PLA major-general abducted arbitration farce alert Asia South China Sea interests | | arbitration _ the South China Sea news

China Netcom unilaterally called the South China Sea brought the arbitration case in the Philippines, recently triggered a strong reaction in the international public opinion, subject to a number of experts, scholars and people of insight at home and abroad criticized. According to the Xinhua News Agency recently reported that independent non-profit legal organizations in Hong Kong Asia-Pacific Academy of international law to the Netherlands the Hague Tribunal submissions, questions whether the Court raised the South China Sea to the Philippines jurisdiction over the arbitration case. The Group worried that the arbitral tribunal to deal with the cases threaten to undermine the system of public international law. In this regard, the former Deputy Political Commissar of Beijing military region air force major-General Yu Aishui China network reporter in an interview, said the South China Sea China's sacred territory since ancient times, the arbitration was a "three arbitration", is based on the name of arbitration law, to reach outside the purpose of messing up the situation in the South China Sea. Yu Aishui believe that Asia is currently the world's largest engine of economic development and the source, the prosperity and stability of Asia will also yield huge dividends for the international community, China safeguard legitimate rights and interests is the China Sea to contribute to world peace.

　　"Three arbitration" is a farce

Major-General Yu Aishui believes that the arbitration is "three arbitration", meaning the right to, case, CD case-free void, was a farce, is a hoax. First of all, there is no jurisdiction in the case of the International Tribunal. The UN Convention specifically provides that relate to questions of territorial sovereignty and islands belonging, is not within the scope of the arbitration. Therefore, the International Tribunal for the South China Sea is no case authority to the arbitration case. The Court does not fall within its area of responsibility under hard to forcibly take over the case, which is clearly illegal, is incredible. The International Court of Justice in the "right" errors under the premise of all trial procedures, are difficult to change the nature of its illegal. Trial of all the effort I'm afraid is to how to make the Philippine arbitration win this starting point and make points, the outcome of arbitration may be effective at all? Major-General Yu Aishui stressed that there is no doubt that in this arbitration case, the International Tribunal defense team had in fact become the Philippines, fully lost should be fair and impartial stance, and self-esteem. For the Tribunal's credibility and image is a wreck, also raised questions and concerns of international public opinion.

Major-General Yu Aishui told reporters, dating history, as early as the Qin and Han dynasties, is has a large ocean-going sailing on the South China Sea area in China trade and fishery production activities, China was first named these islands and, thereafter the world-famous "Zhenghe" maritime trading activities on the passage in the South China Sea. South China Sea China's sacred territory since ancient times, over a long period after World War II, there is no issue, no country in the region of China's Nansha Islands and adjacent waters sovereignty raised objections. Viet Nam before 1975 explicitly recognized China's territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea, the Constitution of the Philippines in 1953 and the 1951 feimei Treaty of military alliance, did confirm the range of Philippine territory, shall not include the Spratlys. So why the sudden prominence and raised tensions in the South China Sea issue?

　　China has always been in good faith and treat neighbors

In this regard, major-General Yu Aishui think there are a few profound reasons.

After the 70 's of last century, China and appeared in some countries around the South China Sea dispute. In order to solve the problem of peace and friendship, China and advocated "putting aside disputes and joint development." However, Viet Nam and the Philippines stole a lot of occupation of the Islands, and insatiable "appetite" more and more very large, although China has been in the midst of negotiations with the countries concerned, but has not yet reached a consensus on ideal, gradually into a more serious and complex situation.

In the South China Sea disputes, China has always advocated in accordance with universally recognized international law and modern maritime law, particularly the 1982 United Nations law of the Sea established the basic principles of the Convention and the legal system, resolved through peace negotiations with the countries concerned. This position actually wrote the 1997 China-ASEAN informal summit meeting issued a joint statement, the Chinese Government also raised the idea of shelving disputes and jointly develop this fully reflects China's good will and open minds, which is impossible to do in any other country, should be highly appreciated by the international community.

Yu Aishui believes that South China Sea dispute is international geopolitical and economic situation changes as a result. China is peaceful development, by the backwardness of the reform and opening up to the world's second-largest economy, some countries unexpected and does not adapt, unwilling to a peaceful development of China will be powerful. Experts pointed out that arbitration cases occurred in the South China Sea United States implementation of the "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy, some foreign countries continues to create tensions in the South China Sea, exaggerated, rendering, situation in the disturbed areas, to achieve their sinister intentions.

　　China safeguard legitimate rights and interests is China Sea to contribute to world peace

Worthy of attention is that the "parties to the South China Sea, some are doing something sold, betrayed the interests of Asia, this Asian betrayal of an Asian is pathetic, which harm the interests of Asia as a whole. "Yu Aishui pointed out that Asia is becoming the world's largest engine of economic development and the source, as the most promising areas, we have ushered in the age of Asia, this is a strategic opportunity in Asia. Because of this, some countries outside mental imbalance, hope to share, plundering Asian interests. So they tried to interfere with, disrupt Asia's disarray, Asian infighting, internal friction. The so-called "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" is "balanced" Asia's rise and rapid development.

Major-General Yu Aishui stressed that China will always adhere to the road of peaceful development, in dealing with the South China Sea issue, stick to their stance, expressing strong will and determination not just to safeguard their own interests, but also make contribution to safeguarding world peace, the international community will no doubt share the resulting bonuses.

Responsible editor: Zhang Chun SN182

Article keywords:
South China Sea Arbitration

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China NET

解放军少将批南海仲裁闹剧 警惕亚洲利益被绑架|南海|仲裁_新闻资讯

　　中国网讯 菲律宾单方面提起的所谓南海仲裁案，近期在国际舆论上引发了强烈反响，受到了国内外多位专家学者和有识之士的批驳。据新华社近日报道称，有香港独立非盈利法律团体亚太国际法学院向荷兰海牙仲裁庭提交意见书，质疑该法庭对菲律宾提出南海仲裁案的管辖权。该团体担心，仲裁庭处理这样的案件恐将破坏国际公法制度。对此，原北京军区空军副政委余爱水少将在接受中国网记者专访时表示，南海自古以来就是中国的神圣领土，此次仲裁是一场“三无仲裁”，是以仲裁法律为幌子，来达到域外国家把南海局势搞乱的目的。余爱水认为，亚洲是当前世界经济发展最大的引擎和源泉，亚洲的繁荣与稳定也将给国际社会带来巨大的红利，中国维护南海正当权益正是为世界和平做贡献。

　　“三无仲裁”是一场闹剧

　　余爱水少将认为，此次仲裁是“三无仲裁”，即接案无权、审案无据、裁案无效，是一场闹剧，也是一场骗局。首先，国际海洋法法庭对此案是没有管辖权的。联合国海洋公约明确规定，涉及到领土主权和岛屿归属问题，不在其仲裁范围内。因此，国际海洋法法庭对南海仲裁案是无接案权力的。该法庭在完全不属于其职责范围的前提下，硬要强行接下这个案子，这显然是不合法的，也是不可思议的。此次国际法庭在“接案无权”的前提性错误之下所进行的一切案审过程，都难以改变其非法的性质。其案审的全部功夫恐怕均是放在如何使菲律宾仲裁获胜这个出发点和归结点上，这种仲裁结果怎么可能会有效呢？余爱水少将强调，毫无疑问，在此次仲裁案中，国际海洋法法庭事实上沦为了菲律宾的辩护律师团，全然失去了本应有的公平公正的立场、原则和自尊。这对该法庭的公信力和形象是一次的折损，还会引发国际舆论地质疑和担忧。

　　余爱水少将对记者表示，回朔历史，早在秦汉时代，中国在南海一带就有大规模的远洋航海通商和渔业生产活动，中国是最早发现这些岛屿并进行命名的，尔后举世闻名的“郑和下西洋”的航海通商活动，就通行于南海。南海自古以来就是中国的神圣领土，二战后的较长时期，都不存在所谓的南海问题，南海地区也没有任何国家对中国在南沙群岛及附近海域行驶主权提出过异议。越南在1975年以前明确承认中国在南海的领土主权，1953年菲律宾的宪法和1951年《菲美军事同盟条约》，均对菲律宾的领土范围做了确认，概不包括南沙群岛。那么，为何现在南海问题骤然突出出来并引发局势紧张呢？

　　中国历来以善意和胸怀善待邻国

　　对此，余爱水少将认为有以下几个深层次的原因。

　　上世纪70年代之后，中国与周边一些国家相继出现了南海争端问题。为了和平友好解决问题，中国提出并主张“搁置争议、共同开发”。但是，越南和菲律宾却偷偷大量侵占中国的岛屿，且得寸进尺，“胃口”越来越很大，虽然中方同有关国家一直在交涉之中，然而，至今尚未达成比较理想的共识，逐渐进入了一种比较严重复杂的局面。

　　在南海争端问题上，中国一向主张愿意根据公认的国际法和现代海洋法，特别是1982年联合国海洋法公约确立的基本原则和法律制度，同有关国家通过和平谈判来解决。这一立场实际上已经写到了1997年中国与东盟非正式首脑会晤发表的联合声明中，中国政府还提出了搁置争议、共同开发的主张，这充分体现了中国的善意和博大的胸怀，这在其他任何国家都是不可能做到的，应当得到国际社会的高度赞扬。

　　余爱水认为，南海争端也是国际地缘政治和经济局势发展变化导致的一个结果。中国正在快速和平发展，由改革开放初期的落后状态一下成了世界第二大经济体，有的国家感到意外和不适应，不愿意一个和平发展的中国强大起来。有专家指出，南海仲裁案发生在美国实施“亚太再平衡”战略之后，一些域外国家不断制造、夸大、渲染南海紧张气氛，扰乱地区局势，以达到其不可告人的企图。

　　中国维护南海正当权益是为世界和平做贡献

　　值得警惕的是，“南海问题的当事国，有的正在干着出卖、背叛亚洲利益的勾当，这种亚洲人背叛亚洲的行为是可悲的，它损害了亚洲的整体利益。”余爱水指出，亚洲正在成为世界经济发展最大的引擎和源泉，成为最有希望的地区，我们已经迎来了亚洲的时代，这是亚洲的战略机遇。正因为如此，一些域外国家心理不平衡，希望来分一杯羹，掠夺亚洲的利益。于是，他们要拼命干扰、打乱亚洲的阵脚，使亚洲人内斗、内耗。所谓的“亚太再平衡”，就是“平衡”掉亚洲的崛起和快速发展。

　　余爱水少将强调，中国始终坚持走和平发展道路，在处理南海问题上，坚持自己的原则立场，表达坚定的意志和决心，不仅有利于维护自身利益，同时也是为维护世界和平做出贡献，国际社会也毫无疑问将分享到由此带来的红利。

责任编辑：张淳 SN182

文章关键词：
南海 仲裁

我要反馈
保存网页
中国网