Xinhua News Agency: avoid the "92 consensus" Taiwan new leader be any goodwill | Tsai | 92 consensus _ news

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, May 22-title: avoiding the "92 consensus" Taiwan new leader what "good faith"?

Shanghai Taiwan Institute Deputy Director, editor in Chief of the Taiwan study Ni Yongjie

Taiwan new leader in 20th "inaugural speech". Although this speech mobilized a lot of think tank gaocan racked my brains, careful preparation, and aides called "maximum goodwill has been released", but it is most concerned about whether the acknowledged the "92 consensus" speech was disappointing. Address has not answered the current cross-strait relations is the fundamental issue of nature, still avoiding the "92 consensus" and its core meaning city, confirmed by both sides, no association with political base. The future of cross-strait relations are still unable to dispel.

Taiwan new leader's speech about 6000 words, but stake Taiwan economic development and the future and destiny of Taiwan was placed after the so-called regional peace and stability, only less than 400 words. Compared with the previous, minor changes discussed in its cross-strait policy, but not a decent answer. Discusses the essence of its policy was to reduce the dependence on cross-strait links and, keeping the so-called Taiwan "subjectivity". It can be seen that her goal of cross-strait policies but stable, no development; just risk, not growth; not on both sides more and more close, but the two sides more and more far away.

Speech refers to the 1992 cross-strait talks and the two agencies made a number of shared cognition, according to Taiwan area the existing rules and regulations in dealing with cross-strait affairs. But merely reiterated the Taiwan position of the existing provisions, still foregoing provisions clearly define the nature of the cross-straits relations. Just make such a statement is not enough to make people believe that she really accepted "the Mainland and Taiwan belong to one China," the "92 consensus" core meaning. Also proposal to maintain the existing communication mechanism between the two sides, but her visions only, no path, unable to maintain viable solutions for institutionalized contacts between the two sides. Also recommended on both sides of the ruling party "and put the historical burden", but it is the DPP's "Taiwan independence party platform" and "Taiwan future resolution" and "normal country resolution" and other "Taiwan independence" file for total Exchange raise one obstacle after another. Currently the DPP even frozen "Taiwan independence platform" are not able to do, bipartisan conversation is highly unlikely.

In fact, the DPP is now keen to promote political "anti", legal "split" and culture "to" economic "away from", strategy "," she "in good faith"? She was high on both sides of the issue say high, people see fog. Glamorous, but is devoid of content, the actual move less. In stark contrast with this is in the promotion of the "new South" policy, join the TPP, the development of the arms industry, away from the city, she was victorious, beating gongs and drums, its essence is to increase the chips against the city, her "in good faith"?

The Taiwan new leader's words and deeds, the Mainland authorities will keep a close watch, rigorous testing. She does not look flat, view, lower requirements, nor relax standards. We must not only listen to what she says, but also to see how she is doing and see if her political options and policy tools to "Taiwan independence." She has repeatedly claimed that to maintain the cross-strait policy of "consistency, predictability and sustainability", and promised "words" is true or not, we'll see. If she is "saying one thing and doing another", or even depending on the commitment of child's play, Lee Teng-hui on cross-strait relations, Chen Shui-bian proceeded to own her political credibility will be completely bankrupt nonsense and lies.

Mainland policy toward Taiwan is consistent and clear. Taiwan new leader every day in the face of the "92 consensus" this mandatory. Taiwan Straits belong to one China, the core meaning can't be avoided, no blur, blur and weakening. If you still do not want to explicitly recognize the "92 consensus" is tantamount to the destruction of two consultations and negotiations between the two sides, Taiwanese, and Mainland Affairs Council regular communication mechanism of political foundations. If the "cross-strait hot line" became empty, responsibility is of course in the DPP administration. Now, ball in the Taiwan new leader's hand. As long as the back reflected a principle of the "92 consensus" cross-strait relations will remain flat and calm and positive mutual interaction.

Responsible editor: Chen yan SN225

Article keywords:
92 consensus, Tsai

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Xinhua

新华社:避“九二共识”台当局新领导人何来善意|九二共识|蔡英文_新闻资讯

　　新华社北京5月22日电 题：回避“九二共识”，台湾当局新领导人何来“善意”？

　　上海台湾研究所常务副所长、《台海研究》主编倪永杰

　　台湾当局新领导人20日发表“就职演讲”。尽管这篇讲话调动了不少智囊高参绞尽脑汁、精心准备，并被其幕僚称为“已释出最大善意”，但面对人们最为关注的是否承认“九二共识”，讲话着实令人失望。讲话没有回答当前两岸关系是何种性质这一根本问题，依然回避“九二共识”及其核心意涵，无意与大陆方面确认两岸共同政治基础。两岸关系的未来仍旧无法拨云见日。

　　台湾当局新领导人的这篇讲话约6000字，但攸关台湾经济发展与前途命运的两岸议题却被放在所谓区域和平稳定之后，只有区区不到400字。与此前相比，其两岸政策论述小有变化，但并不是一份像样的答卷。其政策论述的实质是要降低两岸连结与依存度，保持所谓的台湾“主体性”。可以看出，她的两岸政策目标只求稳定，不求发展；只管控风险，不增长动力；不是让两岸愈走愈近，而是让两岸愈离愈远。

　　讲话提到1992年两岸两会会谈和达成了若干共同认知，表示要依据台湾地区现行规定和有关条例处理两岸事务。但只是重申了台湾方面现行规定的立场，依然回避前述规定中明确界定的两岸关系性质。仅仅作出这样的表态，不足以让人相信她真心接受了“大陆和台湾同属一个中国”的“九二共识”核心意涵。讲话还提出维持两岸现有沟通机制，但她只有愿景，没有路径，无法提出维持两岸制度化交往的可行办法。讲话还建议两岸执政党“放下历史包袱”，但正是民进党的“台独党纲”、“台湾前途决议文”以及“正常国家决议文”等“台独”文件为民共交流制造重重障碍。目前民进党连冻结“台独党纲”都做不到，两党对话的可能性微乎其微。

　　事实上，民进党上下目前正热衷于推动政治“反中”、法理“拆中”、文化“去中”、经济“离中”、战略“制中”，她的“善意”何在？她对两岸议题说得高来高去，让人看得云里雾里。言辞光鲜，但内容空洞，实际举动更少。与此形成强烈对比的是，在推动“新南向政策”、加入TPP、发展军火工业、远离大陆方面她做得轰轰烈烈，可谓敲锣打鼓，其实质是为了增加对抗大陆的筹码，她的“诚意”何在？

　　对台湾当局新领导人的言行，大陆方面会密切观察、严格检验。对她既不看扁、看死，也不放低要求、放宽尺度。我们不但要听她怎么说，还要看她怎么做，看她的政治选项与政策工具是否指向“台独”。她多次声称要保持两岸政策的“一致性、可预测性与可持续性”，承诺“说到做到”，是真是假，我们拭目以待。如果她“说一套，做一套”，甚至视承诺为儿戏，在两岸关系上搞李登辉、陈水扁翻云覆雨那一套，她的政治信用将完全破产，沦为废话与谎言。

　　大陆对台大政方针是一贯的、明确的。台湾当局新领导人任内的每一天都得面对“九二共识”这道必答题。两岸同属一中的核心意涵无法回避，不容模糊、虚化及弱化。如果仍不愿明确承认“九二共识”，无异于毁坏两岸两会协商谈判、国台办与陆委会常态化联系沟通机制的政治基础。如果“两岸热线”成为空号，责任当然在民进党执政当局。现在，球还在台湾当局新领导人手上。只要回到体现一中原则的“九二共识”，两岸关系仍将波平浪静、良性互动。

责任编辑：陈琰 SN225

文章关键词：
九二共识 蔡英文

新华网