Net assessment: Huawei in the United States people's eyes about the "original sin"-Huawei, United States-IT information
According to United States media 2nd reported, United States Commerce has to China communications equipment giant Huawei company issued administrative summoned, requirements Huawei provides past five years to North Korea, and Iran, and Syria, and Cuba and Sudan export of all information, reported said, beauty party does not allegations Huawei has any errors behavior, administrative summoned also not means with criminal survey, but if survey found Huawei on above several country of export violation has United States of policy, United States has may limit Huawei get key of us parts of way.
In March, United States sanctions on ZTE for the similar reasons, prohibit United States companies to export technology. Many people speculate that Huawei will soon become the United States the next difficult goals.
Despite us investigations of Huawei, ZTE-sounding, but Western observers around the world, including many analysts are of the view that United States did so in order to combat the competitiveness of China's high-tech companies. Huawei is seen as model of Chinese high-tech companies, United States communications industry labored under, the United States on national security grounds to block Huawei into the United States market, now about global business has created some sense of urgency.
Huawei, ZTE and other United States harassment has kept a low profile, to avoid a crackdown they carefully. But in the case of technical and trade relations in the era of globalization are too complicated, United States to make up plausible things always do.
This incident has once again demonstrated the Chinese company into the world's hardships. They go out as "vendors" role does not have any problems, but they are also into a hi-tech giant go global stage, may be United States tightly pegged, the strategic repression against them probably to come.
United States to control the force is very strong, it is the basis of some high-tech parts supplier, also can affect the United States attitude in some markets outside. While multinational companies in China should not be "held in my hands", but it can damage the international reputation of Chinese companies to increase their marketing costs.
It seems to concentrate on technology company hit the Americans "political ceiling", its Chinese origin seems to be it's "original sin". Washington don't see it simply as a company, but to treat it as "China's competitiveness" to limit.
Marketization and internationalization of Huawei, India, and Russia, Europe, the United States has a large Research Institute, creating well-paying jobs for the local post, led the local development. But these are, United States already using long span thought to give it geopolitical nature.
Wussy and politically pursued technology, Huawei has been low-key and low profile, still hasn't escaped bolts trite story, to tell you the truth it was unjust.
United States this is often referred to as the world's "most liberal" countries turned out to be like this, it's an eye-opener for the Chinese. In retrospect, many years in the United States companies are so honest and kind. Some United States companies based communications network to provide equipment to China, electronic products into all levels of Government and research institutions of the Office, they "actually" being treated as a partner, but was not seen as a threat to China's national security, "Trojan horse".
"Taste", this should be China's response to United States companies in China feel free to review or even "indiscriminate punishment" intuition and common sense. Market scale of China watched the growing United States transnational corporations have important stakes. Front desk of national security should be on the market in China, to United States companies in China for further scrutiny.
We need around the market and improve relevant laws and regulations, increased lever to defend national interests. If the United States total for Chinese companies is not righteousness, the "national security" as a special trade barrier, then it should have a United States companies in China pay a corresponding price. This great United States is not difficult to understand.
网评：华为在美国人眼里大概有“原罪” - 华为,美国 - IT资讯
据美国媒体2日报道，美国商务部已向中国通讯设备巨头华为公司发出行政传唤，要求华为提供过去五年向朝鲜、伊朗、叙利亚、古巴和苏丹出口的全部信息，报道说，美方并未指控华为有任何错误行为，行政传唤也不意味着刑事调查，但如果调查发现华为对上述几国的出口违反了美国的政策，美国有可能限制华为获得关键的美制零部件的途径。
今年3月，美国以类似的理由对中兴公司进行制裁，禁止美国公司向其出口技术。当时很多人就推测，华为将很快成为美国接下来的刁难目标。
尽管美方对华为、中兴的调查冠冕堂皇，但包括很多西方观察家在内的全球分析人士均认为，美国这样做是为了打击中国高技术公司的竞争力。华为被看成中国高技术公司的楷模，让美国通讯产业备感压力，美方一直以国家安全为由阻挠华为进入美国市场，现在它对华为遍布全球的业务也产生了一些危机感。
华为、中兴等面对美国的刁难一直保持了低姿态，为避免遭打压，它们小心翼翼。但在全球化时代技术和贸易关系盘根错节的情况下，美国编一些似是而非的东西总是能做到的。
这件事再次展示了中国公司走向世界的艰难。它们如果走出去充当“小商小贩”的角色不会有啥问题，但当它们也变成高科技巨头走向全球舞台时，就可能被美国紧紧盯住，针对它们的战略性压制大概也要随之而来了。
美国的把控力还是挺强的，它是一些高技术基础零部件的供应者，还能影响美国之外一些市场的态度。它虽然不能把中国的跨国公司“攥在手心里”，但却可以破坏中国公司的国际声誉，增加它们开拓市场的成本。
专心于技术的华为公司看来撞上了美国人的“政治天花板”，它的中国公司出身似乎成了它的“原罪”。华盛顿逐渐不再把它简单看成一家公司了，而要把它当作“中国的竞争力”来限制了。
华为非常市场化、国际化，它在印度、俄罗斯、欧洲、美国都设有大型研究所，为当地创造了高薪工作岗位，带动了当地的发展。但是这些都没用，美国已经在用地缘政治的大跨度思维给它定性。
奉行技术主义且政治上老实巴交的华为一直低调、再低调，还是没能逃过树大招风的老套故事，说实话它挺冤的。
美国这个常被认为是世界上“最开放”的国家原来是这样的，这让中国人大开眼界。回过头看，中国很多年里对美国公司真是太实诚厚道了。一些美国公司向中国基础通讯网络提供设备，把电子产品打进中国各级政府和科研机构的办公室，它们“居然”被当成了合作者，而没被看成是有可能威胁中国国家安全的“特洛伊木马”。
“以其人之道还治其人之身”，这应是中国回应美国对中国公司随意审查甚至“滥施刑罚”的直觉和常识。如今中国的市场规模眼看着越来越大，对美国的跨国公司有着重要利害关系。中国国家安全等应当走上这个市场的前台，对美国公司的在华行为做进一步的审视。
我们有必要围绕市场健全有关法律和规则，增加捍卫国家利益的杠杆。如果美国总对中国公司行不义之举，把“国家安全”作为特殊贸易壁垒，那么就应当有美国公司在华付出相应代价。这样的人之常情想必美国不难领悟。