Chinese netizens accuse Government sat for questioning, bijie city, Guizhou province, 177 million aid to children left | | |, bijie city bailout _ news
Original title: ask 177 million children left in bailout funds go netizens accuse Government of bijie city of the hearing
Cover journalists Bo Liang
About 177 million left-behind children, bijie city, Guizhou province, the use of Special Relief Fund last July, leading online whistle-blowers Zhou Xiao赟 apply to the bijie City Government to make public the funds "financial audit". Bijie city 7 replies from the Government. Zhou Xiao赟 think the answer, once again filed an application for administrative reconsideration to the Guizhou Provincial Government, which is rejected. Last December, Zhou Xiao赟 a lawsuit, bijie City Government and the Guizhou Provincial Government to court. In January, the official filing of the Guiyang municipal intermediate people's Court.
On June 20, Zhou Xiao赟 to cover news, Guiyang has been sent a summons to determine if this "mingaoguan" administrative litigation will be held on June 28 in the Guiyang Intermediate Court two proper trial by the Court.
The tragedy raised questions
Time to go back to June 9, 2015. That night, bijie city, Guizhou province, Tian Kan Township, qixing districts, killed 4 children left at home. The four children are one brother and three younger sisters, big brother is 13 years old, the youngest sister was 5 years old. Following a preliminary investigation, local police conclude collective drank pesticide is suspected suicide.
When public grieving for a child suicide, well-known whistle-blowers Zhou Xiao赟 push the eye back into the network through 2012. That year, also in bijie, 5 deaths of children left in the bin. According to media reports, after the tragedy, bijie Government set up a left-behind child care funds, "from now on, bijie city, County (district) fiscal year will take out about 60 million Yuan funds to benefit the life difficult for left-behind children, for them to buy school supplies, repair housing to improve their living conditions and provide medical help."
60 million per year by 2015 is 180 million! So much has happened to use? Has not publicly. Zhou Xiao赟 and decided, bijie city to seek information from the Government.
Zhou Xiao-Yun of doubt is in stark contrast, only in the year 2015, in bijie of Guizhou province a spate of tragic events of 6 children:
On May 5, 2015, qixing districts, bijie city, Guizhou province, Tian BA Yang Dazhi town advanced elementary school principal sexually assaulted 6 left-behind girl, was sentenced to death.
On June 9, 2015, bijie city, Guizhou qixing districts, 4 children left-behind children death by taking poison.
On July 4, 2015, nayong, bijie city, Guizhou province, killed 15 students left behind have been beaten and school when security guards witnessed the incident but did not stop.
On August 4, 2015, Shao Wo Xiang, nayong, bijie city, Guizhou province, two more than 10 years of left-behind children in the home were killed, and several knives.
On September 7, 2015, qianxi County, bijie city, Guizhou province, two left-behind girl, aged 14, 16 from the school back to the village, on the road "was pulling away."
On September 17, 2015, the party members, the Deputy Director of the Guizhou Provincial Development Research Center Cai Fushun was dismissed, CAI revealed more than adultery, sex with underage girls, and asked "did you 15-18 friend in bijie was a Virgin."
"These, what do a good job is to explain the left-behind children, bijie city, or is doing bad? So, I as a member of the ordinary citizen and would like to know how children Fund is spent. This is a citizen's right to know. "Zhou Xiao赟 said.
Reply to "answer"
On June 16, 2015, Zhou Xiao赟 exposed to bijie City Government for "left-behind children, bijie city Special Relief Fund (also known as the left-behind children caring Fund, bijie City) audited financial reports, annual reports, third-party assessment report implementation effect". On July 9, 2015, bijie City Government said in the reply, the Government does not exist.
"Does not exist! Grounds that it was not charity, but rather special funds. However, the Government special funds, we should publicize budget reports and other financial information, even excludes Sun books every year, bijie City Government why don't you open it? "For this, Zhou Xiao赟 is not acceptable. On July 22, 2015, Zhou Xiao赟 of bijie city continues to apply to the Government to make public the funds budget reports, property reports, audit reports and other information on the accounts, ask the money trail.
On July 26, 2015, bijie financial information network announced the city's use of the Special Fund for caring for children left in 2013-2015, says city and County, bijie city in the 3 years financial 8% by compressing the administration of public funds in public institutions, establishment of a special fund for caring left-behind children, 3 years total 177.24 million Yuan. At this time, Zhou Xiao赟 know the Fund amounted to 177.24 million Yuan.
This application, bijie City Government to respond. However, Zhou Xiao赟 of content is still not satisfied with the reply. He said that total number of replies is to tell a few. For example, "2013 bailout payment 3.44 million Yuan, improving the learning environment 26.13 million Yuan, improving living conditions of 21.59 million Yuan." "Which is also called open? Student dormitories, cafeterias, where? I applied for a public project name, location, schedule, budget reports, inspection reports, more information, where is it? ”
Based on this, on October 8, 2015, Zhou Xiao赟 again brought to the Guizhou Provincial Government administrative review, requested the Government of bijie city, Guizhou Provincial Government be ordered to disclose information 7 applications open. However, on December 7 last year dismissed the provincial Government of Guizhou province, and Government of bijie city on 7 specific administrative act to enforce decisions.
Sued the provincial government
Zhou Xiao赟 believes that Government disputed answer book, bijie city, as well as administrative reconsideration decision made by the Guizhou Provincial Government, are finding the facts are not clear, error of law, serious violations of the People's Republic of China Government information relevant provisions of the Ordinance.
To safeguard their legitimate rights and interests and the public's right, Zhou Xiao赟, bijie city, Guizhou Provincial Governments on 7 specific administrative acts, together with Institute 7 administrative proceedings in the two cases, sued the Hospital of Guiyang. On January 8 this year, he received the Guiyang City Hospital on January 6 in the case of notification of acceptance. On January 12, after the Zhou Xiao赟 costs, case to be officially registered.
Recently, Zhou Xiao赟 received two summonses from Guiyang intermediate court. Date issued the summons on June 16, 2016.
First summons to confirm, 9:30 A.M. June 27, Zhou Xiao赟 versus disclosure of Government information in the two held court before the Court the evidence Exchange in Guiyang. Second summons confirmed June 28 9:30 A.M., Guiyang intermediate court will be hearing the case.
Expert view
Zhou Xiao-Yun bijie city sued the Government and the Guizhou Provincial Government information open case concerns.
Zhongnan University Professor Yeh said the case involves special funds, government expenditure, according to the Auditing Act, should receive auditing supervision; if there are no audit, in violation of the relevant provisions of the audit law; if you conducted an audit, the Government chose to open information, is contrary to the relevant provisions of the regulations on disclosure of Government information, administrative omissions. Finance Bureau of bijie city openly the other day that the city's use of the Special Fund for caring for children left in 2013-2015, Yeh said that specific issues of public interest, such as in schools, canteens, personal finance is, without elaborating, citizens will still be able to apply for the relevant information public.
Responsible editor: Mao Minmin SN184
Article keywords:Bijie city of left-behind children relief fund
I want feedback
Save a Web page
Sichuan online-huaxi City newspaper
中国网友告贵州省毕节市政府案开庭 追问1.77亿救助金去向|留守儿童|毕节市|救助金_新闻资讯
原标题：追问1.77亿留守儿童救助资金去向 网友告毕节市政府将开庭
封面新闻记者 梁波
为了解贵州省毕节市1.77亿元留守儿童专项救助基金的使用情况，去年7月，知名网络爆料人周筱赟向毕节市政府申请公开该专项资金“财务审计报告”。毕节市政府给予7项答复。周筱赟认为内容答非所问，再次向贵州省政府提起行政复议申请，后者予以驳回。去年12月，周筱赟一纸诉状将毕节市政府及贵州省政府告上法庭。今年1月，贵阳市中级人民法院正式立案。
6月20日，周筱赟向封面新闻透露，贵阳市中院已发来传票，确定这起“民告官”行政诉讼案将于6月28日在贵阳中院二法庭正式开庭审理。
悲剧引发追问
时间回到2015年6月9日。当晚，贵州省毕节市七星关区田坎乡，4名留守儿童在家中死亡。这四名儿童是一兄三妹，最大的哥哥13岁，最小的妹妹才5岁。经初步调查，当地警方给出结论是一起疑似集体喝农药自杀。
公众为孩子自杀悲痛之时，知名网络爆料人周筱赟将时间视线推回至2012年。当年，同样在毕节，发生5名留守儿童在垃圾箱内死亡事件。据媒体报道，这起悲剧之后，毕节政府设立了留守儿童关爱基金，“从现在起，毕节市、县（区）财政每年将拿出约6000万元经费，对生活困难的留守儿童进行补助，为他们购买学习用品，维修房 屋改善居住生活条件，并提供医疗救助等”。
每年6000万，到2015年就是1.8亿！这么多钱到底用到哪里去了？至今没有公开过。周筱赟于是决定，向毕节市政府申请信息公开。
与周筱赟疑问形成鲜明反差的是，仅2015年一年内，贵州毕节接连发生6起留守儿童悲剧事件：
2015年5月5日，贵州省毕节市七星关区田坝镇先进小学校长杨大志性侵6名留守幼女，被判死刑。
2015年6月9日，贵州毕节市七星关区，留守儿童兄妹4人服毒死亡。
2015年7月4日，贵州省毕节市纳雍县，15岁留守学生遭围殴丧命，事发时校保安亲眼目睹但未阻止。
2015年8月4日，贵州毕节市纳雍县勺窝乡，两名十多岁的留守儿童在家中被杀，身中数刀。
2015年9月7日，贵州省毕节市黔西县，两名14、16岁留守女生从学校回村子时，在路上“被拉走”。
2015年9月17日，贵州省政府发展研究中心党组成员、副主任蔡福顺被免职，蔡被曝与多人通奸，与未成年女子发生性行为，并询问“你在毕节有没有15-18岁的朋友中还是处女的”。
“这些，到底是说明毕节市留守儿童救助工作做的好，还是说明做的不好呢？所以，我作为普通公民的一员，很想知道留守儿童基金到底是怎么花的。这是公民的知情权。”周筱赟说。
回复“答非所问”
2015年6月16日，周筱赟向毕节市政府申请公开“毕节市留守儿童专项救助基金（又称毕节市留守儿童关爱基金）的财务审计报告、年度工作报告、实施效果的第三方评估报告”。2015年7月9日，毕节市政府在回复称，该政府信息不存在。
“不存在！理由是这不是慈善基金，而是财政专项资金。但是，政府财政专项资金，更应该公开预算报告等财务信息，连中央各部委每年都要晒账本，毕节市政府你凭什么不公开呢？”对于这个答复，周筱赟不接受。2015年7月22日，周筱赟继续向毕节市政府申请公开该基金的预算报告、决算报告、财物审计报告等信息，追问资金去向。
就在2015年7月26日，毕节试验区财政信息网公布了《全市 2013年-2015年留守儿童关爱专项资金使用情况》，称3年来毕节市市县两级财政通过压缩行政事业单位公用经费的8%，设立留守儿童关爱专项资金，3年共计1.7724亿元。这时，周筱赟才知道该基金共计1.7724亿元。
这一次申请，毕节市政府给予答复。不过，周筱赟对答复内容依旧不满意。他说，答复内容就是告诉了几个总数。比如“2013年发放救助金344万元，改善学习环境2613万元，改善生活条件2159万元”。“这也叫公开？学生宿舍、食堂，建在哪儿了？我申请公开工程名称、地点、进度、预决算报告、验收报告等详细信息，在哪呢？”
基于此，2015年10月8日，周筱赟再次向贵州省政府提起行政复议，要求贵州省政府责令毕节市政府公开7份申请公开的信息。不过，贵州省政府于去年12月7日予以驳回，并对毕节市政府7项具体行政行为作出维持的决定。
状告省市政府
周筱赟认为，毕节市政府作出的诉争答复书，以及贵州省政府作出的行政复议决定书，均属认定事实不清，适用法律错误，严重违反了《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》的相关规定。
为维护自身合法权益和公众知情权，周筱赟针对毕节市政府、贵州省政府的7项具体行政行为，一并向二者提起7个行政诉讼案件，起诉至贵阳市中院。今年1月8日，他收到了贵阳市中院1月6日做出的《案件受理通知书》。1月12日，周筱赟交了诉讼费后，此案得到正式立案。
近日，周筱赟收到贵阳中院发来的两张传票。传票开具日期为2016年6月16日。
第一张传票确认，6月27日上午9点30分，周筱赟所诉政府信息公开案将在贵阳中院二法庭举行庭前证据交换。第二张传票确认，6月28日上午9点30分，贵阳中院将正式开庭审理此案。
专家观点
周筱赟状告毕节市政府和贵州省政府信息公开案备受关注。
中南财经政法大学教授叶青表示，该案涉及专项资金，属政府财政支出，按照《审计法》，应该接受审计监督；如果没有进行审计，就违反了《审计法》的相关规定；如果进行了审计，政府却不予以信息公开，则违反《政府信息公开条例》的相关规定，属于行政不作为。对于毕节市财政局日前公开的《全市2013年-2015年留守儿童关爱专项资金使用情况》，叶青表示，公众关心的具体问题，比如用在学校、食堂、个人的资金具体是多少，均没有详细说明，公民依然可以向政府申请相关信息的公开。
责任编辑：茅敏敏 SN184
文章关键词： 留守儿童 毕节市 救助金
我要反馈
保存网页
四川在线-华西都市报