Supreme Court releases drug crimes judicial interpretation
Reduced number of sentencing standards and strict punishment of public drug-related crime
--Supreme Court released drug crimes judicial interpretation
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, April 7 (reporter Rocha)-Supreme People's Court published on 7th of the Supreme People's Court on several issues concerning the trial of drug crime cases for legal interpretation, the new judicial explanation will take effect on April 11.
China's drug situation grim and complex, high incidence of drug-related crime, multiple, the anti-drug task is very difficult. The judicial interpretation of some new type drug conviction and quantitative criteria were adjusted, increased the penalties for drug crimes, and provides all kinds of drug-related criminal conviction and sentencing standards, highlights a lot.
　　Standard cut ketamine conviction by half
This judicial interpretation provides the number of 28 species of the conviction and sentencing of drug standards. Among them, the new card ziprasidone, tramadol, 12 new types of drugs such as sodium benzoate standard number of conviction and sentencing, and cut in our country against the conviction of the more serious drug ketamine quantitative criteria.
According to judicial interpretation, smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing, illegal possession of 500 grams of ketamine should be identified as "number", not less than 100 g 500 g should be identified as "big".
"Judicial interpretation of the conviction and sentencing of ketamine reduced one-second the quantitative criteria. "The Supreme People's court sentences five Court presiding judge Fang Wenjun said ketamine abuse is more serious in China, growing number of abuses in recent years, has now risen to third place, second only to methamphetamine and heroin. Meanwhile, increasing harm caused by abuse of ketamine, due to its combination of anaesthetic and hallucinogenic effects option to practice a lot of self-mutilation, violent crime and "drug driving" more cases triggered by the use of ketamine. Manufacture of and trafficking in ketamine in China crime showed a rapid growth trend in recent years, thus there is need to increase punishment for crimes involving ketamine.
In addition, toxic substances into illicit channels in recent years was used to make the drug more prominent cases, judicial interpretation in general have dropped all the 33 kinds of toxic substances number of sentencing standards to reflect the crime crackdown on toxic substances, enhanced source for drug crime punished.
　　Agents of the State drug-related crimes and strict punishment
"State officials should consciously resist drugs, actively fight against drug-related crime, if these people, in turn, to carry out drug-related crime, no doubt with more severe social impact and greater harm to the society. "Fang Wenjun said.
The judicial interpretation in multiple terms are imposed on State officials in drug-related crime cases, made of heavier penalties provision.
Such as the national staff of the smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing narcotic drugs, illegal drug possession, lure, instigate, deceive others to ingest or inject drugs, are to be found in the relevant provisions of the criminal law, "serious".
According to Fang Wenjun explained to national staff can be less than the usual number of drug crime conviction and sentencing standards. National staff implementing the toxic substances a crime, convicted 50% master of quantitative criteria in accordance with the usual standards; state staff drug crimes reached "relatively heavy," or "serious" quantitative criteria should be identified as "serious" or "very serious", applied on a range of legal penalty.
　　Receiving a minor drug directly into the crime
According to judicial interpretation, receiving minor to ingest or inject drugs, which constituted the crime of receiving other drugs, in the host number, number and does not need to meet other requirements.
Judicial interpretation provides that the host close relatives smoked, injecting drug, if the circumstances are obviously minor harmless, not treated as a crime; criminal, may, where appropriate, of severity.
In addition, the minor to ingest or inject drugs illegally providing narcotics, psychotropic drugs, to contribute directly to the crime of illegally providing narcotics, psychotropic drugs, on the number of illegal provision of essential drugs not otherwise requested.
"Our national youth drug-related situation is grim, with young people as the main body of the abuse of synthetic drugs has become an acute problem. "The Deputy President of the Supreme People's Court Criminal Court of five then go Mayan said that judicial interpretation, abetting a minor drug crimes and drug trafficking offences, to school students strictly, and aggravating circumstances. This focus group to hold young people, promoting youth drug prevention education "6.27" project, and strive to achieve "student drug use, drug free campus" goal.
　　Drug-related crime clearly part of the network problem
This copies judicial explained proposed, using information network, established for implementation taught manufacturing drug, and illegal production business HIV items of method, trafficking drug, illegal sale business HIV items or organization others smoking, and injection drug, illegal crime activities of website, and communications group, or released implementation Qian said illegal crime activities of information, plot serious of, should in accordance with criminal No. 287 article one of of provides, to illegal using information network crime conviction punishment.
"With the application of information network, network a rapid spread of drug-related crimes, mainly for the advantage of Internet drug-making technology, the sale of dangerous drugs, trafficking in drugs and organized form of drug abuse. "Fang Wenjun said.
"At the same time, judicial interpretations also made it clear the case of concurrence of offences dealing with principles. "He said that judicial interpretation specifically provides that implementation of the amendments to the Penal Code (nine), one of Article No. 287 of the bis Act, with the crime of imparting criminal methods, drug trafficking, illegal sale of manufacturing goods competing convicted of crimes shall be convicted and punished in accordance with punishment of to reflect the heavy punishment for such offences.
(Editors: Zhong Qinghui UN660)
2016-04-07 16:16:27
Xinhua

最高法发布毒品犯罪案件司法解释
下调定罪量刑数量标准　从严惩处公职人员毒品犯罪
　　——最高法发布毒品犯罪案件司法解释
　　新华社北京4月7日电（记者罗沙）最高人民法院7日发布《最高人民法院关于审理毒品犯罪案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，该司法解释将于4月11日起施行。
　　当前我国禁毒斗争形势严峻复杂，毒品犯罪高发、多发，禁毒工作任务十分艰巨。这份司法解释对部分新类型毒品的定罪量刑数量标准进行了调整，加大了对制毒物品犯罪的惩处力度，并全面规定各类毒品犯罪定罪量刑标准，亮点颇多。
　　氯胺酮定罪量刑数量标准下调一半
　　这份司法解释规定了28种毒品的定罪量刑数量标准。其中，新增了甲卡西酮、曲马多、安钠咖等12种新类型毒品的定罪量刑数量标准，并下调了在我国危害较为严重的毒品氯胺酮的定罪量刑数量标准。
　　根据司法解释，走私、贩卖、运输、制造、非法持有氯胺酮五百克以上应当认定为“数量大”，一百克以上不满五百克应当认定为“数量较大”。
　　“司法解释将氯胺酮的定罪量刑数量标准下调为原来的二分之一。”最高人民法院刑五庭审判长方文军表示，氯胺酮在我国滥用较为严重，近年来滥用人数不断增长，目前已上升至第三位，仅次于甲基苯丙胺和海洛因。同时，滥用氯胺酮造成的现实危害不断加大，因其兼具麻醉和致幻效果，实践中大量的自伤自残、暴力犯罪及“毒驾”案件多由吸食氯胺酮引发。我国制造、贩卖氯胺酮犯罪近年来呈迅速增长之势，因而有必要加大对涉氯胺酮犯罪的惩治力度。
　　此外，针对近年来制毒物品流入非法渠道被用于制造毒品情况较为突出的情况，司法解释整体下调了全部33种制毒物品的定罪量刑数量标准，以体现对制毒物品犯罪的严厉打击，强化对毒品犯罪的源头惩治。
　　对国家工作人员毒品犯罪从严处罚
　　“国家工作人员本应自觉抵制毒品、积极与毒品犯罪作斗争，如果这部分人反过来去实施毒品犯罪，无疑具有更为恶劣的社会影响和更大的社会危害。”方文军说。
　　这份司法解释在多个条款中均对国家工作人员实施毒品犯罪的情形，作出了从严处罚的规定。
　　例如国家工作人员走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的，非法持有毒品的，引诱、教唆、欺骗他人吸食、注射毒品的，都将被认定为刑法相关规定中的“情节严重”。
　　据方文军解释，对国家工作人员实施毒品犯罪可以低于通常的数量标准定罪量刑。国家工作人员实施制毒物品犯罪的，定罪数量标准按照通常标准的50%掌握；国家工作人员实施制毒物品犯罪达到“情节较重”或者“情节严重”数量标准，应当认定为“情节严重”或者“情节特别严重”，适用上一幅度的法定刑。
　　容留未成年人吸毒将直接入罪
　　根据司法解释，容留未成年人吸食、注射毒品的，即构成容留他人吸毒罪，在容留人数、次数、后果方面不需要达到其他要求。
　　司法解释同时规定，容留近亲属吸食、注射毒品，情节显著轻微危害不大的，不作为犯罪处理；需要追究刑事责任的，可以酌情从宽处罚。
　　此外，向吸食、注射毒品的未成年人非法提供麻醉药品、精神药品的，直接构成以非法提供麻醉药品、精神药品罪，对非法提供麻精药品的数量不另作要求。
　　“我们国家青少年群体涉毒形势比较严峻，以青少年为主体的合成毒品的滥用问题日益突出。”最高人民法院刑五庭副庭长马岩表示，司法解释将利用、教唆未成年人实施毒品犯罪和向在校学生贩卖毒品的行为规定为从严、加重处罚情节。要紧紧抓住青少年这一重点群体，全面推进青少年毒品预防教育“6.27”工程，努力实现“学生不吸毒、校园无毒品”的目标。
　　明确部分网络涉毒犯罪定性问题
　　这份司法解释提出，利用信息网络，设立用于实施传授制造毒品、非法生产制毒物品的方法，贩卖毒品，非法买卖制毒物品或者组织他人吸食、注射毒品等违法犯罪活动的网站、通讯群组，或者发布实施前述违法犯罪活动的信息，情节严重的，应当依照刑法第二百八十七条之一的规定，以非法利用信息网络罪定罪处罚。
　　“随着信息网络的普及应用，网络涉毒犯罪呈快速蔓延之势，主要表现为利用网络传播制毒技术、买卖制毒物品、贩卖毒品和组织吸毒等形式。”方文军说。
　　“同时，司法解释还明确了罪名竞合情况下的处理原则。”他说，司法解释明确规定，实施《刑法修正案（九）》第二百八十七条之一、之二规定的行为，与传授犯罪方法罪、贩卖毒品罪、非法买卖制毒物品罪等罪名发生竞合时，应当依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚，以体现对此类犯罪的从严惩处。
(责任编辑：钟庆辉 UN660)
2016-04-07 16:16:27
新华网