Violating Japan inventors patented LCD: Samsung accused Samsung, Samsung Electronics-IT information
Foreign media reported on May 19, recently, Japan inventor Masakazu Ushijima again sued Samsung Electronics, said patent infringement of its liquid crystal display technology.
Last year, Ushijima had about the infringement of patent rights to United States Austin, Texas sued in Federal Court, but was not supported by the jury.
On May 18 this year, Ushijima told an Austin Federal Court lawsuit against Samsung notebook violation of its patent on liquid crystal display technology has. In last year's case, is also a matter of patent infringement of liquid crystal display technology, but charges against the technology in TVs and desktop computer applications.
Houston Prebeg, Faucett & Matthew Prebeg Abbott law firm (Matthew Prebeg) and the Bracewell firm ailun·aoerbulaite (Alan Albright) was joint attorneys in that case. They said, though the jury ruled that Samsung did not infringe patent rights last year, but the jury found Ushijima's patent is valid. In addition, last year, many of the findings can be applied to this case, progress in the case is expected to be very smooth.
Kaiwen·Mike (Kevin Meek) is a Houston law firm Baker Botts (Baker Botts) neighborhood of intellectual property experts in patent cases in the last year, he is Samsung's lawyer, but he has not made any comments so far. Samsung spokesman also did not make any indication.
Last year, Samsung after winning a case, apply to the Court, requires Ushijima to pay as much as $ 3.5 million fee, but the United States Federal District Court rejected the request.
侵犯日本发明家液晶专利：
三星成被告 -
三星,
三星电子 - IT资讯
据外媒5月19日报道，近日，日本发明家Masakazu Ushijima再次起诉三星电子，称三星侵犯其液晶显示技术专利。
去年，Ushijima已经就三星侵犯专利权一事向美国得克萨斯州奥斯丁联邦法院提起诉讼，但当时并没有获得陪审团的支持。
今年5月18日，Ushijima再次向奥斯丁联邦法院提出诉讼，控告三星笔记本电脑侵犯其对液晶显示技术拥有的专利权。在去年的案子中，同样是三星侵犯液晶显示技术专利一事，但当时的控告是针对这项技术在电视和台式电脑的应用上。
休斯顿Prebeg, Faucett & Abbott律师事务所的马修·普雷贝格(Matthew Prebeg)和布雷斯韦尔律所的艾伦·奥尔布赖特(Alan Albright)是这场案子的联合代理律师。他们表示，虽然陪审团去年裁定三星没有侵犯专利权，但是陪审团认定Ushijima的这项专利是有效的。另外，由于去年的很多调查结果都能应用到这个案子上，这个案子的进展预期会非常顺利。
凯文·米克(Kevin Meek)是休斯顿贝克博茨律师事务所(Baker Botts)知识产权邻域的专家，在去年的专利权案中，他是三星的代理律师，不过目前他还没有发表任何意见。三星的发言人也还没有做出任何表示。
去年，三星赢得官司后，曾向法院提出申请，要求Ushijima支付其高达350万美元律师费，但美国联邦地区法院驳回了这一请求。