Chen Man State compensation: daily compensation 219.72 total 8,437 | miscarriages | Chen Man _ news of the day news
Chen Man 
Hainan State compensation decisions 
Hainan State compensation decisions 
Hainan State compensation decisions 
Chen Man out of prison 
Chen Man (left) and his family the last group photo Latest developments-watched Chen Man, this morning, the Hainan Provincial higher people's Court announced the results of State compensation cases Chen Man: national award was paid to Chen Man more than 2.75 million Yuan. But two months ago, Chen Man presented to the High Court in Hainan and more than 9.66 million worth of applications for State compensation.
23 years ago, on suspicion of murder and arson, Chen Man arrested; after 23 years, retry revision, Chen Man free. 8,437 lost days of personal freedom, and there is a gap between the amount of compensation, but Chen Man is still accepted.
Hainan High Court decided to pay more than 2.75 million Yuan
On May 13, 2016, after consultations, the Hainan Provincial higher people's Court, Chen Man reached a compensation agreement on State compensation, payment of State compensation to Chen Man 2753777.64. Including compensation of more than 1.85 million yuan of personal freedom, moral damage compensation of 900,000 yuan.
According to the People's Republic of China article 33rd of the State compensation law, violations of citizens ' personal freedom, daily compensation calculated in accordance with State workers ' average salary per day for the last year. Chen Man, that is, to May 27, 2015 issued by the Supreme People's Court of the 2015 standards of compensation for violations of citizens ' personal freedom, specific amounts for the daily compensation 219.72. Chen Man from arrest to acquittal, a total of 23 years, total 8,437 lost days of liberty. 8437x219.72 = 1853777.64.
On March 14, 2016, Chen Man lawyer State compensation application to the higher people's Court of Hainan Province more than 9.66 million Yuan. Hainan higher people's court filing on the same day, March 30, shall organize public hearings and heard the claimant views Chen Man. After the hearing, the Hainan Provincial higher people's Court on several occasions with Chen Man and entrusts an agent to negotiate on State compensation. On May 13, the Hainan Provincial higher people's Court and State compensation agreement Chen Man, Chen Man paying State compensation of 2753777.64 Yuan.
There is a gap with nearly Chen Man applied for compensation
The compensation amount of data and Chen Man applied for a gap. Chen Man being submitted to the Court in the application for State compensation, which presented two requests, requests the Court, in mainstream media such as CCTV, on the one hand openly Chen Man apologized, eliminating the effects.
In addition to requests for rehabilitation, Chen Man also raised the financial compensation requests totaling more than 9.66 million Yuan, including five charges, namely:
1, compensation for violations of liberty 1853777.64. According to the People's Republic of China article 33rd of the State compensation law, violations of citizens ' personal freedom, daily compensation calculated in accordance with State workers ' average salary per day for the last year. Chen Man, that is, to May 27, 2015 issued by the Supreme People's Court of the 2015 standards of compensation for violations of citizens ' personal freedom, specific amounts for the daily compensation 219.72. Chen Man from arrest to acquittal, a total of 23 years, total 8,437 lost days of liberty. 8437x219.72 = 1853777.64
2, delay compensation of 3707555.28 Yuan. Chen Man believes if you don't jail, income levels are higher than the national average wage, calculated as twice times the national average wage, calculated the cost of more than 3.7 million Yuan.
3, fees of subsequent treatment of 100,000 yuan.
4, moral damage compensation of 3 million Yuan. In counsel's view, these 23 years, Chen Man missing people with a complete home, business, not in the parent's knee filial, experience the pain the absence of life, so apply for 3 million yuan in compensation for mental damage.
5, their cost of 1 million Yuan. Chen Man says the family when on the move costly, such as the cost of transportation is a lot, in the early 90 's, not discounted by plane, according to Chen Man relative to produce records from 1993 to 1998, during the five years it took a hundred thousand of.
Why is there such a big difference?
Have applied for State compensation legal basis on January 1, 2013 in modifying the implementation of the People's Republic of China on State Compensation Act. Chen Man applied for the big gap between the amount and the amount of compensation. Experts, State compensation stressed that according to "legal standard" to compensate, rather than "how much cost a lot."
National School of administration, Professor Yang introduced, taking into account national particularities of the compensation itself, this standard for property losses are direct losses and can determine the expected loss calculated, but for General in civil compensation for expected losses are not included. Delay compensation, for example, Chen Man applied for 3.7 million, in his view their income level should be higher than that of society, but the Court did not support.
Before, "Zhejiang nephew rape and murder case" application for compensation of 7.02 million, 2.21 million awarded Zhejiang High Court (Court of the nephew to apply for attorneys ' fees, medical expenses and other compensation is not supported). Fujian "reading bin" application for State compensation of 15 million, the Fuzhou intermediate court awarded 1.13 million (including personal freedom and mental distress damages only, not including other awards).
In the view of Professor Yang, the legislative spirit of the State compensation law was hurt by the public authority of the State of the people given a remedial measure. Parties can accept such a remedy, so to restore the body and mind, this is the core spirit of the State compensation law.
Chen Man: a protest to the highest highest law case
In 1988, the 25-year old Chen Man leave without pay, South to Hainan venture. In 1992, Chen Man and fellow Zhong Zuokuan to rent in upper and lower village. Six months after Chen Man moved out shortly after, upper and lower village rental housing misfire, Zhong Zuokuan death. As former renters, Chen Man was identified as a suspect by police.
On December 27, 1992, Chen Man on suspicion of arson and murder were caught.
On November 29, 1993, the Haikou city people's Procuratorate to Chen Man suspected of intentional homicide indictment to the Court.
On November 9, 1994, Haikou Intermediate Court of first instance sentenced Chen Man to death, suspended for two years.
On August 26, 1998, the Supreme Court of second instance court in Hainan Province.
On April 15, 1999, the Hainan Province High Court of final appeal ruling, dismissed the protest and upheld. Since then, Chen Man begins his sentences, family members and lawyers are running around, making complaints.
In February 2014, Chen Man's complaint was forwarded to the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme People's Procuratorate started review proceedings.
On February 10, 2015, protested to the Supreme People's Procuratorate to the Supreme People's Court on Chen Man, Chen Man case since the 1979 criminal procedure law was implemented, the highest first entered a protest case. Subsequent Supreme Court retrial decision and instruction, Zhejiang Province people's High Court collegial.
On December 29, 2015, the retrial of the case opened in Haikou. In the nearly five-hour hearing, there has been a rare hearing, defendant Chen Man is no longer facing murder and arson charges of reconstruction, but the prosecution and the defence are evidence Chen Man not guilty.
On February 1, 2016, in Hainan Province, meilan prison inside the courtroom, the case retrial verdict, Chen Man was acquitted. After the sentencing, Deputy Director of the Hainan Provincial higher people's Court Fu Qin Chen Man apologized in person.
Responsible editor: Chen yan SN225
Article keywords:Being wrongly accused, Chen Man
I want feedback
Save a Web page
CCTV
陈满国家赔偿书:每日赔偿金219.72元 共8437天|冤假错案|陈满_新闻资讯
陈满 海南高院国家赔偿决定书 海南高院国家赔偿决定书 海南高院国家赔偿决定书 △陈满走出监狱 △陈满（左一）和家人的最后一张合影 备受关注的陈满案出现最新进展，今天上午，海南省高级人民法院公布了对陈满国家赔偿案的结果：向陈满支付国家赔偿金275万余元。而在两个月前，陈满向海南高院提出了高达966万多元的国家赔偿申请。
23年前，因涉嫌故意杀人与纵火，陈满被捕入狱；23年后，再审改判，陈满重获自由。失去8437天人身自由，虽然赔偿金与申请金额之间存在差距，但陈满仍表示接受。
海南高院决定支付275余万元
2016年5月13日，经协商，海南省高级人民法院和陈满就国家赔偿问题达成赔偿协议，向陈满支付国家赔偿金2753777.64元。其中包括人身自由赔偿金185万余元，精神损害抚慰金90万元。
根据《中华人民共和国国家赔偿法》第三十三条，侵犯公民人身自由的，每日赔偿金按照国家上年度职工日平均工资计算。对于陈满来说，也就是要按照2015年5月27日最高人民法院公布的《2015年侵犯公民人身自由赔偿金标准》，具体数额为每日赔偿金219.72元。 陈满从被捕到无罪释放，一共经历23年，合计失去了8437天的人身自由。8437×219.72元＝1853777.64元。
2016年3月14日，陈满委托律师向海南省高级人民法院提出申请国家赔偿966万余元。海南省高级人民法院同日立案，3月30日，依法组织公开听证会，听取赔偿请求人陈满的意见。听证会后，海南省高级人民法院多次与陈满及其委托代理人协商解决国家赔偿问题。5月13日，海南省高级人民法院和陈满达成国家赔偿协议，向陈满支付国家赔偿金2753777.64元。
与陈满申请的近千万赔偿有差距
这个赔偿数据和陈满申请的金额存在一定差距。陈满在向法院提交的国家赔偿申请书中，主要陈述了两方面的请求，一方面是请求法院在中央电视台等主流媒体公开向陈满赔礼道歉、消除影响。
除了对恢复名誉的请求，陈满还提出了总额达到966万多元的经济赔偿请求，其中包括五项费用，分别是：
1、侵犯人身自由赔偿金为1853777.64元。根据《中华人民共和国国家赔偿法》第三十三条，侵犯公民人身自由的，每日赔偿金按照国家上年度职工日平均工资计算。对于陈满来说，也就是要按照2015年5月27日最高人民法院公布的《2015年侵犯公民人身自由赔偿金标准》，具体数额为每日赔偿金219.72元。 陈满从被捕到无罪释放，一共经历23年，合计失去了8437天的人身自由。8437×219.72元＝1853777.64元
2、误工费3707555.28元。陈满方面认为如果自己不入狱，收入水平要高于国家平均工资，因此按国家平均工资的两倍计算，计算出370余万元的费用。
3、医疗费、后续治疗费10万元。
4、精神损害抚慰金300万元。律师认为，这23年，陈满缺失了普通人拥有的完整家庭、事业，不能在双亲膝下尽孝，饱尝了人生离别之苦，所以申请了300万元的精神损害赔偿。
5、申冤费用100万元。陈满方面称，家人当年四处奔波开销巨大，比如交通费就是一大笔，在上个90年代初期，坐飞机不打折，根据陈满亲属出示的开支记录，1993年到1998年五年期间就花了十几万。
为什么会有这么大的差距？
申请国家赔偿的法律依据是2013年1月1日进过修改实施的《中华人民共和国国家赔偿法》。陈满申请的金额与赔偿金额之间存在不小差距。专家介绍，国家赔偿强调根据“法定标准”来进行赔偿，而不是“损失多少赔多少”。
国家行政学院教授杨伟东介绍，考虑到国家赔偿本身的特殊性，对财产损失这个标准是以直接损失以及可明确预期的损失来计算，但对于一般在民事赔偿当中可预期的损失并没有列入其中。比如说误工费，陈满申请370万，在他看来自己的收入水平应该较社会平均水平高，但法院并未支持。
之前，“浙江叔侄奸杀冤案”申请赔偿702万，浙江高院裁定赔偿221万（法院对这对叔侄申请的律师费、医疗费等赔偿请求并未支持）。福建“念斌案”申请国家赔偿1500万，福州中院裁定赔偿113万（基本只包括人身自由损害赔偿金和精神抚慰金，不包括其它赔偿金）。
在杨教授看来，国家赔偿法的立法精神是国家对受到公权力伤害的人给予的一种补救措施。让当事人能够接受这样一种补救措施，从而身心得以恢复，这是《国家赔偿法》最核心的精神。
陈满案：一起最高检向最高法抗诉的案子
1988年，25岁的陈满办了停薪留职，南下到海南创业。1992年，陈满和老乡钟作宽合租在上下坡村。半年后陈满搬离，不久后，上下坡村出租屋里失火，钟作宽死亡。作为曾经的租房客，陈满被警方确定为犯罪嫌疑人。
1992年12月27日，陈满因涉嫌纵火杀人被抓。
1993年11月29日，海口市人民检察院以陈满涉嫌故意杀人罪向法院提起公诉。
1994年11月9日，海口市中院一审判处陈满死刑，缓期两年执行。
1998年8月26日，海南省高法二审开庭。
1999年4月15日，海南省高院作出终审裁定，驳回抗诉，维持原判。从此，陈满开始正式服刑，家人和律师则四处奔走，提出申诉。
2014年2月，陈满案的申诉状递交到了最高人民检察院，之后，最高人民检察院启动复查程序。
2015年2月10日，最高人民检察院就陈满案向最高人民法院提出抗诉，陈满案成为1979年刑事诉讼法实施以来，最高检提出无罪抗诉的第一案。随后最高法作出再审决定，并指令浙江省高级人民法院组成合议庭。
2015年12月29日，这起案件的再审在海南海口开庭。在将近五个小时的庭审中，出现了一种罕见的庭审状况，被告人陈满所面临的不再是故意杀人罪和放火罪构罪的指控，而是检方和辩方都在证明陈满无罪。
2016年2月1日，在海南省美兰监狱的一个内设法庭里，这起案件再审宣判，陈满被宣告无罪。宣判后，海南省高级人民法院副院长傅勤向陈满当面表达了歉意。
责任编辑：陈琰 SN225
文章关键词： 冤假错案 陈满
我要反馈
保存网页
央视