Fu Ying Stanford speech on Sino-US relations: not an ally not an enemy
In the new social San Francisco May 10 electric (reporter Liu Dan) China National NPC Foreign Affairs Committee, Chairman of the, and Academy of social sciences global strategy wisdom library Chief experts Fu Ying 10th in United States Stanford University said, Sino-US are need learning and adapted new of times, China not should tries to became addition a United States, United States also need learning and China in mutual respect of based Shang along and cooperation, China in many aspects are and United States different, although not allies but also not should is enemy.
United States Stanford University, Fu Ying at the school the same day fuliman·sibolige international studies published, entitled the Sino-US relationship, rebuilding a consensus? Lecture, and answer your questions.
Speech by the United States a former Assistant Secretary of State and Stanford University scholar tangmu·fenge, Chairman of the Intelligence Committee Chair, Chinese Consul General in San Francisco, Luo Linquan, United States Secretary of State George Shultz, Jean c. Oi, Director of the China program of Stanford University Asia-Pacific Research Center, nearly hundred scholars, students to attend.
Fu Ying in the beginning of the speech noted that in her experience, current China-US public views on the bilateral relations more diverse and complex, negative speculation on the strategic intent of each other a lot, and the South China Sea issue seems to be rising to the height of the geo-strategic competition between China and.
"But in real life the Sino-US relationship is a different picture. "Fu ying points out that President XI three years six times with President Barack Obama, topic is extremely broad and rich. Economic cooperation deepening, increasing military contacts, frequent exchanges, on transnational issues such as climate change, nuclear security and cooperation began to play a leading role in the world.
"Public opinion and the reality of China-US relations, which is the real one? Or is true? "Fu Ying raised questions. She said, "Sino-American relations in the end public opinion relative to the real state of the fall, perhaps note consensus need to be rebuilt. ”
Fu Ying the Sino-American academic view is reduced to three.
Us is a question the United States Government's adherence to the policy of constructive engagement with China, calling for a new strategy toward China. Second, the development trend of China caused confusion, "China collapse" were revived. Third, China eventually replace the United States as the world's "boss", showed the United States lost global leadership concerns.
When scholars concluded China, Fu said, first of all, scholars generally agree that stable development of China-US relations practice, advocated the creation of a new cooperation framework. Second, China and the need to be higher and more extensive level to enhance coordination. Third, the Sino-US relationship is undergoing qualitative changes, positive "cooperation can achieve great things, contend or bad event" conversion.
Fu noted that China learn and adapt to their new role, and strive to play a bigger role, but the United States does not show tolerance as expected, but the Chinese political system continue to show exclusion and repression, to China's Asia investment banking, "along the way" initiatives, such as refuse, obstruct gesture. United States information is passed to the Chinese: "the trade rules of the 21st century cannot be set by China". These are stimulated and influenced the opinion and judgment of the outside environment.
When talking about the South China Sea, Fu said, "the recent tensions in the South China Sea concentrated reflection of the current risks. ”
She noted that the United States media and think tanks in many articles in the South China sea view lack of factual basis, "for example, that provokes conflicts, increase territory and interests, China is asking for, and bullying small countries. Some even confuse Xisha and Nansha. ”
From the point of view of history and reality, Fu detailing the origin of the South China Sea issue is around the Nansha Islands and their adjacent waters of sovereignty and rights disputes. United States structures complicate the dispute of Nansha new dimensions, "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy both in public opinion and action against China are more and more on color.
Fu pointed out that "in China, it is generally accepted that, United States in the South China Sea, even interfered in issues directly to the front desk, complicate the controversy behind. And this was localized and controlled the Islands and their adjacent waters, is portrayed by the US geo-strategic struggle of the two powers. ”
She stressed that the ASEAN countries have begun to recognize disputed enlargement of risks with China over easing tensions and preventing new unilateral provocation is stepping up consultations to deal with problems with the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi a "twin-track" get recognition and support of the ASEAN countries.
"China's interests in the South China Sea over the years consistently, is to safeguard the territorial integrity of the country and the need for maintaining peace and tranquility in the region. "Fu Ying said," the Chinese people and Government have to issues involving territorial sovereignty have highly sensitive, and would never permit such a thing even in local recurrence, which is outside the view and must be understood and taken into account when judging China. ”
Fu ying points out that the South China Sea is not only one of the world's most important international waterway, is the lifeline of contact between China and the world, must ensure that the freedoms of navigation and safety. In this regard, China is consistent with the national interest, responsibility and capacity in this regard is the need to continuously upgrade.
Fu said that Sino-US relations has become the most important bilateral relationship of the two countries, it is going to the future and destiny of the world has a lot of influence. XI Jinping, President of Sino-American building without conflict and confrontation, mutual respect, cooperation and win-win of a new type of relations.
Fu Ying also responded to the presence of teachers and students on Sino-US relations, the South China Sea, China's economic and financial reform, foreign cultural communication issues. (End)
(Editors: Pan Yi burn UN657)
2016-05-11 18:52:21
Authorities wide nets
傅莹斯坦福演讲谈中美关系：不是盟友也不是敌人
中新社旧金山5月10日电(记者 刘丹)中国全国人大外事委员会主任委员、社科院全球战略智库首席专家傅莹10日在美国斯坦福大学表示，中美都需要学习和适应新的时代，中国不应该试图成为另外一个美国，美国也需要学习与中国在相互尊重的基础上相处和合作，中国在很多方面都与美国不同，虽然不是盟友但也不应该是敌人。
应美国斯坦福大学邀请，傅莹当天在该校弗里曼·斯伯里格国际问题研究院发表题为《中美关系，重塑共识？》的演讲，并回答提问。
演讲活动由美国前助理国务卿、情报委员会主席、斯坦福大学学者汤姆·芬格主持，中国驻旧金山总领事罗林泉，美国前国务卿乔治·舒尔茨，斯坦福大学亚太研究中心中国项目主任戴慕珍等近百位学者、学生出席。
傅莹在演讲伊始指出，据她观察，当前中美舆论对两国关系的看法比较多元、复杂，对彼此战略意图的负面猜测不少，而南海问题似乎上升到中美之间地缘战略较量的高度。
“但现实生活的中美关系又是另外一幅图景。”傅莹指出，习近平主席与奥巴马总统三年六晤，议题极其广泛和丰富。经济合作深化、军事交往增多、民间交流频繁，在气候变化、核安保等跨国议题上，中美合作开始发挥全球引领作用。
“舆论和现实中的中美关系，哪个才是真实的？亦或都是真实的？”傅莹提出疑问。她说，“中美关系在舆论一端相对于现实状态所表现出来的落差，或许正说明两国需要重建共识。”
傅莹将中美学术界的观点各自归结为三个方面。
美方一是质疑美国政府长期奉行的对华建设性接触政策，呼吁制订新的对华大战略。二是对中国的发展趋势产生困惑，“中国崩溃论”再度流行。三是认为中国最终取代美国充当世界“老大”，表现出对美国丧失全球领导地位的担忧。
在总结中方学者观点时，傅莹说，首先，中国学者普遍认同稳定发展对美关系的做法，主张建立新型合作架构。第二，中美需要在更高更广泛的层面加强协调。第三，中美关系形态正在发生质变，正向“合作可以成大事，相争也可能坏大事”方向转换。
傅莹指出，中国在学习和适应自己的新角色，努力发挥更大作用，但美国没有像预期地那样展现包容，而是对中国的政治体制继续表现出排斥和压制，对中国提出的亚投行、“一带一路”等倡议作出拒绝、阻挠的姿态。美国传递给中国的信息是：“21世纪的贸易规则不能由中国制定”。这些都在刺激和影响着中国人对外部环境的看法和判断。
在谈到南海问题时，傅莹说，“最近在南海出现的紧张局势集中地反映了当前面临的风险。”
她指出，美国媒体和智库很多关于南海的文章中的观点都缺乏事实基础，“例如，认为是中国在挑起矛盾、扩大领土和权益索求，在欺负小国。一些文章甚至分不清西沙和南沙。”
从历史和现实的角度，傅莹详细介绍南海问题的本源是围绕南沙群岛及其附近海域的主权和权益之争。美国构成南沙争议复杂化的新维度，“亚太再平衡”战略无论是在舆论上还是在行动上都越来越有针对中国的色彩。
傅莹指出，“在中国，人们普遍认为，美国在南海拉偏架，甚至于直接走向前台插手干预问题，是争议复杂化的背后推手。而这个原本是局部和可控的岛礁及其附近水域之争，正被美方描绘成两个大国的地缘战略之争。”
她强调，东盟国家已经开始认识到争议扩大化的风险，与中国围绕缓和紧张和防止新的单边挑衅上正在加紧磋商，中国外长王毅提出处理问题的“双轨”思路得到东盟不少国家的认可和支持。
“中国在南海的利益诉求多少年来一以贯之，就是维护国家领土主权完整性和维护地区和平安宁的需要。”傅莹说，“中国人民和政府始终对涉及领土主权完整的问题抱有极强的敏感性，绝不会允许那样的事哪怕在局部重演，这是外界在看待和判断中国时必须了解和考虑的。”
傅莹指出，南海不仅是世界最重要的国际航道之一，也是中国与世界联系的生命线，必须确保这里的航行自由和安全。在这方面，中国与各国的利益是一致的，在这方面的责任和能力也需要不断提升。
傅莹最后说，中美关系已成为中美两国彼此最重要的双边关系，它的走向对世界的前途和命运有很大的影响。习近平主席提出中美共建不冲突、不对抗，相互尊重，合作共赢的新型大国关系。
傅莹还回答了在场师生关于中美关系、南海、中国经济金融改革、对外文化传播等方面的问题。(完)
(责任编辑：潘奕燃 UN657)
2016-05-11 18:52:21
央广网