"Drip drop" response driver picked off campaign-esports hand tendons, drops car drivers-IT information
Related: drop in response to driver picked off campaign hand tendon: fully cooperate with investigations
Today, NEWBEE esports Club issued a notice through official micro-blog, said the Club on eSports players Ma Xi Qing drops car ride to the airport in Changsha, was the car driver of knife violence, causing his left hand two hand tendon was picked off. Who have held up quite well in all tournaments running hand, professional esports career almost ended. It is reported that the suspects had been detained, but the effects of this incident apparently were insufficient to fade, people nervously looking again in the event of another "invisible hero", drops.
This incident, released a letter today to the last drop "information note on the Changsha passengers he was driver of violence". Among them, the drop illustrates the causes of the conflict--whether or not to accept a car; note the drops handle events related processes start emergency programs--and visit the injured, pay medical bills, to cooperate with police investigations; indicating the drop areas for drivers handling – account permanently banned the original drivers.
This is clearly not a drop for the first time to face the situation. Last month Shenzhen woman have occurred aboard the ride to the last drop, killed by the driver of the tragedy, officials have said, drivers licence temporary fake, event registration assessment link with the driver and are not directly related. On April 30, the high school girls to take the express train to the last drop of Haikou, masturbating while driving, the driver, drops only account permanently banned and then apologized to the driver, if a bit familiar?
Similarly, in this letter today to the last drop "instructions", has not been telling white that he is once again set off discussions, as drops of information platform in similar events should play roles and responsibilities should be? Account of the problem of "permanent ban" response is infallible ?
In fact, not only is the drop, almost all sharing platform baobuqi will one day face the question.
Sounds beautiful, "sharing economy" if it cannot find the boundaries of responsibility and why us? Still as United States Professor Garrett Hardin said, sharing itself is "releasing curse of greed and destruction of society"--combined with the current situation is that shared in order to enhance the value of idle resources, results related to the project in order to grab the market, financing, cash subsidies, into white washing "non-professional" hotbed of even illegal ?
Cutting-edge technology, ethical paradox is how to persuade the public to rationally understand the crisis, drops's friends said they had already made plans , with special orders of magnitude millions, accidents will happen sooner or later, this is the "law of large numbers" decided by the inevitable, but if an incident occurs, all the questions will focus on "car is not safe." A similar case, also in the balance on this product, people riding bicycles wrestling's not blaming the bike .
Here, you might as well look at the Beijing Intermediate Court had made joint and several liability to e drive platform decisions, give reasons:
"E drive" as a provider of platforms, vehicles failing to audit management obligations to the assigned platform, with obvious mistakes. Vehicles-are car insurance had expired, platform during the audit did not review, nor because you failed to provide new insurance suspended platform services, which magnifies the risk of car accidents. Network trading platform provider knew or should have known of provided services violations of the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, it shall take the necessary measures, and services should bear joint and several liability.
GA bang crunchy, and as stated in the article, car platforms for consumers should have security responsibility platform should review the driver's driver qualifications, vehicle qualification and take reasonable measures to prevent drivers using the platform against passenger rights. Therefore, even with complex legal car platform design, in an attempt to evade responsibility platform, but taking into account the platform on the qualification of drivers and vehicle liability, you must bear the joint and several liability of joint tortfeasor .
Also, hope that this legal vacuum will end as soon as possible.
“滴滴出行”回应司机挑断电竞选手手筋 - 电竞,滴滴专车,司机 - IT资讯
相关阅读：《滴滴回应司机挑断电竞选手手筋：全力配合调查》
今日，电竞俱乐部NEWBEE通过官方微博发布了一则公告，上称该俱乐部电竞选手马玺清在长沙搭乘滴滴专车前往机场时，遭到了专车司机的持刀暴力，导致其左手两条手筋被挑断。这位曾经在各大赛事上都有着不俗表现的电竞选手，职业电竞生涯几乎告终。据悉，目前嫌疑人已被警方拘留，但是这一恶性事件的影响显然尚不足消退，人们又一次胆战心惊地将目光投向了事件中的另一位“隐形主角”，滴滴出行。
就本次的事件，滴滴于今日下午发布了一封“关于长沙乘客马先生遭司机暴力事件的情况说明”。其中，滴滴说明了冲突发生起因——是否接受拼车；说明了滴滴处理事件的相关流程——启动安全应急程序，看望伤者，垫付医药费，配合警方调查；说明了对于滴滴方面对于相关司机的处理结果——永久封禁原司机账号。
这显然不是滴滴第一次面对这种局面了。上个月就曾发生过深圳一女子搭乘滴滴顺风车，遭司机杀害的悲剧，而相关负责人曾表示，涉案司机车辆牌照系临时伪造，事件发生与司机注册审核环节并没有直接关系。而4月30日，海口高中女生搭乘滴滴快车，司机在驾驶时自慰，滴滴也不过是对司机账号做出永久封禁的处理再道歉，是否有点耳熟？
而同样，在滴滴今天的这封“说明”中，始终也没有能说明白以致于又一次引爆相关讨论的是，作为信息平台的滴滴，在类似事件当中理应扮演的角色和承担的责任究竟应该是什么？对问题账号做“永久封禁”能是万试万灵的应对措施？
其实不光是滴滴，几乎所有的共享平台都保不齐会在哪一天面临这样的质问。
听上去很美的“共享经济”若不能找到责任的边界又何以美起来？还是一如美国加勒特·哈丁教授所言，共享本身不过是“释放社会贪婪与毁灭的祸根”——结合时下情况说就是，本来共享是为了提高闲置资源的价值，结果相关项目为了抢市场、拿融资，烧钱补贴，成了洗白“非专业”甚至违法行为的温床？
前沿科技的伦理悖论在于如何说服公众理性的理解危机，滴滴的朋友说他们很早就做了预案，随着专车的订单规模数以亿计，恶性事故迟早会发生，这是“大数法则”所决定的必然，但是一旦出事，所有的质疑都会聚焦到“专车不安全”上。相似的案例，也在平衡车这种产品上，人们骑自行车摔跤可不会责怪自行车。
这里，不妨再回顾一下北京三中院曾对e代驾平台作出连带责任判决时，给出的理由：
“e代驾”作为平台提供者，对入驻平台的车辆没有尽到审核管理义务，具有明显过错。肇事车辆本质属于套牌车，保险也早已过期，平台审核过程中没有审核出来，也没有说因为你没有提供新的保险我就暂停平台服务，无形中放大了乘车发生交通事故的风险。网络交易平台提供者在明知或应知提供服务者侵犯消费者合法权益的，应采取必要措施的，应当与服务者承担连带责任。
而正如嘎嘣脆脆在文章中所言，专车平台对于消费者应当有安全保障责任，平台应审核司机的驾驶资质、车辆资质以及采取合理措施杜绝司机利用平台侵害乘客权益。因此，即便有专车平台进行了复杂的法律设计，企图规避平台责任，但若考虑到平台对司机及车辆的资质审核责任，则必须承担共同侵权的连带责任。
另，希望这种法律真空状态能尽快结束。