Questioning of genetically modified to be reasonable, not scientific revolution-genetically modified food, GMO, food safety-IT information
Global transgenic technology has been developing for decades, commercial planting of genetically modified crops has a 20-year period. Along the way there are ups and downs, yet their international agricultural and industrial production maintained fast development trend.
Follow the world trend of new scientific and technological revolution and the industrial revolution, continued support in countries, the scientific community and the concerted efforts, China's agriculture of GM research and innovation made by the world's attention. But with the gradual application of technology in recent years over GM safety arguments tend to be intense, "turn", "reverse" who gezhiyiduan and technique industrialization progress is lagging behind.
Throughout the history of human science and technology, a transformative new technologies, the emergence of a ground-breaking new formats will inevitably be called into question . To some degree, based on scientific and rational debate is the direction of correct technique and technology, accelerate the development of new technologies and the new economy an essential catalyst.
Worth noting is that If arguments as unscientific and irrational the alienation of the quarrel, dispute, a new technology, a new format there is more harm than good . For the current international agricultural biotechnology is more competitive.
In the GMO scientific rationality in the development of agriculture, demanding bold innovation, our technology research and development. China is an agricultural producer, must be a place of transgenic technology. Especially under the condition of open innovation, integrated and play political forces such as research, investing in technology foresight and the original innovation efforts and accelerate progress, actively seize the global agricultural genetically modified a commanding point in technology.
In the GMO scientific rationality in the development of agriculture, requires that we strengthen supervision to ensure security on the basis of careful promotion. On GM technology, "quarrel", the focus on security. Breakthrough trustee Hanson, not constant or not, "circles", we need more scientific and rational logic, needs to be more aggressive, better patient, popular science, need to be more effective, more interaction.
International economic competition, it is a truism. We need in full consider social psychological of while, strengthening agricultural GM technology and industry development of system design, relies on GM major special, of implementation, along "non-edible-indirect edible-edible" of industrialization development thought, implementation to cash crops and raw materials crop mainly of industrialization strategy, and to core technology mainly of preemption vantage point strategy, and to crops for main of technology reserves strategy, in has based, and has conditions of field first a step, and fast go a step, Speed up the GM in the consensus development pace of the production level and largest in the world.
If you widen your, we also need to better position in the system of modern agricultural biotechnology genetic engineering. Transgenic technology is an important component of modern agricultural biotechnology, but not all. We need to continue to promote the development of transgenic technology, strengthening of genomic precision editing techniques, synthetic biology, biological data, such as agro-forefront technology deployment, enhanced transgenic technology and the new situation of agricultural bio-front linkage and complementarity, collaborative development of technology, and new ideas to open up China's agricultural biotechnology and industry more broad development prospects.
Times science times call for reason!
对转基因要理性的质疑，不要科学的反动 - 转基因食品,转基因,食品安全 - IT资讯
全球转基因技术发展已有数十年，转基因作物商业化种植也已有20年的时间。虽然前进的道路有些坎坷，但国际农业转基因技术和产业化总体保持快速发展的态势。
顺应世界新科技革命和产业变革潮流，在国家持续支持、科技界与各方面共同努力下，我国农业转基因研发创新取得世所瞩目的成果。但随着技术的逐步应用，近些年国内围绕转基因安全的争吵趋于激烈，“挺转”“反转”人士各执一端，技术产业化进程相对滞后。
纵观人类科技经济发展史，一项变革性新技术、一个突破性新业态的出现难免会受到质疑。从一定程度来讲，基于科学理性的争论是端正技术方向和技术路线、加快新科技和新经济发展不可或缺的触媒。
值得注意的是，如果争论异化为不科学、非理性的争吵、争执，对一项新技术、一个新业态而言有百害而无一利。对于当前国际竞争更加激烈的农业生物技术更是如此。
在农业转基因发展上弘扬科学理性，要求我们在技术研发上大胆创新、锐意进取。我国作为农业生产大国，必须在转基因技术上占有一席之地。特别要坚持开放条件下的自主创新，统筹发挥政产学研用等各方力量，着力在技术前瞻和原始创新上加大力度、加快进度，积极抢占全球农业转基因科技制高点。
在农业转基因发展上弘扬科学理性，要求我们加强监管，在确保安全的基础上慎重推广。关于转基因技术产业化的“争吵”，焦点就在安全性。要突破信者恒信、不信者恒不信等“怪圈”，我们需要更多的科学精神和理性逻辑，需要更大力度、更好耐心的科学普及，需要更加有效、更加充分的互动交流。
国际科技经济竞争如逆水行舟，不进则退。我们需要在充分考虑社会心理的同时，加强农业转基因技术和产业发展的系统设计，依托转基因重大专项等的实施，沿着“非食用—间接食用—食用”的产业化发展思路，实施以经济作物和原料作物为主的产业化战略、以核心技术为主的抢占制高点战略、以粮食作物为主要的技术储备战略，在有基础、有条件的领域先行一步、快走一步，在凝聚共识中加快我国转基因研发和产业水平跃居世界前列的步伐。
如果把视野放宽些，我们还需要在现代农业生物技术的大系统中更好定位转基因技术。转基因技术是现代农业生物技术的重要组成，但并非全部。我们需要在继续推进转基因技术发展的同时，加强基因组精准编辑技术、合成生物技术、生物大数据等农业生物前沿技术部署，强化转基因技术和新形势下农业生物前沿技术的衔接互补、协同发展，以新思路开拓我国农业生物技术和产业更加广阔的发展前景。
时代需要科学，时代呼唤理性！