Consumer lawsuit claims 110,000 yuan soufun: delivery down intermediary Pao Lu-soufun, a mediation-IT information
By soufun intermediary companies to buy United Kingdom school district apartments, only after the payment intermediary company lost buyers soufun to court, requested Decree soufun compensation for the economic losses amounted to more than 110,000 yuan. Recently, the Haidian District Court has accepted the case.
She claims, in early February 2014, in their home in Shanghai see soufun overseas properties featured on the pages of "United Kingdom apartment experts" advertising, click go in for investment management limited Shenzhen Hong Chau soufun. In the shop Home said the company focused on agents in United Kingdom schools school district, "says provide one-stop service for customers in China, including the provision of appropriate small school districts, from ordering the title run, and finally the rental managed service operation processes. "Strength is" the exclusive apartment loan, loan interest rate lowest ".
Ms Tam query other similar agents apartments of intermediary companies, its price apartment location information is consistent. Real estate portal sites already listed overseas trust, communicate with listed in the shop's business manager Lee, on May 12, 2014 and prepaid deposit 20000 reservation matches student apartments. Ties after the signing of the housing offers by courier, according to the contract, TAM on May 13 in the home via Internet bank transfer the remaining down payment 89240 Yuan. In July this company not contact properly, on August 19, Ms Tam soufun, soufun verify their qualifications, investigating their status, urged its refund, soufun failed to respond . The end of August, this company no one to contact, to date, their operators are still unable to contact and verify.
Ms Tam, soufun real estate publishers, and online trading platform provider, according to the consumer protection law, advertising law and other related regulations, soufun should bear the compensation responsibility for their economic losses, it filed this appeal.
At present, the case is under further investigation.
消费者诉搜房网索赔11万元：交完首付，中介跑路 - 搜房网,中介 - IT资讯
通过搜房网上的中介公司购买英国学区公寓房，不料交款后中介公司失联，买主将搜房网诉至法院，要求判令搜房网赔偿各项经济损失共计11万余元。日前，海淀法院受理了此案。
谭女士诉称，2014年2月初,其在上海的家中看到搜房网页上海外房产推荐的"英国公寓专家"的广告，点击进去为深圳康洲投资管理有限公司的搜房网站。在该网店首页中称此家公司专注代理英国名校学区公寓，“为中国客户提供一站式服务，包括提供合适的小户型学区房，完成从订购到产权办好，最后进行租赁托管服务的整个运作流程。”另外强项是“国内独家做学生公寓贷款，贷款利率全国最低”。
谭女士查询其他相似代理公寓的中介公司，其价格户型位置信息均一致。出于对于已经在海外上市的房地产门户网站的信任，便与网店所列的业务经理李某进行沟通，并于2014年5月12日预付定金20000元预订圣赛学生公寓。通过快递往来签订《房屋认购书》后，根据合同要求，谭女士于5月13日在家中通过网上银行转账剩余首付款89240元。七月份此公司经营者无法正常联系，8月19日谭女士联系搜房网，请求搜房网核实其资质，调查其现况，督促其退款，搜房网未予答复。八月底，此公司无人可联系，时至今日，其真实经营者仍无法联系及查实。
谭女士认为，搜房网为房地产广告发布者，又为网络交易平台提供者，根据我国《消费者权益保护法》、《广告法》等相关规定，搜房网对自己的经济损失应承担先行赔偿责任，故提起上述诉请。
目前，此案正在进一步审理中。