Supreme Court case of the NIE Shubin, China court date undetermined | the NIE Shubin | grievances _ news
The NIE Shubin. Information chart Caijing reporters zhangyu
The morning of June 8, when received from the hands of the judge of the Supreme Court decision the NIE Shubin's case retrial, when the NIE Shubin mother Zhang Huan to tears. The NIE Shubin's appeals Attorney, said Li Shuting, Nie Mu is cried.
On June 6, the Supreme Court decides law brought before trial the defendant the NIE Shubin murder, rape of women, in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision for a retrial.
Around 5 o'clock in the afternoon, Shandong province High Court has informed Zhang Huanzhi and Li Shuting, let them the morning of 8th to communicate about the NIE Shubin, the Court reviewed the case.
"At that time, the judge does not tell us exactly what happened, repeatedly told us in strict confidence. "Li Shuting said as to when a retrial hearing has not yet been notified.
The NIE Shubin case retrial decision.
On March 15, 1995, the intermediate people's Court of Shijiazhuang city, Hebei province (1995) first stoning 53rd criminal incidental civil judgment, finds that the NIE Shubin committed intentional homicide, sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life; rape committed a crime, sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life. Decision of the death penalty, deprivation of political rights for life. The NIE Shubin compensation in incidental civil action plaintiff Kang 2000 Yuan of funeral expenses and other costs.
After the verdict, the NIE Shubin, Kang a certain appeal, appeal, respectively. On April 25, 1995, the Hebei provincial High Court (1995) no 129th criminal incidental civil to criminal sentences, finds the NIE Shubin committed manslaughter, sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life; rape committed a crime, sentenced to 15 years. Decision of the death penalty, deprivation of political rights for life. Civil compensation partly upheld the first instance decision. On April 27, the NIE Shubin was executed.
Caijing reporters obtained the retrial decision show, since July 2007, the NIE Shubin's parents NIE students, Zhang Huan, sister Nie Shuhui has to appeal to the Supreme Court, the High Court in Hebei province. On December 4, 2014, the directives of the Supreme Court, Shandong provincial higher court review the case. On December 12, the Shandong provincial high court case review.
According to Li Shuting introduced, followed up to now almost 1.5 years of period, total extension 4 times, each time for three months.
Shandong province senior court by review think, trial judgment missing can lock the NIE Shubin modus operandi of objective evidence, in accused modus operandi time, and modus operandi tool, and victims death, aspects exists major questions, cannot excluded others modus operandi of possibilities, trial finds the NIE Shubin made deliberately killing crime, and rape women crime of evidence not does, and not full, recommends highest court started trial supervision program again trial, and reported to the highest court review.
Following a review by the Supreme Court, agreed with the High Court in Shandong province, Hebei province, believe that evidence of the High Court ruling as the basis for the conviction and sentencing, inadequate. In accordance with Article No. 242 of the code of criminal procedure (b) item No. 243, the provisions of the second paragraph of article, decide to trial in this case.
Signature receives after the retrial decision, Shandong province High Court collegial panel of judges again met with Li Shuting and Zhang Huanzhi, and to request from them: one is to believe the Supreme Court will open and fair trials in accordance with law; second, in the hope that during the retrial Attorney not to hype the case; third, to meet the Supreme Court's retrial in accordance with law.
According to Xinhua, the Supreme Court also said that a collegial panel in accordance with law, accountability to the law, the people responsible, responsible attitude to history, based on facts and take law as the criterion, the law in this case. The retrial proceedings will also be announced to the public in due course in accordance with law.
Responsible editor: Chen yan SN225
Article keywords:The NIE Shubin grievance
I want feedback
Save a Web page
Financial network
中国最高法院重审聂树斌案 开庭时间未确定|聂树斌|冤案_新闻资讯
聂树斌。资料图 《财经》记者 张玉学
6月8日上午，当从最高法院法官手中接到聂树斌一案再审决定书时，聂树斌母亲张焕枝热泪盈眶。聂树斌案的申诉代理律师李树亭说，聂母是喜极而泣。
此前的6月6日，最高法院决定依法提审原审被告人聂树斌故意杀人、强奸妇女一案，按照审判监督程序重新审判。
当日下午5时许，山东省高级法院先后通知张焕枝和李树亭，让他们8日上午到法院就聂树斌案复查一事进行沟通。
“当时，法官并没有告知我们具体是什么事，只一再叮嘱要我们严格保密。”李树亭称，至于何时再审开庭，目前还未接到通知。
聂树斌案再审决定书。
1995年3月15日，河北省石家庄市中级法院以（1995）石刑初字第53号刑事附带民事判决，认定聂树斌犯故意杀人罪，判处死刑，剥夺政治权利终身；犯强奸妇女罪，判处死刑，剥夺政治权利终身。决定执行死刑，剥夺政治权利终身。聂树斌赔偿附带民事诉讼原告人康某某丧葬费及其他费用2000元。
宣判后，聂树斌、康某某均不服，分别提出上诉。1995年4月25日，河北省高级法院作出(1995)冀刑一终字第129号刑事附带民事判决，认定聂树斌犯故意杀人罪，判处死刑，剥夺政治权利终身；犯强奸妇女罪，判处有期徒刑15年。决定执行死刑，剥夺政治权利终身。民事赔偿部分维持一审判决。同年4月27日，聂树斌被执行死刑。
《财经》记者获得的再审决定书显示，2007年7月以来，聂树斌的父母聂学生、张焕枝，姐姐聂淑惠先后向最高法院、河北省高级法院提出申诉。2014年12月4日，最高法院指令山东省高级法院复查本案。同年12月12日，山东省高级法院立案复查。
据李树亭介绍，从复查到现在近一年半的时间，共先后延期4次，每次三个月。
山东省高级法院经复查认为，原审判决缺少能够锁定聂树斌作案的客观证据，在被告人作案时间、作案工具、被害人死因等方面存在重大疑问，不能排除他人作案的可能性，原审认定聂树斌犯故意杀人罪、强奸妇女罪的证据不确实、不充分，建议最高法院启动审判监督程序重新审判，并报请最高法院审查。
最高法院经审查，同意山东省高级法院意见，认为河北省高级法院判决据以定罪量刑的证据不确实、不充分。依照《刑事诉讼法》第242条第（二）项、第243条第二款之规定，决定提审本案。
签字接收再审决定书后，山东省高级法院的合议庭法官再次与李树亭和张焕枝进行了会面，并向他们提出要求：一是要相信最高法院会依法公平公开公正的审理案件；二是在再审期间希望代理律师不要炒作该案；三是要依法配合最高法院的再审工作。
据新华社报道，最高法院亦表示，将依法组成合议庭，以对法律负责、对人民负责、对历史负责的态度，以事实为根据，以法律为准绳，依法审理本案。再审审理情况也将依法适时向社会公布。
责任编辑：陈琰 SN225
文章关键词： 聂树斌 冤案
我要反馈
保存网页
财经网