Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)
published in(发表于) 5/31/2016 8:24:23 AM
Complex name of Huangshan Huizhou Facilitator: renaming Huizhou during the Millennium year was a mistake

English

中文

Complex name of Huangshan Huizhou Facilitator: renaming Huizhou during the Millennium year was a mistake

On May 28, the famous writer and senior editor of people's daily Arts Department Li Hui held in Hefei "why calls for restoration of place names of Huizhou – cultural heritage and today's us" talks. The meeting, in 1984, first mayor of the County, Huangshan city, Cui Zhikang about renaming process, Huangshan complex disputes concern once again.


On May 31, Li Hui and Cui Zhikang receiving-upstream Chongqing morning post journalist said in an interview, complex name of Huangshan in Huizhou has its historical and cultural significance.


"Small" Huangshan city's first mayor:


Renaming didn't take into account the historical and cultural heritage


According to the Yearbook of Huangshan, Huangshan city of long history and culture, civilization's origins can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago.


Song Xuan and three years (1121), she who Fang La rebellion, she modified State to Huizhou, jurisdiction of she, xiuning, Yi, jixi, Wuyuan County, and qimen, shexian County, State.


Since then, the three years until the Qing emperor Xuantong (1911) 790 years, as the State capital, has not changed the name of Huizhou.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: when renaming process: can you briefly?


Cui Zhikang: renamed that year, that is, in order to develop Huangshan scenic spot. In Anhui Province, the original belongs to the organs of the Executive Affairs Authority of Anhui Province Huangshan management service, to Huangshan, Anhui Province, authority, directly under the provincial government officials. But little authority in Huangshan, power is also small.


Later, the province decided to merge the Huangshan scenic area, and several other places to set up County, Huangshan city, submitted to the State Council. On December 1, 1983, with the approval of the State Council, County, Huangshan city was founded, which is commonly referred to as the "small" Huangshan city.


In November 1987, issued by the State Council on adjustment of Huizhou, Anhui Province, administrative division of reply, revocation of Huizhou, Tunxi district, Huangshan, Huangshan city, prefecture-level established.


In April 1988, formally established in Huangshan city, prefecture-level, tunxi, Huangshan, the management of Huizhou District 3 and XI, xiuning, Qi, Yi 4 counties. This is now "Huangshan".


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: name change did not take into account the cultural and historical heritage?


Cui Zhikang: renamed at that time mainly on account of the development of tourism, Huangshan Huizhou better-known, without taking into account the historical and cultural heritage issues. Didn't like this, for historical and cultural awareness so high, so impressive. Nor the place names of Huizhou with such a long history, culture is so heavy.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: after renaming, and how local economic benefits?


Cui Zhikang: Huizhou, later changed to Huangshan city, this place, these years were developed. This must be recognized.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: do you support complex name of Huangshan Huizhou?


Cui Zhikang: I support the revert to the original name of Huangshan. From a historical and cultural point of view, we didn't realize it. National Civil Administration ordered to correct improper modifications when place names, and some are in favour of revising the people now feel or restored place names of Huizhou, passing on history and culture of the place names well.


I would consider that complex although there is resistance, but the resistance is small, can be overcome. On a personal level, I hope that after this matter put on the agenda as soon as possible, work out a timetable, collecting polls as wide as possible, discuss the argument.


Writer Li:


Not in favour of all city complex name


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: from the 90 's of the last century began to pay attention to problems of the city changed its name, and involved not just one city, why be concerned about this area?


Li: I work mainly engaged in cultural reports, often dealing with the culture of people of the older generation. Place names with strong continuity, and it names and there is a big difference. Place names carries thousands of years of history and cultural information, especially names, such as Jingzhou and Xiangyang and Huizhou, it represents more than just a place. A case study of Huizhou, when it comes to Huizhou, you thought of Huizhou architecture, Hui ink, merchants, and so on, which is a comprehensive cultural body, is not a natural landscape, a mountain can be replaced.


So I'm still thinking about the last 18 years (complex name of Huangshan Huizhou) the thing pleasing is that now more people agree that names should take into account the history and traditional culture.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: do you think that all names must be restored to its original name?


Li Hui: of course not, "cookie-cutter" I did not want to see, nor realistic. But for part of the history and culture of the city, it is necessary to restore.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: you said "history and culture of the city" is referring to?


Li: I focused on some of the representative City: Jingzhou and Xiangyang, and Mount Huangshan.


Early 90 's of the last century, Jingzhou city, Hubei Province merged with Shashi was renamed "jingshashi" after I wrote but lost Jingzhou. After two years, Hubei Province will "jingsha" changed back to "Jingzhou".


Xiangyang, Hubei Province, and xiangfan, later renamed in 2010 and back. These are real-life examples.


Other is Anhui Huangshan. In 1998, I published in the people's daily, the unfortunately non of Huizhou, explicitly oppose renaming. After 18 years, I have published in the people's daily article of the place names are our way home, rake, hopes to ride the national second place names survey opportunities, leading to complex named Huangshan in Huizhou.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: why do you think these cities be changed?


Li Hui: with economy to drive the modification of place names, this is a problem with renaming in some cities in China in recent years, renamed Huangshan in Huizhou is a typical example. But changed his name after economic development better? ' It may not be. Is also located in Anhui Province, jiuhua mountain, nor changed the name to jiuhua mountain city, but travel as well, and according to the available data, to jiuhuashan tourism numbers are less than those who go to Huangshan.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: why do you think they have double names?


Li Hui: a case study of Xiangyang, Tang dynasty poet Wang Wei of the HANJIANG River pan made by saying "these beautiful days here in Xiangyang, make drunken my old mountain heart. "After Xiangyang later changed its name to xiangfan, I see an ad in the local direct into a verse" xiangfan wind day ", you feel very uncomfortable.


Many place names in our country, have entered the literary Canon. Both the Tang poem, the song CI or the Yuan dynasty drama of place names are being created. You (the names) after the change, you have to add a lot of notes, from a cultural perspective, these place names are not easily changed.


The Government should pay for the bad decisions of the year


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: why are you complex name of Huangshan Huizhou dedicated nearly 20 years?


Li Hui: such a good history of place names ("Hui") is gone, this is a great loss to the Chinese culture. Huizhou studies of Dunhuang studies, tibetology, along China's three major subject areas, it is enough to reflect the social, economic, and cultural in Huizhou, thought, arts, science and technology, technology of Chinese culture.


So I think the importance of the complex name of Huangshan in Huizhou is far greater than in other cities, or even over Jingzhou and Xiangyang.


Chongqing morning post-upstream News: comments, changing the name is cumbersome and requires a fee. If you really want to change, and this cost should not be borne by the taxpayers, should be to you as a representative of the complex's name called on the participants to take, what do you think?


Li: I think the idea belongs to tamper with the concept. Modified time of the year, why does no one say on the question of costs? Huizhou, for example, renaming Huizhou for Huangshan mountain for nearly 30 years. 30 years compared with thousands of years of history, and calculate what? These costs could not spend, but because you made a mistake, and changed his name to immediate economic interests, this cost is wrong before you have to pay the price. Of course, the cost should be borne by the Government, impossible for those of us who called for the complex to assume otherwise it absurd, right?


(Upper reaches of the Chongqing morning post-journalist Wang Xin)


(Editors: Hao Long UN654)
2016-05-31 20:04:28
黄山复名徽州推动者:千年徽州当年改名就是个错

  5月28日,著名作家、人民日报社文艺部高级编辑李辉在合肥举行“为何呼吁恢复徽州地名——文化传承与今天的我们”主题讲座。会上,1984年担任县级黄山市首任市长的崔之康讲述更名过程,黄山复名之争再一次受到关注。


  5月31日,李辉和崔之康在接受重庆晨报-上游新闻记者采访时均表示,黄山复名徽州有其历史文化意义。


  “小”黄山市首任市长:


  改名时没考虑历史与文化的传承


  据《黄山年鉴》, 黄山市历史文化源远流长,文明的源头可以追溯到距今5000多年前。


  宋宣和三年(公元1121年),平歙州人方腊起义,改歙州为徽州,辖歙、休宁、黟、绩溪、婺源、祁门县,州治歙县。


  从此,直到清宣统三年(1911年)的790年间,作为州府名,徽州这一名称一直没有变更。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:当年改名的过程,你能简单说下吗?


  崔之康:当年改名,就是为了大力发展黄山景区。安徽省把原属于安徽省机关行政事务管理局管辖的黄山管理处,改为安徽省黄山管理局,直属省政府领导。但黄山管理局管辖的范围小,权力也小。


  后来,省里决定将黄山风景区等几个地方合并成立县级黄山市,上报国务院。1983年12月1日,经国务院批准同意,县级黄山市正式成立,也就是人们通常所说的“小”黄山市。


  1987年11月,国务院发出《关于安徽省调整徽州地区行政区划的批复》,撤销徽州地区、屯溪市和县级黄山市,设立地级黄山市。


  1988年4月,地级黄山市正式成立,辖屯溪、黄山、徽州3区和歙、休宁、祁门、黟4县。这也就是现在的“大黄山市”。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:当时改名有没有考虑到文化和历史的传承呢?


  崔之康:当时改名主要是考虑发展旅游,黄山比徽州知名度更高,没有考虑到历史文化传承问题。当时没有像现在这样,对历史文化认识这么有高度,这么深刻。也没有考虑徽州地名历史这么悠久,文化积淀这么厚重。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:改名后,地方经济效益如何?


  崔之康:原来的徽州,就是后来改为黄山市的这块地方,这些年是有发展的。这一点必须承认。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:你支持黄山复名徽州吗?


  崔之康:我支持黄山恢复原来的地名。从历史文化的角度说,我们过去没有意识到这一点。就目前国家民政部门要求各地纠正不恰当修改地名的时候,而且有些原来赞成修改的人,现在也觉得还是恢复徽州地名,传承地名的历史文化好。


  我认为复名虽然有阻力,但阻力并不大,可以克服。就我个人来说,我是希望复名这件事早日提上议程,制定出时间表,尽可能大范围地收集民调,讨论论证。


  作家李辉:


  不赞成所有城市都复名


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:你从上世纪九十年代就开始关注城市更名的问题,而且不止涉及一座城市,为什么会关注这一领域?


  李辉:我参加工作后主要从事文化报道,也经常和老一辈的文化人打交道。地名具有很强的延续性,它和人名是有很大区别的。地名承载着千年的历史信息和文化信息,尤其像荆州、襄阳、徽州这些地名,它代表的不仅仅是一个地名。以徽州为例,说到徽州时,你会想到徽派建筑、徽墨、徽商等等,它是一个综合的文化体,不是一个自然景观、一座山能够代替的。


  所以过去18年了我还在惦记(黄山复名徽州)这个事,令人高兴的是,现在更多人认同定地名应该考虑历史和传统文化。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:你认为所有的地名都要恢复成原来的名字吗?


  李辉:当然不是,“一刀切”不是我想看到的,也不现实。但对于部分历史文化气息很重的城市来说,很有必要将之恢复。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:你所说的“历史文化气息很重的城市”指的是?


  李辉:我关注的是一些有代表性的城市:荆州、襄阳和黄山。


  上世纪90年代初,湖北省荆州与沙市合并改名为“荆沙市”后,我写了《可惜从此失荆州》。两年后,湖北省将“荆沙”改回了“荆州”。


  还有湖北省的襄阳,后来改名为襄樊,2010年又改回来了。这些都是活生生的例子。


  另外就是安徽的黄山。1998年,我在《人民日报》上发表《可惜从此无徽州》,明确反对改名。18年后,我又在《人民日报》上发表《地名是我们回家的路》一文,重提旧事,希望借着全国第二次地名普查的契机,促成黄山复名为徽州。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:你认为这些城市为什么要改名?


  李辉:以经济来驱动地名的修改,这是近些年中国部分城市改名的一大弊端,徽州改名黄山就是一个典型的例子。但是你把地名改了之后经济就发展好了么?也未必。同样是位于安徽的九华山,也没把地名改为九华山市,但人家的旅游一样很好啊,而且根据我掌握的数据,去九华山旅游的人数不比去黄山的人少。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:为什么你觉得这些城市要复名?


  李辉:就以襄阳为例,唐朝诗人王维所作的《汉江临泛》有句“襄阳好风日,留醉与山翁。”后来襄阳改名为襄樊后,我看到当地有个广告直接把诗句改成了“襄樊好风日”,你一听就觉得很别扭。


  我们国家的不少地名,都进了文学经典。不论是唐诗、宋词还是元曲,都有地名的出现。你(将这些地名)改了之后,你要加上很多的注解,从文化传承的角度讲,这些好的地名是不要轻易改的。


  政府应该为当年的错误决定买单


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:你为什么对黄山复名徽州执着近二十年?


  李辉:一个这么好的历史地名(指“徽州”)消失了,这是中华文化的一大损失。徽学与敦煌学、藏学并列为中国三大地方显学,这也足以体现徽州的社会、经济、文化、思想、艺术、科技、工艺在中华文化中所占的地位。


  所以我认为黄山复名徽州的重要性远远大于其它城市,甚至超过荆州和襄阳。


  重庆晨报-上游新闻:有评论认为,更改地名很繁琐,而且需要一定的费用。如果真的要改,这笔费用不应当由纳税人来承担,而应由以你为代表的复名呼吁者来承担,你对此怎么看?


  李辉:我认为这样的观点属于偷换概念。当年改的时候,为什么没有人说费用的问题?比如说徽州,徽州改名为黄山快三十年了。三十年相对于上千年的历史而言,又算得了什么?这些成本本来可以不花的,但是因为你犯了错,为了眼前的经济利益把地名改了,这个成本就是你之前犯错所必须要付出的代价。当然,这个成本也应该由政府来承担,不可能让我们这些呼吁复名的人来承担,否则这不是很荒唐吗?


  (重庆晨报-上游新闻记者 王鑫)


(责任编辑:郝龙 UN654)
2016-05-31 20:04:28





If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)




QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759