Police impunity stolen reporting villagers sued the public security Department report | | | police informants _ news
Zhuo Lifu into the reporting process to the letter itself down

Original title: theft discipline in Wenzhou reported to local police to make "no punishment" decision

Zhejiang online, May 04 (qianjiang evening news reporter Wang Yimin) Mayor of light green village, Yueqing city, Zhuo Lifu, real name reporting material into the discipline Inspection Commission set up in the suggestion box. Unexpectedly, a few days later, these materials had disappeared from the suggestion box.

Traces of the suggestion box is not broken, Zhuo Lifu believed that someone was reported stolen.

Zhuo Li Fu alarm. Soon, was caught stealing some people, but the police had made "no administrative penalty" decision.

Zhuo Lifu, and public security departments to court. Yesterday, Yueqing was sentenced in the Court of Justice in the case.

　　Suggestion box never been opened

　　Report materials had disappeared

The lawsuit came from, also dating back to a year ago.

On May 19 last year, third inspection group of rural grass-roots style of Yueqing mobilization meeting held in danxi Mayor green village, decides to Evergreen Village Committee cadres and village finance monitoring group conducted inspections, and published the report calls, set up a suggestion box.

Zhuo Lifu said, May 20, at 11 o'clock at night, he and several other villagers, 33 real-name reporting material into the suggestion box will also be captured posted carry-on.

"We were worried that reports may be tamper, so put on the reporting process to the letter, taking pictures and video, and video surveillance. We believe that even when people tamper with, not without evidence. ”

The afternoon of May 23, Zhuo Lifu again prior to the suggestion box, stuffed full of suggestion box was empty before it found many.

"I have to consult the inspection group, information about this period, and no out of the box through the materials. "Zhuo said, when he felt his reporting materials was stolen.

　　Stolen said "just looked back at"

　　The police "impunity" decision

After viewing the scene with several villagers, Zhuo Lifu suspected reporting materials are people from entrance of hard objects such as tweezers "fishing".

Suggestion box above, there was a surveillance camera, in order to figure out who is stealing the reporting materials, Zhuo Lifu reported the case to police.

Light police station after police, next day access to the surveillance video.

Monitor display, Zhuo Lifu, who in reporting letter before long, someone walked next to the suggestion box, part of report material from inside the box. However, the next morning, suspect and will report back on the box.

Following a police investigation, "stolen" reporting material, are fellow villagers Zhuo Liwu, among others.

Zhuo Liwu says, I just picked up a copy of the material, took it home and looked at, put it back the next day. But Zhuo Lifu said at least 10 materials had been stolen. In this regard, the police found no sufficient evidence cannot be found.

Last July, no written decision of administrative penalty made the Yueqing City Public Security Bureau, finds Zhuo Liwu, human behavior does not constitute acts that violate the administration of public security, no administrative penalties.

Zhuo Lifu, and apply for administrative reconsideration to the Wenzhou City Public Security Bureau. On November 24 of that year, the results are in, Yueqing, Wenzhou City Public Security Bureau to maintain the Public Security Bureau of the original decision.

　　The Court required police to determine

　　Counsel submits that the Peek reporting materials shall be subject to heavy penalties

Flay, Zhuo Lifu Yueqing, Wenzhou City Public Security Bureau, Public Security Bureau, Zhuo Liwu, who together, Yueqing, referred to the Court.

During the trial, the judge considers that, peek Zhuo Liwu, who reported the behavior of materials, constitutes a breach of public order management behavior.

"Although Yueqing City Public Security Bureau on suspicion of theft case, and whether the Act constitutes theft was found, but they are not on whether the acts alleged constitute a violation of other security management for further examination, appearance of impropriety. "In Yueqing, the Court's judgment, said police departments should be" no decision "removed, and redefine.

Yesterday, the qianjiang evening news reporter learned from the Yueqing City Court, Zhuo Liwu, who in the end how should punishment, yet pending police investigation.

Zhejiang Chen Yilai times law firm said, "in this case because it was stole a reporting material to the letter, not only violated the right to privacy, is interference with the discipline inspection departments of administrative acts, shall be given a heavier punishment. ”

Source: Zhejiang online

Responsible editor: Zhang Chun SN182

Article keywords:
Report report

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China NET

警方不处罚偷举报信者 村民状告公安部门|举报信|警方|举报者_新闻资讯
卓礼富将自己投入举报信的过程拍了下来

　　原标题：温州有人偷纪委举报信 当地警方作出“不处罚”决定

　　浙江在线05月04日讯(钱江晚报记者王益敏)乐清市淡溪镇长青村村民卓礼富，将实名举报材料投进了纪委设立的意见箱里。没想到，几天之后，这些材料竟然从意见箱里消失了。

　　意见箱没有被破坏的痕迹，卓礼富相信，是有人把举报信偷走了。

　　卓礼富报警。很快，偷信人被抓住了，但警方却做出了“不予行政处罚”的决定。

　　卓礼富不服，将公安部门告上法庭。昨天，乐清法院对这起案件进行了宣判。

　　意见箱没有打开过

　　举报材料却不见了

　　这起官司的来龙去脉，还要追溯到一年前。

　　去年5月19日，乐清市第三农村基层作风巡查组在淡溪镇长青村召开动员大会，决定对长青村两委党员干部、村财务监督小组开展巡查，并公布了举报电话、设立了意见箱。

　　卓礼富说，5月20日晚上11点，他和其他几位村民一起，将33份实名举报材料塞进了意见箱里，还将投递过程用随身携带的相机拍摄下来。

　　“我们当时就担心，举报信可能会被人做手脚，所以，在投放举报信的过程中，都拍了照片与录像，并且有监控视频在。我们认为，即使遭人动手脚，也不至于没有证据。”

　　5月23日下午，卓礼富再次到意见箱前，发现之前已塞得满满的意见箱空了许多。

　　“我向巡查组咨询，了解到他们在这个期间，并没有开箱取走过材料。”卓先生说，当时他就觉得，自己的举报材料被偷了。

　　偷信者称“只是拿回去看了看”

　　警方作出“不处罚”决定

　　和几位村民一起查看现场后，卓礼富怀疑，举报材料是被人从入口处用镊子之类的硬物“钓”走的。

　　意见箱的上方，有一只监控摄像头，为了搞清楚是谁偷走举报材料，卓礼富向警方报了案。

　　淡溪派出所接警后，第二天调取了监控视频。

　　监控显示，卓礼富等人放进举报信没多久，就有人走到意见箱旁边，将箱内的部分举报材料取出。不过，第二天上午，嫌疑人又将举报信重新放回了箱子里。

　　经警方调查，“偷走”举报材料的，是同村村民卓礼武等人。

　　卓礼武说，自己只拿了一份材料，带回家看了看，第二天就放回去了。但卓礼富称，至少有10份材料被偷走。对此，警方认为证据不足，不能认定。

　　去年7月，乐清市公安局作出《不予行政处罚决定书》，认定卓礼武等人的行为不构成违反治安管理的行为，不予行政处罚。

　　卓礼富不服，向温州市公安局申请行政复议。同年11月24日，结果出来了，温州市公安局维持了乐清公安局原来的决定。

　　法院要求警方重新判定

　　律师认为偷看举报材料应重罚

　　一气之下，卓礼富将乐清市公安局、温州市公安局、卓礼武等人，一起告到了乐清法院。

　　在审理过程中，法官认为，卓礼武等人偷看举报材料的行为，属于违反治安管理的行为。

　　“虽然乐清市公安局对此以涉嫌盗窃立案，并对该行为是否构成盗窃进行了认定，但他们没有对这个行为是否涉嫌构成违反其他治安管理的行为作进一步审查判断，明显不当。”在乐清法院的判决书中，认为公安部门应将“不予处罚决定”进行撤销，并重新判定。

　　昨天，钱江晚报记者从乐清法院了解到，对于卓礼武等人到底应该怎样处罚，目前还有待公安部门重新调查。

　　浙江时代律师事务所陈一来说：“在这起案件中，因为是偷看了举报信的材料，不仅是侵犯了隐私权，更是对纪检部门行政行为的干涉，应当从重处罚。”

　　来源：浙江在线

责任编辑：张淳 SN182

文章关键词：
举报信 警方 举报者

我要反馈
保存网页
中国网