80% user support: micro-group members of spreading pornographic videos, group with the sentence for the crime-Lord micro, micro-groups-IT information
Recently, yunhe County, Zhejiang Province people's Court sentenced the use of spreading pornographic videos. Thanked some of the accused as a micro-cluster group, for failing to stop the spread of group members take up the supervisory responsibility of pornographic video, and video communications to be sentenced to six months, suspended for one year. In this regard, what do people think?
▲ Comics author: Zhu Huiqing
Last week, the China Youth daily social survey Center, through a survey questionnaire for 2002 people network shows that79.4% of respondents supported this decision. A micro-81.6% of respondents said the next letter group will be more serious, 82.5% of respondents made it clear that the construction group after members of the group responsible for publishing content .
79.4% respondents supported micro-main video Communicator due to regulatory responsibilities not covered by crime punishment
Survey for micro main regulatory responsibilities not covered crime punishment with video Communicator, 79.4% per cent of the respondents expressed support, 32.7% respondents were very supportive.
For judgment in the case, University postgraduate student Wang tianran believes that this is consistent with judicial interpretations of the Supreme law. "The Group sing with ordinary citizens, cannot spread and expand the responsibility of spreading pornographic information and information of terrorist activities, as well as the publishing and dissemination of information for tip, warning, and reporting responsibilities. ”
Nankai University method College Associate Professor Wang Qiangjun introduced, Supreme People's Court, and highest people's Procuratorate 2010 through has on handle using Internet, and mobile communications Terminal, and sound news Taiwan making, and copy, and published, and trafficking, and spread obscene electronic information criminal case specific application legal several problem of explained (ii), the explained third article provides: using Internet established main for spread obscene electronic information of group, members up 30 people above or caused serious consequences of, on established who, and Managers and key disseminators, according to provisions of the criminal law to the crime of spreading pornographic materials be convicted and punished . This is also currently the judiciary found that micro-groups of the main responsibility of the present main legal basis.
Strong army Wang said, first of all, this article shall constitute the crime of spreading pornographic stuff there are two main categories: one is the founder and Manager of the group; the second is the main disseminators . The conditions for two classes of subjects constitute a crime are not exactly the same. Identified when Group founder and Manager constitute the crime of spreading obscene articles shall comply with the USO needed to recognize the principle, you must identify the building and school Governor subjectively known to the cases of disseminating obscene materials and failing in supervisory responsibilities . Because, objectively exists after the founder, Manager, construction group, with "fresh" retreat and is no longer involved in the management of cases, such cases finds that both constitute a crime, belong to typical external attribution of guilt. Secondly, not all groups are likely to constitute the crime. Explain the provisions constitute the crime of spreading pornographic stuff "group" of a qualification, is "using the Internet, mainly used for spreading obscene electronic information group" emphasized the establishment of a, Manager main purpose of the group is "to disseminate obscene materials", which determines the Group's established purpose and the target itself is not proper. "If the interpretation of the conditions, identified as the crime of spreading obscene articles are not a problem. But many groups are not intended for dissemination of pornographic material, If the app group was set up to try to contact the friendship, enhance contacts, occasional group member to upload pornographic material, and can not be identified as the crime . ”
82.5% said the group members released after establishing responsibility for the content of
For transmitting obscene video behavior of micro-and 69.1% of respondents clearly indicated that they would affect the social atmosphere, 59.8% per cent of respondents think it would make the app platform dirty, 59.8% of respondents felt they would disrupt the order of cyberspace, 56.4% per cent of respondents said that this was bad for teenagers.
As a Chinese chess player, Liu Quan like to make players, established a number of nearly 500 people in large groups. "As the main regulatory responsibilities, members of the group can only be understood by me into the group. If someone in the Group publishing obscene information, im going to collapse ".
Survey 82.5% of respondents committed the group after group member is responsible for the content. Only 9.1% per cent of respondents said they would not. 8.3% of respondents said bad to say.
81.6% of respondents said after the case, building groups will be more careful in the future.
Group leader responsibilities, respondents believe regulation is its 47.2% should bear the responsibility. But 42.3% of respondents worry that independent micro-letter group, "group leader" deterrence is very weak, so group leader responsible for the difficult group. 15.3% of respondents said bad to say.
Wang strongly believes that the app group is a loose group of organizations. Because it is new establishment of micro-clusters in China and there is no clear, strict rules, there is no specific threshold and terms, casual and easy. "At the same time through the criminal punishment of groups disseminating obscene materials, should also strengthen the app group of specific and clear operating rules, rather than blindly hoped that implementation of the criminal law of micro-operation order maintained".
How to ensure the operation of micro-groups? Survey, 73% of respondents thinks that members of the Group should pay more attention, clean living. 50.4% of respondents recommended principle of prior warning, 34.4% of respondents wanted to set up the monitoring mechanism of communication.
68.1% respondents believed that, within the main group should manage the Group statement, remove the excluded.
Respondents, after 00, 0.4% after the 22.5%, generation accounted for 52.5%, $literal, 18.4%, post 5.2%.
近8成网友支持：
微信群成员传播淫秽视频，群主同罪同刑 -
微信,
微信群 - IT资讯
近日，浙江省云和县人民法院判处了一起利用微信传播淫秽视频案。被告人谢某作为微信群群主，因未负起监管职责阻止群成员传播淫秽视频，与视频传播者同被判处拘役六个月，缓刑一年。对此，人们怎么看？
▲漫画作者：朱慧卿
上周，中国青年报社会调查中心通过问卷网对2002人进行的一项调查显示，79.4%的受访者支持这一判决。81.6%的受访者表示今后建立微信群会更严肃认真，82.5%的受访者明确表示建群后会为群成员发布内容负责。
79.4%受访者支持微信群主因未尽监管职责而与视频传播者受同罪处罚
调查显示，对于微信群主因未尽监管职责而与视频传播者受同罪处罚，79.4%的受访者表示支持，其中32.7%的受访者非常支持。
对于此案判决，中国政法大学法学专业学生王天然认为，这符合最高法的司法解释。“群主应和普通公民一样，承担不传播和扩大传播淫秽色情信息和恐怖活动信息的责任，以及对信息发布和传播者进行提示、警告、举报的责任。”
南开大学法学院副教授王强军介绍，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院2010年通过了《关于办理利用互联网、移动通讯终端、声讯台制作、复制、出版、贩卖、传播淫秽电子信息刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释（二）》，该解释第三条规定：利用互联网建立主要用于传播淫秽电子信息的群组，成员达三十人以上或者造成严重后果的，对建立者、管理者和主要传播者，依刑法的规定以传播淫秽物品罪定罪处罚。此条也是目前司法机关认定当下微信群群主责任的主要法律依据。
王强军表示，首先，本条规定的构成传播淫秽物品罪的主体有两类：一是群的建立者和管理者；二是主要传播者。两类主体构成犯罪所需的条件并不完全相同。在认定群建立者和管理者构成传播淫秽物品罪时，应当遵守认定犯罪所需的主客观相统一原则，必须查明建立者和管理者主观上认识到有人传播淫秽物品的情形，并没有尽到监管责任。因为，客观上存在建立者、管理者在建群之后随着“新鲜感”的退却并不再参与群管理的情形，这种情形下认定二者构成犯罪，就属于较为典型的客观归罪。其次，并不是所有的群都有可能构成本罪。解释规定的构成传播淫秽物品罪的“群”的一个限定条件，是“利用互联网建立主要用于传播淫秽电子信息的群组”，强调了建立者、管理者建群的主要目的是“用于传播淫秽物品”，这一点决定了群的建立初衷和目标本身的不正当性。“如果符合解释规定的条件，认定为传播淫秽物品罪不成为问题。但当下许多微信群并不是为了传播淫秽物品，如果微信群的建立初衷是为了联络友谊、增强联系，偶尔出现群内的成员上传淫秽物品，并不能认定为本罪。”
82.5%受访者表示建群后会为群成员发布的内容负责
对于在微信群传播淫秽视频的行为，69.1%的受访者明确表示会影响社会风气，59.8%的受访者觉得会使微信平台污浊不堪，59.8%的受访者感到会扰乱网络空间秩序，56.4%的受访者认为这对青少年影响极坏。
作为一名中国象棋运动员，刘泉喜欢结交棋友，因此建立了多个规模近500人的大群。“作为群主当然有监督管理责任，群成员都只能由我了解后拉进群。若群内有人发布淫秽信息，我会直接剔除”。
调查显示，82.5%的受访者承诺建群后会为群成员发布的内容负责。仅9.1%的受访者表示不会。8.3%的受访者表示不好说。
81.6%的受访者表示经过这一案例，今后建群会更加谨慎。
对于群主的责任，47.2%的受访者认为监管是其本应承担的责任。但也有42.3%的受访者担心，自主发起的微信群中，“群主”威慑力甚弱，让群主负责是为难群主。15.3%的受访者表示不好说。
王强军认为，微信群是一个较为松散的群体组织。因为是新生事物，我国对于微信群的建立并没有明确、严格的规则，也没有具体的门槛和准入条件，较为随意和容易。“在通过刑法惩罚微信群传播淫秽物品的同时，也应当加强微信群运营规则的具体化、明确化，而不能一味期望通过刑法实现对微信群运行秩序的维护”。
如何保证微信群的良性运行？调查中，73.0%的受访者认为群成员发言应多注意，洁身自好。50.4%的受访者建议实行事前预警原则，34.4%的受访者希望建立相关的沟通监督机制。
68.1%的受访者认为，群主应该管理好群内发言，该剔除的剔除。
受访者中，00后占0.4%，90后占22.5%，80后占52.5%，70后占18.4%，60后占5.2%。