He was father of the bitcoin? Users questioned, "herein"-zhongbencong, bitcoin-IT information
On May 2, the United Kingdom broadcasting companies BBC, the Economist and GQ magazine also released three media revealed father of bitcoins zhongbencong status reports, saying Australia born computer scientist and businessman keleige·shidiwen·laite (Craig Steven Wright) initiative to provide evidence to prove that he is "clever".
This message is a stone arouses thousand waves, causing coins around the world community and technology enthusiasts on the authenticity of the identity debate, followed by currency speculation that important members of the community accounts being hacked and uncertain.
Wright posted on his personal website he was after bencong evidence for more than an hour, there are users on the Social Forum site Reddit questioned the authenticity of the claim.
▲ Keleige·shidiwen·laite
Article in the Economist referred to a number of reasons for reservations, one of which is in addition to the signature on the coins the creation blocks, Wright refused to supply other evidence that proves that he is zhongbencong . But coins important members of the community, this astute successor Gavin Andersen out of the Bitcoin Core items in his personal Web site says "I believe keleige·shidiwen·laite is a person who invented coins", adds some credibility to Wright's statements.
Bitcoin Core open source software project development team members Peter Todd and then posted a message on Twitter saying, due to suspected to Gavin Wright endorsement Andersen accounts being hacked, pushes the Bitcoin Core project code permissions have been removed.
Bitcoin Core project account forwards Todd tweets, and on behalf of the project team post said, "there is currently no public cryptographic evidence that a specific person is the creator of currency".
Later in the day when Andersen attended block chain industry Consensus by the General Assembly in New York 2016. Several of the participants to a surging news at the scene confirmed that Andersen said at the Conference "account is not black" and still believe that Wright is zhongbencong, because he had a block creation of a private key, at the same time he considered consistent with previous.
Square block chain platform (Ethereum) founder of Vitalik Buterin expressed his objections in the General Assembly. In his view, Wright was not bencong, because he's not in the most simple way to reveal identity, such as direct announced the first block of the private key.
At the time of the former, even in the bitcoin enthusiast circles, Wright says is true still today . The Economist launched Twitter vote also showed that so far has 39% voters said they are not sure, just 29% believe that he is the father of the currency.
December 2015, a hacker steals the Wright mail, files and other information on your computer and sends it to the line and two of Gizmodo's website. Two sites through the information, and think Wright is likely to be in the hearing. Post soon, there will be a loophole: the Wright on LinkedIn, some degree of information and a social relationships cannot be confirmed; according to the Economist, said leaked documents can be identified and his personal blog, he changed some key bencong in the near future. Sydney tax office after raids on his home, many people began to think that it's just Wright the Fearless Hyena scene. Wright then remained silent and moved to London.
The Economist's Web site later wrote another article yesterday said Wright would like to prove that he is the father of the currency in the world, still need to go through "many steps of paternity," answered a series of questions. First, Wright can prove he has a single private key bencong? Second, he can for his own last December when bencong was believed to be the first time their vulnerability provides a reasonable explanation of the story? Third, whether he have sufficient technical knowledge to develop complex currency system? Finally, he was largely in line with those who have worked with zhongbencong online, a computer scientist's impression of him?
Until these questions are answered in bitcoins bencong discussions in the community about whether Wright will prevail.
他真是比特币之父？网友质疑，正在“扒皮” - 中本聪,比特币 - IT资讯
5月2日，英国广播公司BBC、《经济学人》和GQ杂志三家媒体同时发布揭晓比特币之父中本聪身份的报道，称澳大利亚籍计算机科学家和商人克雷格·史蒂文·莱特（Craig Steven Wright）主动提供证据证明自己是“中本聪”。
此消息一石激起千层浪，引发全世界比特币社区及科技爱好者对其身份真实性的激烈讨论，之后又因比特币社区重要成员账号被黑的猜测而变得扑朔迷离。
莱特在其个人网站上发布自己是中本聪的证据后一个多小时，就有网友在社交论坛网站Reddit上质疑这一说法的真实性。
▲克雷格·史蒂文·莱特
《经济学人》的文章中提及一些持保留态度的理由，其中之一就是除了在比特币的创世区块上签名外，莱特拒绝提供可以证明他就是中本聪的其他证据。但比特币社区重要成员，中本聪淡出Bitcoin Core项目后的继任者Gavin Andersen在其个人网站上撰文表示“我相信克雷格·史蒂文·莱特就是发明比特币的人”，为莱特的声明增加了一定可信度。
开源软件项目Bitcoin Core开发团队的成员Peter Todd随后在推特上发布消息称，由于怀疑为莱特背书的Gavin Andersen账号被黑，其在Bitcoin Core项目的代码推送权限已被移除。
Bitcoin Core项目的账号转发Todd的推文，并以项目团队的名义发帖称，“目前尚无公开的加密证据可以证明具体某一个人是比特币的创造者”。
当天稍晚时候，Andersen在纽约出席区块链行业大会Consensus 2016。数名在现场的与会者向澎湃新闻确认，Andersen在大会上表示自己“账户没有被黑”，并仍然相信莱特就是中本聪，因为他有创世区块的私钥，同时与他交流后认为与此前风格一致。
但区块链平台以太坊（Ethereum）的创始人Vitalik Buterin在大会现场表达了他的反对意见。他认为，莱特不是中本聪，因为他没有用最简单的方法公布身份，如直接公布第一个区块的私钥。
截至发稿前，即便在比特币爱好者圈内，人们对于莱特所说是否属实仍然莫衷一是。《经济学人》在推特上发起的投票也显示，至今有39%的投票者表示仍然不确定，仅29%相信他是比特币之父。
2015年12月，黑客窃取莱特电脑中的邮件、文件等资料，并将其发给《连线》和Gizmodo两家网站。两家网站当时通过对资料的梳理，认为莱特很有可能是中本聪。但文章发布不久，故事就有了漏洞：莱特在LinkedIn上的一些学位信息和一项社会关系无法被确认；据《经济学人》称，泄露文件和他个人博客中能够指认他为中本聪的一些密钥近期被更改过。悉尼税务办公室对其住所突击搜查后，不少人开始认为，这只是莱特自导自演的一场戏。莱特随后保持沉默，并搬去伦敦。
《经济学人》网站昨日稍晚时间又撰文表示，莱特要向全世界证明自己是比特币之父，还需要经过“多步骤的亲子鉴定”，回答一系列的问题。第一，莱特能否证明自己拥有仅中本聪才有的私钥？第二，他能否为自己去年12月第一次被怀疑是中本聪时自己故事的漏洞提供合理解释？第三，他是否具有足够的技术知识来开发比特币这样复杂的系统？第四，他在多大程度上符合那些曾与中本聪在线上合作过的计算机科学家对他的印象？
在这些问题得到回答前，比特币社区中对于莱特是否中本聪的讨论或将持续。