China study abroad United States the murder of female college students: defendant sentenced | girls murdered in America _ news

Original title: China United States female college student was today sentenced in the killing the defendant sentenced to

Beijing, June 22, according to the intermediate people's Court in Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, the official micro-blog news on June 22, hit Belle murder of college students, the intermediate people's Court in Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, publicly. Lee, the defendant is guilty of intentional homicide and sentenced to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life.

Lee, male, born on September 16, 1991, Yueqing, Zhejiang people, left the United States college students.

Identified by the Court, accused Lee and the victim Shao met in Beijing in 2011. In March 2012, August, Lee, Shao Mou respectively, studied at the United States Rochester College, United States at Iowa State University, after the two became friends. In May 2013, Lee to the nearest convenient meet with Shao Mou, from Rochester Institute of technology transfer to the University of Iowa. September 3, 2014 (United States local time, the same below), Lee calls Shao an phone, Shao Mou inadvertently call Lee on the phone to hear Shao to play down his words. 5th 4:30 P.M., Lee and Shao admitted United States Iowa Iowa City one hotel. Two men had a dispute over their feelings, Lee passed after booked a one-way ticket to China. Next day 5 o'clock in the afternoon Xu, Lee a took Shao a returned do group job of machine, to Iowa Ames city grid blue de Avenue No. 2801, Max discount shop (TJ Maxx) pass blue de Avenue No. 3015, Wal-Mart supermarket (Wal-Mart) respectively purchase a only luggage box and two only dumbbell (respectively heavy 15 pounds, and 20 pounds), hid put Yu its driving of Toyota Camry car reserve box within. 7th at about 1 o'clock in the morning, the two men again in the hotel room had a dispute over their feelings, strangle Shao Li manual strangulation. In order to cover up facts of the crime and fled the United States, Lee mount purchased the body trunk, boxes into a 20-pound dumbbells, and then hid the suitcase in the Toyota Camry sedan trunk. For some reason did not sink in the river after, Lee drove directly back to live in Iowa City, Iowa apartments, cars parked in the nearby parking lot. Lee during a texted Shao in Shao Mou name of a roommate, lied about Shao Minnesota for a leave for a week to visit friends. The same month 8th, Lee on scheduled flights, and fly back home. Identified, Shaw a violence-induced suffocation. May 13, 2015 (Beijing time), Li automatically surrendered himself to the Wenzhou City Public Security Bureau.

The Court held that the accused Lee because of emotional entanglements strangled the victim, his behavior had constituted the crime of intentional homicide. Prosecutor accused guilty of the offence. Although Lee fugitive 8 months after arrest has harped on bad social impact, but in this case causes and nature of relationship conflicts caused the crime of intentional homicide; Lee has surrendered to the plot, have a strong sense of repentance in the courts; their families active compensation for the economic loss of the victim's family on his behalf, incidental civil action of understanding and withdrew to the families of the victims. To sum up, Lee may be given a lighter punishment and sentenced him to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life.

　　Judges say:

1, the United States handed over interview reports can be used as a basis for ascertaining?

According to the Supreme People's Court on the application < People's Republic of China criminal procedure > explanation No. 405 of the rules: evidence from foreign materials, the people's Court shall be provided by the source and the person, provide time, extract, extraction time for review. Upon examination, to prove that the facts of the case and in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law, can be used as evidence.

According to police organ handle criminal case program provides No. 365 article provides: police organ for criminal judicial assist and police works cooperation of range, main including crime intelligence information of Exchange and cooperation, survey forensics, served criminal instruments, transfer evidence, and documentary, and audio-visual information or electronic data, evidence material, extradition, and arrest and deportation crime suspects, and accused or criminals and national Treaty, and agreement provides of other criminal assist and police works cooperation matters.

Crime in the case in the United States, China's public security organs, procuratorial organs in accordance with the Working Group in China and the United States concerning mutual judicial assistance to the United States investigation and evidence collection, United States police will investigate and collect evidence material handed over the Chinese. United States handed over the video, photos, autopsy reports and United States officers interviewed reported, belongs to the scope of judicial assistance in criminal matters. Evidence by the United States of Iowa Secretary of State notary (confirmed United States evidence is true, the transfer procedure by the police), and certified by the Chinese Consulate in Chicago, confirmed by the Chinese Ministry of public security received, transferred again to the Wenzhou City Public Security Bureau, evidence of real, legitimate sources. Defender on the United States officers interviewed reported not subject to legal assistance in criminal matters of opinion has no legal basis, not to accept it.

Interviews reported by the United States issued by individual police officers, after its signature, reports to police officers learned through interviews of stakeholders to the perception of the facts of the case. Interview report details the interview time and location, mode, identity information and interviews the interviews, and part of the interview process to have an attorney present or video recordings, objectively reflecting the interview process. Interview report content, and United States police micro chat records, phone records and other electronic data reflect, reflection, objective truth, and linked to the case. In conclusion, Sun interview reports, such as the Court, on cross-examination, with other evidence can confirm each other part can be used as a basis for ascertaining.

2, on the motive

Although available evidence can be found that Li South homicide motivated by emotional entanglement with Shao Tong, but Li Xiangnan Shao Tong proposed "Monday through Friday with the Chinese men on weekends along with its" claims are not supported by any evidence, inadmissible.

3, on whether the defendant Li Xiangnan murder with premeditation

Li Xiangnan argues the defendant is a spur to kill and not premeditated murder, buying tickets for the return trip, luggage Department prepared for the move, dumbbell exercises are not intended for use after killing; after killing bodies packed in suitcases and put the dumbbells in a suitcase, was intended to sink the body without being detected, ensure their timely escape the United States. The investigation, at the time of Li Xiangnan is preparing for graduate school entrance exams, exam time in close proximity, but buying a one-way ticket to return home, and without telling his family, argued that ticket return trip is not consistent with common sense. Li Xiangnan so-called of moved Department in by live community within moved to another a unit, and its room has has luggage box; Li Xiangnan purchase of two only dumbbell ranging heavy, and dumbbell more heavy, compared Li Xiangnan of form, to mining letter for fitness; in Ames purchase luggage box and dumbbell, but its live Yu 2 hours car drive zhiwai of love load Huacheng, purchase of luggage box big, and dumbbell heavy, options purchase, also not meet general common sense. Li Xiangnan on buying tickets for the return trip, luggage Department prepared for the move, dumbbell exercises use argument does not match the logical, and go against reason, inadmissible. Defendant Li Xiangnan emotional entanglement advance return one-way ticket, prior to buy suitcases, dumbbells, a crime may be used, may recognise South Lee murder with premeditation. Li Xiangnan and defender of the accused's comments on not premeditated were inadmissible.

4, on whether the defendant Li Xiangnan constitutes surrender

Although accused Li Xiangnan automatically surrendered Hou times for said in the mentioned "manslaughter", "fault", and "has no intention of", words, and denied has killing premeditated; and autopsy report confirmed Shao Tong scalp deep left has purple color, that head has blunt device led to of forces injury; face skin Shang has tear injury, face right upper center location teeth and side sector teeth (right maxillary 1, and 2 tooth) missing, confirmed its before by forces combat. Strangle Shao Tong Li Xiangnan account only with the hand of the accused, not entirely consistent with the autopsy report, the trivial. But it has been pleaded guilty to strangling Shao Tong in his hands, so they can be identified Lee truthfully to the South the main facts of the crime, which surrendered. Defender views on constitutes a surrender to accept the proposal.

Responsible editor: Qiao Leihua SN098

Article keywords:
Us girls have been killed

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China News Network

中国留学美国女大学生被杀案：被告人被判无期|留美女生遇害_新闻资讯

　　原标题：中国留学美国女大学生被杀案今天宣判 被告人被判无期

　　中新网6月22日电 据浙江省温州市中级人民法院官方微博消息，6月22日上午，轰动一时的留美女大学生被杀案，在浙江省温州市中级人民法院公开宣判。被告人李某犯故意杀人罪，被判处无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身。

　　李某，男，1991年9月16日出生，浙江乐清人，留美大学生。

　　经法院审理查明，被告人李某与被害人邵某于2011年在北京相识。2012年3月、8月，李某、邵某分别就读于美国罗切斯特理工学院、美国爱荷华州立大学，之后二人成为男女朋友。2013年5月，李某为就近方便与邵某见面，从罗切斯特理工学院转学到爱荷华大学。2014年9月3日（美国当地时间，下同），李某拨打邵某电话，邵某无意中接通电话，致使李某在电话里听到邵某贬低他的言语。同月5日下午4时30分许，李某与邵某入住美国爱荷华州爱荷华市某旅馆。当晚两人因感情问题发生争执，后李某通过他人预定了回中国的单程机票。次日下午5时许，李某乘邵某返校做小组作业之机，到爱荷华州埃姆斯市格兰德大道2801号麦克斯折扣店（TJ Maxx）及格兰德大道3015号沃尔玛超市（Wal-Mart）分别购买一只行李箱和两只哑铃（分别重15磅、20磅），藏放于其驾驶的丰田凯美瑞轿车后备箱内。同月7日凌晨1时许，二人在旅馆房间内再次因感情问题发生争执，李某扼颈掐死邵某。为隐瞒犯罪事实并能及时逃离美国，李某将尸体装入所购行李箱，箱内放入一只重20磅的哑铃，然后将行李箱藏于丰田凯美瑞轿车后备箱。后因故没有沉尸河中，李某直接驾车回到爱荷华州爱荷华市自己居住的公寓，将车停放在其住处附近的停车场。期间李某以邵某的名义发短信给邵某室友，谎称邵某要离开一周前往明尼苏达州看望朋友。同月8日凌晨，李某乘坐预定的航班，辗转飞机回国。经鉴定，邵某系遭受暴力致窒息死亡。2015年5月13日（北京时间），李某自动到温州市公安局投案。

　　法院认为，被告人李某因感情纠葛掐死被害人，其行为已构成故意杀人罪。公诉机关指控的罪名成立。虽然李某畏罪潜逃8个月， 归案后避重就轻，社会影响恶劣，但本案在起因和性质上属于恋爱矛盾激化引发的故意杀人犯罪；李某有自首情节，在法庭上有强烈悔罪表现；其家属积极代为赔偿被害人家属的经济损失，被害人家属表示谅解并撤回附带民事诉讼。综上，对李某可予从轻处罚，故判处其无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身。

　　法官说法：

　　1、美国警方移交的访谈报告能否作为定案的根据？

　　根据《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法>的解释》第四百零五条的规定：对来自境外的证据材料，人民法院应当对材料来源、提供人、提供时间以及提取人、提取时间等进行审查。经审查，能够证明案件事实且符合刑事诉讼法规定的，可以作为证据使用。

　　根据《公安机关办理刑事案件程序规定》第三百六十五条规定：公安机关进行刑事司法协助和警务合作的范围，主要包括犯罪情报信息的交流与合作，调查取证，送达刑事诉讼文书，移交物证、书证、视听资料或者电子数据等证据材料，引渡、缉捕和递解犯罪嫌疑人、被告人或者罪犯以及国家条约、协议规定的其他刑事诉讼协助和警务合作事宜。

　　本案犯罪行为地在美国，中国公安机关、检察机关组成工作组按照中国和美国司法协助协定赴美国调查取证，美国警方将调查收集的主要证据材料移交中方。美国警方移交的视频资料、现场照片、尸检报告等以及美国警官的访谈报告，均属于刑事司法协助范围。证据材料均经美国爱荷华州州务卿公证（证实美国警方所移交的证据内容真实、程序合法），并由中国驻芝加哥总领事馆认证，由我国公安部确认接收，再转交至温州市公安局，证据来源真实、合法。辩护人关于美国警官的访谈报告不属于刑事司法协助范围的意见没有法律依据，不予采纳。

　　访谈报告由美国警官个人出具，经其签字确认，报告内容为警官通过访谈了解到的相关人员对案件事实的感知情况。访谈报告详细记录了访谈时间、地点、方式、被访谈人身份信息和访谈内容，且部分访谈过程有律师在场，或有录音录像，客观真实反映访谈过程。访谈报告所述内容，与美国警方收集的微信聊天记录、通话记录等电子数据反映的情况相互印证，客观真实，且与本案有关联。综上，对孙某某等的访谈报告经法庭质证，与其他证据能相互印证部分可以作为定案的根据。

　　2、关于作案动机

　　虽然现有证据可以认定李向南杀人动机出于与邵童之间的感情纠葛，但李向南关于邵童提出“周一至周五跟那个中国籍男子一起，周末跟其一起”的说法没有任何证据佐证，不予采信。

　　3、关于被告人李向南杀人是否有预谋

　　被告人李向南辩解称是临时起意杀人，并非有预谋杀人，购买机票系为回国散心，行李箱系为搬家准备，哑铃系为锻炼身体，并非准备用于杀人后使用；杀人后用行李箱装尸体并将哑铃放入行李箱，本意是为了沉尸不被发现，保证自己能够及时逃离美国。经查，案发时李向南正在准备研究生入学考试，距离考试时间近，但其购买单程机票回国，又未事先告知家人，其辩称购买机票回国散心不符合常理。李向南所谓的搬家系在所住小区内搬到另一单元，而其房间已有行李箱；李向南购买的两只哑铃不等重，且哑铃较重，相比李向南的形体，难以采信用于健身；在埃姆斯购买行李箱和哑铃，但其居住于2小时车程之外的爱荷华城，购买的行李箱大、哑铃重，舍近求远购买，也不符合一般常理。故李向南关于购买机票系为回国散心，行李箱系为搬家准备，哑铃系为锻炼身体所用的辩解不符逻辑，也有悖于情理，不予采信。被告人李向南因感情纠葛提前预定回国单程机票、事先购买行李箱、哑铃，作案后均予以使用，可认定李向南杀人有预谋。被告人李向南及辩护人关于没有预谋的意见均不予采信。

　　4、关于被告人李向南是否构成自首

　　虽然被告人李向南自动投案后多次供述中提到“误杀”，“过失”、“无意”等字眼，并否认有杀人预谋；且尸检报告证实邵童头皮深层左侧有紫色变色，即头部有钝器导致的外力损伤；脸部皮肤上有撕裂伤，脸右上部中心位置牙齿和侧部门牙（右上颌1、2齿）缺失，证实其生前受到外力打击。被告人李向南交代仅用手掐死邵童，与尸检报告内容不完全相符，避重就轻。但其对自己用手掐死邵童的行为一直供认不讳，故可认定李向南如实供述主要犯罪事实，构成自首。辩护人关于构成自首的意见予以采纳。

责任编辑：乔雷华 SN098

文章关键词：
留美女生遇害

我要反馈
保存网页
中国新闻网