Fast play versus Shenzhen supervision Bureau 260 million penalty hearing today, Tencent will attend-fast play, fast play, Tencent-IT information
IT information news June 21 message, according to Guangdong Province senior Court website information, fast broadcast v Shenzhen supervision Council about 260 million fine a case, will Yu June 21, 2016 (today) 9:00 in Guangdong high hospital public court trial, Shenzhen Tencent computer systems limited will as trial third people, will participate in this times trial, will Guangdong court trial live network will on the trial for live ( points this to ).
Case review:
On March 18, 2014, the company complained to the Shenzhen market supervision authority, broadcasting companies violated their right of information network transmission right in connection with the works, be investigated and prosecuted.
On March 18, 2014, the market surveillance authority to the Yantian port in Shenzhen, Shenzhen Notary Office notarized application evidence preservation.
On May 20, 2014, the Shenzhen market supervision administration served on the broadcasting company of the notice of administrative penalty. Apply for hearing broadcast on May 23, 2014.
On June 17, 2014, the Shenzhen market supervision Administration held hearings, broadcast companies, company lawyers participated and presented their views.
On June 26, 2014, Shenzhen Shenzhen Jian JI sent word of the market surveillance authority [2014]123 number of the written decision of administrative penalty, decided:
A, ordered to stop the infringing act immediately;
Second, 3 times the amount of the fine of 260.148 million yuan of illegal business operation. This written decision, stamped "case seal of the Shenzhen market supervision authority (011)".
Fast play company refuses to accept such a decision, to the copyright Bureau of Guangdong Province within the statutory time limit may apply for administrative reconsideration.
On September 11, 2014, the copyright Bureau of Guangdong Province making the administrative reconsideration of decision, maintain the Shenzhen market supervision and administrative punishment decision of the Board. Fast play company sued Shenzhen Futian District people's Court within the legal time limit, request order the revocation of the written decision of administrative penalty.
On November 6, 2014, the intermediate people's Court in Shenzhen City, Shenzhen Futian District people's Court to transfer the case to trial. Shenzhen intermediate people's Court (2014) deep no 2nd law knowledge in administrative judgment, dismissed the broadcast company's claims.
Fast play company appealed against the judgment of first instance, the Shenzhen market supervision authority on the matter involved no administrative penalty authority, administrative procedure law and basis of administrative punishments, administrative punishments such as improper for the appeal to the Guangdong provincial higher people's Court, according to law after the courts form a collegial panel public hearing decision to the present case.
快播诉深圳监督局2.6亿罚款案今日开庭，
腾讯将出席 - 快播,快播案,
腾讯 - IT资讯
IT资讯讯 6月21日消息，根据广东省高级人民法院网站信息，快播诉深圳市监督局有关2.6亿罚款一案，将于2016年6月21日（今天）9:00在广东高院公开开庭审理，深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司将作为原审第三人，将参加本次庭审，届时广东法院庭审直播网将对此次庭审进行直播（点此前往）。
案情回顾：
2014年3月18日，腾讯公司向深圳市市场监督管理局投诉称，快播公司侵害了其享有的涉案作品信息网络传播权，请求予以查处。
2014年3月18日，深圳市市场监督管理局向深圳市盐田公证处申请证据保全公证。
2014年5月20日，深圳市市场监督管理局向快播公司送达《行政处罚告知书》。快播公司于2014年5月23日提出听证申请。
2014年6月17日，深圳市市场监督管理局召开了听证会，快播公司、腾讯公司各自委托律师参加并陈述意见。
2014年6月26日，深圳市市场监督管理局作出深市监稽罚字[2014]123号《行政处罚决定书》，决定：
一、责令立即停止侵权行为；
二、处以非法经营额3倍的罚款26014.8万元人民币。上述处理决定书加盖了“深圳市市场监督管理局案件专用章（011）”。
快播公司不服上述处理决定，在法定期限内向广东省版权局申请行政复议。
2014年9月11日，广东省版权局做出《行政复议决定书》，维持深圳市市场监督管理局的行政处罚决定。快播公司在法定期限内起诉至深圳市福田区人民法院，请求判令撤销《行政处罚决定书》。
2014年11月6日，深圳市福田区人民法院将案件移送至深圳市中级人民法院审理。深圳市中级人民法院作出（2014）深中法知行初字第2号行政判决，驳回快播公司的诉讼请求。
快播公司不服一审判决，以深圳市市场监督管理局对涉案事项无行政处罚职权、行政程序违法以及行政处罚的依据不足、行政处罚的数额不当等为由，向广东省高级人民法院提出上诉，法院受理后依法组成合议庭，决定公开开庭审理本案。