨“狮身人面像”一事,虽然埃及方面目前很难从法律上控告和起诉,但作为一个标志事件,引发了联合国教科文组织关于世界遗产产权保护公约的讨论与修改,明确世界遗产的知识产权属性与权利人,对仿制、复制行为加以法律规范。



责任编辑:孙爱林 SN146





文章关键词:
狮身人面像 山寨建筑

我要反馈
保存网页
新华社




If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759