Parents spend 3000 brushes for children canvassing votes and found he had been deceived | circle of friends _ news
Comic book illustration: circle of friends for votes.

Original title: parents app for their kids brush and found canvassing for 3000 Yuan is a scam

Yangtse evening post May 30 (reporter Pei Rui Qin Gongxuan journalists) micro-circle of friends to vote and many people hate them, some parents to give their children to vote at micro-letter friends red envelopes, some to find network brush company. Recently, Ms Nanjing qinhuai river police received the public alarm, calling himself in order to give their children the first money brush fool you. Police investigations revealed that brush don't pretend however the entire operations of the company in itself is a hoax.

　　Child playing tired MOM

　　Tissue Group envelopes sent several hundreds of

Zhang likes to bask in micro-circle of friends food, bask in the camera, but since the baby came, her circle of friends and they are all child-related information. Few days ago, Zhang on the Web to participate in the "good King" voting competition, won the first place children can make a free short films. First Lady launched a friend around to help her vote, intelligent cast a vote for one day, the next day to continue voting. But Ms Zhang found that relying on friends ' "easy" to get the first seems to be very difficult. After all, his friends, and she is very familiar with, and someone not too familiar with. In order to encourage the enthusiasm, Zhang also launched a group chat, periodically send a 50, 100 give red envelopes to the Group everyone, and let everyone help vote.

This solution is really effective, few days ladies and children rushed to the third place. Hardly happy, Zhang found the top two votes is too high, your own several times. In order to ensure that children get the first, Zhang brushed heard tickets online, want to brush as many votes as the number of votes. In this way, nor myself everyday to ask friends.

　　Find brush company "natural" brush

　　Money spent the first is not to

Then, Zhang found a brush store on the Internet, they said, they brush is more advanced, are independent of IP address, which belongs to the "natural" brush method. Relatively natural brush growth and increase, rather than a one-off increase in the number of votes, can effectively reduce the background risk of discovery. Holding a try, Zhang spent 1000 pieces to paint and soon picked up in rankings, caught up with the second-place votes. Zhang does not satisfy, she wanted the first name, so find the brush company brushes, ultimate ladies to give kids tickets cost 3000 RMB.

However the final result is not as good as Ms Zhang expected better, whenever Zhang votes in time for the first time, being at higher ticket exceed, last day ticket for the woman to each other with great difference over, got the second place at the end. Failed to get the first prize, Zhang was so angry that he feels is the brush company's responsibility, to police the police, hoping police severely punish these crooks.

　　Police investigations revealed that brush the platform itself is a hoax

　　Illegal means to obtain resident status information is the purpose of

Police immediately to investigate the situations similar to that fact, however the results let police dropped glasses, women's participation in this activity is in itself a hoax. Police checked this "kaidilong photography base" host, found this store in Nanjing is not found. Even more surprising is, get the first name of the child's identity, police also checked, Nanjing has indeed is such a man, but labeled children's information is wrong, and nothing like real people, photographs are not. In other words, the first Nanjing for children at the children's names.

Police then called the organizers phone was found to be empty, the ladies are busy for almost a month, voting platform, is absolutely a bogus platform. After learning of the results still can't believe MS, do not understand. Had a similar experience of civilian police told Zhang for accepting the case, in fact, the platform had appeared before. Suspects use these platforms, the main objective was to collect information on parents or voters. To participating users will provide your baby's photo, still have their own identities and phone numbers.

After the information is collected in a large number of parents, information would be sold to a third party, as advertising customers or engage in other criminal activity. Police have found someone on the street dedicated to Windows Photo, aim is to get the owners to remain in the windshield of a vehicle following "car phone", because the owners of these phones are being used, is real and effective. In addition, the police also learned that polling data can be changed for these platforms, so the first names are generally their own "people". Knowing the information, Lady shouted, fall, for his more than a month of "brush" tour with remorse. At present, the qinhuai have filed for investigation by the police, the case is under further investigation. Police reminded members of the public, circle of friends, relatives and friends to vote and nothing can, but be sure to take good care of your identity and also phone number Web site need to be submitted for voting, open, be sure to pay attention to prevent the disclosure of identity information.

Responsible editor: Zhang Chun SN182

Article keywords:
Circle of friends

I want feedback
Save a Web page
The Yangtze evening news

家长朋友圈为孩子拉票 花3000元刷票后发现被骗|朋友圈_新闻资讯
漫画配图：朋友圈拉票。

　　原标题：家长为孩子微信拉票 花3000元刷票后发现是骗局

　　扬子晚报网5月30日讯 （通讯员 秦公轩 记者 裴睿） 微信朋友圈投票相信不少人都深恶痛绝，有些家长为了给孩子投票不惜给微信好友发红包，有的还去找网络刷票公司。近日，南京秦淮警方就接到市民张女士报警，称自己为了给孩子拿第一，花钱刷票给骗了。警方通过调查后发现，刷票公司没弄假然而整个投票活动本身就是个骗局。

　　孩子参加比赛累坏了妈妈

　　组织微信群红包就发了好几百

　　张女士喜欢在微信朋友圈里晒美食、晒自拍，但自从有了娃后，她的朋友圈里清一色的都是和孩子有关的信息。前两天，张女士在网上参加了一个名为 “精彩孩子王”的投票比赛，获得第一名的孩子可以免费拍一部微电影。一开始张女士发动了身边所有的朋友帮她投票，一人一天智能投一票，到了第二天才能继续 投。但是张女士发现，靠着朋友们的“举手之劳”想拿第一似乎十分困难。毕竟自己的朋友里有人和她很熟悉，也有人并不是太熟悉。为了鼓励大家的积极性，张女 士还发起了群聊，不定期地发个50、100的红包到群里给大家，让大家帮着投票。

　　这个办法还真有效，没过几天张女士的孩子就冲到了第三名。可还没来得及高兴，张女士就发现前两名的票数实在太高，是自己的好几倍。为了确保孩子拿到第一，张女士听说网上有刷票的，想刷多少票就有多少票。这样一来，也不用自己天天去求朋友圈。

　　找了刷票公司“自然”刷票

　　钱花了第一还是拿不到

　　于是，张女士在网上搜到了一家刷票的网店，对方表示，他们的刷票方式更为先进，都是独立的IP地址，属于“自然”刷票法。刷票的增长速度相对自 然，分时段增加，而不是一次性地增加投票数量，能有效减低后台发现的风险。抱着试一试的心态，张女士花了1000块去刷票，很快便在排名上有了起色，赶上了第二名的票数。可张女士不满足，她想要第一名，所以又找到刷票公司进行刷票，最终张女士为了给孩子刷票花掉了3000元。

　　然而最终的效果却不如张女士期望的那样美好，每当张女士的票数快赶上第一名的时候，便被对方以更高的票超过，最后一天张女士被对方以极大的票数 差超过，最终只拿到了第二名。没能拿到第一名，张女士非常生气，觉得是刷票公司的责任，便向警方报警，希望民警严惩这些骗子。

　　警方调查发现刷票平台本身就是个骗局

　　非法渠道获取居民身份信息才是目的

　　民警立即对张女士所描述的情况展开调查，然而调查结果却让民警大跌眼镜，张女士参加的这个活动本身就是一个骗局。民警核实了这家名叫“凯迪隆摄 影基地”的主办方，发现这家店在南京根本找不到。更为让人惊讶的是，拿到第一名的孩子的身份信息，民警也核实了，南京的确有这么一个人，但是上面标注的孩 子的信息都不对，和真实的人完全不一样，照片也对不上。也就是说，这个第一名的孩子冒用了南京这个孩子的名字。

　　民警随后拨打了主办方的电话，发现是个空号，这个让张女士忙活了快一个月的投票平台，就是个彻头彻尾的假平台。张女士得知结果后一直不敢相信， 也不明白。有过类似案件受理经验的民警告诉张女士，其实这种平台以前也出现过。犯罪嫌疑人利用这些平台，最主要的目的就是收集家长或者投票人的信息。想要 参赛的用户，必然会提供宝宝的照片、还有自己的身份信息和手机号码。

　　在收集到大量的家长信息后，这些信息会被他们卖给第三方，作为广告推广的客户或者从事其他的犯罪活动。就比如民警曾在街头发现有人专门对着车窗 玻璃拍照，目的就是获取车主留在车辆挡风玻璃下面的“挪车电话”，因为这些电话都是车主正在使用的，是真实有效的。除此以外，民警还了解到，这些平台的投 票数据都可以改动，所以第一名一般都是他们自己的“人”。了解到这些信息后，张女士大呼上当，对于自己一个多月的“刷票之旅”后悔不已。目前，秦淮警方已 对此事立案侦查，案件正在进一步审理之中。警方也提醒市民，朋友圈内的亲友间投票并没有什么不可以，但是一定要注意保管好自己的身份信息，对于投票也需要 提交手机号的网站，点开后一定要多加注意，防止身份信息的泄露。

责任编辑：张淳 SN182

文章关键词：
朋友圈

扬子晚报