China Tibet online response to foreign media speculation: the Dalai Lama is not China "afraid"

Dalai is bringing us some trouble, not because he has a lot of ability, much higher level, but some national, and some forces in support of him. China Visual information

Recently, some foreign media comment "Dad," said United States President in 4th term in the White House, Obama met with the Dalai Lama, each time, the Chinese Government is strongly opposed to and speculation China is "afraid" of the Dalai Lama? In fact, as early as 2009, when the central United Front work Department Vice Minister Zhu weiqun said Germany focus magazine, in disguise answered this question: "for decades, the Dalai Lama gave us some trouble, but he is not a contender, Challenger. "" We have encountered real difficulties and rivals, the Dalai Lama is not comparable. ”

India media recently published why President Obama received the Dalai Lama from the back door? A paper said on June 15, Obama did not inform China he will meet with the Dalai Lama, also did not explain why he did this, but from the back door of the White House secretly to "meet" the Dalai Lama will meet the concerns of the public to a minimum. As the banner of "free" flag of democracy, do a little unreasonable. On one hand, many people think the Obama hypocrisy, questioned its lack of "keep the faith and courage". The other hand, the article questions: the Chinese Government "afraid" Dalai Lama please?

Article did not answer the question directly, and trying to use questions to guide the answer. Article said, the Chinese Government firmly "control" in Tibet, and the Dalai Lama is unlikely to return to Tibet, under the circumstances, why China has to make every effort to oppose "Dad"? Subsequently, the article two far-fetched speculation "reasons".

First, even though China has a strong economic and military power, but "human rights" and "freedoms" poor people "protest" that disturbed the Government ... ... Is the old Western attacks on China's human rights, secondly, Dalai Lama set himself in the world of "Chinese invasion victim" image, as long as the Dalai Lama cannot get in Tibet "rightful place" worldwide "freedom" concept cannot be achieved.

If the first recognition in a disguised form in Tibet, China's development achievements in construction, due to nearly a century from the West "stereotypes", the second "reasons" is obviously arbitrary logic.

People familiar with Tibetan history knows that the Dalai Lama in 1959 to exile in India. Why had he run out? Because he opposed the democratic reform in Tibet. Actually, it was central in order to look after the interests of Tibet's upper, has made it clear back delay democratic reforms and ask for his approval. But Dalai Lama to feudal serfdom of old Tibet will never change, rather an armed rebellion. After the escape and in the West on China border area for more than 10 years of armed, bloody harassment ... ... However, central to the Dalai Lama remains a way out, repeatedly pointed out that policy towards Dalai has been consistent and clear, contact the door to negotiations is always open.

However, seems to have been unable to join the Dalai Lama in Buddhism, "repent." According to foreign media reports, the Dalai Lama recently told Obama before the interview, again claiming that "Tibet is not a part of China, that's a fact! "If the Dalai Lama returned to Tibet and" rightful place ", or even a return to serfdom, where does that put millions of patriotic Tibetan compatriots in the territory?

Even the old "Tibet independence" organizations "TYC" leaders said that, although 4 Barack Obama met the Dalai Lama, "Tibet did not undergo any significant changes." This, and China "fear"?

As Zhu weiqun, said, the Dalai Lama, "or give us some trouble, not because he has a lot of ability, much higher level, but some national, and some forces in support of him. Without the support of these countries and forces, the Dalai Lama is a day is not going to survive. "

(Editors: Zhong Qinghui UN660)
2016-06-27 13:40:43
Surging

中国西藏网回应外媒臆测：达赖不值得中国“害怕”

　　达赖之所以还是给我们带来一些麻烦，并不是因为他本身有多大的能力，多高的水平，而是有些国家、有些势力在支持他。 视觉中国 资料

　　近日，有外媒评论“奥达会”称，美国总统奥巴马在任期间第4次在白宫会见达赖，每一次，中国政府都强烈反对，并臆测中国是不是“害怕”达赖？事实上，早在2009年，时任中央统战部副部长朱维群在受访德国《焦点》杂志时，就变相地回答过这个问题：“几十年来，达赖喇嘛给我们添了一些麻烦，但是，他构不成什么竞争者、挑战者。”“我们碰到的真正的困难和对手，达赖喇嘛是不可比的。”

　　印度媒体近日刊发《为什么奥巴马总统从后门接待达赖喇嘛？》一文称，6月15日，奥巴马既没有肯定地告诉中国他要接见达赖，也没有解释为什么这样做，而是从白宫后门偷偷地“迎接”达赖，以将此次会面的公众关注度降到最低。作为高举“自由”旗帜的民主国家，这么做有点说不过去。一方面，很多人认为奥巴马虚伪，质疑其缺乏“坚持信念的勇气”。另一方面，文章又提出质疑：中国政府“害怕”达赖吗？

　　文章并未直接回答这个问题，而试图用设问来引导答案。文章称，中国政府牢牢“控制”着西藏，且达赖也不可能回到西藏，在这种情况下，为什么中国还要竭尽全力地反对“奥达会”呢？随后，文章臆测了两个十分牵强的“理由”。

　　第一，尽管中国有着相当强劲的经济水平和军事力量，但“人权”和“自由”状况不佳，民众的“抗议”令政府不安……还是西方攻击中国人权的老一套；第二，达赖在全世界树立了自己“中国入侵受害者”的形象，只要达赖一天无法在西藏获得“正当的地位”，世界范围内的“自由”理念就无法实现。

　　如果第一条变相承认了中国对西藏的发展建设成就，却囿于来自西方近百年的“刻板印象”的话，这第二条“理由”则明显是霸道逻辑了。

　　熟悉西藏历史的人都知道，达赖于1959年流亡印度。当初他为什么跑出去？因为他反对西藏的民主改革。实际上，当时中央为了照顾西藏上层的利益，已经明确把民主改革往后再推迟，而且要征求达赖的同意。但是达赖为了旧西藏的封建农奴制永远不变，宁可发动武装叛乱。逃出去后又在西方支持下对中国边境地区进行了长达十多年的武装、流血骚扰……尽管如此，中央对达赖喇嘛一直留有出路，多次指出对达赖的政策是一贯的、明确的，接触商谈的大门始终是敞开的。

　　然而，达赖似乎至今未能参悟佛教中的“回头是岸”。据外媒报道，近日达赖在接受奥巴马接见前，再次声称“西藏不是中国的一部分，这是事实！”如果让这样的达赖重返西藏并获得“正当的地位”，甚至重操农奴制那一套，那将置境内数百万爱国的藏族同胞于何地？

　　连老牌“藏独”组织“藏青会”头目都说，尽管奥巴马4次会见了达赖，但是“西藏问题没有发生任何显著的变化”。这，还值得中国“害怕”吗？

　　正如朱维群说的，达赖“之所以还是给我们带来一些麻烦，并不是因为他本身有多大的能力，多高的水平，而是有些国家、有些势力在支持他。没有这些国家和势力的支持，达赖喇嘛是一天也混不下去的”。

(责任编辑：钟庆辉 UN660)
2016-06-27 13:40:43
澎湃