GT: Switzerland referendum act part referendum on Chinese face | | social welfare _ news

Yesterday, Switzerland launched a referendum of the people, attracted the attention of miles people, because the content of the referendum is: Switzerland people can also get 2500 Swiss francs per month (about 16,800 RMB) "wages" ...?In fact, only Switzerland, developed since industrialization, high taxes and high population and little more than that is the result of the Nordic welfare State, the past few years have said this will be free of charge to all citizens pay a referendum proposal. But Switzerland became the first real citizens go to the polls, voting in order to this country.

However, when China's micro-blog some of the netizens for Switzerland's referendum envy, even through gritted teeth called China and can't wait to get be reincarnated as Switzerland's time, 8 million Switzerland people have actually hit them in the face. ... The referendum results have been released, the result is 76.9% Switzerland citizens against this practice, and in Switzerland the country's 23 States, nor any of the State's final vote is to support the proposal.

"Lies can each get 16,000 salaries", the benefits of this pie in the sky, why Switzerland people overwhelmingly rejected? Actually, first without asked Switzerland people, we Chinese himself itself on should is clear this "pot" of results is what: "pot" this too "idealism" of fair, actually is is on everyone maximum of not fair--because Dang industrious of people got of money, and lazy of people got of money almost are as, this on serious combat has people work of enthusiasm.

Mention that essentially are hardworking people lazy people live! That is why, lessons we chose to go the route of market, choose the system of distribution according to work. Completely abandoned the "big rice bowl".

? This is our Twitter followers in Switzerland the referendum results are not yet out of comments which, also Switzerland rejected "doesn't work to have 16,000 salary," one of the main reasons.?According to Switzerland media reports, protesters made it clear that if Switzerland really adopted such a proposal, then this country will never be lazy, industry will become worthless. And it may even encourage foreign loser to lazy and cock wire, poured into Switzerland ....

Of course, apart from the moral reasons, Switzerland rejected this "pie in the sky" thing, but because the "pie throwing up into heaven" the costs are too great. In accordance with Switzerland's official calculation, this proposal would make the country more every year 201 billion Swiss francs (about 1.3 trillion yuan).?Government money mainly from taxation, so that means more tax revenue, as well as education, infrastructure and other public spending dropped sharply. Therefore, Switzerland's selection also proves the national quality, level of education and rational. Has not been left in the country common sense lifted "populist mood" Calif.

But more notable is our many Chinese netizens, in Switzerland the referendum results contradict a reaction. For example, when initially released some financial media Switzerland people following a referendum on the matter, the media praise in this Tweet is the envy of most of Switzerland people, who wished to emigrate or to be reincarnated Switzerland and lambaste or sarcastic comments from Chinese, such as "family capitalism is communism! "Totally giving a" China should launch a similar referendum and then unanimously adopted "feeling.

When Switzerland one referendum veto message was one of the popular money after the media reports, the comment was immediately changed the attitude of the media, have become praised Switzerland really rational, advanced countries – before I completely forgot himself so much so that China also Switzerland "money for all" statements.

But watch the whole process of upright but it could not escape the embarrassment, then if you just cast its veto in Switzerland who see these on the Chinese Internet, "spirit of Switzerland who" show, don't know what to think.?Even if these people went to Switzerland, also certain is that probably Switzerland people voted against the social "borers". So, Frank can only come to one conclusion: that is, in the eyes of these people, no matter how foreign, China was the biggest loser.

Then again, actually pursuing high welfare, is the goal of the people of any country are eager to. But only a population of 8 million, and already highly-developed Switzerland, our 1.3 billion people in developing countries, there is still a long way to go.?If our present economic progress, got lazy, hope became overnight Switzerland such as the welfare States of Northern Europe, but want low taxes to nothing, that this year we are na?ve to think that we can rely on a "big" overnight into a Communist society as absurd and funny ... Only if you study hard and work to develop their country, improve the level of productivity per capita, China may be approaching European welfare standards in developed countries. Universal money, we really have no right to think such a thing now, especially those who have hand foot but particularly low levels of contribution to society, not qualified.

Images/micro-signal from the network: HQSBWX

(Source: the global times)

Responsible editor: Chen yan SN225

Article keywords:
A referendum on social welfare

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China NET

环球时报:瑞士公投用行动打了一部分中国人的脸|公投|社会福利_新闻资讯

　　昨天，瑞士人民发起的一项公投，引起了万里之外的中国人民的注意，因为这项公投的内容是：瑞士人民不工作，也能每个月获得2500瑞士法郎（约合1.68万人民币）的“工资”...实际上，也不仅仅是瑞士，因为工业化发达、税收高且人口又很少而造就的北欧多个高福利国家，过去这几年都曾经表示将对这种免费给全体国民发工资的提案进行公投。 只不过瑞士成为了第一个真正公民走到投票站，确实为了此事而投票的国家。

　　可是，当中国微博上的部分网民对于瑞士的这一公投羡慕嫉妒恨，甚至于一边咬牙切齿地骂着中国，一边恨不得立刻投胎做个瑞士人的时候，800万瑞士人民却用实际打了他们的脸....这次公投的结果目前已经公布，结果是76.9%的瑞士公民反对这一做法，而且在瑞士全国23个州，也没有任何一个州的最终投票结果是支持该提案的。

　　“躺在家里就能每个月拿1.6万的工资”，这种天上掉馅饼的福利，为啥瑞士人居然一边倒的拒绝呢？其实，先不用问瑞士人，我们中国人自己本身就应该很清楚这种“大锅饭”的结果是什么： “大锅饭”这种过于“理想主义”的公平，其实却是对每个人最大的不公平——因为当勤劳的人拿到的钱，和懒惰的人拿到的钱几乎都一样，这就严重打击了人们工作的积极性。

　　更何况这本质上其实就是勤劳的人在养着那些懒惰的人！ 这也是为何，吸取教训的我们才选择了走市场经济的路线，选择了按劳分配的制度。彻底抛弃了“大锅饭”。

　　▲这是本报微博粉丝在瑞士公投结果尚未出来时的评论 而这，同样也是瑞士人拒绝了“不工作就能有1.6万工资”的其中一个主要原因。根据瑞士媒体报道，反对者明确表示，如果瑞士真的通过这样的提案，那么这个国家将从此变得懒惰，勤奋将变得一文不值。 而且，这甚至会鼓励那些懒惰的外国loser和屌丝，纷纷涌入瑞士....

　　当然，除了道德上的因素外，瑞士人拒绝这个“天上掉馅饼”的好事，更是因为把“馅饼扔到天上去”的成本太过巨大。 按照瑞士官方的计算，这项提案将令国家每年得多掏2010亿瑞士法郎（约合1.3万亿人民币）。可政府的钱主要都是来自税收，所以这就意味着更重的税收，以及教育、基建等其他公共支出的大幅锐减。 所以，瑞士人的选择还证明了这个国家国民的素质、受教育和理性程度。没有被该国左派常识掀起的“民粹情绪”所裹挟。

　　但更值得注意的，是我们中国不少网民，在瑞士公投结果前后自相矛盾的反应。 比如，当某财经媒体起初发布了瑞士人民要对此事公投后，该媒体这条微博里点赞最多的都是羡慕瑞士人、希望移民或投胎瑞士并且大骂或讽刺着中国的评论，例如“人家资本主义国家都先进入共产主义了！”完全给人一种“中国应该发起类似的公投然后大家一致通过”的感觉。

　　而当瑞士人公投否决全民发钱的消息被同一家媒体报道后，该媒体下的评论却立刻转变了态度，纷纷变成称赞瑞士人真理性、国家真先进——完全忘了自己之前恨不得让中国也学习瑞士“全民发钱”的发言。

　　但围观了全过程的耿直哥却实在摆脱不了尴尬，话说如果刚刚投出否决票的瑞士人，看到中国网络上这些“精神瑞士人”的表演，不知道会是什么感想。哪怕这些人去了瑞士，也一定是那八成瑞士人用投票反对的社会“蛀虫”。 所以吧，耿直哥只能得出一个结论：那就是在这些人眼中，不论国外怎么做，中国都是最大输家。

　　话说回来，实际上追求高福利，是任何一个国家的民众都渴望的目标。但比起只有800万人口，并且早已高度发达的瑞士，我们这个13亿人口的发展中国家，真的还有很长路要走。可如果我们因为现在经济的进步，就早早变得懒惰，希望一夜之间就成为瑞士等北欧的高福利国家，却又希望税低到跟没有一样，那这就和当年我们天真的以为我们可以靠着“大锅饭”一夜之间就进入共产主义社会一样荒唐与可笑... 只有勤奋的学习和工作，努力发展自己的国家，提高人均生产力水平，中国才可能不断接近欧洲发达国家的福利标准。至于全民发钱，我们现在还真没资格想这种事，尤其是那些有手有脚却对社会贡献特别低的人，更加没资格。

　　图片/来自网络微信号：HQSBWX

　　（来源：环球时报）

责任编辑：陈琰 SN225

文章关键词：
公投 社会福利

我要反馈
保存网页
中国网