The Beijing High Court: 14% cases of campus violence involving slapping nude | | slapped | nude photos of campus violence _ news
On May 31, the Beijing high people's Court held a press conference to inform the community in the past five years Beijing court of violent crimes on campus. Five years, the city's courts handled nearly 200 criminal cases of campus violence, accounting for 0.19% of the total criminal cases in the same period, smooth criminal cases of campus violence, overall did not fluctuate, and involve charges of relatively concentrated, high rate of common crime cases.
Case statistics show that violent crimes on campus focuses on intentional assault, crimes quarrel and affray, and today three such cases accounted for more than 78%. About 70% cases of common crime. Among them, the Department of Defense people, victims of one of "many to one" case 45%; are people on both sides of the conflict, "many to many" case 55%. Seen from the crime, minors accounted for 62% of the total number of violent crimes on campus, and the predominantly male, killed the vast majority of students at school.
Vice President of the Beijing high people's Court introduced Sun Li, violent crimes on campus time, place, have certain similarities, mainly focused on schooling, school way less work hours or eat, and military training. Crime, mainly in the school canteen, toilets and dormitories where fewer teachers are present, such as, as well as outside the relatively secluded hiding places such as car parks, Park corner. Causes and motives of the crime is relatively simple, mostly because of daily chores such as Queuing, collision, numbness of the mouth, joke, or "face" aggressive, and try to be brave and sensitive paranoid emotional disputes. Meanwhile, school violence is not only bring different degrees of bodily harm to the victim and victims ' mental health lasting harm. Case statistics show that about 14% cases of victim was slapped, threw cold water on, cigarette burns, nude, very bad insult means, resulting in killing students in the case after a long period of time, continues to be accompanied by panic, irritability, anxiety and other emotional responses, even transferring, drop out of school.
Sun Li pointed out that violent crimes on campus in addition to reflect family, school, networking various outstanding issues, teenagers ' ignorance of the law, defying law in need of attention. Case study found that about 68% of the accused to legal regulations relating to campus violence "is not very understanding"; there are some narrative of the accused, had happened before wounded or injured by students of the students events, parents are helped up as compensation cases, didn't think this would be sentenced. In this psychological drive, they are more likely to take a chance, reckless desperation. In addition, two negative responses need to guard against the victim. One is afraid to be hit again, and suffer in silence, compromise. Worth noting is that trial victims tend to be perpetrators more fearless, intense and frequent into the vicious circle of violence. Another is the transformation from victim to perpetrator. Case statistics show that nearly 10% 's case the accused originally for victims of school violence, after they violated, due to lack of correct behavior guidelines, fails to recover in time and attitude adjustment, resulting in a revenge retaliation, follow the psychological domination, aggressive behavior, so as to translate into new offender.
Sun Li suggested, at the legal level, promotion of special laws, such as the development of the Campus Security Act, identify and refine legal liability of parties such as Governments, schools, families, enhance the operability of the system. Campus violence for perpetrators, to seek help in collaboration with relevant departments to build a linkage mechanism to implement the necessary follow-up counselling, prevent a return to crime. For the victims, social workers, psychological assistance in promoting justice in schools, exploring stress intervention mechanisms for students open recourse, providing professional advisory services. If necessary, intervention by school violence cases, cutting off "victim – offender" conversion path.
In today's press conference, by the Beijing Municipal publicity Office of the leading group produced in collaboration with the Beijing high people's Court, called love? guardian public service announcements in line with Tencent and SINA publishing. This Department public tablets according to real case, selected three bit actor respectively played a deliberately hurt case of violence who, and a robbery case of participation violence who, and a belligerent trouble case of victims, through they monologue type of tells, one by one reflected campus violence case in the violence who from "not knowing, and defying method" to huihenjiaojia of mental course, and campus violence to victims caused of fear, and helpless, and since closed, and exclusion, multiple hurt. In the latter part of the film, as the "judge Mama" Lai q, as well as space hero Yang Liwei Shang Xiuyun, a juvenile court judge has played, colors from the original black and white suddenly to bright light and calling for campus advocacy society prevention and control of violence, peace-building harmonious campus. Beijing high people's Court also issued ten cases of violent crimes on campus, campus violent crime situation from various perspectives, explore how juvenile individual, family, school, and other levels of effective school violence prevention and control measures, and to give warning to society, calling for concerted attention to campus safety.
In recent years, the full implementation of the Beijing court of suiting penalty to the principle of offender and victim dialogue mechanism established to promote parenting education model, efforts to repair relationships, encourage families to improve teaching methods. Strengthened in three court judges serve as Vice-President of the rule of law, annually sending law into the campus more than 300 times, audiences of minors more than 70,000 people. Take advantage of micro-blogging, micro-credit, micro films and other emerging media platforms, creatively "who law enforcement, whose Franco-Prussian" legal accountability into the process of promoting the construction of safe campus.
(Source: Beijing court)
Responsible editor: Chen yan SN225
Article keywords:School violence slapped nude photos
I want feedback
Save a Web page
北京高院：14%校园暴力案涉及扇耳光拍裸照|校园暴力|扇耳光|拍裸照_新闻资讯
5月31日，北京高院召开新闻发布会，向社会各界通报近五年来北京法院审结的校园暴力犯罪案件情况。五年间，全市法院共审结校园暴力犯罪案件近200件，占同期全部刑事案件的0.19%，校园暴力犯罪案件数量平稳，整体波动不大，且涉及的罪名相对集中，共同犯罪案件比例高。
案件统计显示，校园暴力犯罪主要集中于故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪和聚众斗殴罪，三类案件累计占比78%。约有70%的案件系共同犯罪案件。其中，被告方系多人、被害方系一人的“多对一”案件占45%；冲突双方均系多人的“多对多”案件占55%。从犯罪主体上看，未成年人约占校园暴力犯罪总人数的62%，且男性占绝大多数，被害主体绝大多数系在校学生。
北京高院副院长孙力介绍，校园暴力犯罪时间、地点具有一定共性，多集中于上学、放学途中或者就餐、军训等非课业时间。犯罪地点主要在校内食堂、厕所、学生宿舍等老师较少在场的地方，以及校外停车场、公园角落等相对僻静隐蔽的场所。犯罪起因和动机相对简单，多因排队、碰撞、口角、玩笑等日常琐事，或因“好面子”、逞强好斗以及敏感多疑等情感纠纷。同时，校园暴力不仅给被害人带来不同程度的身体伤害，还给被害人心理健康造成持续性危害。案件统计显示，约有14%的案件，对被害人采用了扇耳光、泼冷水、烟头烫、拍裸照等较恶劣的侮辱手段，致使被害学生在案件发生较长一段时间后，仍持续伴有恐慌、烦躁、焦虑等情绪反应，甚至转学、休学。
孙力指出，校园暴力犯罪除反映出家庭、学校、网络多方面突出问题外，未成年人不懂法、不畏法的现象需要引起重视。案件调研发现，约有68%的被告人对有关校园暴力的法律法规“不是很了解”；还有一些被告人自述，以前就发生过把同学打伤或者被同学打伤的事件，都是父母帮助赔偿了事，没想到这次会被判刑。在这种心理的驱使下，他们更容易心存侥幸，不计后果铤而走险。此外，被害人两种负面反应需警惕。一种是害怕再次被打，默默忍受，委屈求全。值得注意的是，被害人的隐忍往往会令加害人更加有恃无恐，变本加厉，从而陷入频繁遭受暴力侵害的恶性循环。另一种是被害人向加害人转化。案件统计显示，近10%的案件被告人原本为校园暴力的被害人，他们在遭受侵害后，因缺乏正确的行为指引，未能及时恢复和调整心态，导致在复仇、效仿等心理的支配下实施报复、攻击行为，从而转化为新的加害人。
孙力建议，在法律层面，推动《校园安全法》等专门法律的制定，明确并细化政府、学校、家庭等各方的法律责任，增强制度可操作性。对于实施校园暴力的加害人，要探索与相关部门构建联动协作帮教机制，实施必要的追踪辅导，防止重新违法犯罪。对于受害人，则要积极推进司法社工、心理援助进校园，探索疏解干预机制，为有需要的学生畅通求助渠道，提供专业咨询服务。必要时，通过校园暴力个案干预，切断“受害人——加害人”的转化路径。
在今天的发布会上，由北京市法制宣传教育领导小组办公室与北京高院联合制作，名为《爱?守护》的公益宣传片正式在腾讯和新浪网上线发布。这部公益片根据真实案例，选取三位演员分别扮演某故意伤害案的施暴者、某抢劫案的参与施暴者、某寻衅滋事案的受害者，通过他们独白式的讲述，逐一体现校园暴力案件中施暴者从“不知法、不畏法”到悔恨交加的心路历程，以及校园暴力给受害者造成的恐惧、无助、自闭、排斥等多重伤害。在影片后半部分，随着“法官妈妈”尚秀云、少年法庭法官赖琪以及航天英雄杨利伟的先后出场，画面色调从原有的黑白豁然转为光明和鲜艳，呼吁倡导全社会共同防控校园暴力，建设平安和谐校园。北京高院还发布了校园暴力犯罪的十个典型案例，从多角度呈现校园暴力犯罪的现状，探索如何在未成年人个体、家庭、学校等多个层面采取有效的校园暴力防控措施，并给予社会以警示，呼吁大家共同关注校园安全。
近年来，北京法院充分贯彻落实罪责刑相适应原则， 建立加害方和被害方对话机制，推广亲职教育工作模式，着力修复社会关系，推动家庭改善教育方法。三级法院不断强化法官兼任法治副校长工作，年均送法进校园300余次，受众未成年人7万余人。充分利用微博、微信、微电影等新兴媒介平台，创造性地将“谁执法，谁普法”的普法责任制融入到推进平安校园建设过程中。
（来源：北京法院网）
责任编辑：陈琰 SN225
文章关键词： 校园暴力 扇耳光 拍裸照