People's daily: why the Administration is considered a called "radio and television always nasty"-radio-IT information

Thanks to IT the information users specifically small 7 contributions

The State press and publications Administration recently issued a notice, will guide the reality show regulation does not in principle allow the production and broadcasting of celebrity children to participate in reality shows. Affected by this, where is the father of the stars such as the father parenting reality show will no longer be making and broadcasting.

In recent years, the press and publication administration issued back-to-back "ban" involved in reality shows, talk shows, TV shows, movies and other entertainment programs, network media dubbed "radio and television always anxious".

If the criticism refers to the radio and television Department of simple management tools fail to blunt, is understandable if excessive exercise of management power refers to the radio and television Department, it would be a mistake. As the television industry administrative departments, the press and publication Administration has the responsibility to manage and guide the program guide, content appears in the program violates state law, and the core values of socialism is not consistent and not conducive to building Customs signs when regulated, is lawful and reasonable. Merely "informed", "ban" lack of open discussion and consensus before, and every time people feel sudden, triggering public criticism .

It also reveals some deep-seated problems in the cultural management . Its core is the balance between government regulation and industry how to . On one hand, due to the lack of cultural legislation, the lack of rules, supervision of the Executive Branch always trailed behind industry, measures are always taken at only after problems have emerged . The other hand, the cultural industries developed rapidly, innovation, government regulation is difficult to keep up with the changing situation, often taking a banned method . The result is that in "a place to die, a tube of" a vicious cycle. Looking back over the years of "ban", this features at a glance: fabrications of Japanese "oratorio" flood, so strengthening the review of war movies and TV dramas; too many costume dramas, so the number of broadcast regulation costume drama; reality shows everywhere, so limit shows the total quantity of TV costume too revealing, so off the weight cut ... ... In essence, commercial is profit maximization as a fundamental goal of the entertainment programs, whether to attract audience attention are the main factors into consideration when programming. And the Government must consider whether the program meets the right orientation. In the case of a lack of clear criteria for content management, whether business or the Government know "red lines" where ever. Enterprise gingerly, for fear of "stepping on mine"; Government run, criticized.

In this case, entertainment program production and broadcasting to the market completely, okay? As far as the ideal government "inaction" of course is the best . But the reality is dominated by commercial forces of entertainment once unleashed, will impact on societies, big or small, a purely commercial issue will become social problems , the Government had to step in. Some reality show hit emotional and family disputes, guests on the show for using foul language, fighting some reality show guest claimed "would rather cry in a BMW", openly advocate money worship some reality show stars privacy as a selling point to mining, promote sex gossip ... ... Compared with foreign countries, there are serious problems in our entertainment is not much, but commercial forces to target the profits led to the vulgar tendency is an objective reality.

In the case of lack of external oversight, is dominated by commercial forces entertainment will go far and the cause of the damage to the mainstream values of a society, we take a look at the situation. A United States reality show dedicated to expose an extramarital affair, after the couple learned the truth fight scenes into a program of popular selling point. There was a guest of the show that his neighbors are secretly after his homosexuality was shot and killed each other. United States scholars regarding the vulgar tendency of the talk show, Jini·sikete solemnly pointed out that: "turn the personal into public entertainment is a threat to our culture. Because the trend is undermining some of the basic value judgments. The dignity of the individual, good taste and manners, privacy in the lives of important damage in these programs. ”

It is clear that such entertainment specialized in society and the darker side of human nature, by making money off other people's pain is extremely unethical. If we relax the Government supervisory responsibility, a similar situation is likely to repeat itself in China. This is the State of public opinion in China and cultural traditions are difficult to accept. Full film entertainment industry the market is not enough, then the only question is how to make more scientific and effective government regulation .

人民日报：广电总局为何被舆论戏称“广电总急” - 广电总局 - IT资讯

感谢IT资讯网友 陌小7 的投稿

国家新闻出版广电总局日前下发通知，将对真人秀节目进行引导调控，原则上不允许再制作播出明星子女参与的真人秀节目。受此影响，《爸爸去哪儿》《爸爸回来了》等明星亲子真人秀将不再制作播出。

近年来，因为新闻出版广电总局接连出台“禁令”，涉及真人秀、脱口秀、电视剧、电影等各类大众娱乐节目，被网络舆论戏称为“广电总急”。

如果这些批评指的是广电部门的管理手段失于简单生硬，倒是可以理解；如果指的是广电部门过度行使管理的权力，那就错了。作为广电行业的行政主管部门，新闻出版广电总局有责任对节目导向进行管理和引导，在节目内容出现违反国家法律、与社会主义核心价值观不相符合、不利于构建公序良俗的苗头时加以规范，是合法合理的。只不过在“下通知”“发禁令”之前缺少公开讨论和舆论铺垫，每次都给人以突如其来的感觉，从而引发舆论诟病。

这也揭示了我国文化管理中的一些深层次问题。其核心是政府监管与行业发展如何平衡。一方面，由于文化相关立法不足，缺少细则，行政部门的监管总是跟在行业的后面，总是在出了问题以后才采取措施。另一方面，文化产业发展迅猛，创新不断，政府的管理方式难以跟上形势变化，往往采取一禁了之的方法。其结果就是陷入“一放就乱、一管就死”的恶性循环。回顾这几年的“禁令”，这一特点可谓一目了然：胡编乱造的抗日“神剧”泛滥，于是加强抗战题材影视剧的审查；古装剧太多，于是调控古装剧的播出数量；选秀节目遍地开花，于是限制选秀节目的总量；有的电视剧服装过于暴露，于是停播重剪……就本质而言，商业性的娱乐节目是以利润最大化为根本目标的，是否吸引受众眼球是节目制作时考虑的主要因素。而政府必须考虑节目是否符合正确导向。在内容管理缺乏明确标准的情况下，不管是企业还是政府都不知道“红线”究竟在哪儿。企业战战兢兢，生怕“踩雷”；政府疲于奔命，饱受批评。

既然这样，完全把娱乐节目的制作播出交给市场不行吗？就理想状态而言，政府“无为而治”当然是最好的。但实际情况是由商业力量主导的娱乐节目一旦失控，就会对社会产生或大或小的冲击，单纯的商业问题就会变成社会问题，政府就不得不介入了。有的真人秀主打情感纠纷和家庭纠纷，嘉宾竟然在节目中爆粗口、打架；有的真人秀嘉宾宣称“宁肯在宝马车中哭”，公然宣扬拜金主义；有的真人秀以挖掘明星隐私为卖点，宣扬桃色绯闻……虽然与国外相比，我国娱乐节目中存在严重问题的并不多，但商业力量以利润为目标导致的低俗化倾向是客观存在的。

在缺乏外部监督的情况下，以商业力量为主导的娱乐节目会走多远、会对社会主流价值观造成怎样的破坏，我们不妨看看国外的情况。有一个美国真人秀节目专门揭发婚外情，夫妻二人在得知真相后大打出手的场面成了节目火爆的卖点。有一个节目的嘉宾在得知他的邻居是暗恋他的同性恋后竟开枪打死了对方。美国学者吉尼·斯科特在谈到脱口秀节目的低俗倾向时严肃地指出：“把个人问题转换成大众娱乐是对我们文化的一种威胁。因为这种趋势破坏着一些基本的价值判断。个人的尊严、良好的趣味和风度、个人隐私在人生中的重要意义，都在这些节目中受到损害。”

很显然，这样的娱乐节目专门贩卖社会和人性的阴暗面，靠别人的痛苦赚钱，是极其不道德的。如果我们放松政府监管责任，类似的局面也可能在中国重演。这是中国国情民意和文化传统难以接受的。既然把影视娱乐业完全交由市场决定是不行的，那么唯一的问题就是如何使政府的监管更加科学有效。