United States politicians not to accept arbitration of the South China Sea South China Sea dangers response | | arbitration _ news
Original title: May 9, 2016 land generous at a regular press conference, Foreign Ministry spokesman
Seventh session of China-Arab Cooperation Forum Ministerial meeting held in Doha, Qatar, on May 12. Should invite the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the State of Qatar Muhammad, Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi will lead a delegation to attend the meeting and to Qatar for an official visit.
Tunisia invitation of the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of zhuhainawei, Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi will be held between May 13 and 14th to Tunisia for an official visit.
Q: last week the Myanmar protests against Chinese copper project, does China fear of more such incidents? Asking the Myanmar Government to take more measures to protect the interests of foreign enterprises, including Chinese companies in Myanmar?
A: as you may have noticed, the new Government since its establishment, the Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi made an official visit to Myanmar. Visits, both sides on Myanmar under new situation of more extensive and conducive to cooperation between the two countries and the two peoples in the discussion. We have confidence in the continued mutually beneficial cooperation between the Myanmar.
On your specific question, I would like to stress is that China and Myanmar are traditional allies, and mutually beneficial cooperation serves the common interests of both sides. The Chinese Government has consistently called for overseas investment of Chinese enterprises to comply with the laws and regulations of the host country, and fulfill our social responsibilities and obligations, including attention to environmental protection. We are ready to work together with Myanmar, implementation of these mutually beneficial cooperation projects to promote local economic and social development, to better benefit the two countries and the two peoples.
Q: can you introduce the Sino-Arab Cooperation Forum Ministerial meeting on this? China is expecting of the meeting?
Answer: this year is the opening of diplomatic relations 60 years ago. As we all know, earlier this year, the Chinese President visited Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other Arab countries and the Arab League headquarters, greatly upgrading the overall level of Sino-Arab relations, reflect the Chinese Government's emphasis on developing relations with Arab countries and look forward to. The seventh ministerial meeting of the Sino-Arab cooperation forum was Mr XI after a visit to the Middle East, China and Arab countries and Arab League's first high level political dialogue between, on the implementation of its results, and strengthen dialogue and cooperation, improve the Forum is of great significance.
Foreign Minister Wang Yi during a meeting of the Arab Foreign Ministers and Arab League Secretary General on "build a ' along the way ', deepen the strategic cooperation" this important issue, but on the common interest of international and regional issues in-depth and extensive exchange of views, specific road map to elaborate and implement a learning outcome of the visit, while planning the next two years and collective cooperation blueprint for the development of the Forum. We sincerely hope to take the opportunity of this meeting with the Arab countries to work together to promote the strategic and cooperative relations to a higher level in the new era.
Q: some comment that, top countries in China, the Philippines and China's strength varies, the Philippines cannot through bilateral negotiations with the Chinese side to solve territorial and maritime delimitation disputes, arbitration. Comment on this?
Answer: this is simply ignoring the facts, confuse right and wrong, and is reminiscent of the so-called "great original sin", clear is the ulterior motive of trying to tarnish the image of China's rhetoric, its country strong is behind the logic of hegemony and projecting work.
I would like to stress that China adheres to the road of peaceful development, adhere to a defensive national defense policy, "being a good neighbor and partner" of foreign policy, for a long time we have been through dialogue, consultation, negotiation, settlement of disputes by peaceful means. This policy is actually made up of people determined by the peace-loving genes flowing in their blood. It was thanks to this policy, since the founding of new China, China has 14 land neighbors 12 on respect for historical facts and based on the basic norms of international law, through bilateral consultations and negotiations, delineated and demarcated common border, delineated and demarcated boundary line lengths of more than 20,000 kilometers, accounted for more than 90% of China's land borders as a whole. In addition, China and Viet Nam through negotiate demarcation in Beibu Gulf of the maritime boundary of the two countries.
I would also like to say that, as regional powers, aware of the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the region and China's own responsibility. For a long time, from an overall perspective of the Chinese side, always with a constructive attitude and responsibly address the issue of South China Sea, the door to negotiations is always open. In contrast, Philippines, is turning its back Sino-Philippine agreement on, the lack of sincerity in negotiations and consultations with the Chinese side to solve the problem, but the South disguised as "victim" image, continuous provocation and stir up, fanning the conflicts worsen regional peace and stability. China will not "pick on someone your own size", but nor do we condone and allow individual States to adopt crooked ways "small and correct".
Asked: it was reported that United States Hagel, a former defence Minister, said if the Philippines and any party that fails to comply with the South China Sea to arbitration results, will be a "dangerous start." How do you respond to the Chinese side?
A: we have already said many times, the Chinese side does not accept, does not participate in the unilateral introduction of the Philippines in the South China Sea arbitration case, the position is clear and consistent. Philippines Philippine Sea in the dispute unilaterally to initiate an arbitration, which itself would be in violation of international law, including the Convention. Some people ignore the basic facts, wanton manipulation of international law or under the international law of signs, some inappropriate words, actually has some ulterior purpose. But I want to say that these aims are not up to.
United States some people keeps to marine rule of law of maintenance who itself, but is in Convention reached 34 years of long still not approved Convention; keeps requirements other accept third party dispute solution way, himself is avoidance and far of, even refused to accept international court this a United Nations most main of judicial institutions had made of judgment and command; keeps requirements other national comply with international law, but is on himself and so-called of allies big open illegal of door, To the Philippines for a long time illegal occupation of part of the reef in the Nansha Islands China turn a blind eye. United States that international law ", and is then discarded," speculative practices seriously eroded the authority of international law, the seriousness and effectiveness, which is the true danger, is worthy of the international community on high alert.
Q: the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-UN in the workers ' Party of Korea "seven," said in a report that North Korea is a nuclear country, will continue to strengthen the quality of nuclear weapons. Rodong said North Korea was nuclear-weapon powers in the East. Comment on this?
A: our position on the nuclear issue on the peninsula has been repeated many times, no change. I want to say to realize denuclearization on the Korean peninsula, maintain peace and stability on the peninsula and solve the nuclear issue on the peninsula through dialogue and consultation, in line with the common interests of all parties and conducive to the peace and development of Northeast Asia, but also conducive to safeguarding the international nuclear non-proliferation mechanism. We hope that all parties concerned will make efforts in line with the trend of the times.
Q: on North Korea claiming to be a nuclear country what is the position?
Answer: as I have said just now, no change in China's position on the nuclear issue on the peninsula. We also argue that all UN Security Council resolutions related to the Korean peninsula nuclear issue, should be supported by the international community without reservation of all concerned parties to abide by, implement.
Q: recently, the Chinese Government and the United Nations signed the establishment of the China-United Nations peace and Development Fund Agreement. Request the Chinese side to establish the Fund related to the specific circumstances and considerations? China is prepared to fund specific projects?
A: on May 6, has signed with the Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Mission of China to the United Nations the establishment of the China-United Nations peace and Development Fund Agreement.
Last September, he attended the 70 anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, the President announced during the Summit, the Chinese Government decided to establish for a period of 10 years, amounting to $ 1 billion China-United Nations Fund for peace and development. Two sub-funds of the Fund, the Secretary-General's Fund for peace and security, hosted by United Nations Secretary-General's Office; the second is to implement the 2030 Fund, the sustainable development agenda, hosted by the United Nations Department of economic and Social Affairs. The signing of the agreement is to implement Chinese President to attend UN Summit outcome of important actions.
This is China's first venture fund at the United Nations, is also China's adherence to multilateralism and is committed to multilateral cooperation, safeguard the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations to support the United Nations in preventing war peacekeeping, the promotion of development areas play a central role in important. China will maintain close communication and coordination with the United Nations, promoting the Fund was officially launched and put into operation as soon as possible.
Q: Russia President Vladimir Putin in Sochi last week met with Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, comment on this?
Answer: Russia and Japan are important neighbors of China, are also major countries in the Asia-Pacific region, we would like to see stable development of relations between Russia and Japan.
Responsible editor: Wang Hao
Article keywords:South China Sea Arbitration
I want feedback
Save a Web page
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs website
美国政要称不接受南海仲裁系危险开始 中方回应|南海|仲裁_新闻资讯
原标题：2016年5月9日外交部发言人陆慷主持例行记者会
中国—阿拉伯国家合作论坛第七届部长级会议将于5月12日在卡塔尔多哈举行。应卡塔尔国外交大臣穆罕默德邀请，外交部长王毅将率团出席会议并对卡塔尔进行正式访问。
应突尼斯共和国外交部长朱海纳维邀请，外交部长王毅将于5月13日至14日对突尼斯进行正式访问。
问：上周，缅甸发生针对中资企业铜矿项目的抗议事件，中方是否担心发生更多的类似事件？是否要求缅甸政府采取更多措施保护包括中国企业在内的外国企业在缅利益？
答：可能你也注意到，缅甸新政府成立伊始，外交部长王毅就应邀对缅甸进行了正式访问。访问中，双方就中缅在新形势下开展更广泛、有利于中缅两国和两国人民的合作进行了深入探讨。我们对中缅之间继续开展互利合作充满信心。
关于你提到的具体问题，我想强调的是，中缅两国是传统友邦，互利合作符合双方共同利益。中国政府也一贯要求赴海外投资的中国企业遵守所在国的法律法规，履行好社会责任和义务，包括重视环境保护。我们愿同缅方共同努力，实施好这些互利合作项目，促进当地经济社会发展，更好地造福两国和两国人民。
问：你能否介绍此次中阿合作论坛部长级会议的有关情况？中方对此次会议有何期待？
答：今年是中阿开启外交关系60周年。大家也知道，今年年初，习近平主席访问了沙特、埃及等阿拉伯国家和阿盟总部，有力提升了中阿关系整体水平，也体现了中国政府对发展同阿拉伯国家关系的重视与期待。中阿合作论坛第七届部长级会议是习主席访问中东后中国同阿拉伯国家和阿盟之间举行的首次高级别政治对话，对落实访问成果、加强对话合作、完善论坛建设具有重要意义。
王毅外长这次出席会议期间将同阿拉伯各国外长和阿盟秘书长一道，围绕“共建‘一带一路’，深化中阿战略合作”这个重要议题，同时就双方共同关心的国际和地区问题深入、广泛交换意见，制定落实习主席访问成果的具体路线图，同时规划好未来两年论坛发展和集体合作蓝图。我们真诚希望能以本次会议为契机，与阿拉伯国家共同努力，推动新时期中阿战略合作关系迈上新台阶。
问：有评论认为，中国国大力强，菲律宾与中国实力相差悬殊，菲方根本无法通过双边谈判与中方解决领土和海洋划界争议，因此才提起仲裁。中方对此有何评论？
答：这种说法纯粹是罔顾事实、颠倒黑白，并且让人想起所谓的“大国原罪论”，显然是个别别有用心者企图抹黑中国的一种说辞，其背后是国强必霸和以己度人的逻辑作祟。
我想强调，中国坚持走和平发展道路，坚持防御性的国防政策，坚持“与邻为善、以邻为伴”的周边外交政策，长期以来我们也一直坚持通过对话、协商、谈判，以和平方式解决有关争议。这一政策实际上是由中国人民血液中流淌着的爱好和平基因所决定的。也正是得益于这一政策，新中国成立以来，中国已经同14个陆地邻国中的12个在尊重历史事实和国际法基本准则的基础上，通过双边磋商与谈判，划定和勘定了共同边界，划定和勘定的边界线长度达两万多公里，占中国整个陆地边界的90%以上。此外，中国和越南通过谈判协商划定了两国在北部湾的海洋边界。
我还想说，作为地区大国，中国深知维护地区和平稳定的重要意义和自身责任担当。长期以来，中方从大局出发，始终以建设性的态度、负责任地处理南海问题，谈判协商的大门始终是敞开的。反观菲律宾，则置中菲共识于不顾，缺乏与中方谈判协商解决问题的诚意，反而在南海假扮“受害者”的形象，不断挑衅，挑起事端，激化矛盾，恶化地区和平稳定。中国不会“以大欺小”，但我们也不会纵容和允许个别国家通过邪门歪道“以小讹大”。
问：据报道，美国前国防部长哈格尔日前称，若菲律宾与中国任何一方不遵守南海仲裁庭仲裁结果，将会是“危险的开端”。中方对此有何回应？
答：我们已经多次说过，中方不接受、不参与菲律宾单方面提交的南海仲裁案，这个立场是明确的、一贯的。菲律宾就中菲南海有关争议单方面提起仲裁，本身就违反了包括《公约》在内的国际法。某些人无视基本事实，肆意操弄国际法，或者打着国际法的招牌，采取一些不恰当的言行，实际上是有一些不可告人的目的。但我想说，这些目的是达不到的。
美国某些人口口声声以海洋法治的维护者自居，但却在《公约》达成34年之久仍不批准《公约》；口口声声要求别国接受第三方争端解决方式，自己却避而远之，甚至拒不接受国际法院这一联合国最主要的司法机构曾经作出的判决和命令；口口声声要求其他国家遵守国际法，但是却对自己和所谓的盟友大开违法之门，长期以来对菲律宾非法侵占中国南沙群岛部分岛礁的行为视而不见。美方这种对于国际法“合则用，不合则弃”的投机做法，严重侵蚀了国际法的权威性、严肃性和有效性，这才是真正危险的，是值得国际社会高度警惕的。
问：朝鲜最高领导人金正恩在朝鲜劳动党“七大”报告中称，朝鲜是拥核国家，将继续强化核武器质量。朝鲜《劳动新闻》称朝是东方核武器大国。中方对此有何评论？
答：我们对半岛核问题的立场已经重复多次，没有变化。我想说，实现朝鲜半岛无核化，维护半岛和平稳定，通过谈判对话协商解决半岛核问题，符合各方共同利益，有利于东北亚和平与发展，也有利于维护国际核不扩散机制。我们希望所有有关各方都能为此作出符合时代潮流的努力。
问：中方对朝鲜声称自己是拥核国持何立场？
答：刚才我已经说过了，中方在半岛核问题上的立场没有变化。我们也主张，联合国安理会通过的所有的跟半岛核问题相关的决议，都应得到国际社会所有有关各方毫无保留的遵守、执行。
问：日前，中国政府同联合国正式签署了设立中国—联合国和平与发展基金协议。请中方介绍设立该基金的具体情况和有关考虑？中方准备通过基金开展哪些具体项目？
答：5月6日，中国常驻联合国代表团同联合国秘书处签署了设立中国—联合国和平与发展基金协议。
去年9月，习近平主席在出席联合国成立70周年系列峰会期间宣布，中国政府决定设立为期10年、总额达10亿美元的中国—联合国和平与发展基金。基金下设两个子基金，一是秘书长和平与安全基金，由联合国秘书长办公室托管；二是落实2030年可持续发展议程基金，由联合国经济和社会事务部托管。协议的签署是落实习近平主席出席联合国系列峰会成果的重要行动。
这是中国首次在联合国出资设立基金，也是中国坚持多边主义，致力于开展多边合作，维护联合国宪章宗旨和原则，支持联合国在止战维和、促进发展领域发挥核心作用的重要体现。中国将同联合国保持密切沟通协调，推动基金尽快正式启动并投入运作。
问：俄罗斯总统普京上周在索契会见了日本首相安倍晋三，中方对此有何评论？
答：俄罗斯和日本都是中国的重要邻国，也都是亚太地区的重要国家，我们乐意见到俄日关系稳定发展。
责任编辑：王浩成
文章关键词： 南海 仲裁
我要反馈
保存网页
外交部网站