Experts recommend "Lei Yang incident" should be investigated by the prosecution | Lei Yang _ news
Original title: experts recommend "Lei Yang incident" should be investigated by the prosecution case and publish the results
Beijing News newsletter (reporter Wang Wei) the morning of May 10, Changping, Beijing police official micro-blog on "Lei Yang" briefings, disclosed more details of the case.
Legal experts said in an interview with reporters, the police as parties to the case, explained has to be clarified and continues to disclose the case, investigations of this matter should be handed over to the procuratorial organ as a third party, investigated by the procuratorial organs to issue final results.
China University criminal law Professor Hong Daode said police continue to disclose case details has been inappropriate, for two reasons:
First, the current case party Lei Yang had died, police can be seen as "one-sided", the event itself to the development of a police stand at the moment it is difficult to objectively and neutrally.
Second, in accordance with the relevant legal provisions, at the stage of investigation and detection of cases, details of the case should not be too much disclosure, one of the unsettling case, details of the suspects and open may result in violations of the right to privacy. As a rule, police in the course of the investigation, only informed of case progress, as well as some of the measures taken. At present, the Changping police have disclosed details of the case on two occasions, published content may have been outside the scope of the law.
Professor Hong Daode said prosecutors have been looking into this matter as a third party investigation, surveillance cameras to the autopsy results, site contents, law enforcement record of the damage, as well as live testimony of the officer, should be collected and investigated by prosecutors for evidence and concluded that, to determine whether the death of Lei Yang and police enforcement.
According to security management punishment method of provides, police in handle security case process in the, met has "and this case party has other relationship, may effect case just processing of" case, should avoided; violation security management behavior people, and was against people or its statutory agent also right to requirements they avoided: police of avoided, by its belongs of police organ decided; police organ head of avoided, by Shang level police organ decided.
Under the law, prosecutors involved in this incident, is exercising its infringe prosecutorial functions.
Under the code of criminal procedure, the Penal Code, the people's Procuratorate of the rules of criminal procedure and the people's Procuratorate of the Supreme People's Procuratorate on file for investigation cases directly accepted range of Regulations infringe criminal cases include:
1. the criminal law chapter fourth State organ staff using the implementation of the terms of reference of the infringement of citizens ' personal rights and the democratic rights of crime. Such as illegal detention, torture, destruction of election crimes.
2. criminal law the Nineth and the Criminal Code amendment (BA) of dereliction of duty under. Crimes such as abuse of power, dereliction of duty and bending.
3. the 18th criminal procedure of article needs directly accepted by the people's Procuratorate of functionaries of other major crimes committed using the terms of reference.
Insiders said the prosecution's involvement is mainly look at this incident, whether there are cases of abuse.
Edit: the woodlands Liu 喆
Responsible editor: Wang Hao
Article keywords:Lei Yang
I want feedback
Save a Web page
The Beijing News
专家建议“
雷洋事件”应由检方调查|
雷洋_新闻资讯
原标题：专家建议“雷洋事件”应由检方调查案件并公布结果
新京报快讯(记者王巍)5月10日凌晨，北京昌平警方通过官方微博对“雷洋事件”再发情况通报，披露了更多的案情细节。
法学专家接受记者采访时表示，警方作为案件的当事方，已不宜继续进行解释澄清并且继续披露案情，应该将此事的调查工作交给作为第三方的检察机关进行，由检察机关公布最终的调查结果。
中国政法大学刑事诉讼法学专家洪道德教授认为，警方继续披露案件细节，已经失当，理由有两点：
第一，目前案件的一方当事人雷洋已经去世，警方的说法都可以被看成是“一面之词”，事件本身的发展决定了警方此刻的表态难以客观和中立。
第二，按照相关的法律规定，处于调查和侦查阶段的案件，案情细节不宜过多对外披露，对一个尚未定论的案件，将嫌疑人的名字和细节公开，可能会造成侵犯隐私权。按照规定，警方在侦查过程中，只能通报办案进展以及采取的一些措施。目前，昌平警方已经两次对外披露案件细节，公布的内容有可能已经超越法律规定的范畴。
洪道德教授认为，检方已经作为第三方介入此事进行调查，对尸检结果、现场的监控探头内容、执法记录仪的毁损情况，以及现场人员的证词等，都应由检方来进行证据收集并进行调查，然后得出结论，以确定雷洋的死因是否与公安的执法有关。
根据《治安管理处罚法》的规定，人民警察在办理治安案件过程中，遇有“与本案当事人有其他关系，可能影响案件公正处理的”情形，应当回避;违反治安管理行为人、被侵害人或者其法定代理人也有权要求他们回避：人民警察的回避，由其所属的公安机关决定;公安机关负责人的回避，由上一级公安机关决定。
根据法律规定，检方介入此次事件，是行使其反渎职侵权检察的职能。
根据《刑事诉讼法》、《刑法》、《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》、《最高人民检察院关于人民检察院直接受理立案侦查案件范围的规定》，渎职侵权犯罪案件范围包括：
1.刑法分则第四章规定的国家机关工作人员利用职权实施的侵犯公民人身权利、民主权利犯罪案件。如非法拘禁、刑讯逼供、破坏选举等犯罪案件。
2.刑法分则第九章和《刑法修正案(八)》规定的渎职犯罪案件。如滥用职权、玩忽职守、徇私枉法等犯罪案件。
3.刑事诉讼法第十八条第二款规定的需要由人民检察院直接受理的国家机关工作人员利用职权实施的其他重大犯罪案件。
业内人士分析称，检方介入主要是看此次事件中，是否存在滥用职权的情况。
编辑：林野 刘喆
责任编辑：王浩成
文章关键词： 雷洋 我要反馈
保存网页
新京报