Illegal in Yangjiang, Guangdong covers an area of 8 penalties penalty only 1 Yuan per square meter | | compensation | demolitions of illegal possession _ news

Xinhua News Agency, Guangzhou, July 11-questions: 8 year four "punishment" was fined only 1 Yuan per square meter – illegal in Yangjiang, Guangdong covers an absurd law enforcement investigations

Xinhua News Agency reporter Zhou

Protect agricultural land from being occupied land and resources management Department's mission. However, in Yangjiang city, Guangdong Province, a case in which tens of thousands of square metres of agricultural land was illegally expropriated during 8 years 4 land under local land departments even written decision of administrative penalty, illegal land acquisition Act have not been blocked, instead covering an area is growing.

Reporters found that face administrative punishment, while renfa while the parties continue to break the local land sector has been per square metre of 1 Yuan in fines. So ridiculous why would law enforcement something embarrassing happens?

　　Land sector 4 halted while renfa while illegal

In February 2007, the individual boss Hong Wanlai Yangdong East towns and real estate development company signed a land agreement, use Golden village: no more than 100,000 square meters of land in the vicinity of the town, clearly by the East side real estate company is responsible for the approval of the land to help straighten out the relevant functional departments, Hong Wanlai responsible for compensation and other expenses, and plans called for leveling.

Due to the agricultural land concerned, according to China's relevant provisions such as the land administration law, land must be approved by the relevant government departments, made of agricultural land into land for construction approval number can be imposed on land expropriation. Land expropriation must be implemented by the municipal and county governments. This means that Hong Wanlai land agreement with the East side real estate company first is illegal.

When just bulldozing the Hong Wanlai, Guangdong provincial Department of land and through satellite photos law enforcement discovered this problem, Yangdong and land Office to follow up. On October 25, 2008, the Dongyang County Land Office has issued two written decision of administrative penalty on the same day.

Facing punishment, Hong Wanlai as required with a fine, and rehabilitation complex green, but he did not stop the illegal land acquisition Act. According to Hong Wanlai was punished after the expropriation compensation paid to East side real estate company. Paid 1.35 million Yuan as of February 20, 2009, April 28, 2009, to pay 144094 Yuan.

On March 21, 2010, Yangdong County Land Office the third piece of land administrative penalty decision. And like before, Hong Wanlai renfa, but still "loose cannon", then in the construction of more buildings on the land concerned.

Yangdong due in 2015 conversion to Duong Dong District, on May 21, Yangjiang city land Bureau fourth administrative decision is made. Reporters found that in 8 years, local land sector even under 4 "punishments", from the outset, not only failing to stop Hong Wanlai illegal land acquisition, but on one side punishment illegal in the see-saw process, more than 70,000 square meters of land were openly sign out. Land was concerned Hong Wanlai surrounded by tall iron fences, outsiders cannot enter. From all the way across the House floor looked more buildings and concrete piles, a cement-paved road across the land.

　　Covers fearless penalty per square metre of 1 Yuan

Reporters learned that involved land approved by the Guangdong Provincial Government in 2012 by the conversion of agricultural land for construction. In the case of not obtaining the land, Hong Wanlai ridiculous use of illegal possession of tens of thousands of square meters of land to set up a "landscape engineering company", business scope, including gardening, flower-growing and selling garden plants and trees. Hong Wanlai why nothing?

Penalties minimal is important. Reporters saw in the three previous decisions, from 2008 to 2010 Hong Wanlai illegally occupies a land area of 26357.8 square meters, and fines for 26357.8 Yuan, fined standard only 1 Yuan/square meter. In this regard, Yangdong District Land Bureau officials explained that, according to relevant regulations of the State, illegal occupation of land without permission, fined a maximum of 30 yuan per square meter of land being illegally occupied, "1 Yuan in line with the national standard of punishment".

More unbelievable is that the local land departments about such illegal acts do. According to local land sector, starting from 2008, Yang District Government has reiterated its tissue Chengguan, construction, land law enforcement forces, such as visiting the site demolished, but nothing definite.

According to People's Republic of China related to the land management Act provides that penalties for illegal occupation of land, in addition to the fines, restore land outside the original, also ordered to return the illegally occupied land, but the first three penalty decision but fails to mention. In response, Yang Eastern Land Office officers responded by saying: "wall was built later, when Hong Wanlai no enclosed land, not building a House on the land, it is difficult to determine whether its occupied land. ”

In counsel's view, called possession is to enjoy the usufruct of the land. Building walls are just a form of occupation of land. Hong Wanlai landscape management of land concerned, the essence of which is the possession of the land. Because there is no order to exit illegally occupied land, and leaves.

　　"Instruments" law enforcement against illegal shall increase accountability

At present, the land agreement has a court order as invalid agreement. The illegal land acquisition Act at the outset, the surface, local land departments according to the relevant legal procedures issued a written decision of administrative penalty, cannot be said to not "bit".

However, the facts really true? In Yangjiang city land Bureau after a fourth penalty decision, Hong Wanlai appealed to the Guangdong provincial Department of land and apply for reconsideration. On September 23, 2015, the Guangdong provincial Department of land and resources hearing concluded that although Hong Wanlai, Yangjiang city land Bureau acts of unlawful occupation of land found that accurate, but failed to adduce evidence to prove that Hong Wanlai illegal land building was the third time in 2010, new offences committed after administrative punishment, for fear of the same violations repeated punishment withdrew the fourth penalty decision.

Involved land not far from Duong Dong District Land Office from, Hong Wanlai illegal behavior in the land sector noses and local land sector in the process of illegal construction for a long time had no evidence, incredible.

Yangjiang city people's Congress Representative believes that local land sector continue to issue a written decision, appears to be in black and white law, the procedure is complete, but Combs will find that this kind of "instrument of law enforcement," it was just for show, not head-on, by its very nature is an "inert politics" "lazy politics", law enforcement embarrassment came to prominence, influence the legal authority.

Yangdong District Land Bureau enforcement agency who declined to be named also acknowledged that Yang Eastern land stations in addition to the members of the leading group from Yangjiang city land Bureau decisions, branch, Division of resources by the Government at the same level as a whole have the final say, most of the time can turn a blind eye on certain items.

Land Department of Guangdong Province Party Secretary for law enforcement, Li said, a number of party and Government cadres in the construction of industrial park land, horse key projects, there is "heavy development, light in accordance with law" phenomenon, often had a "public law" can be forgiven, condoned by the idea. To prevent the land, the key is to increase the accountability of the party and Government leaders. (End)

Responsible editor: Chen yan SN225

Article keywords:
Illegal appropriation land compensation demolitions

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Xinhua News Agency

广东阳江违法占地8年 处罚令每平方米只罚1元|非法占有|征地补偿|强拆_新闻资讯

　　新华社广州7月11日电题：8年四道“处罚令” 每平方米竟只罚1元钱——广东阳江违法占地案荒唐执法的调查

　　新华社记者周强

　　保护农用地不被侵占是国土资源管理部门的使命。然而，在广东省阳江市，一宗数万平方米农用土地在被非法征用过程中，8年来当地国土部门连下4道土地行政处罚决定书，非法征地行为不仅未得到阻止，相反占地面积却越来越大。

　　记者调查发现，面对行政处罚，当事人一边认罚一边继续违法，当地国土部门却一直按每平方米1元钱予以罚款。如此荒唐的执法囧事为何会发生？

　　国土部门4次叫停 一边认罚一边违法

　　2007年2月，个体老板洪万来与阳东县东城镇房地产开发公司签订《代征土地协议书》，征用该镇金村村委会西坑一带10余万平方米土地，明确由东城房地产公司负责报批该宗土地，协助理顺相关职能部门关系，而洪万来负责征地补偿等一切费用，以及按规划要求平整土地。

　　由于涉事土地为农用地，根据我国《土地管理法》等相关规定，征用土地必须经相关政府部门批准，取得农用地转为建设用地批准文号后才能对土地实施征用。土地的征用必须由市、县人民政府组织实施。这意味着洪万来与东城房地产公司的代征地协议一开始就是非法的。

　　就在洪万来开始推土时，广东省国土厅通过卫片执法发现了这一问题，并要求阳东县国土局跟进处理。2008年10月25日，东阳县国土局同一天出具了两份土地行政处罚决定书。

　　面对处罚，洪万来按要求交了罚款，也复耕复绿，但他并未停止非法征地行为。数据显示，洪万来在被处罚之后依然将征地赔偿款支付给东城房地产公司。如2009年2月20日支付了135万元、2009年4月28日支付了144094元。

　　2010年3月21日，阳东县国土局作出第三张土地行政处罚决定书。与之前如出一辙，洪万来认罚，但事后依然“我行我素”，进而在涉事土地上建设起多栋建筑物。

　　由于阳东县在2015年改制为阳东区，同年5月21日，阳江市国土局作出第四张土地行政处罚决定书。记者调查发现，8年来，当地国土部门连下4道“处罚令”，不仅未能从一开始就阻止洪万来违法征地，反而在一边处罚一边违法的拉锯过程中，7万多平方米土地被堂而皇之征出来。如今涉事土地被洪万来用高大的铁皮围墙团团围住，外人无法进入。从一路之隔的民房顶楼望去，可见多栋建筑物和水泥桩，一条用水泥铺就的大马路横穿整片土地。

　　占地有恃无恐 处罚每平方米1元钱

　　记者调查了解到，涉案土地在2012年才经广东省政府批准由农用地转为建设用地。在未取得土地使用权的情况下，洪万来竟然荒唐利用非法占有的上万平方米土地成立了“万来园林绿化工程公司”，经营范围包括园林绿化、花圃种植、销售园林花草树木。洪万来为何有恃无恐？

　　处罚隔靴搔痒是重要原因。记者在前三份决定书上看到，洪万来从2008年至2010年非法占有土地面积为26357.8平方米，而罚款也为26357.8元，罚款标准仅为1元／平方米。对此，阳江市阳东区国土局相关负责人如此解释，根据国家相关规定，对未经批准非法占用土地，处非法占用土地每平方米30元以下罚款，“1元钱符合国家处罚标准”。

　　更难以置信的是，当地国土部门竟然对这样的违法占地行为无计可施。当地国土部门称，从2008年开始，阳东区政府也多次组织城管、建设、国土等综合执法力量前往现场强拆，但最后都不了了之。

　　根据中华人民共和国《土地管理法》相关规定，对非法占用土地行为的处罚方式，除了罚款、恢复土地原状外，还需责令退还非法占用的土地，但前三份处罚决定书却未提及。对此，阳东区国土局执法人员却回应称：“围墙是后来才建的，当时洪万来既没有围闭土地，也没有在土地上建房子，我们很难界定其是否占有土地。”

　　有律师认为，所谓占有就是享有对土地的收益权。建围墙只是占有土地的一种表现形式。洪万来利用涉事土地搞园林绿化经营，其本质就是对土地的占有。正是因为没有责令让其退出非法占有的土地，留下隐患。

　　“文书式”执法只做样子 防违法须加大问责

　　目前，《代征土地协议书》已被当地法院判决为无效协议。面对这起一开始就违法的征地行为，表面看来，当地国土部门按相关法律程序下发了土地行政处罚决定书，不可谓不“尽职尽责”。

　　然而，事实果真如此吗？在阳江市国土局作出第四份处罚决定书之后，洪万来不服向广东省国土厅申请复议。2015年9月23日，广东省国土资源厅听证后认为，虽然阳江市国土局对洪万来非法占用土地行为的认定，定性准确，但未能举证证明洪万来的非法占地建房行为是在2010年第三次行政处罚后新发生的违法行为，因担心同一违法行为重复处罚撤销了第四份处罚决定书。

　　涉事土地离阳东区国土局距离并不远，洪万来的违建行为可谓在国土部门眼皮底下进行，而当地国土部门在其长时间的违建过程中竟然没有前往取证，令人不可思议。

　　阳江市一人大代表认为，当地国土部门不断下发处罚决定书，白纸黑字看起来似乎是依法行政，各项程序完备，但细细梳理会发现，这种“文书式执法”只是做做样子，不敢硬碰硬，其本质就是一种“惰政”“懒政”，执法窘态显露无遗，影响了法律权威。

　　阳江市阳东区国土分局执法大队不愿具名的负责人也坦承，阳东区国土分局除了领导班子成员由阳江市国土局决定外，整个分局的人财物都由同级政府说了算，很多时候对某些项目就只能睁只眼闭只眼。

　　广东省国土厅党组成员、执法局局长李师表示，一些党政领导干部在建设工业园区、上马重点项目征地时，存在“重发展、轻依法”的现象，常常抱有“因公违法”可以原谅、可以不追究的想法。要防止土地违法，关键是要加大对党政领导的问责力度。(完)

责任编辑：陈琰 SN225

文章关键词：
非法占有 征地补偿 强拆

我要反馈
保存网页
新华社