South China Sea Arbitration: shifty poor performers | United States | sea | _ China News

Original title: South China Sea Arbitration: shifty poor performers

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, July 11- questions: South China Sea Arbitration: shifty poor performers

Bao Erwen Xinhua Zhao Zhuoyun

Nanhai arbitration case brought by Aquino of the Philippines Government final due out on July 12. Arbitration results, China's position has always been unambiguous and firm: not to accept, admit it or not, do not perform.

This arbitration case is under Aquino of the Philippines starring role and the United States behind, and Japan acts as a "child care" an anti-China farce.

As the Netherlands Utrecht University School of law professor tangmu·ziwate said: "the decision of the arbitral tribunal in East Asia will be seen as fruit of the poisonous tree, cannot be recognized and supported. ”

Eventually the Clouds obscured the Sun. As time goes on, more and more people come to realize the truth behind the case of South China Sea.

　　Philippines: for embezzlement with "legal" coat

There is an old saying in China: to step well known.

Originally, under Aquino of the Philippines knows perfectly well: between the Philippines and the South China Sea dispute is essentially territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation disputes and territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation dispute does not belong to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.

However, the Philippines January 2013 insisted on bringing up the South China Sea arbitration case, by means of arbitration requests are camouflage, including the Spratly Islands, "cutting", asked the Tribunal to three separate legal status of Islands and maritime rights ruled that to make its demands "in line with the" conditions for arbitration.

Aquino thinks he is clever, but can blind the eyes of the world.

International experts point out that taking this legal tactic in the Philippines, is actually the Spratly Islands as a whole to deny China claims territorial sovereignty and maritime rights stance, and stealing of China's Nansha Islands and reefs of acts put on "legal" coat.

"File arbitration case is neglect of the Nansha Islands of South China Sea in the Philippines as a complete geographical and territorial units of the fact that unilateral acts that have been taken," Islamabad, Pakistan Director of the International Committee for the study of saiyide·qiaoduli said to Xinhua.

United Kingdom andongniaosi·chanakepuluosi, an associate professor of public international law, University of Oxford, also recently noted that the Philippines part tries to dispute "cutting" sovereignty and maritime delimitation issues, so that the Tribunal could have jurisdiction over matters relating to the arbitration.

"However, in view of such arbitration and sovereignty issues, maritime delimitation, in essence, intrinsic intertwined, and the arbitral tribunal had no jurisdiction on issues related to sovereignty and the maritime delimitation, this practice was done deliberately for the taste," chanakepuluosi said.

According to United Nations Sea Convention (following referred to Convention) established of Arbitration Chamber only on "on Convention explained or applies situation produced of dispute" has jurisdiction right, and on island of territory sovereignty of race belongs to general international law of adjustment matters, fundamental not belongs to Convention of explained or applies aspects of dispute, so not this class arbitration Chamber of jurisdiction range within.

In addition to the above litigation tactics, and Benigno Aquino III of the Philippines also runs counter to the Government reached with the Chinese side through agreements negotiated settlement of the dispute, failing before resorting to arbitration the dispute settlement obligation to exchange views with China. These are contrary to the premise of the arbitration.

Pizhibucun, the hair adhere to? Arbitration premise untenable, arbitral awards legitimacy then how about?

Vast South China Sea, the tide rises and falls. For years, China and the Philippines and other Southeast Asian countries are scattered in the waters around each other as neighbors. Being a good and, with neighbor and partner, has been China's consistent foreign policy.

Differences appeared between neighbouring countries around the South China Sea, China has advocated direct parties to respect historical facts and on the basis of international law, and peaceful solution through negotiation and consultation.

In recent years, there are serious disagreements between China and the Philippines, the key is the Aquino Government is willing to act as a United States pawn in Southeast Asia, adopted a hostile policy and abandoned the negotiating channel for resolving territorial disputes in the Philippines.

The flag of the Philippines luode·kapunan, a newspaper columnist pointed out, Aquino in power for six years, actively following the United States called "return to Asia" policy, willfully misleading the Filipino people, inciting hostility towards the neighbouring countries. In the South China Sea issue, "Filipinos are working for United States chestnuts out of."

Motivation is pure, will inevitably suffer.

Wrong to pull on the Aquino Government in the South China Sea, seriously damaged the political mutual trust between China and the Philippines, also affecting economic relations between the two countries.

Community leaders, the Asia-Pacific Economic and cultural exchange Association of the Philippines President Shi Naikang pointed out that bringing a sea arbitration in the Philippines, which amounted to unilaterally tore up the Philippines have signed the Declaration on the conduct of parties in the South China Sea.

"The (Philippine) does not respect China, do not respect their own, much less respect for ASEAN, give the impression of regions, particularly in an order and rules, and ultimately hurt the Philippines ' image and reputation," said Shi Naikang.

　　United States and Japan: to suppress China

There is a saying in the Bible: a small thorn in the eyes of others are always talking, oblivious to the Rafter in your own eye.

South China Sea issue, has so far refused to ratify the Convention of the United States do all Chinese criticism of Wiles, have given China up several big hat: "the militarization of the South China Sea" and "undermine the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea," "change the status of the South China Sea", "big countries bully small", and so on.

In action, the United States again and again "show muscles": the United States aircraft carrier through the South China Sea, Chinese Defense Minister ashidun·Kate United States "Lawrence" destroyer entered the yongshu reef adjacent waters, the United States Commander of the Pacific fleet sikete·siweifute patrol aircraft "reconnaissance," the South China Sea, us-Philippine exercises "United claimed the island". Particularly in mid-June, us "yuehan·sitengnisi" and "Ronald Reagan" aircraft carrier in waters near the South China Sea to joint operations, much to China's show of force.

United States the various words and deeds, is but an arbitration case for the Aquino Government to develop the South China Sea platform.

In fact, unilaterally instituted arbitration case at the beginning of the South China Sea from the Aquino Government, United States controlled behind the scenes.

Involved in the planning of South China Sea arbitration cases, including United States Attorney baoluo·laikele, United States Government officials also support the Philippines filed for arbitration.

Russia people's Friendship University Professor Youli·tafuluofusiji June 20 in Russia published an article the newspaper pointed out that United States no territory in the South China Sea, but want to interfere in arbitration matters.

"(United States Secretary of State) Hillary Clinton (had) put forward the ' international community ' involvement in the South China Sea issue, intended the dispute to the fact of the situation by the United States to control the various international arbitration bodies," Tavrovski said.

In addition, the United States politicians are eager to ask the Chinese recognition and enforcement of arbitration ruling of South China Sea. United States State Department Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State kelin·weilite, said binding arbitration must be the South China Sea.

Maritime Center of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines, former Secretary-General aerweituo·aienkemienda recently noted that Aquino Government exacerbated tension in the South China Sea is the United States.

"The Philippines has no independent foreign policy, is always subject to United States. Aquino was always ' based on the rule of ' and ' legal framework ' on the lips, the ' law ' is actually the United States decides, "he said.

Observers point out that United States hyped up the South China Sea issue, urged the Philippines to initiate an arbitration, a sinister.

From a tactical goal, United States intentions include:

--Undermine China's sovereignty in the South China Sea.

After the end of World War II, the Chinese Government under the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and a series of international conventions and agreements, open or break the law to recover the Islands. China and the United States were allies at that time, Chinese officials were sitting United States warships to recover the Spratly Islands.

The Spratly Islands belong to China, United States was well aware of this, now intentionally to confuse right and wrong on this issue, making waves, the purpose is make trouble for China.

United States the global policy information magazine Washington Bureau Chief William Jones noted that the United States hope that the restrictions on Chinese claims in the South China Sea through arbitration, and to further consolidate relations with regional allies, including the Philippines.

--Alienate China's relations with neighbouring countries.

In the United States, the South China Sea issue is to provoke China and Southeast Asian countries, Southeast Asian countries to enhance the beauty of the best focus.

China and globalization think tank researcher Chu Yin pointed out that: "the United States has been heating up the situation in the South China Sea, the core objective is to contain China, testing China's bottom line, but also in order to keep the United States absolute influence on South-East Asia on the national security. ”

--Smearing China's image, to China in a passive position in the world.

Around the Philippines filed arbitration cases in the South seas, United States published a variety of government officials and the media to defame China, attacks and distorted China's just stance and the legitimate rights and interests, the purpose is to portray China as international order and international law "the Destroyer".

For example, in early June 15th at the Shangri-La dialogue, United States Defense Secretary accused Carter of China in the South China Sea, China is trying to build a "great wall of isolation".

In fact, block in the history of the great wall is the invader's heel, rather than the Messenger of friendship and free trade. China has never thought of self-isolation, if you want to isolate China, but wishful thinking.

Objectives to serve the strategic objectives.

In the South China Sea issue, United States strategic objectives--promoting "regional balance" strategy.

United States implementation of this strategy, designed to ensure that the 21st century United States in the world's fastest-growing economic region of strategic interest. To this end, the United States from three aspects: military, diplomatic, economic, strengthened its presence in the Asia-Pacific region.

Tavrovski pointed out that from "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategies and implementation process, United States return to the strategy of containing China. Contain a variety of forms--including a large number of United States armed forces deployed to the Pacific Ocean, as well as create a hostile neighbours chain along the China coast.

Southeast Asia is United States considered must focus on core business areas. So contradictions surrounding the South China Sea, becoming United States crackdown on China's chances.

Arbitration cases in the South in this farce, there is also a very happy "child care"--Japan.

Held joint naval exercises with the Philippines, on behalf of the self-defense forces in a variety of visiting Philippines, transfers of second-hand military equipment to the Philippines, hosting the Summit of the Group of seven Summit Declaration the South China Sea into all these all reflect Japan ambitions of getting involved in the issue.

Experts pointed out that Japan in the South China Sea issue contains all sorts of evil intent: hype "China threat theory", Japan implemented a new security law and to revise the pacifist Constitution made; Japan self-defense forces looking out to sea, extending its influence, while the American forces a pawn; check the momentum of China's rapid rise, with China competing for influence in the Asia-Pacific region.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University Japan study center director Wang Shaopu pointed out that Japan actively in recent years following the United States, "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy seeks to build on China's so-called "deterrent" and lifted the collective self-defence and a series of actions to take at home.

"It is under such strategic guidance, Japan actively getting involved in the issue, seeking to contain China," said Wang Shaopu.

The Philippines, the United States and Japan in the South China Sea issue arbitration farce deliberately, destroyed the Asia-Pacific region, especially in security and stability in the South China Sea region and deviated from the tide of world peace and development.

In the South China Sea on the stage, there were colonial aggression, illegal occupation, and now was making waves, was also a show of force. However, as the tide retreated, this farce will annihilate history will prove, who is the South China Sea to the passer-by. (Manuscript sources: Bao Erwen, Xinhua Xinhua Zhao Zhuoyun participation interviewer: yanliang, and Sun Ping)

Responsible editor: Zheng Hanxing

Article keywords:
United States China South China Sea Philippines

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Xinhua

南海仲裁：心怀鬼胎的拙劣表演者|美国|南海|中国_新闻资讯

　　原标题：南海仲裁：心怀鬼胎的拙劣表演者

　　新华社北京7月11日电 题：南海仲裁：心怀鬼胎的拙劣表演者

　　新华社记者包尔文 赵卓昀

　　由菲律宾阿基诺三世政府提起的南海仲裁案最终裁决定于7月12日出炉。对于仲裁结果，中国立场一直鲜明而坚定：不接受，不承认，不执行。

　　这一仲裁案是阿基诺三世治下的菲律宾担当主演、美国幕后操纵、日本充当“托儿”的一出反华闹剧。

　　正如荷兰乌得勒支大学法学院教授汤姆·兹瓦特所言：“仲裁庭的裁决在东亚必将被视为毒树之果，无法得到认可和支持。”

　　乌云终难遮蔽太阳。随着时间推移，越来越多的国际人士认识到南海仲裁案背后的真相。

　　菲律宾：为侵占披“合法”外衣

　　中国有句古语：司马昭之心，路人皆知。

　　本来，阿基诺三世治下的菲律宾心知肚明：菲中之间的南海争议本质上是领土主权与海洋划界之争，而领土主权与海洋划界之争不属于仲裁庭的管辖范围。

　　但是，菲律宾2013年1月执意提起了南海仲裁案，其手段是在仲裁案中对提出的诉求进行了伪装，其中包括将南沙群岛进行“切割”，要求仲裁庭就其中数个单独岛礁的法律地位及其海洋权利进行裁定，以使其诉求“符合”获得仲裁的条件。

　　阿基诺三世自以为聪明，但岂能蒙蔽得了世人的眼睛。

　　国际专家指出，菲律宾采取这一诉讼伎俩，实际上是想否定中国将南沙群岛作为整体主张领土主权和海洋权利的立场，并为其非法窃取中国南沙岛礁的行为披上“合法”外衣。

　　“菲律宾提起南海仲裁案是罔顾南沙群岛作为一个完整地理和领土单位的事实而采取的单方行径，”巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡国际问题研究委员会主任赛义德·乔杜里对新华社记者说。

　　英国牛津大学国际公法副教授安东尼奥斯·察纳科普洛斯不久前也指出，菲律宾试图将一部分争议“切割”出主权和海洋划界问题之外，以便仲裁庭能对有关仲裁事项拥有管辖权。

　　“但是，考虑到这些仲裁事项与主权、海洋划界等问题在本质上内在交织，而仲裁庭对相关主权及海洋划界问题没有管辖权，这种做法颇有刻意为之的味道，”察纳科普洛斯说。

　　根据《联合国海洋法公约》（以下简称《公约》）设立的仲裁庭只对“就《公约》解释或适用情况产生的争端”具有管辖权，而关于岛屿的领土主权之争属于一般国际法的调整事项，根本不属于《公约》的解释或适用方面的争端，因此不在此类仲裁庭的管辖范围内。

　　除了采取上述诉讼伎俩外，菲律宾阿基诺三世政府还违背同中方达成的通过谈判方式解决南海争端的协议，在诉诸仲裁前没有尽到就争端解决方式与中国交换意见的义务。这些都违背了提起仲裁的前提。

　　皮之不存，毛将焉附？仲裁前提站不住脚，仲裁裁决合法性又何从谈起？

　　偌大的南海，潮起潮落。多年来，中国和菲律宾等东南亚国家散居在这片海域的四周，彼此为邻。与邻为善，以邻为伴，是中国一贯的周边外交方针。

　　对于邻国之间围绕南海问题出现的分歧，中国一直主张由直接当事国在尊重历史事实和国际法的基础上，通过谈判和协商和平解决。

　　近年来，中菲之间出现严重分歧，关键是阿基诺三世政府甘愿充当美国在东南亚的马前卒，采取敌视中国的政策，进而抛弃了通过谈判解决菲中领土争议的渠道。

　　菲律宾《旗帜报》专栏作家罗德·卡普南一针见血地指出，阿基诺三世执政六年，积极追随美国所谓“重返亚太”政策，肆意误导菲民众，煽动对邻国的敌意。在南海问题上，“菲律宾人是在替美国火中取栗”。

　　动机不纯，难免自食其果。

　　阿基诺三世政府在南海问题上错打算盘，严重破坏了中菲政治互信，也殃及两国经济关系。

　　菲律宾侨领、亚太经济与文化交流协会主席施乃康指出，菲律宾提起南海仲裁，实际上等于片面撕毁了菲律宾业已签署的《南海各方行为宣言》。

　　“（菲律宾）既不尊重中国，也不尊重自己，更不尊重东盟，给人一种破坏地区秩序与规则的印象，最终伤及菲律宾的国家形象与信誉，”施乃康说。

　　美国和日本：意在打压中国

　　《圣经》里有一句名言：总在说别人眼里有细刺，却浑然不觉自己眼里的椽子。

　　围绕南海问题，至今仍拒绝批准《公约》的美国竭尽对中国指责之能事，相继给中国扣上了好几顶大帽子：“南海军事化”“破坏南海航行自由”“改变南海现状”“大国欺负小国”，等等。

　　在行动上，美国一次次“秀肌肉”：美国中国国防部长阿什顿·卡特乘航母穿行南海、美国“劳伦斯”号驱逐舰闯入永暑礁邻近海域、美国太平洋舰队司令斯科特·斯威夫特登巡逻机“侦察”南海、美菲演练“联合夺岛”。特别是在6月中旬，美军“约翰·斯滕尼斯”号和“罗纳德·里根”号航母在南海附近海域展开联合行动，大肆对中国炫耀武力。

　　美国的种种言行，无非是为阿基诺三世政府推进南海仲裁案站台。

　　事实上，从阿基诺三世政府单方面提起南海仲裁案之初，美国就在幕后进行操控。

　　参与策划南海仲裁案的包括美国律师保罗·赖克勒，美国政府的一些高官也支持菲律宾提起仲裁。

　　俄罗斯人民友谊大学教授尤里·塔夫罗夫斯基6月20日在俄罗斯《独立报》发表文章指出，美国在南海没有领土，却想插手仲裁事宜。

　　“（美国前国务卿）希拉里（早就）提出了‘国际社会’参与解决南海问题，意欲将争议局势交给实际上由美国控制的各个国际仲裁机构审议，” 塔夫罗夫斯基说。

　　此外，美国一些政客早就迫不及待地要求中国承认和执行南海仲裁案裁决。美国国务院东亚与太平洋事务局助理国务卿帮办科林·威利特表示，南海仲裁必须是有约束力的。

　　菲律宾中国外交部海事中心前秘书长阿尔韦托·埃恩科米恩达不久前指出，阿基诺三世政府加剧南海紧张局势的行为是美国指使的。

　　“菲律宾没有独立的外交政策，总是受美国指使。阿基诺三世总是把‘基于法制’和‘法律框架’挂在嘴边，这些‘法’其实就是美国决定的，”他说。

　　观察家指出，美国大肆炒作南海问题，怂恿菲律宾提起仲裁，用心险恶。

　　从战术目标来看，美国的意图包括：

　　——损害中国在南海的主权。

　　二战结束后，中国政府根据《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等一系列国际公约和协议，依法、公开收复了南沙群岛。中国和美国当时是盟国，中方人员曾坐着美国的军舰去收复南沙群岛。

　　南沙群岛属于中国，美国本来对此了如指掌，现在却在这一问题上故意混淆是非，兴风作浪，目的就是给中国制造麻烦。

　　美国《全球策略信息》杂志华盛顿分社社长威廉·琼斯指出，美国希望通过仲裁限制中国在南海地区的主张，并进一步巩固与包括菲律宾在内的地区盟友的关系。

　　——离间中国与邻国的关系。

　　在美国看来，南海问题是挑拨中国与东南亚国家关系、让东南亚国家加强对美依附的最佳着力点。

　　中国与全球化智库研究员储殷指出：“美国让南海局势不断升温，核心目的就是遏制中国、试探中国底线，同时也是为了保持美国对东南亚国家在安全上的绝对影响力。”

　　——抹黑中国形象，让中国在国际上陷入被动。

　　围绕菲律宾提起的南海仲裁案，美国政府官员和媒体发表了种种诋毁中国的言论，攻击和曲解中国的正义立场和合法权益，目的就是把中国描绘成国际秩序和国际法的“破坏者”。

　　例如，在6月初举行的第十五届香格里拉对话会上，美国中国国防部长卡特指责中国在南海的行为是在建造一座“自我孤立的长城”。

　　其实，长城在历史上挡住的是侵略者的铁蹄，而不是友好的使者与自由的贸易。中国从未想过自我孤立，有人如果想要孤立中国，不过是痴人说梦罢了。

　　战术目标服务于战略目标。

　　在南海问题上，美国的战略目标是——推进“亚太再平衡”战略。

　　美国实施这一战略，目的在于确保21世纪美国在这个世界上经济发展最快地区的战略利益。为此，美国从军事、外交、经济三个方面着手，强化其在亚太地区的影响力。

　　塔夫罗夫斯基指出，从“亚太再平衡”战略内容和落实过程来看，美国回归遏华战略。其遏制的形式多样——包括将大批美国武装力量调遣至太平洋，以及在中国沿岸打造敌对邻国链。

　　东南亚被美国视为必须重点经营的核心地区。于是，围绕南海问题存在的矛盾，成为美国打压中国的可乘之机。

　　在南海仲裁案这场闹剧中，还有一个闹得甚欢的“托儿”——日本。

　　与菲律宾举行海上联合军演，让自卫队以各种名义访菲，向菲方转让二手军事装备，利用主办七国集团峰会之机把南海问题扯进峰会宣言，所有这些无不折射出日本插手南海问题的野心。

　　专家指出，日本在南海问题上包藏种种祸心：炒作“中国威胁论”，为日本推行新安保法和修改和平宪法制造舆论；让日本自卫队借机出海，扩大影响力，同时充当美军马前卒；牵制中国迅速崛起的势头，同中国争夺在亚太地区的影响力。

　　上海交通大学日本研究中心主任王少普指出，日本近年来积极追随美国“亚太再平衡”战略，谋求建立对中国的所谓“遏制力”，并因此在国内采取解禁集体自卫权等一系列动作。

　　“正是在这种战略指导下，日本近来积极插手南海问题，寻求牵制中国，”王少普说。

　　菲律宾、美国和日本在南海问题上刻意制造的仲裁闹剧，破坏了亚太地区，特别是南海区域的安全与稳定，背离了世界和平与发展的大潮。

　　在南海这一舞台上，曾有过殖民侵略，有过非法侵占，现在又有人兴风作浪，还有人炫耀武力。但是，正如潮来潮退，这些闹剧终将湮灭；历史将会证明，谁是南海的匆匆过客。（稿件来源：新华社 新华社记者包尔文 赵卓昀 参与记者：闫亮、孙萍）

责任编辑：郑汉星

文章关键词：
美国 南海 中国 菲律宾

我要反馈
保存网页
新华网