Three companies involved in illegal broadcasting of events: as the claims 15 million Yuan-music video, Super-IT information
For think using network platform live in the Super League, violations itself information network spread right, and copyright, constitute not due competition, recently, Le depending on sports culture industry development (Beijing) Limited (following referred to Le depending on sports company) will Shenzhen poly network depending on Technology Limited (referred to Shenzhen poly network depending on company), and Shanghai pulse Miao information technology limited (referred to Shanghai pulse Miao company), and Shenzhen new sense easy found network technology limited (referred to Shenzhen new sense easy found company) respectively v to court, claims amounted to 15 million Yuan. This morning, the legal evening news reporter was informed that the Chaoyang Court has formally accepted the three cases. Currently, cases are pending further.
TV plus
Le sued vision sports said the company authorised to obtain 2016, 2017 season Super League exclusive information network transmission right and other economic rights, exclusive proprietary Super League all relevant audio and video programming and broadcast rights to network video. This right includes, but is not limited to broadcasting rights and the right to network dissemination of information on the Internet.
March 2016, the company found that Shenzhen poly mesh depending on the development and operation of the company's networked set-top box software "VST aggregation" and "VST live", you can play in the Chinese Super League first round "suning, Jiangsu Shandong Luneng VS" games live online. New easy search company development and operation of mobile TV broadcast software "cloud TV", it can also provide the game's online video service.
In addition, Shanghai veins lying on development and operation of the company's website "TV for all", also can play in the Chinese Super League first round "VS Guangzhou China, Hebei happiness" games live online.
Le depending on sports company think, its for get in the Super League of related right spent has huge of human, and material and financial, above three company in not made its authorized of situation Xia, through information network illegal to public provides above game of online live service, serious violations has its information network spread right, and other works property, and constitute not due competition, to its caused huge economic loss. The three companies to court, claim compensation for economic loss and reasonable rights fees of 5 million Yuan, three cases claim the subject matter is as high as 15 million Yuan. This morning, informed the Chaoyang Court has formally accepted the three cases currently pending further.
三家公司涉非法播中超赛事：乐视索赔1500万元 - 乐视,中超 - IT资讯
因认为利用网络平台直播中超联赛，侵犯自身信息网络传播权、著作权，构成不正当竞争，近日，乐视体育文化产业发展(北京)有限公司(以下简称乐视体育公司)将深圳聚网视科技有限公司(简称深圳聚网视公司)、上海脉淼信息科技有限公司(简称上海脉淼公司)、深圳新感易搜网络科技有限公司(简称深圳新感易搜公司)分别诉至法院，索赔共计1500万元。今天上午，《法制晚报》记者获悉，朝阳法院已正式受理这三起案件。目前，案件均在进一步审理当中。
乐视
乐视体育公司起诉称，该公司经合法授权取得2016、2017赛季中超联赛独占性信息网络传播权及其他著作财产权，独占专有中超联赛所有相关音视频节目和直播节目的网络视频权。该权利包括但不限于互联网直播权和信息网络传播权。
2016年3月，公司却发现，深圳聚网视公司开发运营的网络机顶盒软件“VST全聚合”及“VST直播”，可以播放中超联赛第一轮“江苏苏宁VS山东鲁能”比赛的在线直播。深圳新感易搜公司开发运营的手机电视直播软件“云图TV”，亦可提供该场赛事的在线直播服务。
此外，上海脉淼公司开发运营的网站“全民TV”上，同样可以播放中超联赛第一轮“广州富力VS河北华夏幸福”比赛的在线直播。
乐视体育公司认为，其为获得中超联赛的相关权利花费了巨大的人力、物力和财力，上述三公司在未取得其授权的情况下，通过信息网络非法向公众提供上述比赛的在线直播服务，严重侵犯了其信息网络传播权、其他著作财产权，并构成不正当竞争，给其造成巨大经济损失。故将上述三公司分别诉至法院，索赔偿经济损失及合理维权费用500万元，三起案件索赔标的高达1500万元。今天上午，朝阳法院通报已正式受理这三起案件，目前正在进一步审理中。