Shandong Haiyang Court asked police officers pull sponsorship Marshal corrupt 38,000 | corrupt | sponsorships | Shandong _ news
Yantai intermediate people's CourtSo far, Haiyang, Yantai City, Shandong province high court orders retrial in court bailiffs Xin Haochun was found guilty of corruption cases has been almost 7 months, exceeding time limit for conclusion of the statutory nearly 1 month, but Xin Haochun has not yet received a notice of trial, and his lawyer appealed to law, Yantai intermediate court hearing the retrial is proceeding.
Qian Street first, (micro-signal: qianjieyihao) reporter understand to, Xin Haochun had was Yantai in the hospital judge corruption 38,000 yuan, this pen money original is Haiyang court trial of other case in the of implementation paragraph, by should collection Party agreed will this pen money to to the Hospital of sponsored fee, Yantai in the hospital finds, evidence displayed Xin Haochun will the pen payments out, but cannot proved Court received has this pen sponsored fee, was to Xin Haochun made corruption crime sentenced to its shall be sentenced to 3 years, probation three years.
Court employees are required to pull sponsorship
Haiyang Sun Dekui, Deputy Director of the Court in charge of the implementation of many who had participated in the work of the court personnel is confirmed in the testimony, since 1999, had led the Court in the General Assembly requested the court staff for sponsorship fee, to the finance section of the Court, month issued to executives. Sun Dekui said in a testimony signed on January 16, 2011, "the Court encourages the Court policemen work together and strengthen the construction of facilities at the Court, where key enterprises of the banking system and practice of the case, to grant the Court must sponsor give policemen a certain benefit proportionately. ”
Xin Haochun were convicted of corruption cases is the reason. Judgement of the Court in 1998, Haiyang, defendant Guo town, laizhou, Haiyang Agricultural Experiment Station to pay the plaintiff pine breeding maize seed 999159 Kuang Wei's Yuan, after its entry into force by Xin Haochun enforcement of sentences. Haiyang Xin Haochun is the second Chamber of the court bailiff. Testimony showed that former President of the second Chamber Wang, and pines after consulting the head of Kuang Wei decided to recover all amounts awarded, pine Court sponsored Kuang Wei Haiyang 100,000 yuan.
Retry resolutions
Retry resolutionsFile evidence, the case then recovery implementation of 465,000 yuan, pine Kuang Wei reached a settlement with the laizhou Agricultural Experiment Station. In the 465,000 yuan, 15,000 Yuan by another Executive Xin Le began in 1999 and completed, and Wang 10,000 yuan as sponsorship fees, another 50,000 yuan from pine Kuang Wei directly away from the laizhou Agricultural Experiment Station.
Xin Haochun, executed by him 400,000 yuan, he took out 90,000 yuan from the 400,000 yuan as sponsorship fees. On May 27, 2000, the end of the enforcement cases comments looks up the file closed.
Testimony showed that on April 2, 2001, pine head of Kuang Wei Haiyang to the Court found Wang, saying the laizhou Agricultural Experiment Station default, reconciliation between the abolition, and the Court as they recover only half implemented, so a refund of half of the sponsorship fee. Wang, in charge of the President after Sun Dekui, Wang Dekui agreed to return to the village of 50,000 yuan.
Pine head of Kuang Wei Xin Haochun, who the day of execution issued transcripts showed that pine Kuang Wei has received 310,000 before implementation. Soon, withheld 100,000 yuan in sponsorship fees of 50,000 yuan Kuang Wei returned to pine.
On July 4 this year, the former street first (micro signal: qianjieyihao) court reporter called Haiyang Office and lab, they are called when the Court asked staff from executive sponsorship deduction who is not informed, "for several stubbles led, were unaware of the situation."
Former Marshal was convicted of corruption of 38,000 yuan sponsorship
Xin Haochun, in 2000 when he performed in this case, Haiyang was a general marshals of the second Chamber of the Court. March 2, 2000, 100,000 sponsorship money has been turned over 42,000 yuan, the same day, he was requested by the President Wang, will be given to 58,000 pine Kuang Wei yuan in sponsorship fees to the Court on behalf of the finance section.
He said, for next day pine Kuang village board personnel future Court led case paragraph, he not determine village Board whether agreed will this pen money handed Court Dang sponsored fee, "financial personnel let I first put these money to case paragraph save in, if village Board not agreed, let they directly to case paragraph of name take go, if agreed, on zhihou again to sponsored fee". Haiyang receipt issued by the finance section of the Court shows that the day they receive the laizhou agricultural experiment stations case 58,000 yuan.
Xin Haochun told the street first before (micro signal: qianjieyihao) the next day, pine Kuang Wei Hui has not objected and took the other, "President Wang on the day let me to financial sponsorship fee 20,000 yuan to finance told me a line", he wrote in their own name from financial receipt received 20,000 yuan. On April 7, 2000, the money has been returned to the pine Kuang Wei finished, "38,000 yuan of the Wang, let me put the rest into sponsorship, so I in accordance with the requirements of the section, on behalf of the Director of the village Committee Jiang Xue had receipts."
Xin Haochun said, when writing these receipts to sponsorship of only doing case procedures, he did not get the money. Haiyang Sun Dekui, Deputy Director of the court testimony said the hospital payment amounts at the time more than 10,000 yuan, and required him to sign to receive, "policemen are not allowed by the regulation brought separately, not in charge of the President signed, accounting will not issue". Counsel suggested that Xin Haochun has not actually taken 38,000 yuan in cash.
Since then, the Xin Haochun second Chamber Vice President, Executive Secretary, Director of the Office of the Tribunal and other staff. On June 25, 2009, was transferred to the municipal demolition Xin Haochun suddenly detained by the Yantai City prosecutor's Office in the Office of the headquarters, and on June 30 on suspicion of carrying out the judgement, convicted of abuse crimes, bribery, Fushan district, Yantai City Procuratorate approved the arrest of.
On January 28, 2010, Fushan District Public Prosecutor's Office to Xin Haochun arrested for enforcement of sentences, convicted of abuse, negligence, bribery, corruption crimes be prosecuted to the Fushan District Court. On May 25 of that year, Fushan district court verdict, saying there was sufficient evidence of Kuang Wei Xin Haochun pine, on behalf of the owner of the 38,000 yuan from Ocean finance out of the Court, said the absence of the defendant taken out just turn into sponsorships, Haiyang, the financial accounts of the Court has not received the funding.
Witness Sun Dekui, Wang, Jiang Xue's testimony can only prove the case consult with the Court to the Court of more than 50,000 yuan sponsorship fees, but do not prove that the Court must receive the sponsorship of this grant. Only Xin Haochun, as practitioners of this implementation will be 38,000 yuan in the name of Jiang Xue removed evidence, but this is not evidence to the Court under subsection, which justifies turning into sponsorship is not a reason. Therefore, the Court considers, 38,000 yuan Xin Haochun be illegal as their own, Prosecutor accused Xin Haochun was convicted of corruption and sentenced him to 3 years of imprisonment.
In addition, Fushan District Court has not found that apart from the corruption of the public prosecution service to prosecute offences and facts.
High Court retrial delay hearing
Xin Haochun Fushan district against the aforementioned judgment of the Court of appeal, appeal decision in the Yantai intermediate court on August 16, 2010, again finds that the Court of first instance on the Xin Haochun of corruption are identified, however, Xin Haochun, their relatives pleaded guilty on behalf of 38,000 Kickback money from revision to 3 years of imprisonment, suspended for 3 years.
On April 11, 2014, Xin Haochun came to the Commission's inspection teams submitted material, saying it does not get 38,000 yuan, written receipt is to sponsor procedures. After 10 days, find Xin Haochun, Yantai Yantai intermediate court and staff of the public prosecutor's Office, said the ccdi inspection group has forwarded to the Yantai Communist Party overseeing the case, they will investigate the matter. After two or three months, Shandong province High Court staff also find his understanding of the situation. On December 10, 2015, the Xin Haochun receive a retrial in Shandong province High Court decision, saying the Court held that the original judgment of the second instance's findings of fact are not clear, Xin Haochun reconsider the grounds for the appeal in accordance with the conditions of the trial, decision directive according to law, Yantai intermediate court shall form a collegial panel rehearing the case, signed December 9.
Has been in the past 7 months, but Xin Haochun never wait until the notice of trial. Period, he repeatedly find the Yantai intermediate court, public prosecutor's Office, they said they have begun to certiorari, but he has not told his hearing when retrial.
Street first before (micro signal: qianjieyihao) on July 4 call the Yantai Intermediate Court Department, Research Office of the person contacted to interview, but the afternoon of July 5, which calls always unanswered.
Xin Haochun hired of Liu Hongchen lawyer said, penalty v method No. 207 article provides, court according to trial supervision program review trial of case, should in made questioned, and retrial decided of day up three months within concluded, need extended term of, shall not over six months, but from December 9, 2015 has has past near 7 months is still not Court retrial, obviously over statutory concluded term, he calls for Yantai in the hospital law case, as soon as possible court.
Responsible editor: Zhang Chun SN182
Article keywords:Sponsorship of corruption in Shandong province
I want feedback
Save a Web page
Front Street, first
山东海阳法院要求干警拉赞助费 法警贪污3.8万|贪污|赞助费|山东_新闻资讯
烟台市中级人民法院 至今，山东省高院指令烟台市中院再审海阳市法院原法警辛浩春被判贪污罪一案已过去近7个月，超过法定审结时限近1个月，但辛浩春仍未收到开庭通知，他的律师呼吁烟台市中院尽快依法开庭再审此案。
前街一号（微信号：qianjieyihao）记者了解到，辛浩春曾被烟台市中院判定贪污3.8万元，这笔钱原是海阳市法院审理的其他案件中的执行款，经应收款方同意将这笔钱转为给该院的赞助费，烟台市中院认定，证据显示辛浩春将该笔款项取出，但无法证明法院收到了这笔赞助费，遂以辛浩春犯贪污罪判处其有期徒刑3年，缓刑三年。
法院被指要求员工拉赞助费
海阳市法院原分管执行工作的副院长孙德奎等多名曾在该法院工作的人员均在证言中证实，从1999年开始，该法院领导曾在大会上要求该法院工作人员拉赞助费，交给法院财务科，月底按比例发放给执行人员。孙德奎在落款为2011年1月16日的证言中称，“法院为了鼓励法院干警的工作积极性和加强法院硬件设施建设，凡给银行系统和重点企业执结的案件，争取给予法院一定的赞助，院里按比例给干警一定的补助。”
辛浩春被判贪污的案件就是因此而起。海阳市法院曾在1998年作出判决，判决被告莱州市农业试验站付给原告海阳市郭城镇松树夼村委代繁玉米种子款99.9159万元，判决生效后由辛浩春执行。当时辛浩春是海阳市法院执行二庭的法警。证言显示，原执行二庭庭长王学军与松树夼村委负责人商议后决定，追回所有欠款后，松树夼村委赞助海阳市法院10万元。
再审决议书再审决议书 案卷证据显示，该案当时追回执行款46.5万元，松树夼村委与莱州市农业试验站达成和解。这46.5万元中，有1.5万元由另一名执行人辛乐起于1999年执行完毕，并交给王学军1万元作为赞助费，另5万元由松树夼村委直接从莱州市农业试验站处拿走。
辛浩春称，经他执行的有40万元，他从这40万元拿出9万元作为赞助费。2000年5月27日，该执行案件评查结束，归档结案。
多份证言显示，2001年4月2日，松树夼村委负责人到海阳市法院找到王学军，称莱州市农业试验站违约，双方达成的和解废除，而法院只为他们追回一半执行款，故要求退还一半的赞助费。王学军向分管院长孙德奎请示后，王德奎同意退给村委5万元。
辛浩春等人当天为松树夼村委负责人做的执行款发放笔录显示，松树夼村委此前已收到31万元执行款。不久，扣留的10万元赞助费中有5万元被退回给松树夼村委。
今年7月4日，前街一号（微信号：qianjieyihao）记者致电海阳市法院办公室及研究室，对方均称对当年法院领导要求工作人员从执行款中扣赞助费一事不知情，“换了好几茬领导了，都不知道原来的情况”。
原法警被判贪污3.8万元赞助费
辛浩春称，2000年他执行这起案件时，是海阳市法院执行二庭的一名普通法警。2000年3月2日之前，10万元赞助费已上交4.2万元，当天，他按照庭长王学军的要求，将本应给松树夼村委的5.8万元以赞助费的名义交给法院财务科。
他称，因次日松树夼村委人员将来法院领案款，他不确定村委是否同意将这笔钱交给法院当赞助费，“财务人员让我先把这些钱以案款存进去，如果村委不同意，就让他们直接以案款的名义取走，如果同意，就之后再转为赞助费”。海阳市法院财务科出具的收条显示，当天他们收到莱州农业试验站案款5.8万元。
辛浩春告诉前街一号（微信号：qianjieyihao）记者，次日，松树夼村委会未表示反对，并领走其它案款，“当天庭长王学军让我到财务把2万元案款转为赞助费，财务的告诉我打个条就行”，他因此以自己的名义写了从财务领到2万元的收条。2000年4月7日，该给松树夼村委的钱已发还完毕，“王学军又让我把剩下的3.8万元转为赞助费，因此我按照财务科的要求，以村委主任姜学的名义打了收条”。
辛浩春称，当时写这两张收条只是在履行将案款转为赞助费的手续，他并未拿到这些钱。海阳市法院副院长孙德奎的证言称，该院发放数额在1万元以上案款时，需经他签字同意才能领取，“按规定也不允许执行干警单独领案款，没有分管院长签字，财务也不会发放案款”。辩护人据此认为，辛浩春实际上并未领走3.8万元现金。
此后，辛浩春又任执行二庭副庭长、执行局局长、法庭办公室主任等职。2009年6月25日，被抽调到市委拆迁指挥部的辛浩春在办公室突然被烟台市检察院拘留，并于6月30日因涉嫌执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪、受贿罪被烟台市福山区检察院批准逮捕。
2010年1月28日，福山区检察院以辛浩春涉嫌执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪、受贿罪、贪污罪将其起诉到福山区法院。同年5月25日，福山区法院作出一审判决，称有充分证据证明辛浩春以松树夼村委负责人的名义将3.8万元从海洋法院财务科取出，虽然被告人称该款没有取出，只是转成赞助费，但海阳市法院的财务账并未收到该赞助费。
证人孙德奎、王学军、姜学等人的证言也只能证明此案村委与法院协商给法院5万余元的赞助费，但不能证明法院一定收到了这笔赞助费。该执行案只有辛浩春作为执行人员将3.8万元以姜学的名义取出的证据，但没有将此款交给法院的证据，其辩解转成赞助费的理由不能成立。因此，该院认为，辛浩春将这3.8万元非法占为己有，公诉机关指控辛浩春贪污罪名成立，判处其有期徒刑3年。
此外，福山区法院未认定公诉机关起诉的除贪污罪之外的罪名及事实。
高院裁定再审迟迟未开庭
辛浩春不服福山区法院的前述判决提出上诉，烟台市中院于2010年8月16日作出二审判决，再次认定一审法院关于辛浩春贪污罪的认定部分，但以辛浩春认罪、其亲属代为退赔赃款3.8万元为由，改判其有期徒刑3年，缓刑3年。
2014年4月11日，辛浩春来到中纪委巡视组递交材料，称其并未拿到3.8万元，所写收条仅是将案款转为赞助费的手续。10天后，烟台市中院和烟台市检察院工作人员一同找到辛浩春，称中纪委巡视组已将此案转交给烟台市政法委督办，他们将调查处理此事。两三个月后，山东省高院工作人员也找到他了解情况。2015年12月10日，辛浩春收到山东省高院作出的再审决定书，称该院认为原二审判决认定的事实不清，辛浩春的申诉理由符合重新审判的条件，依法决定指令烟台市中院另行组成合议庭该此案进行再审，落款为12月9日。
至今已过去近7个月，但辛浩春始终未等到开庭通知。期间，他多次找到烟台市中院、检察院，对方均称已经开始调卷，却未曾告诉他何时能开庭再审。
前街一号（微信号：qianjieyihao）记者7月4日致电烟台市中院政治部，对方让记者联系研究室采访，但至7月5日下午，后者电话始终无人接听。
辛浩春聘请的刘红臣律师称，刑诉法第207条规定，人民法院按照审判监督程序重审审判的案件，应当在做出提审、再审决定之日起三个月以内审结，需要延长期限的，不得超过六个月，但从2015年12月9日至今已过去近7个月却仍未开庭再审，明显超过法定审结期限，他呼吁烟台市中院依法办案，尽快开庭。
责任编辑：张淳 SN182
文章关键词： 贪污 赞助费 山东
我要反馈
保存网页
前街一号